Ontheotherhand,withmaleanimals,itisnotoriousthatthesecondarysexualcharactersaremoreorlesscompletelylostwhentheyaresubjectedtocastration。Thus,iftheoperationbeperformedonayoungcock,henever,asYarrellstates,crowsagain;thecomb,wattles,andspursdonotgrowtotheirfullsize,andthehacklesassumeanintermediateappearancebetweentruehacklesandthefeathersofthehen。Casesarerecordedofconfinement,whichoftenaffectsthereproductivesystem,causinganalogousresults。Butcharactersproperlyconfinedtothefemalearelikewiseacquiredbythemale;
  thecapontakestosittingoneggs,andwillbringupchickens;andwhatismorecurious,theutterlysterilemalehybridsfromthepheasantandthefowlactinthesamemanner,"theirdelightbeingtowatchwhenthehensleavetheirnests,andtotakeonthemselvestheofficeofasitter。"(13/57。
  ’CottageGardener’1860page379。)ThatadmirableobserverReaumur(13/58。
  ’ArtdefaireEclore’etc。1749tome2page8。)assertsthatacock,bybeinglongconfinedinsolitudeanddarkness,canbetaughttotakechargeofyoungchickens;hethenuttersapeculiarcry,andretainsduringhiswholelifethisnewlyacquiredmaternalinstinct。Themanywell—ascertainedcasesofvariousmalemammalsgivingmilkshowsthattheirrudimentarymammaryglandsretainthiscapacityinalatentcondition。
  Wethusseethatinmany,probablyinallcases,thesecondarycharactersofeachsexliedormantorlatentintheoppositesex,readytobeevolvedunderpeculiarcircumstances。Wecanthusunderstandhow,forinstance,itispossibleforagoodmilkingcowtotransmithergoodqualitiesthroughhermaleoffspringtofuturegenerations;forwemayconfidentlybelievethatthesequalitiesarepresent,thoughlatent,inthemalesofeachgeneration。
  Soitiswiththegame—cock,whocantransmithissuperiorityincourageandvigourthroughhisfemaletohismaleoffspring;andwithmanitisknown(13/59。SirH。Holland’MedicalNotesandReflections’3rdedition1855page31。)thatdiseases,suchashydrocele,necessarilyconfinedtothemalesex,canbetransmittedthroughthefemaletothegrandson。Suchcasesastheseoffer,aswasremarkedatthecommencementofthischapter,thesimplestpossibleexamplesofreversion;andtheyareintelligibleonthebeliefthatcharacterscommontothegrandparentandgrandchildofthesamesexarepresent,thoughlatent,intheintermediateparentoftheoppositesex。
  Thesubjectoflatentcharactersissoimportant,asweshallseeinafuturechapter,thatIwillgiveanotherillustration。Manyanimalshavetherightandleftsidesoftheirbodyunequallydeveloped:thisiswellknowntobethecasewithflat—fish,inwhichtheonesidediffersinthicknessandcolourandintheshapeofthefins,fromtheother,andduringthegrowthoftheyoungfishoneeyeisgraduallytwistedfromthelowertotheuppersurface。(13/60。
  SeeSteenstruponthe’ObliquityofFlounders’inAnnalsandMag。ofNat。
  Hist。’May1865page361。IhavegivenanabstractofMalm’sexplanationofthiswonderfulphenomenoninthe’OriginofSpecies’6thEditionpage186。)Inmostflat—fishestheleftistheblindside,butinsomeitistheright;
  thoughinbothcasesreversedor"wrongfishes,"areoccasionallydeveloped;
  andinPlatessaflesustherightorleftsideisindifferentlytheupperone。
  Withgasteropodsorshell—fish,therightandleftsidesareextremelyunlike;
  thefargreaternumberofspeciesaredextral,withrareandoccasionalreversalsofdevelopment;andsomefewarenormallysinistral;butcertainspeciesofBulimus,andmanyAchatinellae(13/61。Dr。E。vonMartensin’AnnalsandMag。ofNat。Hist。’March1866page209。)areasoftensinistralasdextral。Iwillgiveananalogouscaseinthegreatarticulatekingdom:thetwosidesofVerruca(13/62。Darwin’Balanidae’RaySoc。1854page499:seealsotheappendedremarksontheapparentlycapriciousdevelopmentofthethoraciclimbsontherightandleftsidesinthehighercrustaceans。)aresowonderfullyunlike,thatwithoutcarefuldissectionitisextremelydifficulttorecognisethecorrespondingpartsontheoppositesidesofthebody;yetitisapparentlyamerematterofchancewhetheritbetherightortheleftsidethatundergoessosingularamountofchange。Oneplantisknowntome(13/63。
  Mormodesignea:Darwin’FertilisationofOrchids’1862page251。)inwhichtheflower,accordingasitstandsontheoneorothersideofthespike,isunequallydeveloped。Inalltheforegoingcasesthetwosidesareperfectlysymmetricalatanearlyperiodofgrowth。Now,wheneveraspeciesisasliabletobeunequallydevelopedontheoneasontheotherside,wemayinferthatthecapacityforsuchdevelopmentispresent,thoughlatent,intheundevelopedside。Andasareversalofdevelopmentoccasionallyoccursinanimalsofmanykinds,thislatentcapacityisprobablyverycommon。
  Thebestyetsimplestcasesofcharacterslyingdormantare,perhaps,thosepreviouslygiven,inwhichchickensandyoungpigeons,raisedfromacrossbetweendifferentlycolouredbirds,areatfirstofonecolour,butinayearortwoacquirefeathersofthecolouroftheotherparent;forinthiscasethetendencytoachangeofplumageisclearlylatentintheyoungbird。Soitiswithhornlessbreedsofcattle,someofwhichacquiresmallhornsastheygrowold。Purelybredblackandwhitebantams,andsomeotherfowls,occasionallyassume,withadvancingyears,theredfeathersoftheparent—
