Fromthispointofview，thefinalcausesofallsocialchangesandpoliticalrevolutionsaretobesought，notinmen’sbrains，notinmen’sbetterinsightsintoeternaltruthandjustice，butinchangesinthemodesofproductionandexchange。Theyaretobesought，notinthephilosophy，butintheeconomicsofeachparticularepoch。Thegrowingperceptionthatexistingsocialinstitutionsareunreasonableandunjust，thatreasonhasbecomeunreason，andrightwrong1），isonlyproofthatinthemodesofproductionandexchangechangeshavesilentlytakenplacewithwhichthesocialorder，adaptedtoearliereconomicconditions，isnolongerinkeeping。Fromthisitalsofollowsthatthemeansofgettingridoftheincongruitiesthathavebeenbroughttolightmustalsobepresent，inamoreorlessdevelopedcondition，withinthechangedmodesofproductionthemselves。Thesemeansarenottobeinventedbydeductionfromfundamentalprinciples，butaretobediscoveredinthestubbornfactsoftheexistingsystemofproduction。
　　Whatis，then，thepositionofmodernSocialisminthisconnection？
　　Thepresentsituationofsociety？thisisnowprettygenerallyconceded？isthecreationoftherulingclassoftoday，ofthebourgeoisie。Themodeofproductionpeculiartothebourgeoisie，known，sinceMarx，asthecapitalistmodeofproduction，wasincompatiblewiththefeudalsystem，withtheprivilegesitconferreduponindividuals，entiresocialranksandlocalcorporations，aswellaswiththehereditarytiesofsubordinationwhichconstitutedtheframeworkofitssocialorganization。Thebourgeoisiebrokeupthefeudalsystemandbuiltuponitsruinsthecapitalistorderofsociety，thekingdomoffreecompetition，ofpersonalliberty，oftheequality，beforethelaw，ofallcommodityowners，ofalltherestofthecapitalistblessings。Thenceforward，thecapitalistmodeofproductioncoulddevelopinfreedom。Sincesteam，machinery，andthemakingofmachinesbymachinerytransformedtheoldermanufactureintomodernindustry，theproductiveforces，evolvedundertheguidanceofthebourgeoisie，developedwitharapidityandinadegreeunheardofbefore。Butjustastheoldermanufacture，initstime，andhandicraft，becomingmoredevelopedunderitsinfluence，hadcomeintocollisionwiththefeudaltrammelsoftheguilds，sonowmodernindustry，initscompletedevelopment，comesintocollisionwiththeboundswithinwhichthecapitalistmodeofproductionholdsitconfined。Thenewproductiveforceshavealreadyoutgrownthecapitalisticmodeofusingthem。Andthisconflictbetweenproductiveforcesandmodesofproductionisnotaconflictengenderedinthemindofman，likethatbetweenoriginalsinanddivinejustice。Itexists，infact，objectively，outsideus，independentlyofthewillandactionsevenofthementhathavebroughtiton。ModernSocialismisnothingbutthereflex，inthought，ofthisconflictinfact；itsidealreflectionintheminds，first，oftheclassdirectlysufferingunderit，theworkingclass。
　　Now，inwhatdoesthisconflictconsist？
　　Beforecapitalistproduction？i。e。，intheMiddleAges？thesystemofpettyindustryobtainedgenerally，basedupontheprivatepropertyofthelaborersintheirmeansofproduction；inthecountry，theagricultureofthesmallpeasant，freeman，orserf；inthetowns，thehandicraftsorganizedinguilds。Theinstrumentsoflabor？land，agriculturalimplements，theworkshop，thetool？weretheinstrumentsoflaborofsingleindividuals，adaptedfortheuseofoneworker，and，therefore，ofnecessity，small，dwarfish，circumscribed。But，forthisveryreason，theybelongedasaruletotheproducerhimself。Toconcentratethesescattered，limitedmeansofproduction，toenlargethem，toturnthemintothepowerfulleversofproductionofthepresentday？thiswaspreciselythehistoricroleofcapitalistproductionandofitsupholder，thebourgeoisie。InthefourthsectionofCapital，Marxhasexplainedindetailhowsincethe15thcenturythishasbeenhistoricallyworkedoutthroughthethreephasesofsimpleco—operation，manufacture，andmodernindustry。Butthebourgeoisie，asisshownthere，couldnottransformthesepunymeansofproductionintomightyproductiveforceswithouttransformingthem，atthesametime，frommeansofproductionoftheindividualintosocialmeansofproductiononlyworkablebyacollectivityofmen。Thespinningwheel，thehandloom，theblacksmith’shammer，werereplacedbythespinning—machine，thepower—loom，thesteam—hammer；theindividualworkshop，bythefactoryimplyingtheco—operationofhundredsandthousandsofworkmen。Inlikemanner，productionitselfchangedfromaseriesofindividualintoaseriesofsocialacts，andtheproductionfromindividualtosocialproducts。Theyarn，thecloth，themetalarticlesthatnowcomeoutofthefactorywerethejointproductofmanyworkers，throughwhosehandstheyhadsuccessivelytopassbeforetheywereready。Noonepersoncouldsayofthem："Imadethat；thisismyproduct。"
　　Butwhere，inagivensociety，thefundamentalformofproductionisthatspontaneousdivisionoflaborwhichcreepsingraduallyandnotuponanypreconceivedplan，theretheproductstakeontheformofcommodities，whosemutualexchange，buyingandselling，enabletheindividualproducerstosatisfytheirmanifoldwants。AndthiswasthecaseintheMiddleAges。
　　Thepeasant，e。g。，soldtotheartisanagriculturalproductsandboughtfromhimtheproductsofhandicraft。Intothissocietyofindividualproducers，ofcommodityproducers，thenewmodeofproductionthrustitself。Inthemidstoftheolddivisionoflabor，grownupspontaneouslyanduponnodefiniteplan，whichhadgovernedthewholeofsociety，nowarosedivisionoflaboruponadefiniteplan，asorganizedinthefactory；sidebysidewithindividualproductionappearedsocialproduction。
