Iagreewithyou,Parmenides,saidSocrates;andwhatyousayisverymuchtomymind。
Andyet,Socrates,saidParmenides,ifaman,fixinghisattentionontheseandthelikedifficulties,doesawaywithideasofthingsandwillnotadmitthateveryindividualthinghasitsowndeterminateideawhichisalwaysoneandthesame,hewillhavenothingonwhichhismindcanrest;andsohewillutterlydestroythepowerofreasoning,asyouseemtometohaveparticularlynoted。
Verytrue,hesaid。
But,then,whatistobecomeofphilosophy?Whithershallweturn,iftheideasareunknown?
Icertainlydonotseemywayatpresent。
Yes,saidParmenides;andIthinkthatthisarises,Socrates,outofyourattemptingtodefinethebeautiful,thejust,thegood,andtheideasgenerally,withoutsufficientprevioustraining。Inoticedyourdeficiency,whenIheardyoutalkingherewithyourfriendAristoteles,thedaybeforeyesterday。Theimpulsethatcarriesyoutowardsphilosophyisassuredlynobleanddivine;butthereisanartwhichiscalledbythevulgaridletalking,andwhichisofimaginedtobeuseless;inthatyoumusttrainandexerciseyourself,nowthatyouareyoung,ortruthwilleludeyourgrasp。
Andwhatisthenatureofthisexercise,Parmenides,whichyouwouldrecommend?
ThatwhichyouheardZenopractising;atthesametime,Igiveyoucreditforsayingtohimthatyoudidnotcaretoexaminetheperplexityinreferencetovisiblethings,ortoconsiderthequestionthatway;butonlyinreferencetoobjectsofthought,andtowhatmaybecalledideas。
Why,yes,hesaid,thereappearstometobenodifficultyinshowingbythismethodthatvisiblethingsarelikeandunlikeandmayexperienceanything。
Quitetrue,saidParmenides;butIthinkthatyoushouldgoastepfurther,andconsidernotonlytheconsequenceswhichflowfromagivenhypothesis,butalsotheconsequenceswhichflowfromdenyingthehypothesis;andthatwillbestillbettertrainingforyou。
Whatdoyoumean?hesaid。
Imean,forexample,thatinthecaseofthisveryhypothesisofZeno'saboutthemany,youshouldinquirenotonlywhatwillbetheconsequencestothemanyinrelationtothemselvesandtotheone,andtotheoneinrelationtoitselfandthemany,onthehypothesisofthebeingofthemany,butalsowhatwillbetheconsequencestotheoneandthemanyintheirrelationtothemselvesandtoeachother,ontheoppositehypothesis。Or,again,iflikenessisorisnot,whatwillbetheconsequencesineitherofthesecasestothesubjectsofthehypothesis,andtootherthings,inrelationbothtothemselvesandtooneanother,andsoofunlikeness;andthesameholdsgoodofmotionandrest,ofgenerationanddestruction,andevenofbeingandnot—being。Inaword,whenyousupposeanythingtobeornottobe,ortobeinanywayaffected,youmustlookattheconsequencesinrelationtothethingitself,andtoanyotherthingswhichyouchoose—toeachofthemsingly,tomorethanone,andtoall;andsoofotherthings,youmustlookattheminrelationtothemselvesandtoanythingelsewhichyousupposeeithertobeornottobe,ifyouwouldtrainyourselfperfectlyandseetherealtruth。
That,Parmenides,isatremendousbusinessofwhichyouspeak,andI
donotquiteunderstandyou;willyoutakesomehypothesisandgothroughthesteps?—thenIshallapprehendyoubetter。
That,Socrates,isaserioustasktoimposeonamanofmyyears。
Thenwillyou,Zeno?saidSocrates。