  species。Iwillhereaddasomewhatdifferentcase,asitconnectsinastrikingmannerlatentcharactersoftwoclasses。Mr。Hewitt(13/64。’JournalofHorticulture’July1864page38。IhavehadtheopportunityofexaminingtheseremarkablefeathersthroughthekindnessofMr。Tegetmeier。)possessedanexcellentSebrightgold—lacedbantamhen,which,asshebecameold,grewdiseasedinherovaria,andassumedmalecharacters。Inthisbreedthemalesresemblethefemalesinallrespectsexceptintheircombs,wattles,spurs,andinstincts;henceitmighthavebeenexpectedthatthediseasedhenwouldhaveassumedonlythosemasculinecharacterswhicharepropertothebreed,butsheacquired,inaddition,well—archedtailsickle—feathersquiteafootinlength,saddle—feathersontheloins,andhacklesontheneck,——ornamentswhich,asMr。Hewittremarks,"wouldbeheldasabominableinthisbreed。"TheSebrightbantamisknown(13/65。’ThePoultryBook’byMr。Tegetmeier1866
  page241。)tohaveoriginatedabouttheyear1800fromacrossbetweenacommonbantamandaPolishfowl,recrossedbyahen—tailedbantam,andcarefullyselected;hencetherecanhardlybeadoubtthatthesickle—feathersandhackleswhichappearedintheoldhenwerederivedfromthePolishfowlorcommonbantam;andwethusseethatnotonlycertainmasculinecharacterspropertotheSebrightbantam,butothermasculinecharactersderivedfromthefirstprogenitorsofthebreed,removedbyaperiodofabovesixtyyears,werelyinglatentinthishenbird,readytobeevolvedassoonasherovariabecamediseased。
  Fromtheseseveralfactsitmustbeadmittedthatcertaincharacters,capacities,andinstincts,maylielatentinanindividual,andeveninasuccessionofindividuals,withoutourbeingabletodetecttheleastsignoftheirpresence。Whenfowls,pigeons,orcattleofdifferentcoloursarecrossed,andtheiroffspringchangecolourastheygrowold,orwhenthecrossedturbitacquiredthecharacteristicfrillafteritsthirdmoult,orwhenrarely—bredbantamspartiallyassumetheredplumageoftheirprototype,wecannotdoubtthatthesequalitieswerefromthefirstpresent,thoughlatent,intheindividualanimal,likethecharactersofamothinthecaterpillar。Now,iftheseanimalshadproducedoffspringbeforetheyhadacquiredwithadvancingagetheirnewcharacters,nothingismoreprobablethanthattheywouldhavetransmittedthemtosomeoftheiroffspring,whointhiscasewouldinappearancehavereceivedsuchcharactersfromtheirgrand—
  parentsormoredistantprogenitors。Weshouldthenhavehadacaseofreversion,thatis,ofthereappearanceinthechildofanancestralcharacter,actuallypresent,thoughduringyouthcompletelylatent,intheparent;andthiswemaysafelyconcludeiswhatoccursinallreversionstoprogenitors,howeverremote。
  Thisviewofthelatencyineachgenerationofallthecharacterswhichappearthroughreversion,isalsosupportedbytheiractualpresenceinsomecasesduringearlyyouthalone,orbytheirmorefrequentappearanceandgreaterdistinctnessatthisagethanduringmaturity。Wehaveseenthatthisisoftenthecasewiththestripesonthelegsandfacesoftheseveralspeciesofthehorsegenus。TheHimalayanrabbit,whencrossed,sometimesproducesoffspringwhichreverttotheparentsilver—greybreed,andwehaveseenthatinpurelybredanimalspale—greyfuroccasionallyreappearsduringearlyyouth。Blackcats,wemayfeelassured,wouldoccasionallyproducebyreversiontabbies;
  andonyoungblackkittens,withapedigree(13/66。CarlVogt’LecturesonMan’Englishtranslation1864page411。)knowntohavebeenlongpure,fainttracesofstripesmayalmostalwaysbeseenwhichafterwardsdisappear。
  HornlessSuffolkcattleoccasionallyproducebyreversionhornedanimals;andYouatt(13/67。’OnCattle’page174。)assertsthateveninhornlessindividuals"therudimentofahornmaybeoftenfeltatanearlyage。"
  Nodoubtitappearsatfirstsightinthehighestdegreeimprobablethatineveryhorseofeverygenerationthereshouldbealatentcapacityandtendencytoproducestripes,thoughthesemaynotappearonceinathousandgenerations;thatineverywhite,black,orothercolouredpigeon,whichmayhavetransmitteditspropercolourduringcenturies,thereshouldbealatentcapacityintheplumagetobecomeblueandtobemarkedwithcertaincharacteristicbars;thatineverychildinasix—fingeredfamilythereshouldbethecapacityfortheproductionofanadditionaldigit;andsoinothercases。Nevertheless,thereisnomoreinherentimprobabilityinthisbeingthecasethaninauselessandrudimentaryorgan,oreveninonlyatendencytotheproductionofarudimentaryorgan,beinginheritedduringmillionsofgenerations,asiswellknowntooccurwithamultitudeoforganicbeings。
  Thereisnomoreinherentimprobabilityineachdomesticpig,duringathousandgenerations,retainingthecapacityandtendencytodevelopgreattusksunderfittingconditions,thanintheyoungcalfhavingretained,foranindefinitenumberofgenerationsrudimentaryincisorteeth,whichneverprotrudethroughthegums。
  Ishallgiveattheendofthenextchapterasummaryofthethreeprecedingchapters;butasisolatedandstrikingcasesofreversionhaveherebeenchieflyinsistedon,Iwishtoguardthereaderagainstsupposingthatreversionisduetosomerareoraccidentalcombinationofcircumstances。Whenacharacter,lostduringhundredsofgenerations,suddenlyreappears,nodoubtsomesuchcombinationmustoccur;butreversions,totheimmediatelyprecedinggenerationsmaybeconstantlyobserved,atleast,intheoffspringofmostunions。Thishasbeenuniversallyrecognisedinthecaseofhybridsandmongrels,butithasbeenrecognisedsimplyfromthedifferencebetweentheunitedformsrenderingtheresemblanceoftheoffspringtotheirgrandparentsormoreremoteprogenitorsofeasydetection。Reversionislikewisealmostinvariablytherule,asMr。Sedgwickhasshown,withcertaindiseases。Hencewemustconcludethatatendencytothispeculiarformoftransmissionisanintegralpartofthegenerallawofinheritance。