　　Theproductsofbothweresoldinthesamemarket，and，therefore，atpricesatleastapproximatelyequal。Butorganizationuponadefiniteplanwasstrongerthanspontaneousdivisionoflabor。Thefactoriesworkingwiththecombinedsocialforcesofacollectivityofindividualsproducedtheircommoditiesfarmorecheaplythantheindividualsmallproducers。Individualproducerssuccumbedinonedepartmentafteranother。Socializedproductionrevolutionizedalltheoldmethodsofproduction。Butitsrevolutionarycharacterwas，atthesametime，solittlerecognizedthatitwas，onthecontrary，introducedasameansofincreasinganddevelopingtheproductionofcommodities。Whenitarose，itfoundready—made，andmadeliberaluseof，certainmachineryfortheproductionandexchangeofcommodities：merchants’
　　capital，handicraft，wage—labor。Socializedproductionthusintroducingitselfasanewformoftheproductionofcommodities，itwasamatterofcoursethatunderittheoldformsofappropriationremainedinfullswing，andwereappliedtoitsproductsaswell。
　　Inthemedievalstageofevolutionoftheproductionofcommodities，thequestionastotheowneroftheproductoflaborcouldnotarise。Theindividualproducer，asarule，had，fromrawmaterialbelongingtohimself，andgenerallyhisownhandiwork，produceditwithhisowntools，bythelaborofhisownhandsorofhisfamily。Therewasnoneedforhimtoappropriatethenewproduct。Itbelongedwhollytohim，asamatterofcourse。Hispropertyintheproductwas，therefore，baseduponhisownlabor。
　　Evenwhereexternalhelpwasused，thiswas，asarule，oflittleimportance，andverygenerallywascompensatedbysomethingotherthanwages。Theapprenticesandjourneymenoftheguildsworkedlessforboardandwagesthanforeducation，inorderthattheymightbecomemastercraftsmenthemselves。
　　Thencametheconcentrationofthemeansofproductionandoftheproducersinlargeworkshopsandmanufactories，theirtransformationintoactualsocializedmeansofproductionandsocializedproducers。Butthesocializedproducersandmeansofproductionandtheirproductswerestilltreated，afterthischange，justastheyhadbeenbefore？i。e。，asthemeansofproductionandtheproductsofindividuals。Hitherto，theowneroftheinstrumentsoflaborhadhimselfappropriatedtheproduct，because，asarule，itwashisownproductandtheassistanceofotherswastheexception。
　　Now，theowneroftheinstrumentsoflaboralwaysappropriatedtohimselftheproduct，althoughitwasnolongerhisproductbutexclusivelytheproductofthelaborofothers。Thus，theproductsnowproducedsociallywerenotappropriatedbythosewhohadactuallysetinmotionthemeansofproductionandactuallyproducedthecommodities，butbythecapitalists。Themeansofproduction，andproductionitself，hadbecomeinessencesocialized。Buttheyweresubjectedtoaformofappropriationwhichpresupposestheprivateproductionofindividuals，underwhich，therefore，everyoneownshisownproductandbringsittomarket。Themodeofproductionissubjectedtothisformofappropriation，althoughitabolishestheconditionsuponwhichthelatterrests。[2]
　　Thiscontradiction，whichgivestothenewmodeofproductionitscapitalisticcharacter，containsthegermofthewholeofthesocialantagonismsoftoday。Thegreaterthemasteryobtainedbythenewmodeofproductionoverallimportantfieldsofproductionandinallmanufacturingcountries，themoreitreducedindividualproductiontoaninsignificantresiduum，themoreclearlywasbroughtouttheincompatibilityofsocializedproductionwithcapitalisticappropriation。
　　Thefirstcapitalistsfound，aswehavesaid，alongsideofotherformsoflabor，wage—laborready—madeforthemonthemarket。Butitwasexceptional，complementary，accessory，transitorywage—labor。Theagriculturallaborer，though，uponoccassion，hehiredhimselfoutbytheday，hadafewacresofhisownlandonwhichhecouldatalleventsliveatapinch。Theguildsweresoorganizedthatthejourneymantotodaybecamethemasteroftomorrow。
　　Butallthischanged，assoonasthemeansofproductionbecamesocializedandconcentratedinthehandsofcapitalists。Themeansofproduction，aswellastheproduct，oftheindividualproducerbecamemoreandmoreworthless；therewasnothingleftforhimbuttoturnwage—workerunderthecapitalist。Wage—labor，aforetimetheexceptionandaccessory，nowbecametheruleandbasisofallproduction；aforetimecomplementary，itnowbecamethesoleremainingfunctionoftheworker。Thewage—workerforatimebecameawage—workerforlife。Thenumberofthesepermanentwasfurtherenormouslyincreasedbythebreaking—upofthefeudalsystemthatoccurredatthesametime，bythedisbandingoftheretainersofthefeudallords，theevictionofthepeasantsfromtheirhomesteads，etc。Theseparationwasmadecompletebetweenthemeansofproductionconcentratedinthehandsofthecapitalists，ontheoneside，andtheproducers，possessingnothingbuttheirlabor—power，ontheother。Thecontradictionbetweensocializedproductionandcapitalisticappropriationmanifesteditselfastheantagonismofproletariatandbourgeoisie。
　　Wehaveseenthatthecapitalisticmodeofproductionthrustitswayintoasocietyofcommodity—producers，ofindividualproducers，whosesocialbondwastheexchangeoftheirproducts。Buteverysocietybasedupontheproductionofcommoditieshasthispeculiarity：thattheproducershavelostcontrolovertheirownsocialinter—relations。Eachmanproducesforhimselfwithsuchmeansofproductionashemayhappentohave，andforsuchexchangeashemayrequiretosatisfyhisremainingwants。Nooneknowshowmuchofhisparticulararticleiscomingonthemarket，norhowmuchofitwillbewanted。Nooneknowswhetherhisindividualproductwillmeetanactualdemand，whetherhewillbeabletomakegoodhiscostsofproductionoreventosellhiscommodityatall。Anarchyreignsinsocializedproduction。
　　Buttheproductionofcommodities，likeeveryotherformofproduction，hasitpeculiar，inherentlawsinseparablefromit；andtheselawswork，despiteanarchy，inandthroughanarchy。Theyrevealthemselvesintheonlypersistentformofsocialinter—relations？i。e。，inexchange？andheretheyaffecttheindividualproducersascompulsorylawsofcompetition。
