Contents:
  IntroductionConfessionsofanInquiringSpiritLettersontheInspirationoftheScriptures。
  AnEssayonFaithNotesontheBookofCommonPrayerANightlyPrayerASailor’sFortuneEssayI
  EssayII
  EssayIII
  EssayIV
  EssayV
  EssayVI
  INTRODUCTION
  SamuelTaylorColeridgewasbornonthe21stofOctober,1772,youngestofmanychildrenoftheRev。JohnColeridge,VicaroftheParishandHeadMasteroftheGrammarSchoolofOtterySt。Mary,inDevonshire。Oneofthepoet’selderbrotherswasthegrandfatherofLordChiefJusticeColeridge。Coleridge’smotherwasanotablehousewife,aswasneedfulinthemotheroftenchildren,whohadthreemoretransmittedtoherfromherhusband’sformerwife。
  Coleridge’sfatherwasakindlyandlearnedman,littlesophisticated,anddistinguishinghimselfnowandthenbycomicalactsofwhatiscalledabsenceofmind。CharlesBuller,afterwardsajudge,wasoneofhisboys,and,whenherhusband’slifeseemedtobefailing,hadpromisedwhathelphecouldgivetotheanxiouswife。
  Whenhisfatherdied,SamuelTaylorColeridgewasbuteightyearsold,andCharlesBullerobtainedforhimhispresentationtoChrist’sHospital。Coleridge’sminddelightedinfarwanderingoverthefieldsofthought;fromaboyhetookintensedelightindreamyspeculationonthemysteriesthatliearoundthelifeofman。FromaboyalsoheprovedhissubtletiesofthoughtthroughwhatCharlesLambcalledthe"deepandsweetintonations"ofsuchspeechascouldcomeonlyfromapoet。
  FromtheCharterhouse,ColeridgewenttoJesusCollege,Cambridge,wherehesoonwonagoldmedalforaGreekodeontheSlaveTrade,butthroughindolenceheslippedintoahundredpoundsofdebt。ThestiroftheFrenchRevolutionwasthenquickeningyoungmindsintoboldfreedomofspeculation,resentmentagainsttyrannyofcustom,andyearningforahigherlifeinthisworld。Oldopinionsthatfamiliarityhadmadetothemultitudeconventionalwereforthatreasondistrustedanddiscarded。Coleridgenolongerheldhisreligiousfaithintheformtaughtbyhisfather。HecouldnotsigntheThirty-nineArticles,andfelthiscareerclosedattheUniversity。Hisdebtalsopresseduponhimheavily。Afteralongvacationwithaburdenedmind,inwhichonepleasantdayofpicnicgaveoccasiontohis"SongsofthePixies,"ColeridgewentbacktoCambridge。Butsoonafterwardshethrewallupindespair。Heresolvedtobecomelosttohisfriends,andfindsomeplacewherehecouldearninobscuritybaredailybread。HecametoLondon,andthenenlistedasaprivateinthe15thLightDragoons。Afterfourmonthshewasdiscovered,hisdischargewasobtained,andhewentbacktoCambridge。
  Buthehadnocareerbeforehimthere,forhisreligiousopinionsthenexcludedbeliefinthedoctrineoftheTrinity,andtheUniversitieswerenotthenopentoDissenters。AvisittoOxfordbroughthimintorelationwithRobertSoutheyandfellow-studentsofSouthey’swhowerealsotouchedwithrevolutionaryardour。ColeridgejoinedwiththemintheresolvetoleavetheOldWorldandcreateabetterintheNew,asfoundersofaPantisocracy——anall-equalgovernment——onthebanksoftheSusquehannah。Theywouldneedwives,andSoutheyknewofthreegoodliberal-mindedsistersatBristol,oneofthemdesignedforhimself;hertwosistersherecommendedforasfarastheywouldgo。ThechiefpromotersofthePantisocracyremovedtoBristol,andoneofthethreesisters,SarahFricker,wasmarriedbyColeridge;Southeymarryinganother,Edith;whileanotheryoungOxfordenthusiastmarriedtheremainingMissFricker;andsotheymadethreepairsoffuturepatriarchsandmatriarchs。
  NothingcameofthePantisocracy,forwantofmoneytopayfarestotheNewWorld。Coleridgesupportedhimselfbygivinglectures,andin1797publishedPoems。Theyincludedhis"ReligiousMusings,"
  whichcontainexpressionofhisferventrevolutionaryhopes。Thenheplannedaweeklypaper,theWatchman,thatwastocarrythelanternofphilosophictruth,andcallthehourforthosewhocaredaboutthedutiesoftheday。WhenonlythreeorfourhundredsubscribershadbeengottogetherinBristol,Coleridgeresolvedtotravelfromtowntotowninsearchofsubscriptions。Whereverhewenthiseloquenceprevailed;andhecamebackwithaverylargesubscriptionlist。Butthepowerofclosedailywork,bywhichaloneColeridgecouldcarryoutsuchadesign,wasnotinhim,andtheWatchmanonlyreachedtoitstenthnumber。
