Howeverthismaybe,noone,unlessheisgrosslyignorantofwhatsciencehasdoneformankind,canentertainanydoubtoftheincalculablebenefitswhichwillhereafterbederivedfromphysiology,notonlybyman,butbytheloweranimals。LookforinstanceatPasteur’sresultsinmodifyingthegermsofthemostmalignantdiseases,fromwhich,asitsohappens,animalswillinthefirstplacereceivemorereliefthanman。LetitberememberedhowmanylivesandwhatafearfulamountofsufferinghavebeensavedbytheknowledgegainedofparasiticwormsthroughtheexperimentsofVirchowandothersonlivinganimals。Inthefutureeveryonewillbeastonishedattheingratitudeshown,atleastinEngland,tothesebenefactorsofmankind。Asformyself,permitmetoassureyouthatIhonour,andshallalwayshonour,everyonewhoadvancesthenoblescienceofphysiology。
  DearSir,yoursfaithfully,CHARLESDARWIN。
  [Inthe"Times"ofthefollowingdayappearedaletterheaded"Mr。DarwinandVivisection,"signedbyMissFrancesPowerCobbe。Tothismyfatherrepliedinthe"Times"ofApril22,1881。OnthesamedayhewrotetoMr。
  Romanes:——
  "AsIhaveafairopportunity,Isentalettertothe"Times"onVivisection,whichisprintedto—day。Ithoughtitfairtobearmyshareoftheabusepouredinsoatrociousamanneronallphysiologists。]
  CHARLESDARWINTOTHEEDITOROFTHETIMES。
  Sir,IdonotwishtodiscusstheviewsexpressedbyMissCobbeintheletterwhichappearedinthe"Times"ofthe19thinst。;butassheassertsthatI
  have"misinformed"mycorrespondentinSwedeninsayingthat"theinvestigationofthematterbyaRoyalCommissionprovedthattheaccusationsmadeagainstourEnglishphysiologistswerefalse,"IwillmerelyaskleavetorefertosomeothersentencesfromtheReportoftheCommission。
  1。Thesentence——"Itisnottobedoubtedthatinhumanitymaybefoundinpersonsofveryhighpositionasphysiologists,"whichMissCobbequotesfrompage17ofthereport,andwhich,inheropinion,"cannecessarilyconcernEnglishphysiologistsaloneandnotforeigners,"isimmediatelyfollowedbythewords"WehaveseenthatitwassoinMagendie。"MagendiewasaFrenchphysiologistwhobecamenotorioussomehalfcenturyagoforhiscruelexperimentsonlivinganimals。
  2。TheCommissioners,afterspeakingofthe"generalsentimentofhumanity"prevailinginthiscountry,say(page10):——
  "Thisprincipleisacceptedgenerallybytheveryhighlyeducatedmenwhoselivesaredevotedeithertoscientificinvestigationandeducationortothemitigationortheremovalofthesufferingsoftheirfellow—creatures;
  thoughdifferencesofdegreeinregardtoitspracticalapplicationwillbeeasilydiscerniblebythosewhostudytheevidenceasithasbeenlaidbeforeus。"
  Again,accordingtotheCommissioners(page10):——
  "ThesecretaryoftheRoyalSocietyforthePreventionofCrueltytoAnimals,whenaskedwhetherthegeneraltendencyofthescientificworldinthiscountryisatvariancewithhumanity,sayshebelievesittobeverydifferent,indeed,fromthatofforeignphysiologists;andwhilegivingitastheopinionofthesocietythatexperimentsareperformedwhichareintheirnaturebeyondanylegitimateprovinceofscience,andthatthepainwhichtheyinflictispainwhichitisnotjustifiabletoinflictevenforthescientificobjectinview,hereadilyacknowledgesthathedoesnotknowasinglecaseofwantoncruelty,andthatingeneraltheEnglishphysiologistshaveusedanaestheticswheretheythinktheycandosowithsafetytotheexperiment。"
  Iam,Sir,yourobedientservant,CHARLESDARWIN。
  April21。
  [Inthe"Times"ofSaturday,April23,1881,appearedaletterfromMissCobbeinreply:]
  CHARLESDARWINTOG。J。ROMANES。
  Down,April25,1881。
  MydearRomanes,Iwasverygladtoreadyourlastnotewithmuchnewsinterestingtome。