  MONSTROSITIES。
  Alargenumberofmonstrousgrowthsandoflesseranomaliesareadmittedbyeveryonetobeduetoanarrestofdevelopment,thatis,tothepersistenceofanembryoniccondition。Butmanymonstrositiescannotbethusexplained;
  forpartsofwhichnotracecanbedetectedintheembryo,butwhichoccurinothermembersofthesameclassofanimalsoccasionallyappear,andthesemayprobablywithtruthbeattributedtoreversion。As,however,IhavetreatedthissubjectasfullyasIcouldinmy’DescentofMan’(ch。12ndedition),I
  willnothererecurtoit。
  [Whenflowerswhichhavenormallyanirregularstructurebecomeregularorpeloric,thechangeisgenerallylookedatbybotanistsasareturntotheprimitivestate。ButDr。MaxwellMasters(13/68。’NaturalHist。Review’April1863page258。SeealsohisLecture,RoyalInstitution,March16,1860。OnsamesubjectseeMoquin—Tandon’ElementsdeTeratologie’1841pages184,352。
  Dr。Peyritschhascollectedalargenumberofveryinterestingcases’Sitzb。
  d。k。Akad。d。Wissensch。’Wienb。60andespeciallyb。661872page125。),whohasablydiscussedthissubject,remarksthatwhen,forinstance,allthesepalsofaTropaeolumbecomegreenandofthesameshape,insteadofbeingcolouredwithoneprolongedintoaspur,orwhenallthepetalsofaLinariabecomesimpleandregular,suchcasesmaybeduemerelytoanarrestofdevelopment;forintheseflowersalltheorgansduringtheirearliestconditionaresymmetrical,and,ifarrestedatthisstageofgrowth,theywouldnotbecomeirregular。If,moreover,thearrestweretotakeplaceatastillearlierperiodofdevelopment,theresultwouldbeasimpletuftofgreenleaves;andnooneprobablywouldcallthisacaseofreversion。Dr。
  Mastersdesignatesthecasesfirstalludedtoasregularpeloria;andothers,inwhichallthecorrespondingpartsassumeasimilarformofirregularity,aswhenallthepetalsinaLinariabecomespurred,asirregularpeloria。Wehavenorighttoattributetheselattercasestoreversion,untilitcanbeshownthattheparent—form,forinstance,ofthegenusLinariahadhadallitspetalsspurred;forachanceofthisnaturemightresultfromthespreadingofananomalousstructure,inaccordancewiththelaw,tobediscussedinafuturechapter,ofhomologouspartstendingtovaryinthesamemanner。ButasbothformsofpeloriafrequentlyoccuronthesameindividualplantoftheLinaria(13/69。Verlot’DesVarietes’1865page89;Naudin’NouvellesArchivesduMuseum’tome1page137。),theyprobablystandinsomecloserelationtooneanother。Onthedoctrinethatpeloriaissimplytheresultofanarrestofdevelopment,itisdifficulttounderstandhowanorganarrestedataveryearlyperiodofgrowthshouldacquireitsfullfunctionalperfection;——howapetal,supposedtobethusarrested,shouldacquireitsbrilliantcolours,andserveasanenvelopetotheflower,orastamenproduceefficientpollen;yetthisoccurswithmanypeloricflowers。Thatpelorismisnotduetomerechancevariability,buteithertoanarrestofdevelopmentortoreversion,wemayinferfromanobservationmadebyCh。Morren(13/70。InhisdiscussiononsomecuriouspeloricCalceolariasquotedin’JournalofHorticulture’February24,1863page152。)namely,thatfamilieswhichhaveirregularflowersoften"returnbythesemonstrousgrowthstotheirregularform;whilstweneverseearegularflowerrealisethestructureofanirregularone。"
  Someflowershavealmostcertainlybecomemoreorlesscompletelypeloricthroughreversion,asthefollowinginterestingcaseshows。Corydalistuberosaproperlyhasoneofitstwonectariescolourless,destituteofnectar,onlyhalfthesizeoftheother,andtherefore,toacertainextent,inarudimentarystate;thepistiliscurvedtowardstheperfectnectary,andthehood,formedoftheinnerpetals,slipsoffthepistilandstameninonedirectionalone,sothat,whenabeesuckstheperfectnectary,thestigmaandstamensareexposedandrubbedagainsttheinsect’sbody。Inseveralcloselyalliedgenera,asinDielytra,etc。,therearetwoperfectnectaries,thepistilisstraight,andthehoodslipsoffoneitherside,accordingasthebeesuckseithernectary。Now,IhaveexaminedseveralflowersofCorydalistuberosa,inwhichbothnectarieswereequallydevelopedandcontainednectar;
  inthisweseeonlytheredevelopmentofapartiallyabortedorgan;butwiththisredevelopmentthepistilbecomesstraight,andthehoodslipsoffineitherdirection,sothattheseflowershaveacquiredtheperfectstructure,sowelladaptedforinsectagency,ofDielytraanditsallies。Wecannotattributethesecoadaptedmodificationstochance,ortocorrelatedvariability;wemustattributethemtoreversiontoaprimordialconditionofthespecies。
  ThepeloricflowersofPelargoniumhavetheirfivepetalsinallrespectsalike,andthereisnonectarysothattheyresemblethesymmetricalflowersofthecloselyalliedgenusGeranium;butthealternatestamensarealsosometimesdestituteofanthers,theshortenedfilamentsbeingleftasrudiments,andinthisrespecttheyresemblethesymmetricalflowersofthecloselyalliedgenusErodium。HencewemaylookatthepeloricflowersofPelargoniumashavingrevertedtothestateofsomeprimordialform,theprogenitorofthethreecloselyrelatedgeneraofPelargonium,Geranium,andErodium。
  InthepeloricformofAntirrhinummajus,appropriatelycalledthe"Wonder,"
