theDanes,thePrussians,theRugians,arefaintlydescribed;andsomeadventurousHuns,whohadwanderedasfarastheBaltic,mightembarkonboardtheGermanvessels,fortheconquestofanewworld。^130Butthisarduousachievementwasnotpreparedorexecutedbytheunionofnationalpowers。Eachintrepidchieftain,accordingtothemeasureofhisfameandfortunes,assembledhisfollowers;equippedafleetofthree,orperhapsofsixty,vessels;chosetheplaceoftheattack;andconductedhissubsequentoperationsaccordingtotheeventsofthewar,andthedictatesofhisprivateinterest。IntheinvasionofBritainmanyheroesvanquishedandfell;butonlysevenvictoriousleadersassumed,oratleastmaintained,thetitleofkings。
Sevenindependentthrones,theSaxonHeptarchy,werefoundedbytheconquerors,andsevenfamilies,oneofwhichhasbeencontinued,byfemalesuccession,toourpresentsovereign,derivedtheirequalandsacredlineagefromWoden,thegodofwar。Ithasbeenpretended,thatthisrepublicofkingswasmoderatedbyageneralcouncilandasuprememagistrate。ButsuchanartificialschemeofpolicyisrepugnanttotherudeandturbulentspiritoftheSaxons:theirlawsaresilent;andtheirimperfectannalsaffordonlyadarkandbloodyprospectofintestinediscord。^131
[Footnote130:AllthesetribesareexpresslyenumeratedbyBede,l。i。c。15,p。52,l。v。c。9,p。190;andthoughIhaveconsideredMr。Whitaker'sremarks,Hist。ofManchester,vol。ii。
p。538—543,IdonotperceivetheabsurdityofsupposingthattheFrisians,&c。,weremingledwiththeAnglo—Saxons。]
[Footnote*:ThistermtheHeptarchymustberejectedbecauseanideaisconveyedtherebywhichissubstantiallywrong。Atnooneperiodwerethereeversevenkingdomsindependentofeachother。Palgrave,vol。i。p。46。Mr。SharonTurnerhasthemeritofhavingfirstconfutedthepopularnotiononthissubject。
Anglo—SaxonHistory,vol。i。p。302。—M。]
[Footnote131:Bedehasenumeratedsevenkings,twoSaxons,aJute,andfourAngles,whosuccessivelyacquiredintheheptarchyanindefinitesupremacyofpowerandrenown。Buttheirreignwastheeffect,notoflaw,butofconquest;andheobserves,insimilarterms,thatoneofthemsubduedtheIslesofManandAnglesey;andthatanotherimposedatributeontheScotsandPicts。Hist。Eccles。l。ii。c。5,p。83。]
Amonk,who,intheprofoundignoranceofhumanlife,haspresumedtoexercisetheofficeofhistorian,strangelydisfiguresthestateofBritainatthetimeofitsseparationfromtheWesternempire。Gildas^132describesinfloridlanguagetheimprovementsofagriculture,theforeigntradewhichflowedwitheverytideintotheThamesandtheSevernthesolidandloftyconstructionofpublicandprivateedifices;heaccusesthesinfulluxuryoftheBritishpeople;ofapeople,accordingtothesamewriter,ignorantofthemostsimplearts,andincapable,withouttheaidoftheRomans,ofprovidingwallsofstone,orweaponsofiron,forthedefenceoftheirnativeland。
^133Underthelongdominionoftheemperors,BritainhadbeeninsensiblymouldedintotheelegantandservileformofaRomanprovince,whosesafetywasintrustedtoaforeignpower。ThesubjectsofHonoriuscontemplatedtheirnewfreedomwithsurpriseandterror;theywereleftdestituteofanycivilormilitaryconstitution;andtheiruncertainrulerswantedeitherskill,orcourage,orauthority,todirectthepublicforceagainstthecommonenemy。TheintroductionoftheSaxonsbetrayedtheirinternalweakness,anddegradedthecharacterbothoftheprinceandpeople。Theirconsternationmagnifiedthedanger;thewantofuniondiminishedtheirresources;andthemadnessofcivilfactionswasmoresolicitoustoaccuse,thantoremedy,theevils,whichtheyimputedtothemisconductoftheiradversaries。