  ButIwritenowtosayhowI,andindeedallofusinthehousehaveadmiredyourletterinthe"Times"。(April25,1881。——Mr。RomanesdefendedDr。SandersonagainsttheaccusationsmadebyMissCobbe。)Itwassosimpleanddirect。IwasparticularlygladaboutBurtonSanderson,ofwhomIhavebeenforseveralyearsagreatadmirer。Iwasalsoespeciallygladtoreadthelastsentences。Ihavebeenbotheredwithseveralletters,butnoneabusive。UnderaSELFISHpointofviewIamverygladofthepublicationofyourletter,asIwasatfirstinclinedtothinkthatIhaddonemischiefbystirringupthemud。NowIfeelsurethatIhavedonegood。Mr。Jessehaswrittentomeverypolitely,hesayshisSocietyhashadnothingtodowithplacardsanddiagramsagainstphysiology,andI
  suppose,therefore,thatthesealloriginatewithMissCobbe……Mr。Jessecomplainsbitterlythatthe"Times"will"burke"allhisletterstothisnewspaper,noramIsurprised,judgingfromthelaughabletiradesadvertisedin"Nature"。
  Everyours,verysincerely,CH。DARWIN。
  [Thenextletterreferstoaprojectedconjointarticleonvivisection,towhichMr。Romaneswishedmyfathertocontribute:]
  CHARLESDARWINTOG。J。ROMANES。
  Down,September2,1881。
  MydearRomanes,Yourletterhasperplexedmebeyondallmeasure。Ifullyrecognisethedutyofeveryonewhoseopinionisworthanything,expressinghisopinionpubliclyonvivisection;andthismademesendmylettertothe"Times"。I
  havebeenthinkingatintervalsallmorningwhatIcouldsay,anditisthesimpletruththatIhavenothingworthsaying。Youandmenlikeyou,whoseideasflowfreely,andwhocanexpressthemeasily,cannotunderstandthestateofmentalparalysisinwhichIfindmyself。Whatismostwantedisacarefulandaccurateattempttoshowwhatphysiologyhasalreadydoneforman,andevenstillmorestronglywhatthereiseveryreasontobelieveitwillhereafterdo。NowIamabsolutelyincapableofdoingthis,orofdiscussingtheotherpointssuggestedbyyou。
  Ifyouwishformyname(andIshouldbegladthatitshouldappearwiththatofothersinthesamecause),couldyounotquotesomesentencefrommyletterinthe"Times"whichIenclose,butpleasereturnit。Ifyouthoughtfityoumightsayyouquoteditwithmyapproval,andthatafterstillfurtherreflectionIstillabidemoststronglyinmyexpressedconviction。
  ForHeaven’ssake,dothinkofthis。Idonotgrudgethelabourandthought;butIcouldwritenothingworthanyonereading。
  Allowmetodemurtoyourcallingyourconjointarticlea"symposium"
  strictlya"drinkingparty。"Thisseemstomeverybadtaste,andIdohopeeveryoneofyouwillavoidanysemblanceofajokeonthesubject。I
  KNOWthatwords,likeajoke,onthissubjecthavequitedisgustedsomepersonsnotatallinimicaltophysiology。OnepersonlamentedtomethatMr。Simon,inhistrulyadmirableAddressattheMedicalCongress(byfarthebestthingwhichIhaveread),spokeofthefantasticSENSUALITY
  (’TransactionsoftheInternationalMedicalCongress,’1881,volumeiv。
  page413。Theexpression"lackadaisical"(notfantastic),and"feeblesensuality,"areusedwithregardtothefeelingsoftheanti—
  vivisectionists。)(orsomesuchterm)ofthemanymistaken,buthonestmenandwomenwhoarehalfmadonthesubject……
  [ToDr。LauderBruntonmyfatherwroteinFebruary1882:——
  "HaveyoureadMr。[Edmund]Gurney’sarticlesinthe’Fortnightly’("A
  chapterintheEthicsofPain,"’FortnightlyReview,’1881,volumexxx。
  page778。)and’Cornhill?’("AnEpilogueonVivisection,"’CornhillMagazine,’1882,volumexlv。page191。)Theyseemtomeveryclever,thoughobscurelywritten,andIagreewithalmosteverythinghesays,exceptwithsomepassageswhichappeartoimplythatnoexperimentsshouldbetriedunlesssomeimmediategoodcanbepredicted,andthisisagiganticmistakecontradictedbythewholehistoryofscience。"]
  CHAPTER2。IX。
  MISCELLANEA(continued)——AREVIVALOFGEOLOGICALWORK——THEBOOKON
