Cyclops.PublishedbyorderoftheLordsCommissionersoftheAdmiralty,1858."TheyhavesinceformedthesubjectofanelaborateMemoirbyMessrs.ParkerandJones,publishedinthePhilosophicalTransactionsfor1865.
  Theresultofalltheseoperationsis,thatweknowthecontoursandthenatureofthesurface—soilcoveredbytheNorthAtlantic,foradistanceofseventeenhundredmilesfromeasttowest,aswellasweknowthatofanypartofthedryland.
  Itisaprodigiousplain——oneofthewidestandmostevenplainsintheworld.Iftheseaweredrainedoff,youmightdriveawagonallthewayfromValentia,onthewestcoastofIreland,toTrinityBay,inNewfoundland.And,exceptupononesharpinclineabouttwohundredmilesfromValentia,Iamnotquitesurethatitwouldevenbenecessarytoputtheskidon,sogentlearetheascentsanddescentsuponthatlongroute.FromValentiatheroadwouldliedown—hillforabout200milestothepointatwhichthebottomisnowcoveredby1700fathomsofsea—water.Thenwouldcomethecentralplain,morethanathousandmileswide,theinequalitiesofthesurfaceofwhichwouldbehardlyperceptible,thoughthedepthofwateruponitnowvariesfrom10,000to15,000feet;andthereareplacesinwhichMontBlancmightbesunkwithoutshowingitspeakabovewater.Beyondthis,theascentontheAmericansidecommences,andgraduallyleads,forabout300miles,totheNewfoundlandshore.
  Almostthewholeofthebottomofthiscentralplain(whichextendsformanyhundredmilesinanorthandsouthdirection)iscoveredbyafinemud,which,whenbroughttothesurface,driesintoagreyish—whitefriablesubstance.Youcanwritewiththisonablackboard,ifyouaresoinclined;and,totheeye,itisquitelikeverysoft,greyishchalk.Examinedchemically,itprovestobecomposedalmostwhollyofcarbonateoflime;andifyoumakeasectionofit,inthesamewayasthatofthepieceofchalkwasmade,andviewitwiththemicroscope,itpresentsinnumerableGlobigerinaeembeddedinagranularmatrix.
  Thusthisdeep—seamudissubstantiallychalk.Isaysubstantially,becausethereareagoodmanyminordifferences;butasthesehavenobearingonthequestionimmediatelybeforeus,——
  whichisthenatureoftheGlobigerinaeofthechalk,——itisunnecessarytospeakofthem.
  Globigerinaeofeverysize,fromthesmallesttothelargest,areassociatedtogetherintheAtlanticmud,andthechambersofmanyarefilledbyasoftanimalmatter.Thissoftsubstanceis,infact,theremainsofthecreaturetowhichtheGlobigerinashell,orratherskeleton,owesitsexistence——andwhichisananimalofthesimplestimaginabledescription.Itis,infact,amereparticleoflivingjelly,withoutdefinedpartsofanykind——
  withoutamouth,nerves,muscles,ordistinctorgans,andonlymanifestingitsvitalitytoordinaryobservationbythrustingoutandretractingfromallpartsofitssurface,longfilamentousprocesses,whichserveforarmsandlegs.Yetthisamorphousparticle,devoidofeverythingwhich,inthehigheranimals,wecallorgans,iscapableoffeeding,growingandmultiplying;ofseparatingfromtheoceanthesmallproportionofcarbonateoflimewhichisdissolvedinsea—water;andofbuildingupthatsubstanceintoaskeletonforitself,accordingtoapatternwhichcanbeimitatedbynootherknownagency.
  Thenotionthatanimalscanliveandflourishinthesea,atthevastdepthsfromwhichapparentlylivingGlobigerinaehavebeenbroughtup,doesnotagreeverywellwithourusualconceptionsrespectingtheconditionsofanimallife;anditisnotsoabsolutelyimpossibleasitmightatfirstappeartobe,thattheGlobigerinaeoftheAtlanticsea—bottomdonotliveanddiewheretheyarefound.
  AsIhavementioned,thesoundingsfromthegreatAtlanticplainarealmostentirelymadeupofGlobigerinae,withthegranuleswhichhavebeenmentionedandsomefewothercalcareousshells;butasmallpercentageofthechalkymud——perhapsatmostsomefivepercentofit——isofadifferentnature,andconsistsofshellsandskeletonscomposedofsilex,orpureflint.ThesesiliciousbodiesbelongpartlytothelowlyvegetableorganismswhicharecalledDiatomaceae,andpartlytotheminute,andextremelysimple,animals,termedRadiolaria.Itisquitecertainthatthesecreaturesdonotliveatthebottomoftheocean,butatitssurface——wheretheymaybeobtainedinprodigiousnumbersbytheuseofaproperlyconstructednet.Henceitfollowsthatthesesiliciousorganisms,thoughtheyarenotheavierthanthelightestdust,musthavefallen,insomecases,throughfifteenthousandfeetofwater,beforetheyreachedtheirfinalresting—placeontheoceanfloor.And,consideringhowlargeasurfacethesebodiesexposeinproportiontotheirweight,itisprobablethattheyoccupyagreatlengthoftimeinmakingtheirburialjourneyfromthesurfaceoftheAtlantictothebottom.
  ButiftheRadiolariaandDiatomsarethusraineduponthebottomofthesea,fromthesuperficiallayerofitswatersinwhichtheypasstheirlives,itisobviouslypossiblethattheGlobigerinaemaybesimilarlyderived;andiftheywereso,itwouldbemuchmoreeasytounderstandhowtheyobtaintheirsupplyoffoodthanitisatpresent.Nevertheless,thepositiveandnegativeevidenceallpointstheotherway.Theskeletonsofthefull—grown,deep—
  seaGlobigerinaearesoremarkablysolidandheavyinproportiontotheirsurfaceastoseemlittlefittedforfloating;and,asamatteroffact,theyarenottobefoundalongwiththeDiatomsandRadiolaria,intheuppermoststratumoftheopenocean.
  Ithasbeenobserved,again,thattheabundanceofGlobigerinae,inproportiontootherorganisms,oflikekind,increaseswiththedepthofthesea;andthatdeep—waterGlobigerinaearelargerthanthosewhichliveinshallowerpartsofthesea;andsuchfactsnegativethesuppositionthattheseorganismshavebeensweptbycurrentsfromtheshallowsintothedeepsoftheAtlantic.
