Yetthebattlethatcostthemmostwoundswasprobablythatwhichtheyfoughtindefenseoftheirownrighttosocialveracityandsincerityintheirthee-ingandthou-ing,innotdoffingthehatorgivingtitlesofrespect。ItwaslaidonGeorgeFoxthattheseconventionalcustomswerealieandasham,andthewholebodyofhisfollowersthereuponrenouncedthem,asasacrificetotruth,andsothattheiractsandthespirittheyprofessedmightbemoreinaccord。
  “WhentheLordsentmeintotheworld。”saysFoxinhisJournal,“heforbademetoputoffmyhattoany,highorlow:andIwasrequiredto’thee’and’thou’allmenandwomen,withoutanyrespecttorichorpoor,greatorsmall。AndasItraveledupanddown,IwasnottobidpeopleGood-morningorGood-evening,neithermightIboworscrapewithmylegtoanyone。Thismadethesectsandprofessionsrage。Oh!theragethatwasinthepriests,magistrates,professors,andpeopleofallsorts:andespeciallyinpriestsandprofessors:forthough’thou’toasinglepersonwasaccordingtotheiraccidenceandgrammarrules,andaccordingtotheBible,yettheycouldnotbeartohearit:
  andbecauseIcouldnotputoffmyhattothem,itsetthemallintoarage……Oh!thescorn,heat,andfurythatarose!Oh!
  theblows,punchings,beatings,andimprisonmentsthatweunderwentfornotputtingoffourhatstomen!Somehadtheirhatsviolentlypluckedoffandthrownaway,sothattheyquitelostthem。Thebadlanguageandevilusagewereceivedonthisaccountishardtobeexpressed,besidesthedangerweweresometimesinoflosingourlivesforthismatter,andthatbythegreatprofessorsofChristianity,whotherebydiscoveredtheywerenottruebelievers。Andthoughitwasbutasmallthingintheeyeofman,yetawonderfulconfusionitbroughtamongallprofessorsandpriests:but,blessedbetheLord,manycametoseethevanityofthatcustomofputtingoffhatstomen,andfelttheweightofTruth’stestimonyagainstit。”
  IntheautobiographyofThomasElwood,anearlyQuaker,whoatonetimewassecretarytoJohnMilton,wefindanexquisitelyquaintandcandidaccountofthetrialsheunderwentbothathomeandabroad,infollowingFox’scanonsofsincerity。Theanecdotesaretoolengthyforcitation;butElwoodsetsdownhismanneroffeelingaboutthesethingsinashorterpassage,whichIwillquoteasacharacteristicutteranceofspiritualsensibility:——
  “Bythisdivinelight,then。”saysElwood,“IsawthatthoughI
  hadnottheevilofthecommonuncleanliness,debauchery,profaneness,andpollutionsoftheworldtoputaway,becauseI
  had,throughthegreatgoodnessofGodandacivileducation,beenpreservedoutofthosegrosserevils,yetIhadmanyotherevilstoputawayandtoceasefrom;someofwhichwerenotbytheworld,whichliesinwickednessIJohnv。19,accountedevils,butbythelightofChristweremademanifesttometobeevils,andassuchcondemnedinme。
  “Asparticularlythosefruitsandeffectsofpridethatdiscoverthemselvesinthevanityandsuperfluityofapparel;whichItooktoomuchdelightin。ThisevilofmydoingsIwasrequiredtoputawayandceasefrom;andjudgmentlayuponmetillIdidso。
  “Itookofffrommyapparelthoseunnecessarytrimmingsoflace,ribbons,anduselessbuttons,whichhadnorealservice,butweresetononlyforthatwhichwasbymistakecalledornament;andI
  ceasedtowearrings。
  “Again,thegivingofflatteringtitlestomenbetweenwhomandmetherewasnotanyrelationtowhichsuchtitlescouldbepretendedtobelong。ThiswasanevilIhadbeenmuchaddictedto,andwasaccountedareadyartistin;thereforethisevilalsowasIrequiredtoputawayandceasefrom。SothatthenceforwardIdurstnotsay,Sir,Master,MyLord,MadamorMyDame;orsayYourServanttoanyonetowhomIdidnotstandintherealrelationofaservant,whichIhadneverdonetoany。
  “Again,respectofpersons,inuncoveringtheheadandbowingthekneeorbodyinsalutation,wasapracticeIhadbeenmuchintheuseof;andthis,beingoneofthevaincustomsoftheworld,introducedbythespiritoftheworld,insteadofthetruehonorwhichthisisafalserepresentationof,andusedindeceitasatokenofrespectbypersonsonetoanother,whobearnorealrespectonetoanother;andbesidesthis,beingatypeandaproperemblemofthatdivinehonorwhichalloughttopaytoAlmightyGod,andwhichallofallsorts,whotakeuponthemtheChristianname,appearinwhentheyoffertheirprayerstohim,andthereforeshouldnotbegiventomen;——IfoundthistobeoneofthoseevilswhichIhadbeentoolongdoing;thereforeIwasnowrequiredtoputitawayandceasefromit。