  EARTHWORMS——LIFEOFERASMUSDARWIN——MISCELLANEOUSLETTERS。
  1876—1882。
  [Wehavenowtoconsiderthework(otherthanbotanical)whichoccupiedtheconcludingsixyearsofmyfather’slife。AlettertohisoldfriendRev。
  L。Blomefield(Jenyns),writteninMarch,1877,showswhatwasmyfather’sestimateofhisownpowersofworkatthistime:——
  "MydearJenyns(IseeIhaveforgottenyourpropernames)。——Yourextremelykindletterhasgivenmewarmpleasure。Asonegetsold,one’sthoughtsturnbacktothepastratherthantothefuture,andIoftenthinkofthepleasant,andtomevaluable,hourswhichIspentwithyouonthebordersoftheFens。
  "Youaskaboutmyfuturework;IdoubtwhetherIshallbeabletodomuchmorethatisnew,andIalwayskeepbeforemymindtheexampleofpoorold——,whoinhisoldagehadacacoethesforwriting。ButIcannotenduredoingnothing,soIsupposethatIshallgoonaslongasIcanwithoutobviouslymakingafoolofmyself。Ihaveagreatmassofmatterwithrespecttovariationundernature;butsomuchhasbeenpublishedsincetheappearanceofthe’OriginofSpecies,’thatIverymuchdoubtwhetherI
  retainpowerofmindandstrengthtoreducethemassintoadigestedwhole。
  IhavesometimesthoughtthatIwouldtry,butdreadtheattempt……"
  HisprophecyprovedtobeatrueonewithregardtoanycontinuationofanygeneralworkinthedirectionofEvolution,buthisestimateofpowerswhichcouldafterwardsprovecapableofgrapplingwiththe’PowerofMovementinPlants,’andwiththeworkon’Earthworms,’wascertainlyalowone。
  Theyear1876,withwhichthepresentchapterbegins,broughtwithitarevivalofgeologicalwork。Hehadbeenastonished,asIhearfromProfessorJudd,andasappearsinhisletters,tolearnthathisbookson’VolcanicIslands,’1844,andon’SouthAmerica,’1846,werestillconsultedbygeologists,anditwasasurprisetohimthatneweditionsshouldberequired。BoththeseworkswereoriginallypublishedbyMessrs。
  SmithandElder,andtheneweditionof1876wasalsobroughtoutbythem。
  Thisappearedinonevolumewiththetitle’GeologicalObservationsontheVolcanicIslands,andPartsofSouthAmericavisitedduringtheVoyageofH。M。S。"Beagle"。’Hehasexplainedintheprefacehisreasonsforleavinguntouchedthetextoftheoriginaleditions:"Theyrelatetopartsoftheworldwhichhavebeensorarelyvisitedbymenofscience,thatIamnotawarethatmuchcouldbecorrectedoraddedfromobservationssubsequentlymade。OwingtothegreatprogresswhichGeologyhasmadewithinrecenttimes,myviewsonsomefewpointsmaybesomewhatantiquated;butIhavethoughtitbesttoleavethemastheyoriginallyappeared。"
  Itmayhavebeentherevivalofgeologicalspeculation,duetotherevisionofhisearlybooks,thatledtohisrecordingtheobservationsofwhichsomeaccountisgiveninthefollowingletter。PartofithasbeenpublishedinProfessorJamesGeikie’s’PrehistoricEurope,’chaptersvii。
  andix。(Myfather’ssuggestionisalsonoticedinProf。Geikie’saddressonthe’IceAgeinEuropeandNorthAmerica,’givenatEdinburgh,November20,1884。),afewverbalalterationshavingbeenmadeatmyfather’srequestinthepassagesquoted。Mr。Geikielatelywrotetome:"Theviewssuggestedinhisletterastotheoriginoftheangulargravels,etc。,intheSouthofEnglandwill,Ibelieve,cometobeacceptedasthetruth。
  Thisquestionhasamuchwiderbearingthanmightatfirstappear。InpointoffactitsolvesoneofthemostdifficultproblemsinQuaternaryGeology——andhasalreadyattractedtheattentionofGermangeologists。"]
  CHARLESDARWINTOJAMESGEIKIE。
  Down,November16,1876。
  MydearSir,Ihopethatyouwillforgivemefortroublingyouwithaverylongletter。
  ButfirstallowmetotellyouwithwhatextremepleasureandadmirationI