　　Theyare，atfirst，unknowntotheseproducersthemselves，andhavetobediscoveredbythemgraduallyandastheresultofexperience。Theyworkthemselvesout，therefore，independentlyoftheproducers，andinantagonismtothem，asinexorablenaturallawsoftheirparticularformofproduction。
　　Theproductgovernstheproducers。
　　Inmediaevalsociety，especiallyintheearliercenturies，productionwasessentiallydirectedtowardsatisfyingthewantsoftheindividual。
　　Itsatisfied，inthemain，onlythewantsoftheproducerandhisfamily。
　　Whererelationsofpersonaldependenceexisted，asinthecountry，italsohelpedtosatisfythewantsofthefeudallord。Inallthistherewas，therefore，noexchange；theproducts，consequently，didnotassumethecharacterofcommodities。Thefamilyofthepeasantproducedalmosteverythingtheywanted：clothesandfurniture，aswellasthemeansofsubsistence。
　　Onlywhenitbegantoproducemorethanwassufficienttosupplyitsownwantsandthepaymentsinkindtothefeudallords，onlythendiditalsoproducecommodities。Thissurplus，thrownintosocializedexchangeandofferedforsale，becamecommodities。
　　Theartisaninthetowns，itistrue，hadfromthefirsttoproduceforexchange。Butthey，also，themselvessuppliedthegreatestpartoftheirindividualwants。Theyhadgardensandplotsofland。Theyturnedtheircattleoutintothecommunalforest，which，also，yieldedthemtimberandfiring。Thewomenspunflax，wool，andsoforth。Productionforthepurposeofexchange，productionofcommodities，wasonlyinitsinfancy。
　　Hence，exchangewasrestricted，themarketnarrow，themethodsofproductionstable；therewaslocalexclusivenesswithout，localunitywithin；themarkinthecountry；inthetown，theguild。
　　Butwiththeextensionoftheproductionofcommodities，andespeciallywiththeintroductionofthecapitalistmodeofproduction，thelawsofcommodity—production，hithertolatent，cameintoactionmoreopenlyandwithgreaterforce。Theoldbondswereloosened，theoldexclusivelimitsbrokenthrough，theproducersweremoreandmoreturnedintoindependent，isolatedproducersofcommodities。Itbecameapparentthattheproductionofsocietyatlargewasruledbyabsenceofplan，byaccident，byanarchy；
　　andthisanarchygrewtogreaterandgreaterheight。Butthechiefmeansbyaidofwhichthecapitalistmodeofproductionintensifiedthisanarchyofsocializedproductionwastheexactoppositeofanarchy。Itwastheincreasingorganizationofproduction，uponasocialbasis，ineveryindividualproductiveestablishment。Bythis，theold，peaceful，stableconditionofthingswasended。Whereverthisorganizationofproductionwasintroducedintoabranchofindustry，itbrookednoothermethodofproductionbyitsside。Thefieldoflaborbecameabattle—ground。Thegreatgeographicaldiscoveries，andthecolonizationfollowingthem，multipliedmarketsandquickenedthetransformationofhandicraftintomanufacture。Thewardidnotsimplybreakoutbetweentheindividualproducersofparticularlocalities。
　　Thelocalstrugglesbegat，intheirturn，nationalconflicts，thecommercialwarsofthe17thand18thcenturies。
　　Finally，modernindustryandtheopeningoftheworld—marketmadethestruggleuniversal，andatthesametimegaveitanunheard—ofvirulence。
　　Advantagesinnaturalorartificialconditionsofproductionnowdecidetheexistenceornon—existenceofindividualcapitalists，aswellasofwholeindustriesandcountries。Hethatfallsisremorselesslycastaside。
　　ItistheDarwinianstruggleoftheindividualforexistencetransferredfromNaturetosocietywithintensifiedviolence。Theconditionsofexistencenaturaltotheanimalappearasthefinaltermofhumandevelopment。Thecontradictionbetweensocializedproductionandcapitalisticappropriationnowpresentsitselfasanantagonismbetweentheorganizationofproductionintheindividualworkshopandtheanarchyofproductioninsocietygenerally。
　　Thecapitalisticmodeofproductionmovesinthesetwoformsoftheantagonismimmanenttoitfromitsveryorigin。Itisneverabletogetoutofthat"viciouscircle"whichFourierhadalreadydiscovered。WhatFouriercouldnot，indeed，seeinhistimeisthatthiscircleisgraduallynarrowing；thatthemovementbecomesmoreandmoreaspiral，andmustcometoanend，likethemovementofplanets，bycollisionwiththecentre。
　　Itisthecompellingforceofanarchyintheproductionofsocietyatlargethatmoreandmorecompletelyturnsthegreatmajorityofmenintoproletarians；
　　anditisthemassesoftheproletariatagainwhowillfinallyputanendtoanarchyinproduction。Itisthecompellingforceofanarchyinsocialproductionthatturnsthelimitlessperfectibilityofmachineryundermodernindustryintoacompulsorylawbywhicheveryindividualindustrialcapitalistmustperfecthismachinerymoreandmore，underpenaltyofruin。
　　Buttheperfectingofmachineryismakinghumanlaborsuperfluous。Iftheintroductionandincreaseofmachinerymeansthedisplacementofmillionsofmanualbyafewmachine—workers，improvementinmachinerymeansthedisplacementofmoreandmoreofthemachine—workersthemselves。Itmeans，inthelastinstance，theproductionofanumberofavailablewageworkersinexcessoftheaverageneedsofcapital，theformationofacompleteindustrialreservearmy，asIcalleditin1845[3]，availableatthetimeswhenindustryisworkingathighpressure，tobecastoutuponthestreetwhentheinevitablecrashcomes，aconstantdeadweightuponthelimbsoftheworking—classinitsstruggleforexistencewithcapital，aregulatorforkeepingofwagesdowntothelowlevelthatsuitstheinterestsofcapital。
　　Thusitcomesabout，toquoteMarx，thatmachinerybecomesthemostpowerfulweaponinthewarofcapitalagainsttheworking—class；