  ThenColeridgesettledatNetherStowey,bytheBristolChannel,partlyforconvenienceofneighbourhoodtoThomasPoole,fromwhomhecouldborrowatneed。HehadtherealsoayearlyallowancefromtheWedgwoodsofEtruria,whohadastrongfaithinhisfuture。FromNetherStowey,ColeridgewalkedovertomakefriendswithWordsworthatRacedown,andthefriendshipthereestablishedcausedWordsworthandhissistertoremovetotheneighbourhoodofNetherStowey。OutoftherelationswithWordsworththusestablishedcameColeridge’sbestachievementsasapoet,the"AncientMariner"and"Christabel。"
  The"AncientMariner"wasfinished,andwasthechiefpartofColeridge’scontributiontothe"LyricalBallads,"whichthetwofriendspublishedin1798。"Christabel,"beingunfinished,wasleftunpublisheduntil1816。
  WithhelpfromtheWedgwoods,ColeridgewentabroadwithWordsworthandhissister,leftthematHamburg,andduringfourteenmonthsincreasedhisfamiliaritywithGerman。Hecamebackinthelatesummerof1799,fullofenthusiasmforSchiller’slastgreatwork,hisWallenstein,whichColeridgehadseenacted。TheCamphadbeenfirstactedatWeimaronthe18thofOctober,1798;thePiccolominionthe30thofJanuary,1799;andWallenstein’sDeathonthe10thofthenextfollowingApril。Coleridge,undertheinfluenceoffreshenthusiasm,rapidlycompletedforMessrs。LongmanhistranslationofWallenstein’sDeathintoanEnglishpoemofthehighestmark。
  Thenfollowedaweakeningofhealth。Coleridgeearnedfitfullyasjournalist;settledatKeswick;foundhistendencytorheumatismincreasedbythedampoftheLakeCountry;tookaremedycontainingopium,andbegantoacquirethattastefortheexcitementofopiumwhichruinedthenextyearsofhislife。HewasinvitedtoMalta,forthebenefitoftheclimate,byhisfriend,JohnStoddart,whowasthere。AtMaltahemadetheacquaintanceofthegovernor,SirAlexanderBall,whoseworthhecelebratesinessaysoftheFriend,whichareincludedunderthetitleof"ASailor’sFortune"inthislittlevolume。ForashorttimeheactedassecretarytoSirAlexander,thenreturnedtotheLakesandplannedhisjournal,theFriend,publishedatPenrith,ofwhichthefirstnumberappearedonthe1stofAugust,1809,thetwenty-eighthandlasttowardstheendofMarch,1810。
  NextfollowedsixyearsofstruggletoliveasjournalistandlecturerinLondonandelsewhere,whilethehabitoftakingopiumgrewyearbyyear,andatlastadvancedfromtwoquartsoflaudanumaweektoapintaday。ColeridgeputhimselfundervoluntaryrestraintforatimewithaMr。MorganatCalne。Finallyheplacedhimself,inApril,1816——theyearofthepublicationof"Christabel"——
  withasurgeonatHighgate,Mr。Gillman,underwhosefriendlycarehewasrestoredtohimself,andinwhosehousehediedonthe25thofJuly,1834。ItwasduringthiscalmautumnofhislifethatColeridge,turningwhollytothehigherspeculationsonphilosophyandreligionuponwhichhismindwaschieflyfixed,areverttotheChurch,andoftenactivelyantagonisttotheopinionshehadheldforafewyears,wrote,his"LaySermons,"andhis"BiographiaLiteraria,"andarrangedalsoavolumeofEssaysoftheFriend。HelecturedonShakespeare,wrote"AidstoReflection,"andshowedhowhisdoubtsweresetatrestinthese"ConfessionsofanInquiringSpirit,"whichwerefirstpublishedin1840,aftertheirwriter’sdeath。
  H。M。
  CONFESSIONSOFANINQUIRINGSPIRIT。
  LETTERSONTHEINSPIRATIONOFTHESCRIPTURES。
  LETTERI。
  Mydearfriend,IemployedthecompelledandmostunwelcomeleisureofsevereindispositioninreadingTheConfessionsofaFairSaintinMr。
  Carlyle’srecenttranslationoftheWilhelmMeister,whichmight,I
  think,havebeenbetterrenderedliterallyTheConfessionsofaBeautifulSoul。This,actinginconjunctionwiththeconcludingsentencesofyourletter,threwmythoughtsinwardonmyownreligiousexperience,andgaveimmediateoccasiontothefollowingConfessionsofonewhoisneitherfairnorsaintly,butwho,groaningunderadeepsenseofinfirmityandmanifoldimperfection,feelsthewant,thenecessity,ofreligioussupport;whocannotaffordtoloseanythesmallestbuttress,butwhonotonlylovesTruthevenforitself,andwhenitrevealsitselfalooffromallinterest,butwholovesitwithanindescribableawe,whichtoooftenwithdrawsthegenialsapofhisactivityfromthecolumnartrunk,theshelteringleaves,thebrightandfragrantflower,andthefoodfulormedicinalfruitage,tothedeeproot,ramifyinginobscurityandlabyrinthineway-winning-
  Indarknesstheretohouseunknown,Farunderground,PiercedbynosoundSavesuchasliveinFancy’searalone,Thatlistensfortheuptornmandrake’spartinggroan!