  havejustfinishedreadingyour’GreatIceAge。’Itseemstomeadmirablydone,andmostclear。Interestingasmanychaptersareinthehistoryoftheworld,Idonotthinkthatanyonecomes[up]nearlytotheglacialperiodorperiods。ThoughIhavesteadilyreadmuchonthesubject,yourbookmakesthewholeappearalmostnewtome。
  Iamnowgoingtomentionasmallobservation,madebymetwoorthreeyearsago,nearSouthampton,butnotfollowedout,asIhavenostrengthforexcursions。Ineedsaynothingaboutthecharacterofthedriftthere(whichincludespalaeolithiccelts),foryouhavedescribeditsessentialfeaturesinafewwordsatpage506。Itcoversthewholecountry[inan]
  evenplain—likesurface,almostirrespectiveofthepresentoutlineoftheland。
  Thecoarsestratificationhassometimesbeendisturbed。Ifindthatyouallude"tothelargerstonesoftenstandingonend;"andthisisthepointwhichstruckmesomuch。Notonlymoderatelysizedangularstones,butsmallovalpebblesoftenstandverticallyup,inamannerwhichIhaveneverseeninordinarygravelbeds。Thisfactremindedmeofwhatoccursnearmyhome,inthestiffredclay,fullofunwornflintsoverthechalk,whichisnodoubttheresidueleftundissolvedbyrainwater。Inthisclay,flintsaslongandthinasmyarmoftenstandperpendicularlyup;andIhavebeentoldbythetank—diggersthatitistheir"naturalposition!"
  Ipresumethatthispositionmaysafelybeattributedtothedifferentialmovementofpartsoftheredclayasitsubsidedveryslowlyfromthedissolutionoftheunderlyingchalk;sothattheflintsarrangethemselvesinthelinesofleastresistance。ThesimilarbutlessstronglymarkedarrangementofthestonesinthedriftnearSouthamptonmakesmesuspectthatitalsomusthaveslowlysubsided;andthenotionhascrossedmymindthatduringthecommencementandheightoftheglacialperiodgreatbedsoffrozensnowaccumulatedoverthesouthofEngland,andthat,duringthesummer,gravelandstoneswerewashedfromthehigherlandoveritssurface,andinsuperficialchannels。Thelargerstreamsmayhavecutrightthroughthefrozensnow,anddepositedgravelinlinesatthebottom。
  Butoneachsucceedingautumn,whentherunningwaterfailed,Iimaginethatthelinesofdrainagewouldhavebeenfilledupbyblownsnowafterwardscongealed,andthat,owingtogreatsurfaceaccumulationsofsnow,itwouldbeamerechancewhetherthedrainage,togetherwithgravelandsand,wouldfollowthesamelinesduringthenextsummer。Thus,asI
  apprehend,alternatelayersoffrozensnowanddrift,insheetsandlines,wouldultimatelyhavecoveredthecountrytoagreatthickness,withlinesofdriftprobablydepositedinvariousdirectionsatthebottombythelargerstreams。Astheclimatebecamewarmer,thelowerbedsoffrozensnowwouldhavemeltedwithextremeslowness,andthemanyirregularbedsofinterstratifieddriftwouldhavesunkdownwithequalslowness;andduringthismovementtheelongatedpebbleswouldhavearrangedthemselvesmoreorlessvertically。Thedriftwouldalsohavebeendepositedalmostirrespectiveoftheoutlineoftheunderlyingland。WhenIviewedthecountryIcouldnotpersuademyselfthatanyflood,howevergreat,couldhavedepositedsuchcoarsegraveloverthealmostlevelplatformsbetweenthevalleys。MyviewdiffersfromthatofHolst,page415[’GreatIceAge’],ofwhichIhadneverheard,ashisrelatestochannelscutthroughglaciers,andminetobedsofdriftinterstratifiedwithfrozensnowwherenoglaciersexisted。Theupshotofthislongletteristoaskyoutokeepmynotioninyourhead,andlookoutforuprightpebblesinanylowlandcountrywhichyoumayexamine,whereglaciershavenotexisted。Orifyouthinkthenotiondeservesanyfurtherthought,butnototherwise,totellanyoneofit,forinstanceMr。Skertchly,whoisexaminingsuchdistricts。
  Prayforgivemeforwritingsolongaletter,andagainthankingyouforthegreatpleasurederivedfromyourbook,Iremainyoursveryfaithfully,CH。DARWIN。