YettheBritonswerenotignorant,theycouldnotbeignorant,ofthemanufactureortheuseofarms;thesuccessiveanddisorderlyattacksoftheSaxonsallowedthemtorecoverfromtheiramazement,andtheprosperousoradverseeventsofthewaraddeddisciplineandexperiencetotheirnativevalor。
[Footnote132:SeeGildasdeExcidioBritanniae,c。i。p。l。
edit。Gale。]
[Footnote133:Mr。WhitakerHist。ofManchester,vol。ii。p。
503,516hassmartlyexposedthisglaringabsurdity,whichhadpassedunnoticedbythegeneralhistorians,astheywerehasteningtomoreinterestingandimportantevents]
WhilethecontinentofEuropeandAfricayielded,withoutresistance,totheBarbarians,theBritishisland,aloneandunaided,maintainedalong,avigorous,thoughanunsuccessful,struggle,againsttheformidablepirates,who,almostatthesameinstant,assaultedtheNorthern,theEastern,andtheSoutherncoasts。Thecitieswhichhadbeenfortifiedwithskill,weredefendedwithresolution;theadvantagesofground,hills,forests,andmorasses,werediligentlyimprovedbytheinhabitants;theconquestofeachdistrictwaspurchasedwithblood;andthedefeatsoftheSaxonsarestronglyattestedbythediscreetsilenceoftheirannalist。HengistmighthopetoachievetheconquestofBritain;buthisambition,inanactivereignofthirty—fiveyears,wasconfinedtothepossessionofKent;andthenumerouscolonywhichhehadplantedintheNorth,wasextirpatedbytheswordoftheBritons。ThemonarchyoftheWestSaxonswaslaboriouslyfoundedbytheperseveringeffortsofthreemartialgenerations。ThelifeofCerdic,oneofthebravestofthechildrenofWoden,wasconsumedintheconquestofHampshire,andtheIsleofWight;andthelosswhichhesustainedinthebattleofMountBadon,reducedhimtoastateofingloriousrepose。Kenric,hisvaliantson,advancedintoWiltshire;besiegedSalisbury,atthattimeseatedonacommandingeminence;andvanquishedanarmywhichadvancedtothereliefofthecity。InthesubsequentbattleofMarlborough,^134
hisBritishenemiesdisplayedtheirmilitaryscience。Theirtroopswereformedinthreelines;eachlineconsistedofthreedistinctbodies,andthecavalry,thearchers,andthepikemen,weredistributedaccordingtotheprinciplesofRomantactics。
TheSaxonschargedinoneweightycolumn,boldlyencounteredwiththeirshordswordsthelonglancesoftheBritons,andmaintainedanequalconflicttilltheapproachofnight。Twodecisivevictories,thedeathofthreeBritishkings,andthereductionofCirencester,Bath,andGloucester,establishedthefameandpowerofCeaulin,thegrandsonofCerdic,whocarriedhisvictoriousarmstothebanksoftheSevern。
[Footnote134:AtBeran—birig,orBarbury—castle,nearMarlborough。TheSaxonchronicleassignsthenameanddate。
CamdenBritannia,vol。i。p。128ascertainstheplace;andHenryofHuntingdonScriptorespestBedam,p。314relatesthecircumstancesofthisbattle。Theyareprobableandcharacteristic;andthehistoriansofthetwelfthcenturymightconsultsomematerialsthatnolongerexist。]Afterawarofahundredyears,theindependentBritonsstilloccupiedthewholeextentoftheWesterncoast,fromthewallofAntoninustotheextremepromontoryofCornwall;andtheprincipalcitiesoftheinlandcountrystillopposedthearmsoftheBarbarians。