  Ishould,perhaps,beahappier——atalleventsamoreuseful——manifmymindwereotherwiseconstituted。Butsoitis,andevenwithregardtoChristianityitself,likecertainplants,Icreeptowardsthelight,eventhoughitdrawmeawayfromthemorenourishingwarmth。Yea,Ishoulddoso,evenifthelighthadmadeitswaythrougharentinthewalloftheTemple。Glad,indeed,andgratefulamI,thatnotintheTempleitself,butonlyinoneortwoofthesidechapels,notessentialtotheedifice,andprobablynotcoevalwithit,haveIfoundthelightabsent,andthattherentinthewallhasbutadmittedthefreelightoftheTempleitself。
  Ishallbestcommunicatethestateofmyfaithbytakingthecreed,orsystemofcredenda,commontoalltheFathersoftheReformation——
  overlooking,asnon-essential,thedifferencesbetweentheseveralReformedChurches,accordingtothefivemainclassesorsectionsintowhichtheaggregatedistributesitselftomyapprehension。I
  havethenonlytostatetheeffectproducedonmymindbyeachofthese,orthequantumofrecipiencyandcoincidenceinmyselfrelativelythereto,inordertocompletemyConfessionofFaith。
  I。TheAbsolute;theinnominable[Greektextwhichcannotbereproduced]etCausaSui,inwhosetranscendentIAM,astheGround,ISwhateverVERILYis:-theTriuneGod,bywhoseWordandSpirit,asthetranscendentCause,EXISTSwhateverSUBSTANTIALLYexists:-GodAlmighty——Father,Son,andHolyGhost,undivided,unconfounded,co-
  eternal。ThisclassIdesignatebytheword[Greektextwhichcannotbereproduced]。
  II。TheEternalPossibilities;theactualityofwhichhathnotitsorigininGod:Chaosspirituale:-[Greektextwhichcannotbereproduced]。
  III。TheCreationandFormationoftheheavenandearthbytheRedemptiveWord:-theApostasyofMan:-theRedemptionofMan:-theIncarnationoftheWordintheSonofMan:-theCrucifixionandResurrectionoftheSonofMan:-theDescentoftheComforter:-
  Repentance([Greektextwhichcannotbereproduced]):-Regeneration:-
  Faith:-Prayer:-Grace——CommunionwiththeSpirit:-Conflict:-Self-
  abasement:-AssurancethroughtherighteousnessofChrist:-SpiritualGrowth:-Love:-Discipline:-Perseverance:-Hopeindeath:-[Greektextwhichcannotbereproduced]
  IV。Buttheseoffers,gifts,andgracesarenotforone,orforafew。Theyareofferedtoall。EvenwhentheGospelispreachedtoasingleindividualitisofferedtohimastooneofagreathousehold。Notonlyman,but,saysSt。Paul,thewholecreationisincludedintheconsequencesoftheFall——[Greektextwhichcannotbereproduced]——soalsointhoseofthechangeattheRedemption——[Greektextwhichcannotbereproduced]。WetooshallberaisedINTHE
  BODY。Christianityisfactnolessthantruth。Itisspiritual,yetsoastobehistorical;andbetweenthesetwopolestheremustlikewisebeamidpoint,inwhichthehistoricalandspiritualmeet。
  Christianitymusthaveitshistory——ahistoryofitselfandlikewisethehistoryofitsintroduction,itsspread,anditsoutward-
  becoming;and,asthemidpointabovementioned,aportionofthesefactsmustbemiraculous,thatis,phenomenainnaturethatarebeyondnature。Furthermore,thehistoryofallhistoricalnationsmustinsomesensebeitshistory——inotherwords,allhistorymustbeprovidential,andthisaprovidence,apreparation,andalookingforwardtoChrist。
  Here,then,wehavefouroutofthefiveclasses。Andinallthesetheskyofmybeliefisserene,uncloudedbyadoubt。WouldtoGodthatmyfaith,thatfaithwhichworksonthewholeman,confirmingandconforming,werebutinjustproportiontomybelief,tothefullacquiescenceofmyintellect,andthedeepconsentofmyconscience!
  Theverydifficultiesarguethetruthofthewholeschemeandsystemformyunderstanding,sinceIseeplainlythatsomustthetruthappear,ifitbethetruth。
  V。ButthereisaBookoftwoparts,eachpartconsistingofseveralbooks。Thefirstpart(Ispeakinthecharacterofanuninterestedcriticorphilologist)containstherelicsoftheliteratureoftheHebrewpeople,whiletheHebrewwasstillthelivinglanguage。Thesecondpartcomprisesthewritings,and,withoneortwoinconsiderableanddoubtfulexceptions,allthewritingsofthefollowersofChristwithinthespaceofninetyyearsfromthedateoftheResurrection。IdonotmyselfthinkthatanyofthesewritingswerecomposedaslateasA。D。120;butIwishtoprecludealldispute。ThisBookIresumeasread,andyetunread——readandfamiliartomymindinallparts,butwhichisyettobeperusedasawhole,orratherawork,cujusparticulasetsententiolasomnesetsingulasrecogniturussum,butthecomponentintegersofwhich,andtheirconspiration,Ihaveyettostudy。ItakeupthisworkwiththepurposetoreaditforthefirsttimeasIshouldreadanyotherwork,asfaratleastasIcanordare。ForIneithercan,nordare,throwoffastrongandawfulprepossessioninitsfavour——certainasIamthatalargepartofthelightandlife,inandbywhichIsee,love,andembracethetruthsandthestrengthsco-organisedintoalivingbodyoffaithandknowledgeinthefourprecedingclasses,hasbeendirectlyorindirectlyderivedtomefromthissacredvolume——
  andunabletodeterminewhatIdonotowetoitsinfluences。Butevenonthisaccount,andbecauseithastheseinalienableclaimsonmyreverenceandgratitude,IwillnotleaveitinthepowerofunbelieverstosaythattheBibleisformeonlywhattheKoranisforthedeafTurk,andtheVedasforthefeebleandacquiescentHindoo。No;IwillretireUPINTOTHEMOUNTAIN,andholdsecretcommunewithmyBibleabovethecontagiousblastmentsofprejudice,andthefog-blightofselfishsuperstition。FORFEARHATHTORMENT。