　　thattheinstrumentsoflaborconstantlytearthemeansofsubsistenceoutofthehandsofthelaborer；thattheyveryproductoftheworkeristurnedintoaninstrumentforhissubjugation。
　　Thusitcomesaboutthattheeconomizingoftheinstrumentsoflaborbecomesatthesametime，fromtheoutset，themostrecklesswasteoflabor—power，androbberybaseduponthenormalconditionsunderwhichlaborfunctions；thatmachinery，"themostpowerfulinstrumentforshorteninglabortime，becomesthemostunfailingmeansforplacingeverymomentofthelaborer’stimeandthatofhisfamilyatthedisposalofthecapitalistforthepurposeofexpandingthevalueofhiscapital。"（Capital，Englishedition，p。406）
　　Thusitcomesaboutthattheoverworkofsomebecomesthepreliminaryconditionfortheidlenessofothers，andthatmodernindustry，whichhuntsafternewconsumersoverthewholeworld，forcestheconsumptionofthemassesathomedowntoastarvationminimum，andindoingthusdestroysitsownhomemarket。
　　"Thelawthatalwaysequilibratestherelativesurplus—
　　population，orindustrialreservearmy，totheextentandenergyofaccumulation，thislawrivetsthelaborertocapitalmorefirmlythanthewedgesofVulcandidPrometheustotherock。Itestablishesanaccumulationofmisery，correspondingwiththeaccumulationofcapital。Accumulationofwealthatonepoleis，therefore，atthesametimeaccumulationofmisery，agonyoftoil，slavery，ignorance，brutality，mentaldegradation，attheoppositepole，i。e。，onthesideoftheclassthatproducesitsownproductintheformofcapital（Marx’sCapital，p。661）
　　Andtoexpectanyotherdivisionoftheproductsfromthecapitalistmodeofproductionisthesameasexpectingtheelectrodesofabatterynottodecomposeacidulatedwater，nottoliberateoxygenatthepositive，hydrogenatthenegativepole，solongastheyareconnectedwiththeybattery。
　　Wehaveseenthattheever—increasingperfectibilityofmodernmachineryis，bytheanarchyofsocialproduction，turnedintoacompulsorylawthatforcestheindividualindustrialcapitalistalwaystoimprovehismachinery，alwaystoincreaseitsproductiveforce。Thebarepossibilityofextendingthefieldofproductionistransformedforhimintoasimilarlycompulsorylaw。Theenormousexpansiveforceofmodernindustry，comparedwithwhichthatofgasesismerechild’splay，appearstousnowasanecessityforexpansion，bothqualitativeandquantative，thatlaughsatallresistance。
　　Suchresistanceisofferedbyconsumption，bysales，bythemarketsfortheproductsofmodernindustry。Butthecapacityforextension，extensiveandintensive，ofthemarketsisprimarilygovernedbyquitedifferentlawsthatworkmuchlessenergetically。Theextensionofthemarketscannotkeeppacewiththeextensionofproduction。Thecollisionbecomesinevitable，andasthiscannotproduceanyrealsolutionsolongasitdoesnotbreakinpiecesthecapitalistmodeofproduction，thecollisionsbecomeperiodic。
　　Capitalistproductionhasbegottenanother"viciouscircle"。
　　Asamatteroffact，since1825，whenthefirstgeneralcrisisbrokeout，thewholeindustrialandcommercialworld，productionandexchangeamongallcivilizedpeoplesandtheirmoreorlessbarbarichangers—on，arethrownoutofjointaboutonceevery10years。Commerceisatastand—still，themarketsareglutted，productsaccumulate，asmultitudinousastheyareunsaleable，hardcashdisappears，creditvanishes，factoriesareclosed，themassoftheworkersareinwantofthemeansofsubsistence，becausetheyhaveproducedtoomuchofthemeansofsubsistence；bankruptcyfollowsuponbankruptcy，executionuponexecution。Thestagnationlastforyears；
　　productiveforcesandproductsarewastedanddestroyedwholesale，untiltheaccumulatedmassofcommoditiesfinallyfilteroff，moreorlessdepreciatedinvalue，untilproductionandexchangegraduallybegintomoveagain。
　　Littlebylittle，thepacequickens。Itbecomesatrot。Theindustrialtrotbreaksintoacanter，thecanterinturngrowsintotheheadlonggallopofaperfectsteeplechaseofindustry，commercialcredit，andspeculation，whichfinally，afterbreakneckleaps，endswhereitbegan？intheditchofacrisis。Andsooverandoveragain。Wehavenow，sincetheyear1825，gonethroughthisfivetimes，andatthepresentmoment（1877），wearegoingthroughitforthesixthtime。AndthecharacterofthesecrisesissoclearlydefinedthatFourierhitallofthemoffwhenhedescribedthefirst"criseplethorique"，acrisisfromplethora。
　　Inthesecrises，thecontradictionbetweensocializedproductionandcapitalistappropriationendsinaviolentexplosion。Thecirculationofcommoditiesis，forthetimebeing，stopped。Money，themeansofcirculation，becomesahindrancetocirculation。Allthelawsofproductionandcirculationofcommoditiesareturnedupsidedown。Theeconomiccollisionhasreacheditsapogee。Themodeofproductionisinrebellionagainstthemodeofexchange。
　　Thefactthatthesocializedorganizationofproductionwithinthefactoryhasdevelopedsofarthatithasbecomeincompatiblewiththeanarchyofproductioninsociety，whichexistssidebysidewithanddominatesit，isbroughthometothecapitalistthemselvesbytheviolentconcentrationofcapitalthatoccursduringcrises，throughtheruinofmanylarge，andastillgreaternumberofsmall，capitalists。Thewholemechanismofthecapitalistmodeofproductionbreaksdownunderthepressureoftheproductiveforces，itsowncreations。Itisnolongerabletoturnallthismassofmeansofproductionintocapital。Theyliefallow，andforthatveryreasontheindustrialreservearmymustalsoliefallow。Meansofproduction，meansofsubsistence，availablelaborers，alltheelementsofproductionandofgeneralwealth，arepresentinabundance。But"abundancebecomesthesourceofdistressandwant"（Fourier），becauseitistheverythingthatpreventsthetransformationofthemeansofproductionandsubsistenceintocapital。Forincapitalisticsociety，themeansofproductioncanonlyfunctionwhentheyhaveundergoneapreliminarytransformationintocapital，intothemeansofexploitinghumanlabor—power。Thenecessityofthistransformationintocapitalofthemeansofproductionandsubsistencestandslikeaghostbetweentheseandtheworkers。Italonepreventsthecomingtogetherofthematerialandpersonalleversofproduction；italoneforbidsthemeansofproductiontofunction，theworkerstoworkandlive。