  “Again,thecorruptandunsoundformofspeakinginthepluralnumbertoasingleperson,YOUtoone,insteadofTHOU,contrarytothepure,plain,andsinglelanguageoftruth,THOUtoone,andYOUtomorethanone,whichhadalwaysbeenusedbyGodtomen,andmentoGod,aswellasonetoanother,fromtheoldestrecordoftimetillcorruptmen,forcorruptends,inlaterandcorrupttimes,toflatter,fawn,andworkuponthecorruptnatureinmen,broughtinthatfalseandsenselesswayofspeakingyoutoone,whichhassincecorruptedthemodernlanguages,andhathgreatlydebasedthespiritsanddepravedthemannersofmen;——thisevilcustomIhadbeenasforwardinasothers,andthisIwasnowcalledoutofandrequiredtoceasefrom。
  “Theseandmanymoreevilcustomswhichhadsprungupinthenightofdarknessandgeneralapostasyfromthetruthandtruereligionwerenow,bytheinshiningofthispurerayofdivinelightinmyconscience,graduallydiscoveredtometobewhatI
  oughttoceasefrom,shun,andstandawitnessagainst。”[176]
  [176]TheHistoryofThomasElwood,writtenbyHimself,London,1885,pp。32-34
  TheseearlyQuakerswerePuritansindeed。Theslightestinconsistencybetweenprofessionanddeedjarredsomeofthemtoactiveprotest。JohnWoolmanwritesinhisdiary:——
  “InthesejourneysIhavebeenwheremuchclothhathbeendyed;
  andhaveatsundrytimeswalkedovergroundwheremuchoftheirdyestuffshasdrainedaway。Thishathproducedalonginginmymindthatpeoplemightcomeintocleannessofspirit,cleannessofperson,andcleannessabouttheirhousesandgarments。Dyesbeinginventedpartlytopleasetheeye,andpartlytohidedirt,Ihavefeltinthisweakstate,whentravelingindirtiness,andaffectedwithunwholesomescents,astrongdesirethatthenatureofdyeingclothtohidedirtmaybemorefullyconsidered。
  “Washingourgarmentstokeepthemsweetiscleanly,butitistheoppositetorealcleanlinesstohidedirtinthem。Throughgivingwaytohidingdirtinourgarmentsaspiritwhichwouldconcealthatwhichisdisagreeableisstrengthened。Realcleanlinessbecomethaholypeople;buthidingthatwhichisnotcleanbycoloringourgarmentsseemscontrarytothesweetnessofsincerity。Throughsomesortsofdyesclothisrenderedlessuseful。Andifthevalueofdyestuffs,andexpenseofdyeing,andthedamagedonetocloth,werealladdedtogether,andthatcostappliedtokeepingallsweetandclean,howmuchmorewouldrealcleanlinessprevail。
  “Thinkingoftenonthesethings,theuseofhatsandgarmentsdyedwithadyehurtfultothem,andwearingmoreclothesinsummerthanareuseful,grewmoreuneasytome;believingthemtobecustomswhichhavenottheirfoundationinpurewisdom。Theapprehensionofbeingsingularfrommybelovedfriendswasastraituponme;andthusIcontinuedintheuseofsomethings,contrarytomyjudgment,aboutninemonths。ThenIthoughtofgettingahatthenaturalcolorofthefur,buttheapprehensionofbeinglookeduponasoneaffectingsingularityfeltuneasytome。OnthisaccountIwasundercloseexerciseofmindinthetimeofourgeneralspringmeetingin1762,greatlydesiringtoberightlydirected;when,beingdeeplybowedinspiritbeforetheLord,IwasmadewillingtosubmittowhatIapprehendedwasrequiredofme;andwhenIreturnedhome,gotahatofthenaturalcolorofthefur。
  “Inattendingmeetings,thissingularitywasatrialtome,andmoreespeciallyatthistime,aswhitehatswereusedbysomewhowerefondoffollowingthechangeablemodesofdress,andassomefriends,whoknewnotfromwhatmotivesIworeit,grewshyofme,Ifeltmywayforatimeshutupintheexerciseoftheministry。Somefriendswereapprehensivethatmywearingsuchahatsavoredofanaffectedsingularity:thosewhospokewithmeinafriendlyway,Igenerallyinformedinafewwords,thatI
  believedmywearingitwasnotinmyownwill。”