  AndwhatthoughMYreasonbetothepowerandsplendouroftheScripturesbutasthereflectedandsecondaryshineofthemooncomparedwiththesolarradiance;yetthesunendurestheoccasionalco-presenceoftheunsteadyorb,andleavingitvisibleseemstosanctionthecomparison。ThereisaLighthigherthanall,evenTHE
  WORDTHATWASINTHEBEGINNING;theLight,ofwhichlightitselfisbuttheshechinahandcloudytabernacle;theWordthatisLightforeveryman,andlifeforasmanyasgiveheedtoit。IfbetweenthisWordandthewrittenletterIshallanywhereseemtomyselftofindadiscrepance,Iwillnotconcludethatsuchthereactuallyis,norontheotherhandwillIfallunderthecondemnationofthemthatwouldLIEFORGOD,butseekasImay,bethankfulforwhatIhave——andwait。
  Withsuchpurposes,withsuchfeelings,haveIperusedthebooksoftheOldandNewTestaments,eachbookasawhole,andalsoasanintegralpart。AndneedIsaythatIhavemeteverywheremoreorlesscopioussourcesoftruth,andpower,andpurifyingimpulses,thatIhavefoundwordsformyinmostthoughts,songsformyjoy,utterancesformyhiddengriefs,andpleadingsformyshameandmyfeebleness?Inshort,whateverFINDSme,bearswitnessforitselfthatithasproceededfromaHolySpirit,evenfromthesameSpirit,WHICHREMAININGINITSELF,YETREGENERATETHALLOTHERPOWERS,ANDIN
  ALLAGESENTERINGINTOHOLYSOULS,MAKETHTHEMFRIENDSOFGOD,AND
  PROPHETS。(Wisd。vii。)Andhere,perhaps,Imighthavebeencontenttorest,ifIhadnotlearnedthat,asaChristian,Icannot,mustnot,standalone;orifIhadnotknownthatmorethanthiswasholdenandrequiredbytheFathersoftheReformation,andbytheChurchescollectively,sincetheCouncilofNiceatlatest,theonlyexceptionsbeingthatdoubtfuloneofthecorruptRomishChurchimplied,thoughnotavowed,initsequalisationoftheApocryphalBookswiththoseoftheHebrewCanon,andtheirrelevantoneofthefewandobscuresectswhoacknowledgenohistoricalChristianity。
  Thissomewhatmore,inwhichJerome,Augustine,Luther,andHookerwereofoneandthesamejudgment,andlessthanwhichnotoneofthemwouldhavetolerated——woulditfallwithinthescopeofmypresentdoubtsandobjections?Ihopeitwouldnot。LetonlytheirgeneralexpressionsbeinterpretedbytheirtreatmentoftheScripturesindetail,andIdareconfidentlytrustthatitwouldnot。
  ForIcannomorereconcilethedoctrinewhichstartlesmybeliefwiththepracticeandparticulardeclarationsofthesegreatmen,thanwiththeconvictionsofmyownunderstandingandconscience。Atallevents——andIcannottooearlyortooearnestlyguardagainstanymisapprehensionofmymeaningandpurpose——letitbedistinctlyunderstoodthatmyargumentsandobjectionsapplyexclusivelytothefollowingdoctrineordogma。Totheopinionswhichindividualdivineshaveadvancedinlieuofthisdoctrine,myonlyobjection,asfarasIobject,is——thatIdonotunderstandthem。ThepreciseenunciationofthisdoctrineIdefertothecommencementofthenextLetter。Farewell。
  LETTERII。
  Mydearfriend,InmylastLetterIsaidthatintheBiblethereismorethatFINDS
  methanIhaveexperiencedinallotherbooksputtogether;thatthewordsoftheBiblefindmeatgreaterdepthsofmybeing;andthatwhateverfindsmebringswithitanirresistibleevidenceofitshavingproceededfromtheHolySpirit。Butthedoctrineinquestionrequiresmetobelievethatnotonlywhatfindsme,butthatallthatexistsinthesacredvolume,andwhichIamboundtofindtherein,was——notaloneinspiredby,thatiscomposedby,menundertheactuatinginfluenceoftheHolySpirit,butlikewise——dictatedbyanInfallibleIntelligence;thatthewriters,eachandall,weredivinelyinformedaswellasinspired。Nowhereallevasion,allexcuse,iscutoff。Aninfallibleintelligenceextendstoallthings,physicalnolessthanspiritual。Itmayconveythetruthinanyoneofthethreepossiblelanguages——thatofsense,asobjectsappeartothebeholderonthisearth;orthatofscience,whichsupposesthebeholderplacedinthecentre;orthatofphilosophy,whichresolvesbothintoasupersensualreality。Butwhicheverbechosen——anditisobviousthattheincompatibilityexistsonlybetweenthefirstandsecond,bothofthembeingindifferentandofequalvaluetothethird——itmustbeemployedconsistently;foraninfallibleintelligencemustintendtobeintelligible,andnottodeceive。And,moreover,whicheverofthesethreelanguagesbechosen,itmustbetranslatableintotruth。Forthisistheveryessenceofthedoctrine,thatoneandthesameintelligenceisspeakingintheunityofaperson;whichunityisnomorebrokenbythediversityofthepipesthroughwhichitmakesitselfaudible,thanisatunebythedifferentinstrumentsonwhichitisplayedbyaconsummatemusician,equallyperfectinall。Oneinstrumentmaybemorecapaciousthananother,butasfarasitscompassextends,andinwhatitsoundsforth,itwillbetruetotheconceptionofthemaster。Icanconceivenosofteningherewhichwouldnotnullifythedoctrine,andconvertittoacloudforeachman’sfancytoshiftandshapeatwill。Andthisdoctrine,Iconfess,plantsthevineyardoftheWordwiththornsforme,andplacessnaresinitspathways。
  Thesemaybedelusionsofanevilspirit;butereIsoharshlyquestiontheseemingangeloflight——myreason,Imean,andmoralsenseinconjunctionwithmyclearestknowledge——Imustinquireonwhatauthoritythisdoctrinerests。AndwhatotherauthoritydaresatrulycatholicChristianadmitascoerciveinthefinaldecision,butthedeclarationsoftheBookitself——thoughIshouldnot,withoutstruggles,andatremblingreluctance,gainsayevenauniversaltradition?