  Itthereforeseemstobehardlydoubtfulthatthesewonderfulcreaturesliveanddieatthedepthsinwhichtheyarefound.
  However,theimportantpointsforusare,thatthelivingGlobigerinaeareexclusivelymarineanimals,theskeletonsofwhichaboundatthebottomofdeepseas;andthatthereisnotashadowofreasonforbelievingthatthehabitsoftheGlobigerinaeofthechalkdifferedfromthoseoftheexistingspecies.Butifthisbetrue,thereisnoescapingtheconclusionthatthechalkitselfisthedriedmudofanancientdeepsea.
  InworkingoverthesoundingscollectedbyCaptainDayman,IwassurprisedtofindthatmanyofwhatIhavecalledthe"granules"ofthatmud,werenot,asonemighthavebeentemptedtothinkatfirst,themerepowderandwasteofGlobigerinae,butthattheyhadadefiniteformandsize.Itermedthesebodies"coccoliths,"anddoubtedtheirorganicnature.Dr.Wallich[65]verifiedmyobservation,andaddedtheinterestingdiscovery,that,notunfrequently,bodiessimilartothese"coccoliths"wereaggregatedtogetherintospheroids,whichhetermed"coccospheres."Sofarasweknew,thesebodies,thenatureofwhichisextremelypuzzlingandproblematical,werepeculiartotheAtlanticsoundings.
  But,afewyearsago,Mr.Sorby,[66]inmakingacarefulexaminationofthechalkbymeansofthinsectionsandotherwise,observed,asEhrenberghaddonebeforehim,thatmuchofitsgranularbasispossessesadefiniteform.ComparingtheseformedparticleswiththoseintheAtlanticsoundings,hefoundthetwotobeidentical;
  andthusprovedthatthechalk,likethesoundings,containsthesemysteriouscoccolithsandcoccospheres.Herewasafurtherandamostinterestingconfirmation,frominternalevidence,oftheessentialidentityofthechalkwithmoderndeep—seamud.
  Globigerinae,coccoliths,andcoccospheresareroundasthechiefconstituentsofboth,andtestifytothegeneralsimilarityoftheconditionsunderwhichbothhavebeenformed.
  Theevidencefurnishedbythehewing,facing,andsuperpositionofthestonesofthePyramids,thatthesestructureswerebuiltbymen,hasnogreaterweightthantheevidencethatthechalkwasbuiltbyGlobigerinae;andthebeliefthatthoseancientpyramid—
  builderswereterrestrialandair—breathingcreatureslikeourselves,isitnotbetterbasedthantheconvictionthatthechalk—makerslivedinthesea?
  ButasourbeliefinthebuildingofthePyramidsbymenisnotonlygroundedontheinternalevidencesaffordedbythesestructures,butgathersstrengthfrommultitudinouscollateralproofs,andisclinchedbythetotalabsenceofanyreasonforacontrarybelief;sotheevidencedrawnfromtheGlobigerinaethatthechalkisanancientsea—bottom,isfortifiedbyinnumerableindependentlinesofevidence;andourbeliefinthetruthoftheconclusiontowhichallpositivetestimonytends,receivesthelikenegativejustificationfromthefactthatnootherhypothesishasashadowoffoundation.
  Itmaybeworthwhilebrieflytoconsiderafewofthesecollateralproofsthatthechalkwasdepositedatthebottomofthesea.
  Thegreatmassofthechalkiscomposed,aswehaveseen,oftheskeletonsofGlobigerinae,andothersimpleorganisms,imbeddedingranularmatter.Hereandthere,however,thishardenedmudoftheancientsearevealstheremainsofhigheranimalswhichhavelivedanddied,andlefttheirhardpartsinthemud,justastheoystersdieandleavetheirshellsbehindthem,inthemudofthepresentseas.
  Thereare,atthepresentday,certaingroupsofanimalswhichareneverfoundinfreshwaters,beingunabletoliveanywherebutinthesea.Sucharethecorals;thosecorallineswhicharecalledPolycoa;thosecreatureswhichfabricatethelamp—shells,andarecalledBrachiopoda;thepearlyNautilus,andallanimalsalliedtoit;andalltheformsofsea—urchinsandstar—fishes.
  Notonlyareallthesecreaturesconfinedtosaltwateratthepresentday;but,sofarasourrecordsofthepastgo,theconditionsoftheirexistencehavebeenthesame:hence,theiroccurrenceinanydepositisasstrongevidenceascanbeobtained,thatthatdepositwasformedinthesea.Nowtheremainsofanimalsofallthekindswhichhavebeenenumerated,occurinthechalk,ingreaterorlessabundance;whilenotoneofthoseformsofshell—fishwhicharecharacteristicoffreshwaterhasyetbeenobservedinit.
  Whenweconsiderthattheremainsofmorethanthreethousanddistinctspeciesofaquaticanimalshavebeendiscoveredamongthefossilsofthechalk,thatthegreatmajorityofthemareofsuchformsasarenowmetwithonlyinthesea,andthatthereisnoreasontobelievethatanyoneoftheminhabitedfreshwater——thecollateralevidencethatthechalkrepresentsanancientsea—bottomacquiresasgreatforceastheproofderivedfromthenatureofthechalkitself.IthinkyouwillnowallowthatIdidnotoverstatemycasewhenIassertedthatwehaveasstronggroundsforbelievingthatallthevastareaofdryland,atpresentoccupiedbythechalk,wasonceatthebottomofthesea,aswehaveforanymatterofhistorywhatever;whilethereisnojustificationforanyotherbelief.
  Nolesscertainitisthatthetimeduringwhichthecountrieswenowcallsouth—eastEngland,France,Germany,Poland,Russia,Egypt,Arabia,Syria,weremoreorlesscompletelycoveredbyadeepsea,wasofconsiderableduration.