  Whenthecravingformoralconsistencyandpurityisdevelopedtothisdegree,thesubjectmaywellfindtheouterworldtoofullofshockstodwellin,andcanunifyhislifeandkeephissoulunspottedonlybywithdrawingfromit。Thatlawwhichimpelstheartisttoachieveharmonyinhiscompositionbysimplydroppingoutwhateverjars,orsuggestsadiscord,rulesalsointhespirituallife。Toomit,saysStevenson,istheoneartinliterature:“IfIknewhowtoomit,Ishouldasknootherknowledge。”Andlife,whenfullofdisorderandslacknessandvaguesuperfluity,cannomorehavewhatwecallcharacterthanliteraturecanhaveitundersimilarconditions。Somonasteriesandcommunitiesofsympatheticdevoteesopentheirdoors,andintheirchangelessorder,characterizedbyomissionsquiteasmuchasconstitutedofactions,theholy-mindedpersonfindsthatinnersmoothnessandcleannesswhichitistorturetohimtofeelviolatedateveryturnbythediscordancyandbrutalityofsecularexistence。
  Thatthescrupulosityofpuritymaybecarriedtoafantasticextrememustbeadmitted。InthisitresemblesAsceticism,towhichfurthersymptomofsaintlinesswehadbetterturnnext。
  Theadjective“ascetic“isappliedtoconductoriginatingondiversepsychologicallevels,whichImightaswellbeginbydistinguishingfromoneanother。
  1。Asceticismmaybeamereexpressionoforganichardihood,disgustedwithtoomuchease。
  2。Temperanceinmeatanddrink,simplicityofapparel,chastity,andnon-pamperingofthebodygenerally,maybefruitsoftheloveofpurity,shockedbywhateversavorsofthesensual。
  3。Theymayalsobefruitsoflove,thatis,theymayappealtothesubjectinthelightofsacrificeswhichheishappyinmakingtotheDeitywhomheacknowledges。
  4。Again,asceticmortificationsandtormentsmaybeduetopessimisticfeelingsabouttheself,combinedwiththeologicalbeliefsconcerningexpiation。Thedevoteemayfeelthatheisbuyinghimselffree,orescapingworsesufferingshereafter,bydoingpenancenow。
  5。Inpsychopathicpersons,mortificationsmaybeenteredonirrationally,byasortofobsessionorfixedideawhichcomesasachallengeandmustbeworkedoff,becauseonlythusdoesthesubjectgethisinteriorconsciousnessfeelingrightagain。
  6。Finally,asceticexercisesmayinrarerinstancesbepromptedbygenuineperversionsofthebodilysensibility,inconsequenceofwhichnormallypain-givingstimuliareactuallyfeltaspleasures。
  Iwilltrytogiveaninstanceundereachoftheseheadsinturn;
  butitisnoteasytogetthempure,forincasespronouncedenoughtobeimmediatelyclassedasascetic,severaloftheassignedmotivesusuallyworktogether。Moreover,beforecitinganyexamplesatall,Imustinviteyoutosomegeneralpsychologicalconsiderationswhichapplytoallofthemalike。
  AstrangemoraltransformationhaswithinthepastcenturysweptoverourWesternworld。Wenolongerthinkthatwearecalledontofacephysicalpainwithequanimity。Itisnotexpectedofamanthatheshouldeitherendureitorinflictmuchofit,andtolistentotherecitalofcasesofitmakesourfleshcreepmorallyaswellasphysically。Thewayinwhichourancestorslookeduponpainasaneternalingredientoftheworld’sorder,andbothcausedandsuffereditasamatter-of-courseportionoftheirday’swork,fillsuswithamazement。Wewonderthatanyhumanbeingscouldhavebeensocallous。TheresultofthishistoricalterationisthatevenintheMotherChurchherself,whereasceticdisciplinehassuchafixedtraditionalprestigeasafactorofmerit,ithaslargelycomeintodesuetude,ifnotdiscredit。Abelieverwhoflagellatesor“macerates“himselftodayarousesmorewonderandfearthanemulation。ManyCatholicwriterswhoadmitthatthetimeshavechangedinthisrespectdosoresignedly;andevenaddthatperhapsitisaswellnottowastefeelingsinregrettingthematter,fortoreturntotheheroiccorporealdisciplineofancientdaysmightbeanextravagance。
  Wheretoseektheeasyandthepleasantseemsinstinctive——andinstinctiveitappearstobeinman;anydeliberatetendencytopursuethehardandpainfulassuchandfortheirownsakesmightwellstrikeoneaspurelyabnormal。Nevertheless,inmoderatedegreesitisnaturalandevenusualtohumannaturetocourtthearduous。Itisonlytheextrememanifestationsofthetendencythatcanberegardedasaparadox。