  thetubularandelongatedflowersdifferwonderfullyfromthoseofthecommonsnapdragon;thecalyxandthemouthofthecorollaconsistofsixequallobes,andincludesixequalinsteadoffourunequalstamens。Oneofthetwoadditionalstamensismanifestlyformedbythedevelopmentofamicroscopicallyminutepapilla,whichmaybefoundatthebaseoftheupperlipoftheflowerofthecommonsnapdragonsinthenineteenplantsexaminedbyme。ThatthispapillaisarudimentofastamenwaswellshownbyitsvariousdegreesofdevelopmentincrossedplantsbetweenthecommonandthepeloricAntirrhinum。Again,apeloricGaleobdolonluteum,growinginmygarden,hadfiveequalpetals,allstripedliketheordinarylowerlip,andincludedfiveequalinsteadoffourunequalstamens;butMr。R。Keeley,whosentmethisplant,informsmethattheflowersvarygreatly,havingfromfourtosixlobestothecorolla,andfromthreetosixstamens。(13/71。ForothercasesofsixdivisionsinpeloricflowersoftheLabiataeandScrophulariaceaeseeMoquin—
  Tandon’Teratologie’page192。)Now,asthemembersofthetwogreatfamiliestowhichtheAntirrhinumandGaleobdolonbelongareproperlypentamerous,withsomeofthepartsconfluentandotherssuppressed,weoughtnottolookatthesixthstamenandthesixthlobetothecorollaineithercaseasduetoreversion,anymorethantheadditionalpetalsindoubleflowersinthesesametwofamilies。ButthecaseisdifferentwiththefifthstameninthepeloricAntirrhinum,whichisproducedbytheredevelopmentofarudimentalwayspresent,andwhichprobablyrevealstousthestateoftheflower,asfarasthestamensareconcerned,atsomeancientepoch。Itisalsodifficulttobelievethattheotherfourstamensandthepetals,afteranarrestofdevelopmentataveryearlyembryonicage,wouldhavecometofullperfectionincolour,structure,andfunction,unlesstheseorganshadatsomeformerperiodnormallypassedthroughasimilarcourseofgrowth。HenceitappearstomeprobablethattheprogenitorofthegenusAntirrhinummustatsomeremoteepochhaveincludedfivestamensandborneflowersinsomedegreeresemblingthosenowproducedbythepeloricform。Theconclusionthatpeloriaisnotameremonstrosity,irrespectiveofanyformerstateofthespecies,issupportedbythefactthatthisstructureisoftenstronglyinherited,asinthecaseofthepeloricAntirrhinumandGloxiniaandsometimesinthatofthepeloricCorydalissolida。(13/72。Godronreprintedfromthe’Memoiresdel’Acad。deStanislas’1868。)
  LastlyImayaddthatmanyinstanceshavebeenrecordedofflowers,notgenerallyconsideredaspeloric,inwhichcertainorgansareabnormallyaugmentedinnumber。Asanincreaseofpartscannotbelookedatasanarrestofdevelopment,norasduetotheredevelopmentofrudiments,fornorudimentsarepresent,andastheseadditionalpartsbringtheplantintocloserrelationshipwithitsnaturalallies,theyoughtprobablytobeviewedasreversionstoaprimordialcondition。]
  Theseseveralfactsshowusinaninterestingmannerhowintimatelycertainabnormalstatesareconnectedtogether;namely,arrestsofdevelopmentcausingpartstobecomerudimentaryortobewhollysuppressed,——theredevelopmentofpartsnowinamoreorlessrudimentarycondition,——thereappearanceoforgansofwhichnotavestigecanbedetected,——andtothesemaybeadded,inthecaseofanimals,thepresenceduringyouth,andsubsequentdisappearance,ofcertaincharacterswhichoccasionallyareretainedthroughoutlife。Somenaturalistslookatallsuchabnormalstructuresasareturntotheidealstateofthegrouptowhichtheaffectedbeingbelongs;butitisdifficulttoconceivewhatismeanttobeconveyedbythisexpression。Othernaturalistsmaintain,withgreaterprobabilityanddistinctnessofview,thatthecommonbondofconnectionbetweentheseveralforegoingcasesisanactual,thoughpartial,returntothestructureoftheancientprogenitorofthegroup。Ifthisviewbecorrect,wemustbelievethatavastnumberofcharacters,capableofevolution,liehiddenineveryorganicbeing。Butitwouldbeamistaketosupposethatthenumberisequallygreatinallbeings。Weknow,forinstance,thatplantsofmanyordersoccasionallybecomepeloric;butmanymorecaseshavebeenobservedintheLabiataeandScrophulariaceaethaninanyotherorder;andinonegenusoftheScrophulariaceae,namelyLinaria,nolessthanthirteenspecieshavebeendescribedinthiscondition(13/73。Moquin—
  Tandon’Teratologie’page186。)Onthisviewofthenatureofpeloricflowers,andbearinginmindcertainmonstrositiesintheanimalkingdom,wemustconcludethattheprogenitorsofmostplantsandanimalshaveleftanimpression,capableofredevelopment,onthegermsoftheirdescendants,althoughthesehavesincebeenprofoundlymodified。
  Thefertilisedgermofoneofthehigheranimals,subjectedasitistosovastaseriesofchangesfromthegerminalcelltooldage,——incessantlyagitatedbywhatQuatrefageswellcallsthetourbillonvital,——isperhapsthemostwonderfulobjectinnature。Itisprobablethathardlyachangeofanykindaffectseitherparent,withoutsomemarkbeingleftonthegerm。Butonthedoctrineofreversion,asgiveninthischapter,thegermbecomesafarmoremarvellousobject,for,besidesthevisiblechangeswhichitundergoes,wemustbelievethatitiscrowdedwithinvisiblecharacters,propertobothsexes,toboththerightandleftsideofthebody,andtoalonglineofmaleandfemaleancestorsseparatedbyhundredsoreventhousandsofgenerationsfromthepresenttime:andthesecharacters,likethosewrittenonpaperwithinvisibleink,liereadytobeevolvedwhenevertheorganisationisdisturbedbycertainknownorunknownconditions。
  CHAPTER2。XIV。
  INHERITANCEcontinued。——FIXEDNESSOFCHARACTER——PREPOTENCY——SEXUALLIMITATION
  ——CORRESPONDENCEOFAGE。
  FIXEDNESSOFCHARACTERAPPARENTLYNOTDUETOANTIQUITYOFINHERITANCE。
  PREPOTENCYOFTRANSMISSIONININDIVIDUALSOFTHESAMEFAMILY,INCROSSED
  BREEDSANDSPECIES;OFTENSTRONGERINONESEXTHANTHEOTHER;SOMETIMESDUETO