  IreturntotheBook。WithafullpersuasionofsoulrespectingallthearticlesoftheChristianFaith,ascontainedinthefirstfourclasses,Ireceivewillinglyalsothetruthofthehistory,namely,thattheWordoftheLorddidcometoSamuel,toIsaiah,toothers;
  andthatthewordswhichgaveutterancetothesamearefaithfullyrecorded。Butthoughtheoriginofthewords,evenasofthemiraculousacts,besupernatural,yettheformeronceuttered,thelatteroncehavingtakentheirplaceamongthephenomenaofthesenses,thefaithfulrecordingofthesamedoesnotofitselfimply,orseemtorequire,anysupernaturalworking,otherthanasalltruthandgoodnessaresuch。InthebooksofMoses,andonceortwiceintheprophecyofJeremiah,Ifinditindeedassertedthatnotonlythewordsweregiven,buttherecordingofthesameenjoinedbythespecialcommandofGod,anddoubtlessexecutedunderthespecialguidanceoftheDivineSpirit。Astoallsuchpassages,therefore,therecanbenodispute;andallothersinwhichthewordsarebythesacredhistoriandeclaredtohavebeentheWordoftheLordsupernaturallycommunicated,Ireceiveassuchwithadegreeofconfidenceproportionedtotheconfidencerequiredofmebythewriterhimself,andtotheclaimshehimselfmakesonmybelief。
  Letus,therefore,removeallsuchpassages,andtakeeachbookbyitself;andIrepeatthatIbelievethewriterinwhateverhehimselfrelatesofhisownauthority,andofitsorigin。ButIcannotfindanysuchclaim,asthedoctrineinquestionsupposes,madebythesewriters,explicitlyorbyimplication。Onthecontrary,theyrefertootherdocuments,andinallpointsexpressthemselvesassober-
  mindedandveraciouswritersunderordinarycircumstancesareknowntodo。Butperhapstheybeartestimony,thesuccessortohispredecessor?Orsomeoneofthenumberhasleftitonrecord,thatbyspecialinspirationHEwascommandedtodeclaretheplenaryinspirationofalltherest?Thepassageswhichcanwithoutviolencebeappealedtoassubstantiatingthelatterpositionaresofew,andthesesoincidental——theconclusiondrawnfromtheminvolvinglikewisesoobviouslyapetitioprincipii,namely,thesupernaturaldictation,wordbyword,ofthebookinwhichthequestionisfound(for,untilthisisestablished,theutmostthatsuchatextcanproveisthecurrentbeliefofthewriter’sageandcountryconcerningthecharacterofthebooksthencalledtheScriptures)——
  thatitcannotbutseemstrange,andassuredlyisagainstallanalogyofGospelrevelation,thatsuchadoctrine——which,iftrue,mustbeanarticleoffaith,andamostimportant,yea,essentialarticleoffaith——shouldbeleftthusfaintly,thusobscurely,and,ifImaysosay,OBITANEOUSLY,declaredandenjoined。ThetimeoftheformationandclosingoftheCanonunknown;——theselectorsandcompilersunknown,orrecordedbyknownfabulists;——and(moreperplexingstill)
  thebeliefoftheJewishChurch——thebelief,Imean,commontotheJewsofPalestineandtheirmorecultivatedbrethreninAlexandria(noreprehensionofwhichistobefoundintheNewTestament)——
  concerningthenatureandimportofthe[Greektextwhichcannotbereproduced]attributedtothepreciousremainsoftheirTempleLibrary;——thesecircumstancesaresuch,especiallythelast,asineffecttoevacuatethetenet,ofwhichIamspeaking,oftheonlymeaninginwhichitpracticallymeansanythingatalltangible,steadfast,orobligatory。Ininfallibilitytherearenodegrees。
  ThepoweroftheHighandHolyOneisoneandthesame,whetherthespherewhichitfillsbelargerorsmaller;——theareatraversedbyacomet,ortheoracleofthehouse,theholyplacebeneaththewingsofthecherubim;——thePentateuchoftheLegislator,whodrewneartothethickdarknesswhereGodwas,andwhospakeinthecloudwhencethethunderingsandlightningscame,andwhomGodansweredbyavoice;orbutaletterofthirteenversesfromtheaffectionateELDER
  TOTHEELECTLADYANDHERCHILDREN,WHOMHELOVEDINTHETRUTH。ButatnoperiodwasthisthejudgmentoftheJewishChurchrespectingallthecanonicalbooks。ToMosesalone——toMosesintherecordingnolessthaninthereceivingoftheLaw——andtoallandeverypartofthefivebookscalledtheBooksofMoses,theJewishdoctorsofthegenerationbefore,andcoevalwith,theapostles,assignedthatunmodifiedandabsolutetheopneustywhichourdivines,inwordsatleast,attributetotheCanoncollectively。InfactitwasfromtheJewishRabbis——who,inoppositiontotheChristianscheme,contendedforaperfectionintherevelationbyMoses,whichneitherrequirednorenduredanyaddition,andwhostrainedtheirfanciesinexpressingthetranscendencyofthebooksofMoses,inaidoftheiropinion——thatthefoundersofthedoctrineborrowedtheirnotionsandphrasesrespectingtheBiblethroughout。RemovethemetaphoricaldraperyfromthedoctrineoftheCabbalists,anditwillbefoundtocontaintheonlyintelligibleandconsistentideaofthatplenaryinspiration,whichlaterdivinesextendtoallthecanonicalbooks;
  asthus:-"ThePentateuchisbutONEWORD,eventheWordofGod;andthelettersandarticulatesounds,bywhichthisWordiscommunicatedtoourhumanapprehensions,arelikewisedivinelycommunicated。"
  Now,for’Pentateuch’substitute’OldandNewTestament,’andthenI
  saythatthisisthedoctrinewhichIrejectassuperstitiousandunscriptural。AndyetaslongastheconceptionsoftherevealingWordandtheinspiringSpiritareidentifiedandconfounded,Iassertthatwhateversayslessthanthis,sayslittlemorethannothing。
  Forhowcanabsoluteinfallibilitybeblendedwithfallibility?