　　Ontheonehand，therefore，thecapitalisticmodeofproductionstandsconvictedofitsownincapacitytofurtherdirecttheseproductiveforces。
　　Ontheother，theseproductiveforcesthemselves，withincreasingenergy，pressforwardtotheremovaloftheexistingcontradiction，totheabolitionoftheirqualityascapital，tothepracticalrecognitionoftheircharacterassocialproductionforces。
　　Thisrebellionoftheproductiveforces，astheygrowmoreandmorepowerful，againsttheirqualityascapital，thisstrongerandstrongercommandthattheirsocialcharactershallberecognized，forcesthecapitalclassitselftotreatthemmoreandmoreassocialproductiveforces，sofarasthisispossibleundercapitalistconditions。Theperiodofindustrialhighpressure，withitsunboundedinflationofcredit，notlessthanthecrashitself，bythecollapseofgreatcapitalistestablishments，tendstobringaboutthatformofthesocializationofgreatmassesofthemeansofproductionwhichwemeetwithinthedifferentkindsofjoint—stockcompanies。Manyofthesemeansofproductionandofdistributionare，fromtheoutset，socolossalthat，liketherailways，theyexcludeallotherformsofcapitalisticexpansion。Atafurtherstageofevolution，thisformalsobecomesinsufficient。Theproducersonalargescaleinaparticularbranchofanindustryinaparticularcountryuniteina"Trust"，aunionforthepurposeofregulatingproduction。Theydeterminethetotalamounttobeproduced，parcelitoutamongthemselves，andthusenforcethesellingpricefixedbeforehand。Buttrustsofthiskind，assoonasbusinessbecomesbad，aregenerallyliabletobreakup，andonthisveryaccountcompelayetgreaterconcentrationofassociation。Thewholeofaparticularindustryisturnedintoonegiganticjoint—stockcompany；internalcompetitiongivesplacetotheinternalmonopolyofthisonecompany。Thishashappenedin1890withtheEnglishalkaliproduction，whichisnow，afterthefusionof48largeworks，inthehandsofonecompany，conducteduponasingleplan，andwithacapitalof6，000，000pounds。
　　Inthetrusts，freedomofcompetitionchangesintoitsveryopposite？intomonopoly；andtheproductionwithoutanydefiniteplanofcapitalisticsocietycapitulatestotheproductionuponadefiniteplanoftheinvadingsocialisticsociety。Certainly，thisissofarstilltothebenefitandadvantageofthecapitalists。But，inthiscase，theexploitationissopalpable，thatitmustbreakdown。Nonationwillputupwithproductionconductedbytrusts，withsobarefacedanexploitationofthecommunitybyasmallbandofdividend—mongers。
　　Inanycase，withtrustsorwithout，theofficialrepresentativeofcapitalistsociety？thestate？willultimatelyhavetoundertakethedirectionofproductiop；[4]ThisnecessityforconversionintoStatepropertyisfeltfirstinthegreatinstitutionsforintercourseandcommunication？thepostoffice，thetelegraphs，therailways。
　　Ifthecrisesdemonstratetheincapacityofthebourgeoisieformanaginganylongermodernproductiveforces，thetransformationofthegreatestablishmentsforproductionanddistributionintojoint—stockcompanies，trusts，andStateproperty，showhowunnecessarythebourgeoisieareforthatpurpose。
　　Allthesocialfunctionsofthecapitalisthasnofurthersocialfunctionthanthatofpocketingdividends，tearingoffcoupons，andgamblingontheStockExchange，wherethedifferentcapitalistsdespoiloneanotheroftheircapital。Atfirst，thecapitalisticmodeofproductionforcesouttheworkers。Now，itforcesoutthecapitalists，andreducesthem，justasitreducedtheworkers，totheranksofthesurplus—population，althoughnotimmediatelyintothoseoftheindustrialreservearmy。
　　But，thetransformation？eitherintojoint—stockcompaniesandtrusts，orintoState—ownership？doesnotdoawaywiththecapitalisticnatureoftheproductiveforces。Inthejoint—stockcompaniesandtrusts，thisisobvious。AndthemodernState，again，isonlytheorganizationthatbourgeoissocietytakesoninordertosupporttheexternalconditionsofthecapitalistmodeofproductionagainsttheencroachmentsaswelloftheworkersasofindividualcapitalists。Themodernstate，nomatterwhatitsform，isessentiallyacapitalistmachine？thestateofthecapitalists，theidealpersonificationofthetotalnationalcapital。Themoreitproceedstothetakingoverofproductiveforces，themoredoesitactuallybecomethenationalcapitalist，themorecitizensdoesitexploit。Theworkersremainwage—workers？proletarians。Thecapitalistrelationisnotdoneawaywith。Itis，rather，broughttoahead。But，broughttoahead，ittopplesover。State—ownershipoftheproductiveforcesisnotthesolutionoftheconflict，butconcealedwithinitarethetechnicalconditionsthatformtheelementsofthatsolution。
　　Thissolutioncanonlyconsistinthepracticalrecognitionofthesocialnatureofthemodernforcesofproduction，andthereforeintheharmonizingwiththesocializedcharacterofthemeansofproduction。Andthiscanonlycomeaboutbysocietyopenlyanddirectlytakingpossessionoftheproductiveforceswhichhaveoutgrownallcontrol，exceptthatofsocietyasawhole。Thesocialcharacterofthemeansofproductionandoftheproductstodayreactsagainsttheproducers，periodicallydisruptsallproductionandexchange，actsonlylikealawofNatureworkingblindly，forcibly，destructively。But，withthetakingoverbysocietyoftheproductiveforces，thesocialcharacterofthemeansofproductionandoftheproductswillbeutilizedbytheproducerswithaperfectunderstandingofitsnature，andinsteadofbeingasourceofdisturbanceandperiodicalcollapse，willbecomethemostpowerfulleverofproductionitself。