  Wehavealreadyseenthatthechalkis,inplaces,morethanathousandfeetthick.Ithinkyouwillagreewithme,thatitmusthavetakensometimefortheskeletonsofanimalculesofahundredthofaninchindiametertoheapupsuchamassasthat.I
  havesaidthatthroughoutthethicknessofthechalktheremainsofotheranimalsarescattered.Theseremainsareofteninthemostexquisitestateofpreservation.Thevalvesoftheshell—fishesarecommonlyadherent;thelongspinesofsomeofthesea—urchins,whichwouldbedetachedbythesmallestjar,oftenremainintheirplaces.Inaword,itiscertainthattheseanimalshavelivedanddiedwhentheplacewhichtheynowoccupywasthesurfaceofasmuchofthechalkashadthenbeendeposited;andthateachhasbeencoveredupbythelayerofGlobigerinamud,uponwhichthecreaturesimbeddedalittlehigheruphave,inlikemanner,livedanddied.Butsomeoftheseremainsprovetheexistenceofreptilesofvastsizeinthechalksea.Theselivedtheirtime,andhadtheirancestorsanddescendants,whichassuredlyimpliestime,reptilesbeingofslowgrowth.
  Thereismorecuriousevidence,again,thattheprocessofcoveringup,or,inotherwords,thedepositofGlobigerinaskeletons,didnotgoonveryfast.Itisdemonstrablethatananimalofthecretaceousseamightdie,thatitsskeletonmightlieuncovereduponthesea—bottomlongenoughtoloseallitsoutwardcoveringsandappendagesbyputrefaction;andthat,afterthishadhappened,anotheranimalmightattachitselftothedeadandnakedskeleton,mightgrowtomaturity,andmightitselfdiebeforethecalcareousmudhadburiedthewhole.
  CasesofthiskindareadmirablydescribedbySirCharlesLyell.[67]
  Hespeaksofthefrequencywithwhichgeologistsfindinthechalkafossilizedsea—urchin,towhichisattachedthelowervalveofaCrania.Thisisakindofshell—fish,withashellcomposedoftwopieces,ofwhich,asintheoyster,oneisfixedandtheotherfree.
  "Theuppervalveisalmostinvariablywanting,thoughoccasionallyfoundinaperfectstateofpreservationinthewhitechalkatsomedistance.Inthiscase,weseeclearlythatthesea—urchinfirstlivedfromyouthtoage,thendiedandlostitsspines,whichwerecarriedaway.ThentheyoungCraniaadheredtothebaredshell,grewandperishedinitsturn;afterwhich,theuppervalvewasseparatedfromthelower,beforetheEchinus[68]becameenvelopedinchalkymud."
  AspecimenintheMuseumofPracticalGeology,inLondon,stillfurtherprolongstheperiodwhichmusthaveelapsedbetweenthedeathofthesea—urchin,anditsburialbytheGlobigerinae.FortheoutwardfaceofthevalveofaCrania,whichisattachedtoasea—urchin(Micraster),isitselfoverrunbyanincrustingcoralline,whichspreadsthenceovermoreorlessofthesurfaceofthesea—urchin.Itfollowsthat,aftertheuppervalveoftheCraniafelloff,thesurfaceoftheattachedvalvemusthaveremainedexposedlongenoughtoallowofthegrowthofthewholecorraline,sincecorallinesdonotliveimbeddedinmud.
  Theprogressofknowledgemay,oneday,enableustodeducefromsuchfactsasthesethemaximumrateatwhichthechalkcanhaveaccumulated,andthustoarriveattheminimumdurationofthechalkperiod.SupposethatthevalveoftheCraniauponwhichacorallinehasfixeditselfinthewayjustdescribed,issoattachedtothesea—urchinthatnopartofitismorethananinchabovethefaceuponwhichthesea—urchinrests.Then,asthecorallinecouldnothavefixeditself,iftheCraniahadbeencoveredupwithchalkmud,andcouldnothavelivedhaditselfbeensocovereditfollows,thataninchofchalkmudcouldnothaveaccumulatedwithinthetimebetweenthedeathanddecayofthesoftpartsofthesea—urchinandthegrowthofthecorallinetothefullsizewhichithasattained.Ifthedecayofthesoftpartsofthesea—urchin;theattachment,growthtomaturity,anddecayoftheCrania;andthesubsequentattachmentandgrowthofthecoralline,tookayear(whichisalowestimateenough),theaccumulationoftheinchofchalkmusthavetakenmorethanayear:andthedepositofathousandfeetofchalkmust,consequently,havetakenmorethantwelvethousandyears.
  Thefoundationofallthiscalculationis,ofcourse,aknowledgeofthelengthoftimetheCraniaandthecorallineneededtoattaintheirfullsize;and,onthishead,preciseknowledgeisatpresentwanting.Buttherearecircumstanceswhichtendtoshow,thatnothinglikeaninchofchalkhasaccumulatedduringthelifeofaCrania;and,onanyprobableestimateofthelengthofthatlife,thechalkperiodmusthavehadamuchlongerdurationthanthatthusroughlyassignedtoit.
  Thus,notonlyisitcertainthatthechalkisthemudofanancientsea—bottom;butitisnolesscertain,thatthechalkseaexistedduringanextremelylongperiod,thoughwemaynotbepreparedtogiveapreciseestimateofthelengthofthatperiodinyears.Therelativedurationisclear,thoughtheabsolutedurationmaynotbedefinable.Theattempttoaffixanyprecisedatetotheperiodatwhichthechalkseabegan,orended,itsexistence,isbaffledbydifficultiesofthesamekind.Buttherelativeageofthecretaceousepochmaybedeterminedwithasgreateaseandcertaintyasthelongdurationofthatepoch.
  Youwillhaveheardoftheinterestingdiscoveriesrecentlymade,invariouspartsofWesternEurope,offlintimplements,obviouslyworkedintoshapebyhumanhands,undercircumstanceswhichshowconclusivelythatmanisaveryancientdenizenoftheseregions.
  IthasbeenprovedthattheoldpopulationsofEurope,whoseexistencehasbeenrevealedtousinthisway,consistedofsavages,suchastheEsquimauxarenow;that,inthecountrywhichisnowFrance,theyhuntedthereindeer,andwerefamiliarwiththewaysofthemammothandthebison.ThephysicalgeographyofFrancewasinthosedaysdifferentfromwhatitisnow——theriverSomme,[69]forinstance,havingcutitsbedahundredfeetdeeperbetweenthattimeandthis;and,itisprobable,thattheclimatewasmorelikethatofCanadaorSiberia,thanthatofWesternEurope.