  Whereistheinfalliblecriterion?Howcaninfallibletruthbeinfalliblyconveyedindefectiveandfallibleexpressions?TheJewishteachersconfinedthismiraculouscharactertothePentateuch。
  BetweentheMosaicandthePropheticinspirationtheyassertedsuchadifferenceasamountstoadiversity;andbetweenboththeoneandtheother,andtheremainingbookscomprisedunderthetitheofHagiographa,theintervalwasstillwider,andtheinferiorityinkind,andnotonlyindegree,wasunequivocallyexpressed。Ifwetakeintoaccountthehabit,universalwiththeHebrewdoctors,ofreferringallexcellentorextraordinarythingstothegreatFirstCause,withoutmentionoftheproximateandinstrumentalcauses——astrikingillustrationofwhichmaybeobtainedbycomparingthenarrativesofthesameeventinthePsalmsandinthehistoricalbooks;andifwefurtherreflectthatthedistinctionoftheprovidentialandthemiraculousdidnotenterintotheirformsofthinking——atalleventsnotintotheirmodeofconveyingtheirthoughts——thelanguageoftheJewsrespectingtheHagiographawillbefoundtodifferlittle,ifatall,fromthatofreligiouspersonsamongourselves,whenspeakingofanauthoraboundingingifts,stirredupbytheHolySpirit,writingundertheinfluenceofspecialgrace,andthelike。
  Butitformsnopartofmypresentpurposetodiscussthepointhistorically,ortospeculateontheformationofeitherCanon。
  Rather,suchinquiriesarealtogetheralienfromthegreatobjectofmypursuitsandstudies,whichistoconvincemyselfandothersthattheBibleandChristianityaretheirownsufficientevidence。ButitconcernsbothmycharacterandmypeaceofmindtosatisfyunprejudicedjudgesthatifmypresentconvictionsshouldinallotherrespectsbefoundconsistentwiththefaithandfeelingsofaChristian——andifinmanyandthoseimportantpointstheytendtosecurethatfaithandtodeepenthosefeelings——thewordsoftheApostle,rightlyinterpreted,donotrequiretheircondemnation。
  Enough,ifwhathasbeenstatedaboverespectingthegeneraldoctrineoftheHebrewmasters,underwhomtheApostlewasbred,shallremoveanymisconceptionsthatmightpreventtherightinterpretationofhiswords。Farewell。
  LETTERIII。
  Mydearfriend,HavingintheformertwoLettersdefinedthedoctrinewhichIreject,IamnowtocommunicatetheviewsthatIwouldproposetosubstituteinitsplace。
  Before,however,Iattempttolaydownonthetheologicalcharttheroad-placetowhichmybarkhasdrifted,andtomarkthespotandcircumscribethespacewithinwhichIswingatanchor,letmefirstthankyoufor,andthenattempttoanswer,theobjections——oratleastthequestions——whichyouhaveurgeduponme。
  "ThepresentBibleistheCanontowhichChristandtheApostlesreferred?"
  Doubtless。
  "AndintermswhichaChristianmusttrembletotamperwith?"
  Yea。Theexpressionsareasdirectasstrong;andatruebelieverwillneitherattempttodivertnordilutetheirstrength。
  "Thedoctrinewhichisconsideredastheorthodoxviewseemstheobviousandmostnaturalinterpretationofthetextinquestion?"
  Yea,andnay。Tothosewhosemindsareprepossessedbythedoctrineitself——whofromearliestchildhoodhavealwaysmeantthisdoctrinebytheverywordBible——thedoctrinebeingbutitsexpositionandparaphrase——Yea。InsuchmindsthewordsofourLordandthedeclarationsofSt。Paulcanawakennoothersense。Tothoseontheotherhandwhofindthedoctrinesenselessandself-confuting,andwhotakeuptheBibleastheydootherbooks,andapplytoitthesamerulesofinterpretation——Nay。
  And,lastly,hewho,likemyself,recognisesinneitherofthetwothestateofhisownmind——whocannotrestintheformer,andfeels,orfears,apresumptuousspiritinthenegativedogmatismofthelatter——hehashisanswertoseek。ButsofarIdarehazardareplytothequestion——Inwhatothersensecanthewordsbeinterpreted?——
  beseechingyou,however,totakewhatIamabouttoofferbutasanattempttodelineateanarcofoscillation——thattheeulogyofSt。
  PaulisinnowisecontravenedbytheopiniontowhichIincline,whofullybelievetheOldTestamentcollectively,bothinthecompositionandinitspreservation,agreatandpreciousgiftofProvidence;——
  whofindinitallthattheApostledescribes,andwhomorethanbelievethatallwhichtheApostlespokeofwasofDivineinspiration,andablessingintendedforasmanyasareincommunionwiththeSpiritthroughallages。AndIfreelyconfessthatmywholeheartwouldturnawaywithanangryimpatiencefromthecoldandcaptiousmortalwho,themomentIhadbeenpouringouttheloveandgladnessofmysoul——whilebookafterbook,law,andtruth,andexample,oracle,andlovelyhymn,andchoralsongoftenthousandthousands,andacceptedprayersofsaintsandprophets,sentback,asitwere,fromheaven,likedoves,tobeletlooseagainwithanewfreightofspiritualjoysandgriefsandnecessities,werepassingacrossmymemory——atthefirstpauseofmyvoice,andwhilstmycountenancewasstillspeaking——shouldaskmewhetherIwasthinkingoftheBookofEsther,ormeantparticularlytoincludethefirstsixchaptersofDaniel,orverses6-20ofthe109thPsalm,orthelastverseofthe137thPsalm?Wouldanyconclusionofthissortbedrawninanyotheranalogouscase?InthecourseofmylecturesonDramaticPoetry,I,inhalfascoreinstances,referredmyauditorstothepreciousvolumebeforeme——Shakespeare——andspokeenthusiastically,bothingeneralandwithdetailofparticularbeauties,oftheplaysofShakespeare,asinalltheirkinds,andinrelationtothepurposesofthewriter,excellent。Wouldithavebeenfair,oraccordingtothecommonusageandunderstandingofmen,tohaveinferredanintentiononmyparttodecidethequestionrespectingTitusAndronicus,orthelargerportionofthethreepartsofHenryVI。?WouldnoteverygenialmindunderstandbyShakespearethatunityortotalimpressioncomprisingandresultingfromthethousandfoldseveralandparticularemotionsofdelight,admiration,gratitudeexcitedbyhisworks?Butifitbeanswered,"Aye!butwemustnotinterpretSt。Paulaswemayandshouldinterpretanyotherhonestandintelligentwriterorspeaker,"——then,Isay,thisistheverypetitioprincipiiofwhichIcomplain。
  StilllessdothewordsofourLordapplyagainstmyview。HaveI
  notdeclared——doInotbeginbydeclaring——thatwhateverisreferredbythesacredpenmantoadirectcommunicationfromGod,andwhereveritisrecordedthatthesubjectofthehistoryhadassertedhimselftohavereceivedthisorthatcommand,thisorthatinformationorassurance,fromasuperhumanIntelligence,orwherethewriterinhisownperson,andinthecharacterofanhistorian,relatesthattheWORDOFTHELORDCAMEuntopriest,prophet,chieftain,orotherindividual——haveInotdeclaredthatIreceivethesamewithfullbelief,andadmititsinappellableauthority?WhomoreconvincedthanIam——whomoreanxioustoimpressthatconvictiononthemindsofothers——thattheLawandtheProphetsspeakthroughoutofChrist?