　　Activesocialforcesworkexactlylikenaturalforces：blindly，forcibly，destructively，solongaswedonotunderstand，andreckonwith，them。
　　But，whenonceweunderstandthem，whenoncewegrasptheiraction，theirdirection，theireffects，itdependsonlyuponourselvestosubjectthemmoreandmoretoourownwill，and，bymeansofthem，toreachourownends。Andthisholdsquiteespeciallyofthemightyproductiveforcesoftoday。Aslongasweobstinatelyrefusetounderstandthenatureandthecharacterofthesesocialmeansofaction？andthisunderstandinggoesagainstthegrainofthecapitalistmodeofproduction，anditsdefenders？solongtheseforcesareatworkinspiteofus，inoppositiontous，solongtheymasterus，aswehaveshownaboveindetail。
　　Butwhenoncetheirnatureisunderstood，theycan，inthehandworkingtogether，betransformedfrommasterdemonsintowillingservants。Thedifferenceisasthatbetweenthedestructiveforceofelectricityinthelightninginthestorm，andelectricityundercommandinthetelegraphandthevoltaicarc；thedifferencebetweenaconflagration，andfireworkingintheserviceofman。Withthisrecognition，atlast，oftherealnatureoftheproductiveforcesoftoday，thesocialanarchyofproductiongivesplacetoasocialregulationofproductionuponadefiniteplan，accordingtotheneedsofthecommunityandofeachindividual。Thenthecapitalistmodeofappropriation，inwhichtheproductenslavesfirsttheproducer，andthentheappropriator，isreplacedbythemodeofappropriationoftheproductsthatisbaseduponthenatureofthemodernmeansofproduction；
　　upontheonehand，directsocialappropriation，asmeanstothemaintenanceandextensionofproduction？ontheother，directindividualappropriation，asmeansofsubsistenceandofenjoyment。
　　Whilstthecapitalistmodeofproductionmoreandmorecompletelytransformsthegreatmajorityofthepopulationintoproletarians，itcreatesthepowerwhich，underpenaltyofitsowndestruction，isforcedtoaccomplishthisrevolution。Whilstitforcesonmoreandmoreofthetransformationofthevastmeansofproduction，alreadysocialized，intoStateproperty，itshowsitselfthewaytoaccomplishingthisrevolution。TheproletariatseizespoliticalpowerandturnsthemeansofproductionintoStateproperty。
　　But，indoingthis，itabolishesitselfasproletariat，abolishesallclassdistinctionandclassantagonisms，abolishesalsotheStateasState。
　　Society，thusfar，baseduponclassantagonisms，hadneedoftheState。
　　Thatis，ofanorganizationoftheparticularclasswhichwas，protempore，theexploitingclass，anorganizationforthepurposeofpreventinganyinterferencefromwithoutwiththeexistingconditionsofproduction，and，therefore，especially，forthepurposeofforciblykeepingtheexploitedclassesintheconditionofoppressioncorrespondingwiththegivenmodeofproduction（slavery，serfdom，wage—labor）。TheStatewastheofficialrepresentativeofsocietyasawhole；thegatheringofittogetherintoavisibleembodiment。But，itwasthisonlyinsofarasitwastheStateofthatclasswhichitselfrepresented，forthetimebeing，societyasawhole：
　　inancienttimes，theStateofslaveowningcitizens；
　　intheMiddleAges，thefeudallords；
　　inourowntimes，thebourgeoisie。
　　When，atlast，itbecomestherealrepresentativeofthewholeofsociety，itrendersitselfunnecessary。Assoonasthereisnolongeranysocialclasstobeheldinsubjection；assoonasclassrule，andtheindividualstruggleforexistencebaseduponourpresentanarchyinproduction，withthecollisionsandexcessesarisingfromthese，areremoved，nothingmoreremainstoberepressed，andaspecialrepressiveforce，aState，isnolongernecessary。ThefirstactbyvirtueofwhichtheStatereallyconstitutesitselftherepresentativeofthewholeofsociety？thetakingpossessionofthemeansofproductioninthenameofsociety？thisis，atthesametime，itslastindependentactasaState。Stateinterferenceinsocialrelationsbecomes，inonedomainafteranother，superfluous，andthendiesoutofitself；thegovernmentofpersonsisreplacedbytheadministrationofthings，andbytheconductofprocessesofproduction。TheStateisnot"abolished"。Itdiesout。Thisgivesthemeasureofthevalueofthephrase："afreeState"，bothastoitsjustifiableuseattimesbyagitators，andastoitsultimatescientificinefficiency；andalsoofthedemandsoftheso—calledanarchistsfortheabolitionoftheStateoutofhand。
　　Sincethehistoricalappearanceofthecapitalistmodeofproduction，theappropriationbysocietyofallthemeansofproductionhasoftenbeendreamedof，moreorlessvaguely，byindividuals，aswellasbysects，astheidealofthefuture。Butitcouldbecomepossible，couldbecomeahistoricalnecessity，onlywhentheactualconditionsforitsrealizationwerethere。Likeeveryothersocialadvance，itbecomespracticable，notbymenunderstandingthattheexistenceofclassesisincontradictiontojustice，equality，etc。，notbythemerewillingnesstoabolishtheseclasses，butbyvirtueofcertainneweconomicconditions。Theseparationofsocietyintoanexploitingandanexploitedclass，arulingandanoppressedclass，wasthenecessaryconsequencesofthedeficientandrestricteddevelopmentofproductioninformertimes。Solongasthetotalsociallaboronlyyieldsaproducewhichbutslightlyexceedsthatbarelynecessaryfortheexistenceofall；solong，therefore，aslaborengagesalloralmostallthetimeofthegreatmajorityofthemembersofsociety？solong，ofnecessity，thissocietyisdividedintoclasses。Sidebysidewiththegreatmajority，exclusivelybondslavestolabor，arisesaclassfreedfromdirectlyproductivelabor，whichlooksafterthegeneralaffairsofsociety：thedirectionoflabor，Statebusiness，law，science，art，etc。Itis，therefore，thelawofdivisionoflaborthatliesatthebasisofthedivisionintoclasses。