  P。S……IamgladthatyouhavereadBlytt(AxelBlytt。——’EssayontheImmigrationoftheNorwegianFloraduringalternaterainyanddrySeasons。’
  Christiania,1876。);hispaperseemedtomeamostimportantcontributiontoBotanicalGeography。HowcuriousthatthesameconclusionsshouldhavebeenarrivedatbyMr。Skertchly,whoseemstobeafirst—rateobserver;
  andthisimplies,asIalwaysthink,asoundtheoriser。
  Ihavetoldmypublishertosendyouintwoorthreedaysacopy(secondedition)ofmygeologicalworkduringthevoyageofthe"Beagle"。Thesolepointwhichwouldperhapsinterestyouisaboutthesteppe—likeplainsofPatagonia。
  FormanyyearspastIhavehadfearfulmisgivingsthatitmusthavebeenthelevelofthesea,andnotthatofthelandwhichhaschanged。
  Ireadafewmonthsagoyour[brother’s]veryinterestinglifeofMurchison。(ByMr。ArchibaldGeikie。)ThoughIhavealwaysthoughtthatherankednexttoW。Smithintheclassificationofformations,andthoughIknewhowkind—hearted[hewas],yetthebookhasraisedhimgreatlyinmyrespect,notwithstandinghisfoiblesandwantofbroadphilosophicalviews。
  [Theonlyothergeologicalworkofhislateryearswasembodiedinhisbookonearthworms(1881),whichmaythereforebeconvenientlyconsideredinthisplace。Thissubjectwasonewhichhadinterestedhimmanyyearsbeforethisdate,andin1838apaperontheformationofmouldwaspublishedintheProceedingsoftheGeologicalSociety(seevolumei。)。
  Hereheshowedthat"fragmentsofburntmarl,cinders,etc。,whichhadbeenthicklystrewedoverthesurfaceofseveralmeadowswerefoundafterafewyearslyingatadepthofsomeinchesbeneaththeturf,butstillformingalayer。"Fortheexplanationofthisfact,whichformsthecentralideaofthegeologicalpartofthebook,hewasindebtedtohisuncleJosiahWedgwood,whosuggestedthatworms,bybringingearthtothesurfaceintheircastings,mustundermineanyobjectslyingonthesurfaceandcauseanapparentsinking。
  Inthebookof1881heextendedhisobservationsonthisburyingaction,anddevisedanumberofdifferentwaysofcheckinghisestimatesastotheamountofworkdone。(HereceivedmuchvaluablehelpfromDr。King,oftheBotanicalGardens,Calcutta。ThefollowingpassageisfromalettertoDr。
  King,datedJanuary18,1873:——
  "Ireallydonotknowhowtothankyouenoughfortheimmensetroublewhichyouhavetaken。YouhaveattendedEXACTLYandFULLYtothepointsaboutwhichIwasmostanxious。IfIhadbeeneacheveningbyyourside,Icouldnothavesuggestedanythingelse。")Healsoaddedamassofobservationsonthehabits,naturalhistoryandintelligenceofworms,apartoftheworkwhichaddedgreatlytoitspopularity。
  In1877SirThomasFarrerhaddiscoveredclosetohisgardentheremainsofabuildingofRoman—Britishtimes,andthusgavemyfathertheopportunityofseeingforhimselftheeffectsproducedbyearthworms’workontheoldconcrete—floors,walls,etc。OnhisreturnhewrotetoSirThomasFarrer:
  "Icannotrememberamoredelightfulweekthanthelast。IknowverywellthatE。willnotbelieveme,butthewormswerebynomeansthesolecharm。"
  Intheautumnof1880,whenthe’PowerofMovementinPlants’wasnearlyfinished,hebeganoncemoreonthesubject。HewrotetoProfessorCarus(September21):——
  "Intheintervalsofcorrectingthepress,Iamwritingaverylittlebook,andhavedonenearlyhalfofit。Itstitlewillbe(asatpresentdesigned)’TheFormationofVegetableMouldthroughtheActionofWorms。’
  (Thefulltitleis’TheFormationofVegetableMouldthroughtheActionofWormswithObservationsontheirHabits,’1881。)AsfarasIcanjudgeitwillbeacuriouslittlebook。"
  ThemanuscriptwassenttotheprintersinApril,1881,andwhentheproof—
  sheetswerecominginhewrotetoProfessorCarus:"Thesubjecthasbeentomeahobby—horse,andIhaveperhapstreateditinfoolishdetail。"