  THESAMECHARACTERBEINGPRESENTANDVISIBLEINONEBREEDANDLATENTINTHE
  OTHER。
  INHERITANCEASLIMITEDBYSEX。
  NEWLY—ACQUIREDCHARACTERSINOURDOMESTICATEDANIMALSOFTENTRANSMITTEDBYONE
  SEXALONE,SOMETIMESLOSTBYONESEXALONE。
  INHERITANCEATCORRESPONDINGPERIODSOFLIFE。
  THEIMPORTANCEOFTHEPRINCIPLEWITHRESPECTTOEMBRYOLOGY;ASEXHIBITEDIN
  DOMESTICATEDANIMALS:ASEXHIBITEDINTHEAPPEARANCEANDDISAPPEARANCEOF
  INHERITEDDISEASES;SOMETIMESSUPERVENINGEARLIERINTHECHILDTHANIN
  THEPARENT。
  SUMMARYOFTHETHREEPRECEDINGCHAPTERS。
  InthelasttwochaptersthenatureandforceofInheritance,thecircumstanceswhichinterferewithitspower,andthetendencytoReversion,withitsmanyremarkablecontingencies,werediscussed。Inthepresentchaptersomeotherrelatedphenomenawillbetreatedof,asfullyasmymaterialspermit。
  FIXEDNESSOFCHARACTER。
  Itisageneralbeliefamongstbreedersthatthelongeranycharacterhasbeentransmittedbyabreed,themorefullyitwillcontinuetobetransmitted。I
  donotwishtodisputethetruthofthepropositionthatinheritancegainsstrengthsimplythroughlongcontinuance,butIdoubtwhetheritcanbeproved。Inonesensethepropositionislittlebetterthanatruism;ifanycharacterhasremainedconstantduringmanygenerations,itwillbelikelytocontinueso,iftheconditionsofliferemainthesame。So,again,inimprovingabreed,ifcarebetakenforalengthoftimetoexcludeallinferiorindividuals,thebreedwillobviouslytendtobecometruer,asitwillnothavebeencrossedduringmanygenerationsbyaninferioranimal。Wehavepreviouslyseen,butwithoutbeingabletoassignanycause,that,whenanewcharacterappears,itisoccasionallyfromthefirstconstant,orfluctuatesmuch,orwhollyfailstobetransmitted。Soitiswiththeaggregateofslightdifferenceswhichcharacteriseanewvariety,forsomepropagatetheirkindfromthefirstmuchtruerthanothers。Evenwithplantsmultipliedbybulbs,layers,etc。,whichmayinonesensebesaidtoformpartsofthesameindividual,itiswellknownthatcertainvarietiesretainandtransmitthroughsuccessivebud—generationstheirnewly—acquiredcharactersmoretrulythanothers。Innoneofthese,norinthefollowingcases,doesthereappeartobeanyrelationbetweentheforcewithwhichacharacteristransmittedandthelengthoftimeduringwhichithasbeentransmitted。Somevarieties,suchaswhiteandyellowhyacinthsandwhitesweet—peas,transmittheircoloursmorefaithfullythandothevarietieswhichhaveretainedtheirnaturalcolour。IntheIrishfamily,mentionedinthetwelfthchapter,thepeculiartortoiseshell—likecolouringoftheeyeswastransmittedfarmorefaithfullythananyordinarycolour。AnconandMauchampsheepandniatacattle,whichareallcomparativelymodernbreeds,exhibitremarkablystrongpowersofinheritance。Manysimilarcasescouldbeadduced。
  Asalldomesticatedanimalsandcultivatedplantshavevaried,andyetaredescendedfromaboriginallywildforms,whichnodoubthadretainedthesamecharacterfromanimmenselyremoteepoch,weseethatscarcelyanydegreeofantiquityensuresacharacterbeingtransmittedperfectlytrue。Inthiscase,however,itmaybesaidthatchangedconditionsoflifeinducecertainmodifications,andnotthatthepowerofinheritancefails;butineverycaseoffailure,somecause,eitherinternalorexternal,mustinterfere。Itwillgenerallybefoundthattheorgansorpartswhichinourdomesticatedproductionshavevaried,orwhichstillcontinuetovary,——thatis,whichfailtoretaintheirformerstate,——arethesamewiththepartswhichdifferinthenaturalspeciesofthesamegenus。As,onthetheoryofdescentwithmodification,thespeciesofthesamegenushavebeenmodifiedsincetheybranchedofffromacommonprogenitor,itfollowsthatthecharactersbywhichtheydifferfromoneanotherhavevaried,whilstotherpartsoftheorganisationhaveremainedunchanged;anditmightbearguedthatthesesamecharactersnowvaryunderdomestication,orfailtobeinherited,fromtheirlesserantiquity。Butvariationinastateofnatureseemstostandinsomecloserelationwithchangedconditionsoflife,andcharacterswhichhavealreadyvariedundersuchconditionswouldbeapttovaryunderthestillgreaterchangesconsequentondomestication,independentlyoftheirgreaterorlessantiquity。
  Fixednessofcharacter,orthestrengthofinheritance,hasoftenbeenjudgedofbythepreponderanceofcertaincharactersinthecrossedoffspringbetweendistinctraces;butprepotencyoftransmissionherecomesintoplay,andthis,asweshallimmediatelysee,isaverydifferentconsiderationfromthestrengthorweaknessofinheritance。(14/1。See’YouattonCattle’pages92,69,78,88,163;and’YouattonSheep’page325。AlsoDr。Lucas’L’Hered。
  Nat。’tome2page310。)Ithasoftenbeenobservedthatbreedsofanimalsinhabitingwildandmountainouscountriescannotbepermanentlymodifiedbyourimprovedbreeds;andastheselatterareofmodernorigin,ithasbeenthoughtthatthegreaterantiquityofthewilderbreedshasbeenthecauseoftheirresistancetoimprovementbycrossing;butitismoreprobablyduetotheirstructureandconstitutionbeingbetteradaptedtothesurroundingconditions。Whenplantsarefirstsubjectedtoculture,ithasbeenfoundthat,duringseveralgenerations,theytransmittheircharacterstruly,thatis,donotvary,andthishasbeenattributedtoancientcharactersbeingstronglyinherited:butitmaywithequalorgreaterprobabilitybeconsequentonchangedconditionsofliferequiringalongtimefortheircumulativeaction。Notwithstandingtheseconsiderations,itwouldperhapsberashtodenythatcharactersbecomemorestronglyfixedthelongertheyaretransmitted;