Zenoansweredwithasmile:—LetusmakeourpetitiontoParmenideshimself,whoisquiterightinsayingthatyouarehardlyawareoftheextentofthetaskwhichyouareimposingonhim;andifthereweremoreofusIshouldnotaskhim,forthesearenotsubjectswhichanyone,especiallyathisage,canwellspeakofbeforealargeaudience;mostpeoplearenotawarethatthisround—aboutprogressthroughallthingsistheonlywayinwhichthemindcanattaintruthandwisdom。Andtherefore,Parmenides,IjoinintherequestofSocrates,thatImayheartheprocessagainwhichIhavenotheardforalongtime。
WhenZenohadthusspoken,Pythodorus,accordingtoAntiphon'sreportofhim,said,thathehimselfandAristotelesandthewholecompanyentreatedParmenidestogiveanexampleoftheprocess。I
cannotrefuse,saidParmenides;andyetIfeelratherlikeIbycus,who,wheninhisoldage,againsthiswill,hefellinlove,comparedhimselftoanoldracehorse,whowasabouttoruninachariotrace,shakingwithfearatthecourseheknewsowell—thiswashissimileofhimself。AndIalsoexperienceatremblingwhenI
rememberthroughwhatanoceanofwordsIhavetowadeatmytimeoflife。ButImustindulgeyou,asZenosaysthatIought,andwearealone。WhereshallIbegin?Andwhatshallbeourfirsthypothesis,ifIamtoattemptthislaboriouspastime?ShallIbeginwithmyself,andtakemyownhypothesistheone?andconsidertheconsequenceswhichfollowonthesuppositioneitherofthebeingorofthenotbeingofone?
Byallmeans,saidZeno。
Andwhowillanswerme?hesaid。ShallIproposetheyoungest?Hewillnotmakedifficultiesandwillbethemostlikelytosaywhathethinks;andhisanswerswillgivemetimetobreathe。
Iamtheonewhomyoumean,Parmenides,saidAristoteles;forIamtheyoungestandatyourservice。Ask,andIwillanswer。
Parmenidesproceeded:Ifoneis,hesaid,theonecannotbemany?
Impossible。
Thentheonecannothaveparts,andcannotbeawhole?
Whynot?
Becauseeverypartispartofawhole;isitnot?
Yes。
Andwhatisawhole?wouldnotthatofwhichnopartiswantingbeawhole?
Certainly。
Then,ineithercase,theonewouldbemadeupofparts;bothasbeingawhole,andalsoashavingparts?
Tobesure。
Andineithercase,theonewouldbemany,andnotone?
True。
But,surely,itoughttobeoneandnotmany?
Itought。
Then,iftheoneistoremainone,itwillnotbeawhole,andwillnothaveparts?
No。
Butifithasnoparts,itwillhaveneitherbeginning,middle,norend;forthesewouldofcoursebepartsofit。
Right。
Butthen,again,abeginningandanendarethelimitsofeverything?
Certainly。
Thentheone,havingneitherbeginningnorend,isunlimited?
Yes,unlimited。
Andthereforeformless;foritcannotpartakeeitherofroundorstraight。
Butwhy?
Why,becausetheroundisthatofwhichalltheextremepointsareequidistantfromthecentre?
Yes。
Andthestraightisthatofwhichthecentreinterceptstheviewoftheextremes?
True。
Thentheonewouldhavepartsandwouldbemany,ifitpartookeitherofastraightorofacircularform?
Assuredly。
Buthavingnoparts,itwillbeneitherstraightnorround?
Right。
And,beingofsuchanature,itcannotbeinanyplace,foritcannotbeeitherinanotherorinitself。
Howso?
Becauseifitwereinanother,itwouldbeencircledbythatinwhichitwas,andwouldtouchitatmanyplacesandwithmanyparts;
butthatwhichisoneandindivisible,anddoesnotpartakeofacircularnature,cannotbetouchedallroundinmanyplaces。
Certainlynot。
Butif,ontheotherhand,onewereinitself,itwouldalsobecontainedbynothingelsebutitself;thatistosay,ifitwerereallyinitself;fornothingcanbeinanythingwhichdoesnotcontainit。