  Theexistenceofthesepeopleisforgotteneveninthetraditionsoftheoldesthistoricalnations.Thenameandfameofthemhadutterlyvanisheduntilafewyearsback;andtheamountofphysicalchangewhichhasbeeneffectedsincetheirday,rendersitmorethanprobablethat,venerableasaresomeofthehistoricalnations,theworkersofthechippedflintsofHoxneorofAmiens[70]
  aretothem,astheyaretous,inpointofantiquity.
  But,ifweassigntothesehoarrelicsoflong—vanishedgenerationsofmenthegreatestagethatcanpossiblybeclaimedforthem,theyarenotolderthanthedrift,orboulderclay,which,incomparisonwiththechalk,isbutaveryjuveniledeposit.Youneedgonofurtherthanyourownsea—boardforevidenceofthisfact.AtoneofthemostcharmingspotsonthecoastofNorfolk,Cromer,youwillseetheboulderclayformingavastmass,whichliesuponthechalk,andmustconsequentlyhavecomeintoexistenceafterit.
  Hugebouldersofchalkare,infact,includedintheclay,andhaveevidentlybeenbroughttothepositiontheynowoccupy,bythesameagencyasthatwhichhasplantedblocksofsyenitefromNorwaysidebysidewiththem.
  Thechalk,then,iscertainlyolderthantheboulderclay.Ifyouaskhowmuch,Iwillagaintakeyounofurtherthanthesamespotuponyourowncoastsforevidence.Ihavespokenoftheboulderclayanddriftasrestinguponthechalk.Thatisnotstrictlytrue.Interposedbetweenthechalkandthedriftisacomparativelyinsignificantlayer,containingvegetablematter.
  Butthatlayertellsawonderfulhistory.Itisfullofstumpsoftreesstandingastheygrew.Fir—treesaretherewiththeircones,andhazel—busheswiththeirnuts;therestandthestoolsofoakandyewtrees,beechesandalders.Hencethisstratumisappropriatelycalledthe"forest—bed."
  Itisobviousthatthechalkmusthavebeenup—heavedandconvertedintodryland,beforethetimbertreescouldgrowuponit.Asthebolesofsomeofthesetreesarefromtwotothreefeetindiameter,itisnolessclearthatthedrylandthisformedremainedinthesameconditionforlongages.Andnotonlydotheremainsofstatelyoaksandwell—grownfirstestifytothedurationofthisconditionofthings,butadditionalevidencetothesameeffectisaffordedbytheabundantremainsofelephants,rhinoceroses,hippopotomusesandothergreatwildbeasts,whichithasyieldedtothezealoussearchofsuchmenastheRev.Mr.Gunn.[71]
  Whenyoulookatsuchacollectionashehasformed,andbethinkyouthattheseelephantinebonesdidveritablycarrytheirownersabout,andthesegreatgrinderscrunch,inthedarkwoodsofwhichtheforest—bedisnowtheonlytrace,itisimpossiblenottofeelthattheyareasgoodevidenceofthelapseoftimeastheannualringsofthetree—stumps.
  ThusthereisawritinguponthewallsofcliffsatCromer,andwhosorunsmayreadit.Ittellsus,withanauthoritywhichcannotbeimpeached,thattheancientsea—bedofthechalkseawasraisedup,andremaineddryland,untilitwascoveredwithforest,stockedwiththegreatgamewhosespoilshaverejoicedyourgeologists.Howlongitremainedinthatconditioncannotbesaid;
  but"thewhirligigoftime[72]broughtitsrevenges"inthosedaysasinthese.Thatdryland,withthebonesandteethofgenerationsoflong—livedelephants,hiddenawayamongthegnarledrootsanddryleavesofitsancienttrees,sankgraduallytothebottomoftheicysea,whichcovereditwithhugemassesofdriftandboulderclay.Sea—beasts,suchasthewalrus,nowrestrictedtotheextremenorth,paddledaboutwherebirdshadtwitteredamongthetopmosttwigsofthefir—trees.Howlongthisstateofthingsenduredweknownot,butatlengthitcametoanend.TheupheavedglacialmudhardenedintothesoilofmodernNorfolk.Forestsgrewoncemore,thewolfandthebeaverreplacedthereindeerandtheelephant;andatlengthwhatwecallthehistoryofEnglanddawned.
  Thusyouhavewithinthelimitsofyourowncounty,proofthatthechalkcanjustlyclaimaverymuchgreaterantiquitythaneventheoldestphysicaltracesofmankind.Butwemaygofurtheranddemonstrate,byevidenceofthesameauthorityasthatwhichtestifiestotheexistenceofthefatherofmen,thatthechalkisvastlyolderthanAdamhimself.
  TheBookofGenesisinformsusthatAdam,immediatelyuponhiscreation,andbeforetheappearanceofEve,wasplacedintheGardenofEden.TheproblemofthegeographicalpositionofEdenhasgreatlyvexedthespiritsofthelearnedinsuchmatters,butthereisonepointrespectingwhich,sofarasIknow,nocommentatorhaseverraisedadoubt.Thisis,thatofthefourriverswhicharesaidtorunoutofit,EuphratesandHiddekel[73]
  areidenticalwiththeriversnowknownbythenamesofEuphratesandTigris.
  Butthewholecountryinwhichthesemightyriverstaketheirorigin,andthroughwhichtheyrun,iscomposedofrockswhichareeitherofthesameageasthechalk,oroflaterdate.Sothatthechalkmustnotonlyhavebeenformed,but,afteritsformation,thetimerequiredforthedepositoftheselaterrocks,andfortheirupheavalintodryland,musthaveelapsed,beforethesmallestbrookwhichfeedstheswiftstreamof"thegreatriver,theriverofBabylon,"[74]begantoflow.
  Thus,evidencewhichcannotberebutted,andwhichneednotbestrengthened,thoughiftimepermittedImightindefinitelyincreaseitsquantity,compelsyoutobelievethattheearth,fromthetimeofthechalktothepresentday,hasbeenthetheatreofaseriesofchangesasvastintheiramount,astheywereslowintheirprogress.Theareaonwhichwestandhasbeenfirstseaandthenland,foratleastfouralternations;andhasremainedineachoftheseconditionsforaperiodofgreatlength.
  Norhavethesewonderfulmetamorphosesofseaintoland,andoflandintosea,beenconfinedtoonecornerofEngland.Duringthechalkperiod,or"cretaceousepoch,"notoneofthepresentgreatphysicalfeaturesoftheglobewasinexistence.Ourgreatmountainranges,Pyrenees,Alps,Himalayas,Andes,haveallbeenupheavedsincethechalkwasdeposited,andthecretaceousseaflowedoverthesitesofSinaiandArarat.