　　Butthisdoesnotpreventthisdivisionintoclassesfrombeingcarriedoutbymeansofviolenceandrobbery，trickeryandfraud。itdoesnotpreventtherulingclass，oncehavingtheupperhand，fromconsolidatingitspowerattheexpenseoftheworking—class，fromturningitssocialleadershipintoanintensifiedexploitationofthemasses。
　　Butif，uponthisshowing，divisionintoclasseshasacertainhistoricaljustification，ithasthisonlyforagivenperiod，onlyundergivensocialconditions。Itwasbasedupontheinsufficiencyofproduction。Itwillbesweptawaybythecompletedevelopmentofmodernproductiveforces。
　　And，infact，theabolitionofclassesinsocietypresupposesadegreeofhistoricalevolutionatwhichtheexistence，notsimplyofthisorthatparticularrulingclass，butofanyrulingclassatall，and，therefore，theexistenceofclassdistinctionitself，hasbecomeaobsoleteanachronism。
　　Itpresupposes，therefore，thedevelopmentofproductioncarriedouttoadegreeatwhichappropriationofthemeansofproductionandoftheproducts，and，withthis，ofpoliticaldomination，ofthemonopolyofculture，andofintellectualleadershipbyaparticularclassofsociety，hasbecomenotonlysuperfluousbuteconomically，politically，intellectually，ahindrancetodevelopment。
　　Thispointisnowreached。Theirpoliticalandintellectualbankruptcyisscarcelyanylongerasecrettothebourgeoisiethemselves。Theireconomicbankruptcyrecursregularlyevery10years。Ineverycrisis，societyissuffocatedbeneaththeweightofitsownproductiveforcesandproducts，whichitcannotuse，andstandshelpless，face—to—facewiththeabsurdcontradictionthattheproducershavenothingtoconsume，becauseconsumersarewanting。Theexpansiveforceofthemeansofproductionburstthebondsthatthecapitalistmodeofproductionhadimposeduponthem。Theirdeliverancefromthesebondsistheonepreconditionforanunbroken，constantly—accelerateddevelopmentoftheproductiveforces，andtherewithforapracticallyunlimitedincreaseofproductionitself。Noristhisall。Thesocializedappropriationofthemeansofproductiondoesaway，notonlywiththepresentartificialrestrictionsuponproduction，butalsowiththepositivewasteanddevastationofproductiveforcesandproductsthatareatthepresenttimetheinevitableconcomitantsofproduction，andthatreachtheirheightinthecrises。
　　Further，itsetsfreeforthecommunityatlargeamassofmeansofproductionandofproducts，bydoingawaywiththesenselessextravaganceoftherulingclassesoftoday，andtheirpoliticalrepresentatives。Thepossibilityofsecuringforeverymemberofsociety，bymensofsocializedproduction，anexistencenotonlyfullysufficientmaterially，andbecomingday—by—daymorefull，butanexistenceguaranteeingtoallthefreedevelopmentandexerciseoftheirphysicalandmentalfaculties？thispossibilityisnow，forthefirsttime，here，butitishere。[5]
　　Withtheseizingofthemeansofproductionbysociety，productionofcommoditiesisdoneawaywith，and，simultaneously，themasteryoftheproductovertheproducer。Anarchyinsocialproductionisreplacedbysystematic，definiteorganization。Thestruggleforindividualexistencedisappears。Then，forthefirsttime，man，inacertainsense，isfinallymarkedofffromtherestoftheanimalkingdom，andemergesfrommereanimalconditionsofexistenceintoreallyhumanones。Thewholesphereoftheconditionsoflifewhichenvironman，andwhichhavehithertoruledman，nowcomesunderthedominionandcontrolofman，whoforthefirsttimebecomesthereal，consciouslordofnature，becausehehasnowbecomemasterofhisownsocialorganization。Thelawsofhisownsocialaction，hithertostandingface—to—facewithmanaslawsofNatureforeignto，anddominatinghim，willthenbeusedwithfullunderstanding，andsomasteredbyhim。
　　Man’sownsocialorganization，hithertoconfrontinghimasanecessityimposedbyNatureandhistory，nowbecomestheresultofhisownfreeaction。
　　Theextraneousobjectiveforcesthathave，hitherto，governedhistory，passunderthecontrolofmanhimself。Onlyfromthattimewillmanhimself，moreandmoreconsciously，makehisownhistory？onlyfromthattimewillthesocialcausessetinmovementbyhimhave，inthemainandinaconstantlygrowingmeasure，theresultsintendedbyhim。Itistheascentofmanfromthekingdomofnecessitytothekingdomoffreedom。
　　Letusbrieflysumupoursketchofhistoricalevolution。
　　I。MediaevalSociety？Individualproductiononasmallscale。Meansofproductionadaptedforindividualuse；henceprimitive，ungainly，petty，dwarfedinaction。Productionforimmediateconsumption，eitheroftheproducerhimselforhisfeudallord。
　　Onlywhereanexcessofproductionoverthisconsumptionoccursissuchexcessofferedforsale，entersintoexchange。Productionofcommodities，therefore，onlyinitsinfancy。Butalreadyitcontainswithinitself，inembryo，anarchyintheproductionofsocietyatlarge。
　　II。CapitalistRevolution？transformationofindustry，atfirstbemeansofsimplecooperationandmanufacture。Concentrationofthemeansofproduction，hithertoscattered，intogreatworkshops。Asaconsequence，theirtransformationfromindividualtosocialmeansofproduction？atransformationwhichdoesnot，onthewhole，affecttheformofexchange。Theoldformsofappropriationremaininforce。Thecapitalistappears。Inhiscapacityasownerofthemeansofproduction，healsoappropriatestheproductsandturnsthemintocommodities。Productionhasbecomeasocialact。Exchangeandappropriationcontinuetobeindividualacts，theactsofindividuals。Thesocialproductisappropriatedbytheindividualcapitalist。Fundamentalcontradiction，whenceariseallthecontradictionsinwhichourpresent—daysocietymoves，andwhichmodernindustrybringstolight。