  butIbelievethatthepropositionresolvesitselfintothis,——thatcharactersofallkinds,whetherneworold,tendtobeinherited,andthatthosewhichhavealreadywithstoodallcounteractinginfluencesandbeentrulytransmitted,will,asageneralrule,continuetowithstandthem,andconsequentlybefaithfullyinherited。
  PREPOTENCYINTHETRANSMISSIONOFCHARACTER。
  Whenindividuals,belongingtothesamefamily,butdistinctenoughtoberecognised,orwhentwowell—markedraces,ortwospecies,arecrossed,theusualresult,asstatedinthepreviouschapter,is,thattheoffspringinthefirstgenerationareintermediatebetweentheirparents,orresembleoneparentinonepartandtheotherparentinanotherpart。Butthisisbynomeanstheinvariablerule;forinmanycasesitisfoundthatcertainindividuals,races,andspecies,areprepotentintransmittingtheirlikeness。
  ThissubjecthasbeenablydiscussedbyProsperLucas(14/2。’Hered。Nat。’
  tome2pages112—120。),butisrenderedextremelycomplexbytheprepotencysometimesrunningequallyinbothsexes,andsometimesmorestronglyinonesexthanintheother;itislikewisecomplicatedbythepresenceofsecondarysexualcharacters,whichrenderthecomparisonofcrossedbreedswiththeirparentsdifficult。
  Itwouldappearthatincertainfamiliessomeoneancestor,andafterhimothersinthesamefamily,havehadgreatpowerintransmittingtheirlikenessthroughthemaleline;forwecannototherwiseunderstandhowthesamefeaturesshouldsooftenbetransmittedaftermarriageswithmanyfemales,asinthecaseoftheAustrianEmperors;andsoitwas,accordingtoNiebuhr,withthementalqualitiesofcertainRomanfamilies。(14/3。SirH。Holland’ChaptersonMentalPhysiology’1852page234。)ThefamousbullFavouriteisbelieved(14/4。’Gardener’sChronicle’1860page270。)tohavehadaprepotentinfluenceontheshorthornrace。Ithasalsobeenobserved(14/5。Mr。N。H。
  Smith’ObservationsonBreeding’quotedin’Encyclop。ofRuralSports’page278。)withEnglishracehorsesthatcertainmareshavegenerallytransmittedtheirowncharacter,whilstothermaresofequallypurebloodhaveallowedthecharacterofthesiretoprevail。Afamousblackgreyhound,Bedlamite,asI
  hearfromMr。C。M。Brown"invariablygotallhispuppiesblack,nomatterwhatwasthecolourofthebitch;"butthenBedlamite"hadapreponderanceofblackinhisblood,bothonthesireanddamside。"
  [Thetruthoftheprincipleofprepotencycomesoutmoreclearlywhendistinctracesarecrossed。TheimprovedShorthorns,notwithstandingthatthebreediscomparativelymodern,aregenerallyacknowledgedtopossessgreatpowerinimpressingtheirlikenessonallotherbreeds;anditischieflyinconsequenceofthispowerthattheyaresohighlyvaluedforexportation。
  (14/6。QuotedbyBronn’GeshichtederNatur’b。2s。170。SeeSturm’UeberRacen’1825s。104—107。Fortheniatacattleseemy’JournalofResearches’
  1845page146。)Godinehasgivenacuriouscaseofaramofagoat—likebreedofsheepfromtheCapeofGoodHope,whichproducedoffspringhardlytobedistinguishedfromhimself,whencrossedwithewesoftwelveotherbreeds。Buttwoofthesehalf—bredewes,whenputtoamerinoram,producedlambscloselyresemblingthemerinobreed。GiroudeBuzareingues(14/7。Lucas’L’HerediteNat。’tome2page112。)foundthatoftworacesofFrenchsheeptheewesofone,whencrossedduringsuccessivegenerationswithmerinorams,yieldeduptheircharacterfarsoonerthantheewesoftheotherrace。SturmandGirouhavegivenanalogouscaseswithotherbreedsofsheepandwithcattle,theprepotencyrunninginthesecasesthroughthemaleside;butIwasassuredongoodauthorityinSouthAmerica,thatwhenniatacattlearecrossedwithcommoncattle,thoughtheniatabreedisprepotentwhethermalesorfemalesareused,yetthattheprepotencyisstrongestthroughthefemaleline。TheManxcatistaillessandhaslonghindlegs;Dr。WilsoncrossedamaleManxwithcommoncats,and,outoftwenty—threekittens,seventeenweredestituteoftails;butwhenthefemaleManxwascrossedbycommonmalecatsallthekittenshadtails,thoughtheyweregenerallyshortandimperfect。(14/8。Mr。
  Orton’PhysiologyofBreeding’1855page9。)
  Inmakingreciprocalcrossesbetweenpouterandfantailpigeons,thepouter—
  raceseemedtobeprepotentthroughbothsexesoverthefantail。Butthisisprobablyduetoweakpowerinthefantailratherthantoanyunusuallystrongpowerinthepouter,forIhaveobservedthatbarbsalsopreponderateoverfantails。Thisweaknessoftransmissioninthefantail,thoughthebreedisanancientone,issaid(14/9。BoitardandCorbie’LesPigeons’1824page224。)
  tobegeneral;butIhaveobservedoneexceptiontotherule,namely,inacrossbetweenafantailandlaugher。Themostcuriousinstanceknowntomeofweakpowerinbothsexesisinthetrumpeterpigeon。Thisbreedhasbeenwellknownforatleast130years:itbreedsperfectlytrue,asIhavebeenassuredbythosewhohavelongkeptmanybirds:itischaracterisedbyapeculiartuftoffeathersoverthebeak,byacrestonthehead,byasingularcooquiteunlikethatofanyotherbreed,andbymuch—featheredfeet。Ihavecrossedbothsexeswithturbitsoftwosub—breeds,withalmondtumblers,spots,andrunts,andrearedmanymongrelsandrecrossedthem;andthoughthecrestontheheadandfeatheredfeetwereinherited(asisgenerallythecasewithmostbreeds),Ihaveneverseenavestigeofthetuftoverthebeakorheardthepeculiarcoo。BoitardandCorbie(14/10。’LesPigeons’pages168,198。)assertthatthisistheinvariableresultofcrossingtrumpeterswithotherbreeds:
  Neumeister(14/11。’DasGanze’etc。1837s。39。),however,statesthatinGermanymongrelshavebeenobtained,thoughveryrarely,whichwerefurnishedwiththetuftandwouldtrumpet:butapairofthesemongrelswithatuft,whichIimported,nevertrumpeted。Mr。Brentstates(14/12。’ThePigeonBook’
  page46。)thatthecrossedoffspringofatrumpeterwerecrossedwithtrumpetersforthreegenerations,bywhichtimethemongrelshad7/8thsofthisbloodintheirveins,yetthetuftoverthebeakdidnotappear。Atthefourthgenerationthetuftappeared,butthebirdsthoughnowhaving15—16thstrumpeter’sbloodstilldidnottrumpet。Thiscasewellshowsthewidedifferencebetweeninheritanceandprepotency;forherewehaveawell—
  establishedoldracewhichtransmitsitscharactersfaithfully,butwhich,whencrossedwithanyotherrace,hasthefeeblestpoweroftransmittingitstwochiefcharacteristicqualities。
  Iwillgiveoneotherinstancewithfowlsandpigeonsofweaknessandstrengthinthetransmissionofthesamecharactertotheircrossedoffspring。TheSilkfowlbreedstrue,andthereisreasontobelieveisaveryancientrace;butwhenIrearedalargenumberofmongrelsfromaSilkhenbyaSpanishcock,notoneexhibitedevenatraceoftheso—calledsilkiness。Mr。Hewittalsoassertsthatinnoinstancearethesilkyfeatherstransmittedbythisbreedwhencrossedwithanyothervariety。ButthreebirdsoutofmanyraisedbyMr。
  Ortonfromacrossbetweenasilkcockandabantamhenhadsilkyfeathers。
  (14/13。’PhysiologyofBreeding’page22;Mr。Hewittin’ThePoultryBook’byTegetmeier1866page224。)Sothatitiscertainthatthisbreedveryseldomhasthepoweroftransmittingitspeculiarplumagetoitscrossedprogeny。Ontheotherhand,thereisasilksub—varietyofthefantailpigeon,whichhasitsfeathersinnearlythesamestateasintheSilkfowl:nowwehavealreadyseenthatfantails,whencrossed,possesssingularlyweakpowerintransmittingtheirgeneralqualities;butthesilksub—varietywhencrossedwithanyothersmall—sizedraceinvariablytransmitsitssilkyfeathers!
  (14/14。BoitardandCorbie’LesPigeons’1824page226。)
  Thewell—knownhorticulturist,Mr。Paul,informsmethathefertilisedtheBlackPrincehollyhockwithpollenoftheWhiteGlobeandtheLemonadeandBlackPrincehollyhocksreciprocally;butnotoneseedlingfromthesethreecrossesinheritedtheblackcolouroftheBlackPrince。So,again,Mr。Laxton,whohashadsuchgreatexperienceincrossingpeas,writestomethat"wheneveracrosshasbeeneffectedbetweenawhite—blossomedandapurple—
  blossomedpea,orbetweenawhite—seededandapurple—spotted,brownormaple—
  seededpea,theoffspringseemstolosenearlyallthecharacteristicsofthewhite—floweredandwhite—seededvarieties;andthisresultfollowswhetherthesevarietieshavebeenusedasthepollen—bearingorseed—producingparents。"
  Thelawofprepotencycomesintoactionwhenspeciesarecrossed,aswithracesandindividuals。Gartnerhasunequivocallyshown(14/15。
  ’Bastarderzeugung’s。256,290,etc。Naudin’NouvellesArchivesduMuseum’
  tome1page149givesastrikinginstanceofprepotencyinDaturastramoniumwhencrossedwithtwootherspecies。)thatthisisthecasewithplants。Togiveoneinstance:whenNicotianapaniculataandvincaefloraarecrossed,thecharacterofN。paniculataisalmostcompletelylostinthehybrid;butifN。
  quadrivalvisbecrossedwithN。vincaeflora,thislatterspecies,whichwasbeforesoprepotent,nowinitsturnalmostdisappearsunderthepowerofN。
  quadrivalvis。Itisremarkablethattheprepotencyofonespeciesoveranotherintransmissionisquiteindependent,asshownbyGartner,ofthegreaterorlessfacilitywithwhichtheonefertilisestheother。
  Withanimals,thejackalisprepotentoverthedog,asisstatedbyFlourens,whomademanycrossesbetweentheseanimals;andthiswaslikewisethecasewithahybridwhichIoncesawbetweenajackalandaterrier。Icannotdoubt,fromtheobservationsofColinandothers,thattheassisprepotentoverthehorse;theprepotencyinthisinstancerunningmorestronglythroughthemalethanthroughthefemaleass;sothatthemuleresemblestheassmorecloselythandoesthehinny。(14/16。Flourens’LongeviteHumaine’page144oncrossedjackals。WithrespecttothedifferencebetweenthemuleandthehinnyIamawarethatthishasgenerallybeenattributedtothesireanddamtransmittingtheircharactersdifferently;butColin,whohasgiveninhis’TraitePhys。
  Comp。’tome2pages537—539,thefullestdescriptionwhichIhavemetwithofthesereciprocalhybrids,isstronglyofopinionthattheasspreponderatesinbothcrosses,butinanunequaldegree。ThisislikewisetheconclusionofFlourens,andofBechsteininhis’NaturgeschichteDeutschlands’b。1s。294。
  Thetailofthehinnyismuchmorelikethatofthehorsethanisthetailofthemule,andthisisgenerallyaccountedforbythemalesofbothspeciestransmittingwithgreaterpowerthispartoftheirstructure;butacompoundhybridwhichIsawintheZoologicalGardens,fromamarebyahybridass—
  zebra,closelyresembleditsmotherinitstail。)Themalepheasant,judgingfromMr。Hewitt’sdescriptions(14/17。Mr。Hewittwhohashadsuchgreatexperienceinraisingthesehybridssays(’PoultryBook’byMr。Tegetmeier1866pages165—167)thatinall,theheadwasdestituteofwattles,comb,andear—lappets;andallcloselyresembledthepheasantintheshapeofthetailandgeneralcontourofthebody。Thesehybridswereraisedfromhensofseveralbreedsbyacock—pheasant;butanotherhybrid,describedbyMr。
  Hewitt,wasraisedfromahen—pheasant,byasilver—lacedBantamcock,andthispossessedarudimentalcombandwattles。),andfromthehybridswhichI