  Allthisiscertain,becauserocksofcretaceous,orstilllater,datehavesharedintheelevatorymovementswhichgaverisetothesemountainchains;andmaybefoundperchedup,insomecases,manythousandfeethighupontheirflanks.Andevidenceofequalcogencydemonstratesthat,though,inNorfolk,theforest—bedrestsdirectlyuponthechalk,yetitdoesso,notbecausetheperiodatwhichtheforestgrewimmediatelyfollowedthatatwhichthechalkwasformed,butbecauseanimmenselapseoftime,representedelsewherebythousandsoffeetofrock,isnotindicatedatCromer.
  Imustaskyoutobelievethatthereisnolessconclusiveproofthatastillmoreprolongedsuccessionofsimilarchangesoccurred,beforethechalkwasdeposited.Norhaveweanyreasontothinkthatthefirsttermintheseriesofthesechangesisknown.Theoldestsea—bedspreservedtousaresands,andmud,andpebbles,thewearandtearofrockswhichwereformedinstillolderoceans.
  But,greatasisthemagnitudeofthesephysicalchangesoftheworld,theyhavebeenaccompaniedbyanolessstrikingseriesofmodificationsinitslivinginhabitants.
  Allthegreatclassesofanimals,beastsofthefield,fowlsoftheair,creepingthings,andthingswhichdwellinthewaters,flourishedupontheglobelongagesbeforethechalkwasdeposited.
  Veryfew,however,ifany,oftheseancientformsofanimallifewereidenticalwiththosewhichnowlive.Certainlynotoneofthehigheranimalswasofthesamespeciesasanyofthosenowinexistence.Thebeastsofthefield,inthedaysbeforethechalk,werenotourbeastsofthefield,northefowlsoftheairsuchasthosewhichtheeyeofmenhasseenflying,unlesshisantiquitydatesinfinitelyfurtherbackthanweatpresentsurmise.Ifwecouldbecarriedbackintothosetimes,weshouldbeasonesuddenlysetdowninAustraliabeforeitwascolonized.Weshouldseemammals,birds,reptiles,fishes,insects,snails,andthelike,clearlyrecognisableassuch,andyetnotoneofthemwouldbejustthesameasthosewithwhichwearefamiliar,andmanywouldbeextremelydifferent.
  Fromthattimetothepresent,thepopulationoftheworldhasundergoneslowandgradual,butincessantchanges.Therehasbeennograndcatastrophe——nodestroyerhassweptawaytheformsoflifeofoneperiod,andreplacedthembyatotallynewcreation;butonespecieshasvanishedandanotherhastakenitsplace;creaturesofonetypeofstructurehavediminished,thoseofanotherhaveincreased,astimehaspassedon.Andthus,whilethedifferencesbetweenthelivingcreaturesofthetimebeforethechalkandthoseofthepresentdayappearstartling,ifplacedsidebyside,weareledfromonetotheotherbythemostgradualprogress,ifwefollowthecourseofNaturethroughthewholeseriesofthoserelicsofheroperationswhichshehasleftbehind.
  Anditisbythepopulationofthechalkseathattheancientandthemoderninhabitantsoftheworldaremostcompletelyconnected.
  Thegroupswhicharedyingoutflourish,sidebyside,withthegroupswhicharenowthedominantformsoflife.
  Thusthechalkcontainsremainsofthosestrangeflyingandswimmingreptiles,thepterodactyl,theichthyosaurus,andtheplesiosaurus,whicharefoundinnolaterdeposits,butaboundedinprecedingages.Thechamberedshellscalledammonitesandbelemnites,whicharesocharacteristicoftheperiodprecedingthecretaceous,inlikemannerdiewithit.
  But,amongstthesefadingremaindersofapreviousstateofthings,aresomeverymodernformsoflife,lookinglikeYankeepedlarsamongatribeofRedIndians.Crocodilesofmoderntypeappear;
  bonyfishes,manyofthemverysimilartoexistingspeciesalmostsupplanttheformsoffishwhichpredominateinmoreancientseas;
  andmanykindsoflivingshellfishfirstbecomeknowntousinthechalk.Thevegetationacquiresamodernaspect.Afewlivinganimalsarenotevendistinguishableasspecies,fromthosewhichexistedatthatremoteepoch.TheGlobigerinaofthepresentday,forexample,isnotdifferentspecificallyfromthatofthechalk;
  andthesamemaybesaidofmanyotherForaminifera.Ithinkitprobablethatcriticalandunprejudicedexaminationwillshowthatmorethanonespeciesofmuchhigheranimalshavehadasimilarlongevity;buttheonlyexample,whichIcanatpresentgiveconfidentlyisthesnake’s—headlamp—shell(Terebratulinacaputserpentis),whichlivesinourEnglishseasandabounded(asTerebratulinastriataofauthors)inthechalk.
  Thelongestlineofhumanancestrymusthideitsdiminishedheadbeforethepedigreeofthisinsignificantshell—fish.WeEnglishmenareproudtohaveanancestorwhowaspresentattheBattleofHastings.TheancestorsofTerebratulinacaputserpentismayhavebeenpresentatabattleofIchthyosauriainthatpartoftheseawhich,whenthechalkwasforming,flowedoverthesiteofHastings.Whileallaroundhaschanged,thisTerebratulinahaspeacefullypropagateditsspeciesfromgenerationtogeneration,andstandstothisday,asalivingtestimonytothecontinuityofthepresentwiththepasthistoryoftheglobe.
  UptothismomentIhavestated,sofarasIknow,nothingbutwell—authenticatedfacts,andtheimmediateconclusionswhichtheyforceuponthemind.
  Butthemindissoconstitutedthatitdoesnotwillinglyrestinfactsandimmediatecauses,butseeksalwaysafteraknowledgeoftheremoterlinksinthechainofcausation.
  Takingthemanychangesofanygivenspotoftheearth’ssurface,fromseatolandandfromlandtosea,asanestablishedfact,wecannotrefrainfromaskingourselveshowthesechangeshaveoccurred.Andwhenwehaveexplainedthem——astheymustbeexplained——bythealternateslowmovementsofelevationanddepressionwhichhaveaffectedthecrustoftheearth,wegostillfurtherback,andask,Whythesemovements?