Resistancebecamemorelanguid,asthenumberandboldnessoftheassailantscontinuallyincreased。Winningtheirwaybyslowandpainfulefforts,theSaxons,theAngles,andtheirvariousconfederates,advancedfromtheNorth,fromtheEast,andfromtheSouth,tilltheirvictoriousbannerswereunitedinthecentreoftheisland。BeyondtheSeverntheBritonsstillassertedtheirnationalfreedom,whichsurvivedtheheptarchy,andeventhemonarchy,oftheSaxons。Thebravestwarriors,whopreferredexiletoslavery,foundasecurerefugeinthemountainsofWales:thereluctantsubmissionofCornwallwasdelayedforsomeages;^135andabandoffugitivesacquiredasettlementinGaul,bytheirownvalor,ortheliberalityoftheMerovingiankings。^136TheWesternangleofArmoricaacquiredthenewappellationsofCornwall,andtheLesserBritain;andthevacantlandsoftheOsismiiwerefilledbyastrangepeople,who,undertheauthorityoftheircountsandbishops,preservedthelawsandlanguageoftheirancestors。TothefeebledescendantsofClovisandCharlemagne,theBritonsofArmoricarefusedthecustomarytribute,subduedtheneighboringdiocesesofVannes,Rennes,andNantes,andformedapowerful,thoughvassal,state,whichhasbeenunitedtothecrownofFrance。^137
[Footnote135:CornwallwasfinallysubduedbyAthelstan,A。D。
927—941,whoplantedanEnglishcolonyatExeter,andconfinedtheBritonsbeyondtheRiverTamar。SeeWilliamofMalmsbury,l。
ii。,intheScriptorespostBedam,p。50。ThespiritoftheCornishknightswasdegradedbyservitude:anditshouldseem,fromtheRomanceofSirTristram,thattheircowardicewasalmostproverbial。]
[Footnote136:TheestablishmentoftheBritonsinGaulisprovedinthesixthcentury,byProcopius,GregoryofTours,thesecondcouncilofTours,A。D。567,andtheleastsuspiciousoftheirchroniclesandlivesofsaints。ThesubscriptionofabishopoftheBritonstothefirstcouncilofTours,A。D。461,orrather481,thearmyofRiothamus,andtheloosedeclamationofGildas,aliitransmarinaspetebantregiones,c。25,p。8,maycountenanceanemigrationasearlyasthemiddleofthefifthcentury。Beyondthatera,theBritonsofArmoricacanbefoundonlyinromance;andIamsurprisedthatMr。WhitakerGenuineHistoryoftheBritons,p。214—221shouldsofaithfullytranscribethegrossignoranceofCarte,whosevenialerrorshehassorigorouslychastised。]
[Footnote137:TheantiquitiesofBretagne,whichhavebeenthesubjectevenofpoliticalcontroversy,areillustratedbyHadrianValesius,NotitiaGalliarum,subvoceBritanniaCismarina,p。98
—100。M。D'Anville,Noticedel'AncienneGaule,Corisopiti,Curiosolites,Osismii,Vorganium,p。248,258,508,720,andEtatsdel'Europe,p。76—80,Longuerue,DescriptiondelaFrance,tom。i。p。84—94,andtheAbbedeVertot,Hist。
Critiquedel'EtablissementdesBretonsdanslesGaules,2vols。
in12mo。,Paris,1720。Imayassumethemeritofexaminingtheoriginalevidencewhichtheyhaveproduced。
Note:CompareGallet,MemoiressurlaBretagne,andDaru,HistoiredeBretagne。TheseauthorsappeartometoestablishthepointoftheindependenceofBretagneatthetimethattheinsularBritonstookrefugeintheircountry,andthatthegreaterpartlandedasfugitivesratherthanasconquerors。I
observethatM。LappenbergGeschichtevonEngland,vol。i。p。
56supposesthesettlementofamilitarycolonyformedofBritishsoldiers,Militeslimitanei,laeti,duringtheusurpationofMaximus,381,388,whogavetheirnameandpeculiarcivilizationtoBretagne。M。LappenbergexpresseshissurprisethatGibbonhererejectstheauthoritywhichhefollowselsewhere。—M。]
ChapterXXXVIII:ReignOfClovis。
PartV。