  haveseen,preponderatesoverthedomesticfowl;butthelatter,asfarascolourisconcerned,hasconsiderablepoweroftransmission,forhybridsraisedfromfivedifferentlycolouredhensdifferedgreatlyinplumage。I
  formerlyexaminedsomecurioushybridsintheZoologicalGardens,betweenthePenguinvarietyofthecommonduckandtheEgyptiangoose(Anseraegyptiacus);
  andalthoughIwillnotassertthatthedomesticatedvarietypreponderatedoverthenaturalspecies,yetithadstronglyimpresseditsunnaturaluprightfigureonthesehybrids。
  Iamawarethatsuchcasesastheforegoinghavebeenascribedbyvariousauthors,nottoonespecies,race,orindividualbeingprepotentovertheotherinimpressingitscharacteronitscrossedoffspring,buttosuchrulesasthatthefatherinfluencestheexternalcharactersandthemothertheinternalorvitalorgans。Butthegreatdiversityoftherulesgivenbyvariousauthorsalmostprovestheirfalseness。Dr。ProsperLucashasfullydiscussedthispoint,andhasshown(14/18。’L’Hered。Nat。’tome2book2
  chapter1。)thatnoneoftherules(andIcouldaddotherstothosequotedbyhim)applytoallanimals。Similarruleshavebeenannouncedforplants,andhavebeenprovedbyGartner(14/19。’Bastarderzeugung’s。264—266。Naudin’NouvellesArchivesduMuseum’tome1page148hasarrivedatasimilarconclusion。)tobeallerroneous。Ifweconfineourviewtothedomesticatedracesofasinglespecies,orperhapseventothespeciesofthesamegenus,somesuchrulesmayholdgood;forinstance,itseemsthatinreciprocallycrossingvariousbreedsoffowlsthemalegenerallygivescolour(14/20。
  ’CottageGardener’1856pages101,137。);butconspicuousexceptionshavepassedundermyowneyes。Itseemsthattheramusuallygivesitspeculiarhornsandfleecetoitscrossedoffspring,andthebullthepresenceorabsenceofhorns。
  InthefollowingchapteronCrossingIshallhaveoccasiontoshowthatcertaincharactersarerarelyorneverblendedbycrossing,butaretransmittedinanunmodifiedstatefromeitherparent—form;Irefertothisfactherebecauseitissometimesaccompaniedontheonesidebyprepotency,whichthusacquiresthefalseappearanceofunusualstrength。InthesamechapterIshallshowthattherateatwhichaspeciesorbreedabsorbsandobliteratesanotherbyrepeatedcrosses,dependsinchiefpartonprepotencyintransmission。]
  Inconclusion,someofthecasesabovegiven,——forinstance,thatofthetrumpeterpigeon,——provethatthereisawidedifferencebetweenmereinheritanceandprepotency。Thislatterpowerseemstous,inourignorance,toactinmostcasesquitecapriciously。Theverysamecharacter,eventhoughitbeanabnormalormonstrousone,suchassilkyfeathers,maybetransmittedbydifferentspecies,whencrossed,eitherwithprepotentforceorsingularfeebleness。Itisobvious,thatapurely—bredformofeithersex,inallcasesinwhichprepotencydoesnotrunmorestronglyinonesexthantheother,willtransmititscharacterwithprepotentforceoveramongrelisedandalreadyvariableform。(14/21。SeesomeremarksonthisheadwithrespecttosheepbyMr。Wilsonin’Gardener’sChronicle’1863page15。ManystrikinginstancesofthisresultaregivenbyM。Malingie—Nouel’Journ。R。Agricult。Soc。’volume141853page220withrespecttocrossesbetweenEnglishandFrenchsheep。HefoundthatheobtainedthedesiredinfluenceoftheEnglishbreedsbycrossingintentionallymongrelisedFrenchbreedswithpureEnglishbreeds。)Fromseveraloftheabove—givencaseswemayconcludethatmereantiquityofcharacterdoesnotbyanymeansnecessarilymakeitprepotent。Insomecasesprepotencyapparentlydependsonthesamecharacterbeingpresentandvisibleinoneofthetwobreedswhicharecrossed,andlatentorinvisibleintheotherbreed;andinthiscaseitisnaturalthatthecharacterwhichispotentiallypresentinbothbreedsshouldbeprepotent。Thus,wehavereasontobelievethatthereisalatenttendencyinallhorsestobedun—colouredandstriped;andwhenahorseofthiskindiscrossedwithoneofanyothercolour,itissaidthattheoffspringarealmostsuretobestriped。Sheephaveasimilarlatenttendencytobecomedark—coloured,andwehaveseenwithwhatprepotentforcearamwithafewblackspots,whencrossedwithwhitesheepofvariousbreeds,coloureditsoffspring。Allpigeonshavealatenttendencytobecomeslaty—blue,withcertaincharacteristicmarks,anditisknownthat,whenabirdthuscolourediscrossedwithoneofanyothercolour,itismostdifficultafterwardstoeradicatethebluetint。Anearlyparallelcaseisofferedbythoseblackbantamswhich,astheygrowold,developalatenttendencytoacquireredfeathers。Butthereareexceptionstotherule:
  hornlessbreedsofcattlepossessalatentcapacitytoreproducehorns,yetwhencrossedwithhornedbreedstheydonotinvariablyproduceoffspringbearinghorns。
  Wemeetwithanalogouscaseswithplants。Stripedflowers,thoughtheycanbepropagatedtrulybyseed,havealatenttendencytobecomeuniformlycoloured,butwhenoncecrossedbyauniformlycolouredvariety,theyeverafterwardsfailtoproducestripedseedlings。(14/22。Verlot’DesVarietes’1865page66。)Anothercaseisinsomerespectsmorecurious:plantsbearingpeloricflowershavesostrongalatenttendencytoreproducetheirnormallyirregularflowers,thatthisoftenoccursbybudswhenaplantistransplantedintopoorerorrichersoil。(14/23。Moquin—Tandon’Teratologie’page191。)NowI
  crossedthepeloricsnapdragon(Antirrhinummajus),describedinthelastchapter,withpollenofthecommonform;andthelatter,reciprocally,withpeloricpollen。Ithusraisedtwogreatbedsofseedlings,andnotonewaspeloric。Naudin(14/24。’NouvellesArchivesduMuseum’tome1page137。)
  obtainedthesameresultfromcrossingapeloricLinariawiththecommonform。