  Iamnotcertainthatanyonecangiveyouasatisfactoryanswertothatquestion.AssuredlyIcannot.Allthatcanbesaid,forcertain,is,thatsuchmovementsarepartoftheordinarycourseofnature,inasmuchastheyaregoingonatthepresenttime.Directproofmaybegiven,thatsomepartsofthelandofthenorthernhemisphereareatthismomentinsensiblyrisingandothersinsensiblysinking;andthereisindirect,butperfectlysatisfactory,proof,thatanenormousareanowcoveredbythePacifichasbeendeepenedthousandsoffeet,sincethepresentinhabitantsofthatseacameintoexistence.
  Thusthereisnotashadowofareasonforbelievingthatthephysicalchangesoftheglobe,inpasttimeshavebeeneffectedbyotherthannaturalcauses.
  Isthereanymorereasonforbelievingthattheconcomitantmodificationsintheformsofthelivinginhabitantsoftheglobehavebeenbroughtaboutinotherways?
  Beforeattemptingtoanswerthisquestion,letustrytoformadistinctmentalpictureofwhathashappened,insomespecialcase.
  Thecrocodilesareanimalswhich,asagroup,haveaveryvastantiquity.Theyaboundedagesbeforethechalkwasdeposited;theythrongtheriversinwarmclimates,atthepresentday.Thereisadifferenceintheformofthejointsoftheback—bone,andinsomeminorparticulars,betweenthecrocodilesofthepresentepochandthosewhichlivedbeforethechalk;butinthecretaceousepoch,asIhavealreadymentioned,thecrocodileshadassumedthemoderntypeofstructure.Notwithstandingthis,thecrocodilesofthechalkarenotidenticallythesameasthosewhichlivedinthetimescalled"oldertertiary,"whichsucceededthecretaceousepoch;andthecrocodilesoftheoldertertiariesarenotidenticalwiththoseofthenewertertiaries,noraretheseidenticalwithexistingforms.Ileaveopenthequestionwhetherparticularspeciesmayhavelivedonfromepochtoepoch.Buteachepochhashaditspeculiarcrocodiles;thoughall,sincethechalk,havebelongedtothemoderntype,anddiffersimplyintheirproportions,andinsuchstructuralparticularsasarediscernibleonlytotrainedeyes.
  Howistheexistenceofthislongsuccessionofdifferentspeciesofcrocodilestobeaccountedfor?
  Onlytwosuppositionsseemtobeopentous——Eithereachspeciesofcrocodilehasbeenspeciallycreated,orithasarisenoutofsomepre—existingformbytheoperationofnaturalcauses.
  Chooseyourhypothesis;Ihavechosenmine.Icanfindnowarrantyforbelievinginthedistinctcreationofascoreofsuccessivespeciesofcrocodilesinthecourseofcountlessagesoftime.
  Sciencegivesnocountenancetosuchawildfancy;norcaneventheperverseingenuityofacommentatorpretendtodiscoverthissense,inthesimplewordsinwhichthewriterofGenesisrecordstheproceedingsofthefifthandsixthdaysoftheCreation.
  Ontheotherhand,Iseenogoodreasonfordoubtingthenecessaryalternative,thatallthesevariedspecieshavebeenevolvedfrompre—existingcrocodilianforms,bytheoperationofcausesascompletelyapartofthecommonorderofnature,asthosewhichhaveeffectedthechangesoftheinorganicworld.
  Fewwillventuretoaffirmthatthereasoningwhichappliestocrocodileslosesitsforceamongotheranimals,oramongplants.
  Ifoneseriesofspecieshascomeintoexistencebytheoperationofnaturalcauses,itseemsfollytodenythatallmayhaveariseninthesameway.
  Asmallbeginninghasledustoagreatending.IfIweretoputthebitofchalkwithwhichwestartedintothehotbutobscureflameofburninghydrogen,itwouldpresentlyshinelikethesun.
  Itseemstomethatthisphysicalmetamorphosisisnofalseimageofwhathasbeentheresultofoursubjectingittoajetoffervent,thoughnowisebrilliant,thoughtto—night.Ithasbecomeluminous,anditsclearrays,penetratingtheabyssoftheremotepast,havebroughtwithinourkensomestagesoftheevolutionoftheearth.Andintheshifting"withouthaste,butwithoutrest"[75]
  ofthelandandsea,asintheendlessvariationoftheformsassumedbylivingbeings,wehaveobservednothingbutthenaturalproductoftheforcesoriginallypossessedbythesubstanceoftheuniverse.
  THEPRINCIPALSUBJECTSOFEDUCATION[76]
  Iknowquitewellthatlaunchingmyselfintothisdiscussion[77]isaverydangerousoperation;thatitisaverylargesubject,andonewhichisdifficulttodealwith,howevermuchImaytrespassuponyourpatienceinthetimeallottedtome.Butthediscussionissofundamental,itissocompletelyimpossibletomakeupone’smindonthesemattersuntilonehassettledthequestion,thatIwillevenventuretomaketheexperiment.Agreatlawyer—statesmanandphilosopherofaformerage——ImeanFrancisBacon[78]——saidthattruthcameoutoferrormuchmorerapidlythanitcameoutofconfusion.
  Thereisawonderfultruthinthatsaying.Nexttobeingrightinthisworld,thebestofallthingsistobeclearlyanddefinitelywrong,becauseyouwillcomeoutsomewhere.Ifyougobuzzingaboutbetweenrightandwrong,vibratingandfluctuating,youcomeoutnowhere;butifyouareabsolutelyandthoroughlyandpersistentlywrong,youmust,someofthesedays,havetheextremegoodfortuneofknockingyourheadagainstafact,andthatsetsyouallstraightagain.SoIwillnottroublemyselfastowhetherImayberightorwronginwhatIamabouttosay,butatanyrateIhopetobeclearanddefinite;andthenyouwillbeabletojudgeforyourselveswhether,infollowingoutthetrainofthoughtI
  havetointroduce,youknockyourheadsagainstfactsornot.