Inacenturyofperpetual,oratleastimplacable,war,muchcourage,andsomeskill,musthavebeenexertedforthedefenceofBritain。Yetifthememoryofitschampionsisalmostburiedinoblivion,weneednotrepine;sinceeveryage,howeverdestituteofscienceorvirtue,sufficientlyaboundswithactsofbloodandmilitaryrenown。ThetombofVortimer,thesonofVortigern,waserectedonthemarginofthesea—shore,asalandmarkformidabletotheSaxons,whomhehadthricevanquishedinthefieldsofKent。AmbrosiusAurelianwasdescendedfromanoblefamilyofRomans;^138hismodestywasequaltohisvalor,andhisvalor,tillthelastfatalaction,^139wascrownedwithsplendidsuccess。ButeveryBritishnameiseffacedbytheillustriousnameofArthur,^140thehereditaryprinceoftheSilures,inSouthWales,andtheelectivekingorgeneralofthenation。Accordingtothemostrationalaccount,hedefeated,intwelvesuccessivebattles,theAnglesoftheNorth,andtheSaxonsoftheWest;butthedecliningageoftheherowasimbitteredbypopularingratitudeanddomesticmisfortunes。Theeventsofhislifearelessinterestingthanthesingularrevolutionsofhisfame。Duringaperiodoffivehundredyearsthetraditionofhisexploitswaspreserved,andrudelyembellished,bytheobscurebardsofWalesandArmorica,whowereodioustotheSaxons,andunknowntotherestofmankind。TheprideandcuriosityoftheNormanconquerorspromptedthemtoinquireintotheancienthistoryofBritain:theylistenedwithfondcredulitytothetaleofArthur,andeagerlyapplaudedthemeritofaprincewhohadtriumphedovertheSaxons,theircommonenemies。Hisromance,transcribedintheLatinofJeffreyofMonmouth,andafterwardstranslatedintothefashionableidiomofthetimes,wasenrichedwiththevarious,thoughincoherent,ornamentswhichwerefamiliartotheexperience,thelearning,orthefancy,ofthetwelfthcentury。TheprogressofaPhrygiancolony,fromtheTybertotheThames,waseasilyingraftedonthefableoftheAeneid;andtheroyalancestorsofArthurderivedtheiroriginfromTroy,andclaimedtheiralliancewiththeCaesars。HistrophiesweredecoratedwithcaptiveprovincesandImperialtitles;andhisDanishvictoriesavengedtherecentinjuriesofhiscountry。ThegallantryandsuperstitionoftheBritishhero,hisfeastsandtournaments,andthememorableinstitutionofhisKnightsoftheRoundTable,werefaithfullycopiedfromthereigningmannersofchivalry;andthefabulousexploitsofUther'ssonappearlessincrediblethantheadventureswhichwereachievedbytheenterprisingvaloroftheNormans。Pilgrimage,andtheholywars,introducedintoEuropethespeciousmiraclesofArabianmagic。Fairiesandgiants,flyingdragons,andenchantedpalaces,wereblendedwiththemoresimplefictionsoftheWest;andthefateofBritaindependedontheart,orthepredictions,ofMerlin。EverynationembracedandadornedthepopularromanceofArthur,andtheKnightsoftheRoundTable:theirnameswerecelebratedinGreeceandItaly;andthevoluminoustalesofSirLancelotandSirTristramweredevoutlystudiedbytheprincesandnobles,whodisregardedthegenuineheroesandhistoriansofantiquity。Atlengththelightofscienceandreasonwasrekindled;thetalismanwasbroken;thevisionaryfabricmeltedintoair;andbyanatural,thoughunjust,reverseofthepublicopinion,theseverityofthepresentageisinclinedtoquestiontheexistenceofArthur。^141
[Footnote138:Bede,whoinhischroniclep。28placesAmbrosiusunderthereignofZeno,A。D。474—491,observes,thathisparentshadbeen"purpurainduti;"whichheexplains,inhisecclesiasticalhistory,by"regiumnomenetinsigneferentibus,"l。i。c。16,p。53。TheexpressionofNenniusc。
44,p。110,edit。Galeisstillmoresingular,"UnusdeconsulibusgentisRomanicaeestpatermeus。"]
[Footnote139:Bytheunanimous,thoughdoubtful,conjectureofourantiquarians,AmbrosiusisconfoundedwithNatanleod,whoA。D。508losthisownlife,andfivethousandofhissubjects,inabattleagainstCerdic,theWestSaxon,Chron。Saxon。p。17,18。]