  Thatalltheintermediateapplicationsandrealisationsofthewordsarebuttypesandrepetitions——translations,asitwere,fromthelanguageoflettersandarticulatesoundsintothelanguageofeventsandsymbolicalpersons?
  Andhereagainletmerecurtotheaidofanalogy。SupposealifeofSirThomasMorebyhisson-in-law,oralifeofLordBaconbyhischaplain;thatapartoftherecordsoftheCourtofChancerybelongingtotheseperiodswerelost;thatinRoper’sorinRawley’sbiographicalworktherewerepreservedaseriesofdictaandjudgmentsattributedtotheseillustriousChancellors,manyandimportantspecimensoftheirtablediscourses,withlargeextractsfromworkswrittenbythem,andfromsomethatarenolongerextant。
  Letitbesupposed,too,thattherearenogrounds,internalorexternal,todoubteitherthemoral,intellectual,orcircumstantialcompetenceofthebiographers。Suppose,moreover,thatwherevertheopportunityexistedofcollatingtheirdocumentsandquotationswiththerecordsandworksstillpreserved,theformerwerefoundsubstantiallycorrectandfaithful,thefewdifferencesinnowisealteringordisturbingthespiritandpurposeoftheparagraphsinwhichtheywerefound;andthatofwhatwasnotcollatable,andtowhichnotestabextracouldbeapplied,thefarlargerpartborewitnessinitselfofthesamespiritandorigin;andthatnotonlybyitscharacteristicfeatures,butbyitssurpassingexcellence,itrenderedthechancesofitshavinghadanyotherauthorthanthegiant-mind,towhomthebiographerascribesit,smallindeed!Now,fromthenatureandobjectsofmypursuits,Ihave,wewillsuppose,frequentoccasiontorefertooneorotheroftheseworks;forexample,toRawley’sDictaetFactaFranciscideVerulam。AtonetimeImightrefertotheworkinsomesuchwordsas——"RememberwhatFrancisofVerulamsaidorjudged;"or,"Ifyoubelievenotme,yetbelieveLordBacon。"AtanothertimeImighttaketherunningtitleofthevolume,andatanotherthenameofthebiographer;——"TurntoyourRawley!HEwillsetyouright;"or,"THEREyouwillfindadepthwhichnoresearchwilleverexhaust;"orwhateverotherstrongexpressionmysenseofBacon’sgreatnessandoftheintrinsicworthandthevalueoftheproofsandspecimensofthatgreatness,containedandpreservedinthatvolume,wouldexciteandjustify。
  Butletmyexpressionsbeasvividandunqualifiedasthemostsanguinetemperamenteverinspired,wouldanymanofsenseconcludefromthemthatImeant——andmeanttomakeothersbelieve——thatnotonlyeachandalloftheseanecdotes,adages,decisions,extracts,incidents,hadbeendictated,wordbyword,byLordBacon;andthatallRawley’sownobservationsandinferences,alltheconnectivesanddisjunctives,alltherecollectionsoftime,place,andcircumstance,togetherwiththeorderandsuccessionofthenarrative,wereinlikemannerdictatedandrevisedbythespiritofthedeceasedChancellor?
  Theanswerwillbe——mustbe——Nomaninhissenses!"Nomaninhissenses——inTHISinstance;butinthatoftheBibleitisquiteotherwise;for(Itakeitasanadmittedpointthat)itISquiteotherwise!"