  Itakeitthatthewholeobjectofeducationis,inthefirstplace,totrainthefacultiesoftheyounginsuchamannerastogivetheirpossessorsthebestchanceofbeinghappy[79]andusefulintheirgeneration;and,inthesecondplace,tofurnishthemwiththemostimportantportionsofthatimmensecapitalisedexperienceofthehumanracewhichwecallknowledgeofvariouskinds.Iamusingthetermknowledgeinitswidestpossiblesense;andthequestionis,whatsubjectstoselectbytraininganddiscipline,inwhichtheobjectIhavejustdefinedmaybebestattained.
  Imustcallyourattentionfurthertothisfact,thatallthesubjectsofourthoughts——allfeelingsandpropositions(leavingasideoursensationsasthemerematerialsandoccasionsofthinkingandfeeling),allourmentalfurniture——maybeclassifiedunderoneoftwoheads——aseitherwithintheprovinceoftheintellect,somethingthatcanbeputintopropositionsandaffirmedordenied;oraswithintheprovinceoffeeling,orthatwhich,beforethenamewasdefiled,wascalledtheaestheticsideofournature,andwhichcanneitherbeprovednordisproved,butonlyfeltandknown.
  AccordingtotheclassificationwhichIhaveputbeforeyou,then,thesubjectsofallknowledgearedivisibleintothetwogroups,mattersofscienceandmattersofart;forallthingswithwhichthereasoningfacultyaloneisoccupied,comeundertheprovinceofscience;andinthebroadestsense,andnotinthenarrowandtechnicalsenseinwhichwearenowaccustomedtousethewordart,allthingsfeelable,allthingswhichstirouremotions,comeunderthetermofart,inthesenseofthesubject—matteroftheaestheticfaculty.Sothatweareshutuptothis——thatthebusinessofeducationis,inthefirstplace,toprovidetheyoungwiththemeansandthehabitofobservation;and,secondly,tosupplythesubject—matterofknowledgeeitherintheshapeofscienceorofart,orofbothcombined.
  Now,itisaveryremarkablefact——butitistrueofmostthingsinthisworld——thatthereishardlyanythingone—sided,orofonenature;anditisnotimmediatelyobviouswhatofthethingsthatinterestusmayberegardedaspurescience,andwhatmayberegardedaspureart.Itmaybethattherearesomepeculiarlyconstitutedpersonswho,beforetheyhaveadvancedfarintothedepthsofgeometry,findartisticbeautyaboutit;but,takingthegeneralityofmankind,Ithinkitmaybesaidthat,whentheybegintolearnmathematics,theirwholesoulsareabsorbedintracingtheconnectionbetweenthepremissesandtheconclusion,andthattothemgeometryispurescience.SoIthinkitmaybesaidthatmechanicsandosteologyarepurescience.Ontheotherhand,melodyinmusicispureart.Youcannotreasonaboutit;thereisnopropositioninvolvedinit.So,again,inthepictorialart,anarabesque,ora"harmonyingrey,"[80]touchesnonebuttheaestheticfaculty.Butagreatmathematician,andevenmanypersonswhoarenotgreatmathematicians,willtellyouthattheyderiveimmensepleasurefromgeometricalreasonings.Everybodyknowsmathematiciansspeakofsolutionsandproblemsas"elegant,"andtheytellyouthatacertainmassofmysticsymbolsis"beautiful,quitelovely."Well,youdonotseeit.Theydoseeit,becausetheintellectualprocess,theprocessofcomprehendingthereasonssymbolisedbythesefiguresandthesesigns,confersuponthemasortofpleasure,suchasanartisthasinvisualsymmetry.TakeascienceofwhichImayspeakwithmoreconfidence,andwhichisthemostattractiveofthoseIamconcernedwith.Itiswhatwecallmorphology,whichconsistsintracingouttheunityinvarietyoftheinfinitelydiversifiedstructuresofanimalsandplants.I
  cannotgiveyouanyexampleofathoroughaestheticpleasuremoreintenselyrealthanapleasureofthiskind——thepleasurewhicharisesinone’smindwhenawholemassofdifferentstructuresrunintooneharmonyastheexpressionofacentrallaw.Thatiswheretheprovinceofartoverlaysandembracestheprovinceofintellect.And,ifImayventuretoexpressanopiniononsuchasubject,thegreatmajorityofformsofartarenotinthesensewhatIjustnowdefinedthemtobe——pureart;buttheyderivemuchoftheirqualityfromsimultaneousandevenunconsciousexcitementoftheintellect.
  WhenIwasaboy,Iwasveryfondofmusic,andIamsonow;anditsohappenedthatIhadtheopportunityofhearingmuchgoodmusic.
  Amongotherthings,Ihadabundantopportunitiesofhearingthatgreatoldmaster,SebastianBach.Irememberperfectlywell——
  thoughIknewnothingaboutmusicthen,and,Imayadd,knownothingwhateveraboutitnow——theintensesatisfactionanddelightwhichIhadinlistening,bythehourtogether,toBach’sfugues.
  Itisapleasurewhichremainswithme,Iamgladtothink;but,oflateyears,Ihavetriedtofindoutthewhyandwherefore,andithasoftenoccurredtomethatthepleasurederivedfrommusicalcompositionsofthiskindisessentiallyofthesamenatureasthatwhichisderivedfrompursuitswhicharecommonlyregardedaspurelyintellectual.Imean,thatthesourceofpleasureisexactlythesameasinmostofmyproblemsinmorphology——thatyouhavethethemeinoneoftheoldmaster’sworksfollowedoutinallitsendlessvariations,alwaysappearingandalwaysremindingyouofunityinvariety.Soinpainting;whatiscalled"truthtonature"istheintellectualelementcomingin,andtruthtonaturedependsentirelyupontheintellectualcultureofthepersontowhomartisaddressed.IfyouareinAustralia,youmaygetcreditforbeingagoodartist——Imeanamongthenatives——ifyoucandrawakangarooafterafashion.But,amongmenofhighercivilisation,theintellectualknowledgewepossessbringsitscriticismintoourappreciationofworksofart,andweareobligedtosatisfyit,aswellasthemeresenseofbeautyincolourandinoutline.Andso,thehigherthecultureandinformationofthosewhomartaddresses,themoreexactandprecisemustbewhatwecallits"truthtonature."
