hadbeengovernedbyeldestsonaftereldestson。
EvenwhentheTeutonicracesspreadoverWesternEuropethey
didnotbringwiththemPrimogenitureastheirordinaryruleof
succession。TheallodialpropertyoftheTeutonicfreeman,that
sharewhichhehadtheoreticallyreceivedattheoriginal
settlementofthebrotherhoodtowhichhebelongedontheir
domain,wasdividedathisdeath,whenitwasdividedatall,
equallybetweenhissonsorequallybetweenhissonsand
daughters。Itisquitecertain,however,thattheappearanceof
PrimogenitureintheWestanditsrapiddiffusionmustbe
connectedwiththeirruptionofthebarbarians,andwiththe
tribalideasre-introducedbythemintotheRomanworld。Atthis
point,however,weencounteranotherdifficulty。The
Primogeniturewhichfirstmeetsusisnotuniformlythe
Primogeniturewithwhichwearenowfamiliar。Therightofthe
eldestsonsometimesgiveswaytotherightoftheeldestmale
relativeofthedeceased,andoccasionallyitseemsasifneither
thesuccessionoftheeldestsonnorthatoftheeldestrelative
couldtakeeffectwithoutelectionorconfirmationbythemembers
oftheaggregategrouptowhichbothbelong。
Asusual,wehavetolookforlivingillustrationsofthe
ancientsystemtotheusagesoftheHindoos。TheFamily,
accordingtotheHindootheory,isdespoticallygovernedbyits
head;butifhediesandtheFamilyseparatesathisdeath,the
propertyisequallydividedbetweenthesons。If,however,the
Familydoesnotseparate,butallowsitselftoexpandintoa
JointFamily,wehavetheexactmixtureofelectionanddoubtful
successionwhichwefindintheearlyexamplesofEuropean
primogeniture。Theeldestson,andafterhimhiseldestson,is
ordinarilythemanageroftheaffairsoftheJointFamily,but
hisprivilegestheoreticallydependonelectionbythe
brotherhood,andmaybesetasidebyit,and,whentheyareset
aside,itisgenerallyinfavourofabrotherofthedeceased
manager,who,onthescoreofgreaterage,isassumedtobe
betterqualifiedthanhisnephewforadministrationandbusiness。
InancientIrishsocietytheJointFamily,continuedthroughmany
generations,hasgrownfirstintotheSeptandthenintothe
Clan,contractingagreaterdegreeofartificialityinproportion
toitsenlargement。Theimportance,meanwhile,oftheChiefto
theTribehasratherincreasedthandiminished,sinceheisno
longermerelyadministratorofitscivilaffairsbutitsleader
inwar。Thesystemproducedfromtheseelementsappearstome
sufficientlyintelligible。ThevenerationoftheTribeisnot
attractedbyindividualsoftheChieftain’sfamily,butbythe
familyitself,asrepresentingthepurestbloodoftheentire
brotherhood。Itchoosesitsheadandleadersaveonthevery
rarestoccasionsfromthisfamily,andthereareinstancesof
thechoicebeingsystematicallymadefromtwofamiliesin
alternation。Butthenecessityofhavingamilitaryleaderinthe
vigourofhisphysicalandmentalpowersismuchtooimperiousto
admitofhischoicebeinginvariablydeferredtothedeathofthe
rulingChief,ortoallowoftheelectionfallinguniversallyor
evengenerallyonhisson。’ItisacustomamongalltheIrish,’
saysSpenser,’thatpresentlyafterthedeathofanyoftheir
chieflordsorcaptains,theydopresentlyassemblethemselvesto
aplacegenerallyappointedandknownuntothemtochooseanother
inhisstead,wheretheydonominateandelectforthemostpart,
nottheeldestson,noranyofthechildrenofthelorddeceased,
butthenexttohimofbloodthatiseldestandworthiest,as
commonlythenextbrotherifhehaveany,orthenextcousin,and
soforth,asanyiselderinthatkindredorsept;andthen,next
tohim,theychoosethenextofthebloodtobeTanaist,who
shallsucceedhiminthesaidCaptaincyifhelivethereunto……
ForwhentheirCaptaindieth,iftheSignoryshoulddescendto
hischild,andheperhapsaninfant,anothermightperadventure
stepinbetweenorthrusthimoutbystronghandbeingthen
unabletodefendhisrightandtowithstandtheforceofa
forreiner;andthereforetheydoappointtheeldestofthekinto
havetheSignory,forthatcommonlyheisamanofstrongeryears
andbetterexperiencetomaintaintheinheritanceandtodefend
thecountry……AndtothisendtheTanaistisalwaysready
known,ifitshouldhappentotheCaptainsuddenlytodie,orto
beslaininbattle,ortobeoutofthecountry,todefendand
keepitfromallsuchdangers。’Spenser’s’ViewoftheStateof
Ireland。’
Primogeniture,therefore,consideredasaruleofsuccession
toproperty,appearstometobeaproductoftriballeadership
initsdecay。SomesuchsystemasthatrepresentedbytheIrish
Tanistrybelongedprobablyatonetimetoallthetribal
communitieswhichoverrantheRomanEmpire,butnoprecise
assertioncanbemadeastothestageintheirhistoryatwhich
itbegantobemodified,especiallysinceSohm’sinvestigations
inhis’Fr鋘kischeReichs-undGerichtsverfassung’haveshownus
howconsiderablythesocialorganisationofsomeofthese
communitieshadbeenaffectedbycentralorroyalauthorityin
theintervalbetweentheobservationsofTacitusandthewriting
oftheSalicLaw。ButIthinkwemaysafelyconjecturethatthe
transitionfromtheoldertothenewerPrimogenituretookplace
everywhereundercircumstancesnearlythereverseofthosewhich
keptTanistrysolongaliveinIreland。Whereversomedegreeof
internalpeacewasmaintainedduringtolerablylongperi(丁香书院小说)odsof
time,whereveranapproachwasmadetotheformationofsocieties
ofthedistinctivemoderntype,wherevermilitaryandcivil
institutionsbegantogroupthemselvesroundthecentral
authorityofaking,thevalueofstrategicalcapacityinthe
humblerchiefswoulddiminish,andinthesmallerbrotherhoods
therespectforpurityofbloodwouldhaveuncheckedplay。The
mostnaturalobjectofthisrespectishewhomostdirectly
deriveshisbloodfromthelastruler,andthustheeldestson,
eventhoughaminor,comestobepreferredinthesuccessionto
hisuncle;and,indefaultofsons,thesuccessionmayeven
devolveonawoman。Therearenotafewindicationsthatthe
transformationofideaswasgradual。Thedisputesamonggreat
Highlandfamiliesaboutthetitletothechieftaincyof
particularclansappeartodatefromaperiodwhentherewas
stillaconflictbetweentheoldprincipleofsuccessionandthe
new;andatarelativelylaterperiod,whenthroughoutmostof