[Footnote140:AsIamastrangertotheWelshbards,Myrdhin,Llomarch,andTaliessin,myfaithintheexistenceandexploitsofArthurprincipallyrestsonthesimpleandcircumstantialtestimonyofNennius。Hist。Brit。c。62,63,p。114。Mr。
Whitaker,Hist。ofManchester,vol。ii。p。31—71hadframedaninteresting,andevenprobable,narrativeofthewarsofArthur:thoughitisimpossibletoallowtherealityoftheroundtable。
Note:IpresumethatGibbonmeansLlywarchHen,ortheAged。
—TheElegiesofthisWelshprinceandbardhavebeenpublishedbyMr。Owen;towhoseworksandintheMyvyrianArchaeology,slumbersmuchcuriousinformationonthesubjectofWelshtraditionandpoetry。ButtheWelshantiquarianshaveneverobtainedahearingfromthepublic;theyhavehadnoMacphersontocompensateforhiscorruptionoftheirpoeticlegendsbyforcingthemintopopularity。—SeealsoMr。SharonTurner'sEssayontheWelshBards。—M。]
[Footnote141:Theprogressofromance,andthestateoflearning,inthemiddleages,areillustratedbyMr。ThomasWarton,withthetasteofapoet,andtheminutediligenceofanantiquarian。IhavederivedmuchinstructionfromthetwolearneddissertationsprefixedtothefirstvolumeofhisHistoryofEnglishPoetry。
Note:Thesevaluabledissertationsshouldnotnowbereadwithoutthenotesandpreliminaryessayofthelateeditor,Mr。
Price,which,inpointoftasteandfulnessofinformation,areworthyofaccompanyingandcompletingthoseofWarton。—M。]
Resistance,ifitcannotavert,mustincreasethemiseriesofconquest;andconquesthasneverappearedmoredreadfulanddestructivethaninthehandsoftheSaxons;whohatedthevaloroftheirenemies,disdainedthefaithoftreaties,andviolated,withoutremorse,themostsacredobjectsoftheChristianworship。Thefieldsofbattlemightbetraced,almostineverydistrict,bymonumentsofbones;thefragmentsoffallingtowerswerestainedwithblood;thelastoftheBritons,withoutdistinctionofageorsex,wasmassacred,^142intheruinsofAnderida;^143andtherepetitionofsuchcalamitieswasfrequentandfamiliarundertheSaxonheptarchy。Theartsandreligion,thelawsandlanguage,whichtheRomanshadsocarefullyplantedinBritain,wereextirpatedbytheirbarbaroussuccessors。Afterthedestructionoftheprincipalchurches,thebishops,whohaddeclinedthecrownofmartyrdom,retiredwiththeholyrelicsintoWalesandArmorica;theremainsoftheirflockswereleftdestituteofanyspiritualfood;thepractice,andeventheremembrance,ofChristianitywereabolished;andtheBritishclergymightobtainsomecomfortfromthedamnationoftheidolatrousstrangers。ThekingsofFrancemaintainedtheprivilegesoftheirRomansubjects;buttheferociousSaxonstrampledonthelawsofRome,andoftheemperors。Theproceedingsofcivilandcriminaljurisdiction,thetitlesofhonor,theformsofoffice,theranksofsociety,andeventhedomesticrightsofmarriage,testament,andinheritance,werefinallysuppressed;andtheindiscriminatecrowdofnobleandplebeianslaveswasgovernedbythetraditionarycustoms,whichhadbeencoarselyframedfortheshepherdsandpiratesofGermany。Thelanguageofscience,ofbusiness,andofconversation,whichhadbeenintroducedbytheRomans,waslostinthegeneraldesolation。AsufficientnumberofLatinorCelticwordsmightbeassumedbytheGermans,toexpresstheirnewwantsandideas;^144butthoseilliteratePaganspreservedandestablishedtheuseoftheirnationaldialect。^145Almosteveryname,conspicuouseitherinthechurchorstate,revealsitsTeutonicorigin;^146andthegeographyofEnglandwasuniversallyinscribedwithforeigncharactersandappellations。