　　A。Severanceoftheproducerfromthemeansofproduction。
　　Condemnationoftheworkertowage—laborforlife。Antagonismbetweentheproletariatandthebourgeoisie。
　　B。Growingpredominanceandincreasingeffectivenessofthelawsgoverningtheproductionofcommodities。Unbridledcompetition。
　　Contradictionbetweensocializedorganizationintheindividualfactoryandsocialanarchyintheproductionasawhole。
　　C。Ontheonehand，perfectingofmachinery，madebycompetitioncompulsoryforeachindividualmanufacturer，andcomplementedbyaconstantlygrowingdisplacementoflaborers。Industrialreserve—army。
　　Ontheotherhand，unlimitedextensionofproduction，alsocompulsoryundercompetition，foreverymanufacturer。Onbothsides，unheard—ofdevelopmentofproductiveforces，excessofsupplyoverdemand，over—productionandproducts？excessthere，oflaborers，withoutemploymentandwithoutmeansofexistence。Butthesetwoleversofproductionandofsocialwell—beingareunabletoworktogether，becausethecapitalistformofproductionpreventstheproductiveforcesfromworkingandtheproductsfromcirculating，unlesstheyarefirstturnedintocapital？whichtheirverysuperabundanceprevents。Thecontradictionhasgrownintoanabsurdity。Themodeofproductionrisesinrebellionagainsttheformofexchange。
　　D。Partialrecognitionofthesocialcharacteroftheproductiveforcesforceduponthecapitaliststhemselves。Takingoverofthegreatinstitutionsforproductionandcommunication，firstbyjoint—stockcompanies，laterinbytrusts，thenbytheState。Thebourgeoisiedemonstratedtobeasuperfluousclass。Allitssocialfunctionsarenowperformedbysalariedemployees。
　　III。ProletarianRevolution？Solutionofthecontradictions。Theproletariatseizesthepublicpower，andbymeansofthistransformsthesocializedmeansofproduction，slippingfromthehandsofthebourgeoisie，intopublicproperty。Bythisact，theproletariatfreesthemeansofproductionfromthecharacterofcapitaltheyhavethusfarborne，andgivestheirsocializedcharactercompletefreedomtoworkitselfout。Socializedproductionuponapredeterminedplanbecomeshenceforthpossible。Thedevelopmentofproductionmakestheexistenceofdifferentclassesofsocietythenceforthananachronism。Inproportionasanarchyinsocialproductionvanishes，thepoliticalauthorityoftheStatediesout。Man，atlastthemasterofhisownformofsocialorganization，becomesatthesametimethelordoverNature，hisownmaster？free。
　　Toaccomplishthisactofuniversalemancipationisthehistoricalmissionofthemodernproletariat。Tothoroughlycomprehendthehistoricalconditionsandthistheverynatureofthisact，toimparttothenowoppressedproletarianclassafullknowledgeoftheconditionsandofthemeaningofthemomentousactitiscalledupontoaccomplish，thisisthetaskofthetheoreticalexpressionoftheproletarianmovement，scientificSocialism。
　　Footnotes（1MephistophelesinGoethe’sFaust[2]Itishardlynecessaryinthisconnectiontopointoutthat，eveniftheformofappropriationremainsthesame，thecharacteroftheappropriationisjustasmuchrevolutionizedasproductionisbythechangesdescribedabove。Itis，ofcourse，averydifferentmatterwhetherIappropriatetomyselfmyownproductorthatofanother。Noteinpassingthatwage—labor，whichcontainsthewholecapitalistmodeofproductioninembryo，isveryancient；inasporadic，scatteredform，itexistedforcenturiesalongsideslave—labor。Buttheembryocoulddulydevelopintothecapitalisticmodeofproductiononlywhenthenecessaryhistoricalpre—conditionshadbeenfurnished。
　　[3]"TheConditionsoftheWorking—ClassinEngland"？Sonnenschein&；Co。，p。84。
　　[4]Isay"haveto"。Foronlywhenthemeansofproductionanddistributionhave_actually_outgrowntheformofmanagementbyjoint—stockcompanies，andwhen，therefore，thetakingthemoverbytheStatehasbecome_economically_
　　inevitable，onlythen？evenifitistheStateoftodaythateffectsthis？isthereaneconomicadvance，theattainmentofanothersteppreliminarytothetakingoverofallproductiveforcesbysocietyitself。Butoflate，sinceBismarckwentinforState—ownershipofindustrialestablishments，akindofspuriousSocialismhasarisen，degenerating，nowandagain，intosomethingofflunkyism，thatwithoutmoreadodeclaresallState—ownership，evenoftheBismarkiansort，tobesocialistic。Certainly，ifthetakingoverbytheStateofthetobaccoindustryissocialistic，thenNapoleonandMetternichmustbenumberedamongthefoundersofSocialism。
　　IftheBelgianState，forquiteordinarypoliticalandfinancialreasons，itselfconstructeditschiefrailwaylines；ifBismarck，notunderanyeconomiccompulsion，tookoverfortheStatethechiefPrussianlines，simplytobethebetterabletohavetheminhandincaseofwar，tobringuptherailwayemployeesasvotingcattlefortheGovernment，andespeciallytocreateforhimselfanewsourceofincomeindependentofparliamentaryvotes？thiswas，innosense，asocialisticmeasure，directlyorindirectly，consciouslyorunconsciously。Otherwise，theRoyalMaritimeCompany，theRoyalporcelainmanufacture，andeventheregimentaltailorofthearmywouldalsobesocialisticinstitutions，oreven，aswasseriouslyproposedbyaslydoginFrederickWilliamIII’sreign，thetakingoverbytheStateofthebrothels。
　　[5]Afewfiguresmayservetogiveanapproximateideaoftheenormousexpansiveforceofthemodernmeansofproduction，evenundercapitalistpressure。
　　AccordingtoMr。Giffen，thetotalwealthofGreatBritainandIrelandamounted，inroundnumbersin1814to£；2，200，000，000，1865to£；6，100，000，000，1875to£；8，500，000，000。
　　Asaninstanceofthesquanderingofmeansofproductionandofproductsduringacrisis，thetotallossintheGermanironindustryalone，inthecrisisof1873—78，wasgivenatthesecondGermanIndustrialCongress（Berlin，February21，1878），as22，750，000pounds。