  ItwaspublishedonOctober10,and2000copiesweresoldatonce。HewrotetoSirJ。D。Hooker,"Iamgladthatyouapproveofthe’Worms。’WheninolddaysIusedtotellyouwhateverIwasdoing,ifyouwereatallinterested,Ialwaysfeltasmostmendowhentheirworkisfinallypublished。"
  ToMr。MellardReadehewrote(November8):"Ithasbeenacompletesurprisetomehowmanypersonshavecaredforthesubject。"AndtoMr。
  Dyer(inNovember):"Mybookhasbeenreceivedwithalmostlaughableenthusiasm,and3500copieshavebeensold!!!"Again,tohisfriendMr。
  AnthonyRich,hewroteonFebruary4,1882,"Ihavebeenplaguedwithanendlessstreamoflettersonthesubject;mostofthemveryfoolishandenthusiastic;butsomecontaininggoodfactswhichIhaveusedincorrectingyesterdaythe’SixthThousand。’"Thepopularityofthebookmayberoughlyestimatedbythefactthat,inthethreeyearsfollowingitspublication,8500copiesweresold——asalerelativelygreaterthanthatofthe’OriginofSpecies。’
  Itisnotdifficulttoaccountforitssuccesswiththenon—scientificpublic。Conclusionssowideandsonovel,andsoeasilyunderstood,drawnfromthestudyofcreaturessofamiliar,andtreatedwithunabatedvigourandfreshness,maywellhaveattractedmanyreaders。Areviewerremarks:
  "Intheeyesofmostmen……theearthwormisamereblind,dumb,senseless,andunpleasantlyslimyannelid。Mr。Darwinundertakestorehabilitatehischaracter,andtheearthwormstepsforthatonceasanintelligentandbeneficentpersonage,aworkerofvastgeologicalchanges,aplanerdownofmountainsides……afriendofman……andanallyoftheSocietyforthepreservationofancientmonuments。"The"St。JamesGazette",October17,1881,pointedoutthattheteachingofthecumulativeimportanceoftheinfinitelylittleisthepointofcontactbetweenthisbookandtheauthor’spreviouswork。
  Onemorebookremainstobenoticed,the’LifeofErasmusDarwin。’
  InFebruary1879anessaybyDr。ErnstKrause,onthescientificworkofErasmusDarwin,appearedintheevolutionaryjournal,’Kosmos。’Thenumberof’Kosmos’inquestionwasa"Gratulationsheft"(Thesamenumbercontainsagoodbiographicalsketchofmyfather,ofwhichthematerialwastoalargeextentsuppliedbyhimtothewriter,ProfessorPreyerofJena。Thearticlecontainsanexcellentlistofmyfather’spublications。),orspecialcongratulatoryissueinhonourofmyfather’sbirthday,sothatDr。
  Krause’sessay,glorifyingtheolderevolutionist,wasquiteinitsplace。
  HewrotetoDr。Krause,thankinghimcordiallyforthehonourpaidtoErasmus,andaskinghispermissiontopublish(Thewishtodosowassharedbyhisbrother,ErasmusDarwintheyounger,whocontinuedtobeassociatedwiththeproject。)anEnglishtranslationoftheEssay。
  Hischiefreasonforwritinganoticeofhisgrandfather’slifewas"tocontradictflatlysomecalumniesbyMissSeward。"ThisappearsfromaletterofMarch27,1879,tohiscousinReginaldDarwin,inwhichheasksforanydocumentsandletterswhichmightthrowlightonthecharacterofErasmus。ThisledtoMr。ReginaldDarwinplacinginmyfather’shandsaquantityofvaluablematerial,includingacuriousfoliocommon—placebook,ofwhichhewrote:"Ihavebeendeeplyinterestedbythegreatbook,……readingandlookingatitislikehavingcommunionwiththedead……[it]hastaughtmeagooddealabouttheoccupationsandtastesofourgrandfather。"Asubsequentletter(April8)tothesamecorrespondentdescribesthesourceofafurthersupplyofmaterial:——
  SincemylastletterIhavemadeastrangediscovery;foranoldboxfrommyfathermarked"OldDeeds,"andwhichconsequentlyIhadneveropened,I
  foundfullofletters——hundredsfromDr。Erasmus——andothersfromoldmembersoftheFamily:somefewverycurious。AlsoadrawingofElstonbeforeitwasaltered,about1750,ofwhichIthinkIwillgiveacopy。"