  Ifweturntoliterature,thesamethingistrue,andyoufindworksofliteraturewhichmaybesaidtobepureart.AlittlesongofShakespeareorofGoetheispureart;itisexquisitelybeautiful,althoughitsintellectualcontentmaybenothing.A
  seriesofpicturesismadetopassbeforeyourmindbythemeaningofwords,andtheeffectisamelodyofideas.Nevertheless,thegreatmassoftheliteratureweesteemisvalued,notmerelybecauseofhavingartisticform,butbecauseofitsintellectualcontent;andthevalueisthehigherthemoreprecise,distinct,andtrueisthatintellectualcontent.And,ifyouwillletmeforamomentspeakoftheveryhighestformsofliterature,dowenotregardthemashighestsimplybecausethemoreweknowthetruertheyseem,andthemorecompetentwearetoappreciatebeautythemorebeautifultheyare?NomaneverunderstandsShakespeareuntilheisold,thoughtheyoungestmayadmirehim,thereasonbeingthathesatisfiestheartisticinstinctoftheyoungestandharmoniseswiththeripestandrichestexperienceoftheoldest.
  Ihavesaidthismuchtodrawyourattentiontowhat,inmymind,liesattherootofallthismatter,andattheunderstandingofoneanotherbythemenofscienceontheonehand,andthemenofliterature,andhistory,andart,ontheother.Itisnotaquestionwhetheroneorderofstudyoranothershouldpredominate.
  Itisaquestionofwhattopicsofeducationyoushallselectwhichwillcombinealltheneedfulelementsinsuchdueproportionastogivethegreatestamountoffood,support,andencouragementtothosefacultieswhichenableustoappreciatetruth,andtoprofitbythosesourcesofinnocenthappinesswhichareopentous,and,atthesametime,toavoidthatwhichisbad,andcoarse,andugly,andkeepclearofthemultitudeofpitfallsanddangerswhichbesetthosewhobreakthroughthenaturalormorallaws.
  Iaddressmyself,inthisspirit,totheconsiderationofthequestionofthevalueofpurelyliteraryeducation.Isitgoodandsufficient,orisitinsufficientandbad?Well,hereIventuretosaythatthereareliteraryeducationsandliteraryeducations.IfIamtounderstandbythattermtheeducationthatwascurrentinthegreatmajorityofmiddle—classschools,andupperschoolstoo,inthiscountrywhenIwasaboy,andwhichconsistedabsolutelyandalmostentirelyinkeepingboysforeightortenyearsatlearningtherulesofLatinandGreekgrammar,construingcertainLatinandGreekauthors,andpossiblymakingverseswhich,hadtheybeenEnglishverses,wouldhavebeencondemnedasabominabledoggerel,——ifthatiswhatyoumeanbyliberaleducation,thenI
  sayitisscandalouslyinsufficientandalmostworthless.Myreasonforsayingsoisnotfromthepointofviewofscienceatall,butfromthepointofviewofliterature.Isaythethingprofessestobeliteraryeducationthatisnotaliteraryeducationatall.Itwasnotliteratureatallthatwastaught,butscienceinaverybadform.Itisquiteobviousthatgrammarisscienceandnotliterature.Theanalysisofatextbythehelpoftherulesofgrammarisjustasmuchascientificoperationastheanalysisofachemicalcompoundbythehelpoftherulesofchemicalanalysis.Thereisnothingthatappealstotheaestheticfacultyinthatoperation;andIaskmultitudesofmenofmyownage,whowentthroughthisprocess,whethertheyeverhadaconceptionofartorliteratureuntiltheyobtaineditforthemselvesafterleavingschool?Thenyoumaysay,"Ifthatisso,iftheeducationwasscientific,whycannotyoubesatisfiedwithit?"Isay,becausealthoughitisascientifictraining,itisofthemostinadequateandinappropriatekind.Ifthereisanygoodatallinscientificeducationitisthatmenshouldbetrained,asIsaidbefore,toknowthingsforthemselvesatfirsthand,andthattheyshouldunderstandeverystepofthereasonofthatwhichtheydo.
  Idesiretospeakwiththeutmostrespectofthatscience——
  philology——ofwhichgrammarisapartandparcel;yeteverybodyknowsthatgrammar,asitisusuallylearnedatschool,affordsnoscientifictraining.Itistaughtjustasyouwouldteachtherulesofchessordraughts.Ontheotherhand,ifIamtounderstandbyaliteraryeducationthestudyoftheliteraturesofeitherancientormodernnations——butespeciallythoseofantiquity,andespeciallythatofancientGreece;ifthisliteratureisstudied,notmerelyfromthepointofviewofphilologicalscience,anditspracticalapplicationtotheinterpretationoftexts,butasanexemplificationofandcommentaryupontheprinciplesofart;ifyoulookupontheliteratureofapeopleasachapterinthedevelopmentofthehumanmind,ifyouworkoutthisinabroadspirit,andwithsuchcollateralreferencestomoralsandpolitics,andphysicalgeography,andthelikeasareneedfultomakeyoucomprehendwhatthemeaningofancientliteratureandcivilisationis,——then,assuredly,itaffordsasplendidandnobleeducation.ButIstillthinkitissusceptibleofimprovement,andthatnomanwillevercomprehendtherealsecretofthedifferencebetweentheancientworldandourpresenttime,unlesshehaslearnedtoseethedifferencewhichthelatedevelopmentofphysicalsciencehasmadebetweenthethoughtofthisdayandthethoughtofthat,andhewillneverseethatdifference,unlesshehassomepracticalinsightintosomebranchesofphysicalscience;andyoumustrememberthataliteraryeducationsuchasthatwhichIhavejustreferredto,isoutofthereachofthosewhoseschoollifeiscutshortatsixteenorseventeen.
  But,youwillsay,allthisisfault—finding;letushearwhatyouhaveinthewayofpositivesuggestion.ThenIamboundtotellyouthat,ifIcouldmakeacleansweepofeverything——IamverygladIcannotbecauseImight,andprobablyshould,makemistakes,——
  butifIcouldmakeacleansweepofeverythingandstartafresh,Ishould,inthefirstplace,securethattrainingoftheyounginreadingandwriting,andinthehabitofattentionandobservation,bothtothatwhichistoldthem,andthatwhichtheysee,whicheverybodyagreesto.Butinadditiontothat,Ishouldmakeitabsolutelynecessaryforeverybody,foralongerorshorterperiod,tolearntodraw.Now,youmaysay,therearesomepeoplewhocannotdraw,howevermuchtheymaybetaught.Idenythatintoto,becauseIneveryetmetwithanybodywhocouldnotlearntowrite.