  Dr。Krause’scontributionformedthesecondpartofthe’LifeofErasmusDarwin,’myfathersupplyinga"preliminarynotice。"Thisexpressiononthetitle—pageissomewhatmisleading;myfather’scontributionismorethanhalfthebook,andshouldhavebeendescribedasabiography。Workofthiskindwasnewtohim,andhewrotedoubtfullytoMr。ThiseltonDyer,June18th:"GodonlyknowswhatIshallmakeofhislife,itissuchanewkindofworktome。"Thestronginteresthefeltabouthisforebearshelpedtogivezesttothework,whichbecameadecidedenjoymenttohim。
  Withthegeneralpublicthebookwasnotmarkedlysuccessful,butmanyofhisfriendsrecogniseditsmerits。SirJ。D。Hookerwasoneofthese,andtohimmyfatherwrote,"YourpraiseoftheLifeofDr。D。haspleasedmeexceedingly,forIdespisedmywork,andthoughtmyselfaperfectfooltohaveundertakensuchajob。"
  ToMr。Galton,too,hewrote,November14:——
  "IamEXTREMELYgladthatyouapproveofthelittle’Life’ofourgrandfather,forIhavebeenrepentingthatIeverundertookit,astheworkwasquitebeyondmytether。"
  Thepublicationofthe’LifeofErasmusDarwin’ledtoanattackbyMr。
  SamuelButler,whichamountedtoachargeoffalsehoodagainstmyfather。
  Afterconsultinghisfriends,hecametothedeterminationtoleavethechargeunanswered,asunworthyofhisnotice。(Hehad,inalettertoMr。
  Butler,expressedhisregretattheoversightwhichcausedsomuchoffence。)Thosewhowishtoknowmoreofthematter,maygatherthefactsofthecasefromErnstKrause’s’CharlesDarwin,’andtheywillfindMr。
  Butler’sstatementofhisgrievanceinthe"Athenaeum",January31,1880,andinthe"St。James’sGazette",December8,1880。Theaffairgavemyfathermuchpain,butthewarmsympathyofthosewhoseopinionherespectedsoonhelpedhimtoletitpassintoawell—meritedoblivion。
  ThefollowingletterreferstoM。J。H。Fabre’s’SouvenirsEntomologiques。’
  Itmayfindaplacehere,asitcontainsadefenceofErasmusDarwinonasmallpoint。Thepostscriptisinteresting,asanexampleofoneofmyfather’sboldideasbothastoexperimentandtheory:]
  CHARLESDARWINTOJ。H。FABRE。
  Down,January31,1880。
  MydearSir,IhopethatyouwillpermitmetohavethesatisfactionofthankingyoucordiallyforthelivelypleasurewhichIhavederivedfromreadingyourbook。Neverhavethewonderfulhabitsofinsectsbeenmorevividlydescribed,anditisalmostasgoodtoreadaboutthemastoseethem。I
  feelsurethatyouwouldnotbeunjusttoevenaninsect,muchlesstoaman。Now,youhavebeenmisledbysometranslator,formygrandfather,ErasmusDarwin,states(’Zoonomia,’volumei。page183,1794)thatitwasawasp(guepe)whichhesawcuttingoffthewingsofalargefly。Ihavenodoubtthatyouarerightinsayingthatthewingsaregenerallycutoffinstinctively;butinthecasedescribedbymygrandfather,thewasp,aftercuttingoffthetwoendsofthebody,roseintheair,andwasturnedroundbythewind;hethenalightedandcutoffthewings。Imustbelieve,withPierreHuber,thatinsectshave"unepetitedosederaison。"Inthenexteditionofyourbook,IhopethatyouwillalterPARTofwhatyousayaboutmygrandfather。
  IamsorrythatyouaresostronglyopposedtotheDescenttheory;Ihavefoundthesearchingforthehistoryofeachstructureorinstinctanexcellentaidtoobservation;andwonderfulobserverasyouare,itwouldsuggestnewpointstoyou。IfIweretowriteontheevolutionofinstincts,Icouldmakegooduseofsomeofthefactswhichyougive。
  Permitmetoadd,thatwhenIreadthelastsentenceinyourbook,I
  sympathiseddeeplywithyou。(ThebookisintendedasamemorialoftheearlydeathofM。Fabre’sson,whohadbeenhisfather’sassistantinhisobservationsoninsectlife。)
  Withthemostsincererespect,Iremain,dearSir,yoursfaithfully,CHARLESDARWIN。
  P。S。——Allowmetomakeasuggestioninrelationtoyourwonderfulaccountofinsectsfindingtheirwayhome。Iformerlywishedtotryitwithpigeons:namely,tocarrytheinsectsintheirpaper"cornets,"aboutahundredpacesintheoppositedirectiontothatwhichyouultimatelyintendedtocarrythem;butbeforeturningroundtoreturn,toputtheinsectinacircularbox,withanaxlewhichcouldbemadetorevolveveryrapidly,firstinonedirection,andtheninanother,soastodestroyforatimeallsenseofdirectionintheinsects。IhavesometimesIMAGINED
  thatanimalsmayfeelinwhichdirectiontheywereatthefirststartcarried。(Thisideawasafavouriteonewithhim,andhehasdescribedin’Nature’(volumevii。1873,page360)thebehaviourofhiscobTommy,inwhomhefanciedhedetectedasenseofdirection。ThehorsehadbeentakenbyrailfromKenttotheIsleofWight;whenthereheexhibitedamarkeddesiretogoeastward,evenwhenhisstablelayintheoppositedirection。
  Inthesamevolumeof’Nature,’page417,isaletteronthe’OriginofCertainInstincts,’whichcontainsashortdiscussiononthesenseofdirection。)Ifthisplanfailed,Ihadintendedplacingthepigeonswithinaninductioncoil,soastodisturbanymagneticordia—magneticsensibility,whichitseemsjustpossiblethattheymaypossess。
  C。D。
  [Duringthelatteryearsofmyfather’slifetherewasagrowingtendencyinthepublictodohimhonour。In1877hereceivedthehonorarydegreeofLL。D。fromtheUniversityofCambridge。ThedegreewasconferredonNovember17,andwiththecustomaryLatinspeechfromthePublicOrator,concludingwiththewords:"Tuvero,quilegesnaturaetamdocteillustraveris,legumdoctornobisesto。"
  ThehonorarydegreeledtoamovementbeingsetonfootintheUniversitytoobtainsomepermanentmemorialofmyfather。Asumofabout400poundswassubscribed,andaftertherejectionoftheideathatabustwouldbethebestmemorial,apicturewasdeterminedon。InJune1879hesattoMr。
  W。RichmondfortheportraitinthepossessionoftheUniversity,nowplacedintheLibraryofthephilosophicalSocietyatCambridge。HeisrepresentedseatedinhisDoctor’sgown,theheadturnedtowardsthespectator:thepicturehasmanyadmirers,but,accordingtomyownview,neithertheattitudenortheexpressionarecharacteristicofmyfather。
  AsimilarwishonthepartoftheLinneanSociety——withwhichmyfatherwassocloselyassociated——ledtohissittinginAugust,1881,toMr。JohnCollier,fortheportraitnowinthepossessionoftheSociety。Oftheartist,hewrote,"Collierwasthemostconsiderate,kindandpleasantpainterasittercoulddesire。"Theportraitrepresentshimstandingfacingtheobserverintheloosecloaksofamiliartothosewhoknewhim,andwithhisslouchhatinhishand。Manyofthosewhoknewhisfacemostintimately,thinkthatMr。Collier’spictureisthebestoftheportraits,andinthisjudgmentthesitterhimselfwasinclinedtoagree。AccordingtomyfeelingitisnotsosimpleorstrongarepresentationofhimasthatgivenbyMr。Ouless。ThereisacertainexpressioninMr。Collier’sportraitwhichIaminclinedtoconsideranexaggerationofthealmostpainfulexpressionwhichProfessorCohnhasdescribedinmyfather’sface,andwhichhehadpreviouslynoticedinHumboldt。ProfessorCohn’sremarksoccurinapleasantlywrittenaccountofavisittoDownin1876,publishedinthe"BreslauerZeitung",April23,1882。(Inthisconnectionmaybementionedavisit(1881)fromanotherdistinguishedGerman,HansRichter。Theoccurrenceisotherwiseworthyofmention,inasmuchasitledtothepublication,aftermyfather’sdeath,ofHerrRichter’srecollectionsofthevisit。Thesketchissimplyandsympatheticallywritten,andtheauthorhassucceededingivingatruepictureofmyfatherashelivedatDown。Itappearedinthe"NeueTagblatt"ofVienna,andwasrepublishedbyDr。O。Zachariasinhis’CharlesR。Darwin,’Berlin,1882。)