  AndhereIrenounceanyadvantageImightobtainformyargumentbyrestrictingtheapplicationofourLord’sandtheApostle’swordstotheHebrewCanon。Iadmitthejustice——Ihavelongfeltthefullforce——oftheremark——"Wehaveallthattheoccasionallowed。"AndifthesameawfulauthoritydoesnotapplysodirectlytotheEvangelicalandApostolicalwritingsastotheHebrewCanon,yettheanalogyoffaithjustifiesthetransfer。IfthedoctrinebelessdecisivelyScripturalinitsapplicationtotheNewTestamentortheChristianCanon,thetemptationtodoubtitislikewiseless。Soatleastweareledtoinfer;sinceinpointoffactitistheapparentorimaginedcontrast,thediversityofspiritwhichsundryindividualshavebelievedthemselvestofindintheOldTestamentandintheGospel,thathasgivenoccasiontothedoubt;——and,intheheartofthousandswhoyieldafaithofacquiescencetothecontrary,andfindrestintheirhumility——suppliesfueltoafearfulwishthatitwerepermittedtomakeadistinction。
  But,lastly,youobjectthat——evengrantingthatnocoercive,positivereasonsforthebelief——nodirectandnotinferredassertions——oftheplenaryinspirationoftheOldandNewTestament,inthegenerallyreceivedimportoftheterm,couldbeadduced,yet——
  inbehalfofadoctrinesocatholic,andduringsolongasuccessionofagesaffirmedandactedonbyJewandChristian,Greek,Romish,andProtestant,youneednootheranswerthan:-"Tellme,first,whyitshouldnotbereceived!WhyshouldInotbelievetheScripturesthroughoutdictated,inwordandthought,byaninfallibleIntelligence?"Iadmitthefairnessoftheretort;andeagerlyandearnestlydoIanswer:ForeveryreasonthatmakesmeprizeandreveretheseScriptures;——prizethem,lovethem,reverethem,beyondallotherbooks!WHYshouldInot?BecausethedoctrineinquestionpetrifiesatoncethewholebodyofHolyWritwithallitsharmoniesandsymmetricalgradations——theflexileandtherigid——thesupportinghardandtheclothingsoft——thebloodWHICHISTHELIFE——theintelligencingnerves,andtherudelywoven,butsoftandspringy,cellularsubstance,inwhichallareimbeddedandlightlyboundtogether。Thisbreathingorganism,thisgloriouspanharmoniconwhichIhadseenstandonitsfeetasaman,andwithaman’svoicegiventoit,thedoctrineinquestionturnsatonceintoacolossalMemnon’shead,ahollowpassageforavoice,avoicethatmocksthevoicesofmanymen,andspeaksintheirnames,andyetisbutonevoice,andthesame;andnomanutteredit,andneverinahumanheartwasitconceived。WHYshouldInot?——Becausethedoctrineevacuatesofallsenseandefficacythesureandconstanttradition,thatalltheseveralbooksbounduptogetherinourpreciousfamilyBiblewerecomposedindifferentandwidely-distantages,underthegreatestdiversityofcircumstances,anddegreesoflightandinformation,andyetthatthecomposers,whetherasutteringorasrecordingwhatwasutteredandwhatwasdone,wereallactuatedbyapureandholySpirit,oneandthesame——(foristhereanyspiritpureandholy,andyetnotproceedingfromGod——andyetnotproceedinginandwiththeHolySpirit?)——oneSpirit,workingdiversely,nowawakeningstrength,andnowglorifyingitselfinweakness,nowgivingpoweranddirectiontoknowledge,andnowtakingawaythestingfromerror!Erethesummerandthemonthsofripeninghadarrivedfortheheartoftherace;whilethewholesapofthetreewascrude,andeachandeveryfruitlivedintheharshandbitterprinciple;eventhenthisSpiritwithdrewitschosenministersfromthefalseandguilt-makingcentreofSelf。Itconvertedthewrathintoaformandanorganoflove,andonthepassingstorm-cloudimpressedthefairrainbowofpromisetoallgenerations。PutthelustofSelfintheforkedlightning,andwoulditnotbeaSpiritofMoloch?ButGodmakeththelightningsHisministers,fireandhail,vapoursandstormywindsfulfillingHisword。
  CURSEYEMEROZ,SAIDTHEANGELOFTHELORD;CURSEYEBITTERLYTHE
  INHABITANTSTHEREOF——sangDeborah。Wasitthatshecalledtomindanypersonalwrongs——rapineorinsult——thatsheorthehouseofLapidothhadreceivedfromJabinorSisera?No;shehaddweltunderherpalmtreeinthedepthofthemountain。ButshewasaMOTHERIN
  ISRAEL;andwithamother’sheart,andwiththevehemencyofamother’sandapatriot’slove,shehadshotthelightoflovefromhereyes,andpouredtheblessingsoflovefromherlips,onthepeoplethathadJEOPARDEDTHEIRLIVESUNTOTHEDEATHagainsttheoppressors;andthebitterness,awakenedandbornealoftbythesamelove,sheprecipitatedincursesontheselfishandcowardrecreantswhoCAMENOTTOTHEHELPOFTHELORD,TOTHEHELPOFTHELORD,AGAINSTTHEMIGHTY。AslongasIhavetheimageofDeborahbeforemyeyes,andwhileIthrowmyselfbackintotheage,country,circumstances,ofthisHebrewBonducainthenotyettamedchaosofthespiritualcreation;——aslongasIcontemplatetheimpassioned,high-souled,heroicwomaninalltheprominenceandindividualityofwillandcharacter,——IfeelasifIwereamongthefirstfermentsofthegreataffections——theproplasticwavesofthemicrocosmicchaos,swellingupagainst——andyettowards——theoutspreadwingsofthedovethatliesbroodingonthetroubledwaters。Solongalliswell,——allrepletewithinstructionandexample。InthefierceandinordinateI
  ammadetoknowandbegratefulfortheclearerandpurerradiancewhichshinesonaChristian’spaths,neitherbluntedbythepreparatoryveil,norcrimsonedinitsstrugglethroughtheall-
  enwrappingmistoftheworld’signorance:whilstintheself-
  oblivionoftheseheroesoftheOldTestament,theirelevationabovealllowandindividualinterests,——aboveall,intheentireandvehementdevotionoftheirtotalbeingtotheserviceoftheirdivineMaster,Ifindalessonofhumility,agroundofhumiliation,andashaming,yetrousing,exampleoffaithandfealty。Butletmeoncebepersuadedthatalltheseheart-awakeningutterancesofhumanhearts——ofmenoflikefacultiesandpassionswithmyself,mourning,rejoicing,suffering,triumphing——arebutasaDivinaCommediaofasuperhuman——Obearwithme,ifIsay——Ventriloquist;——thattheroyalharper,towhomIhavesooftensubmittedmyselfasaMANY-STRINGED
  INSTRUMENTforhisfire-tiptfingerstotraverse,whileeveryseveralnerveofemotion,passion,thought,thatthridstheflesh-and-bloodofourcommonhumanity,respondedtothetouch,——thatthisSWEET
  PSALMISTOFISRAELwashimselfasmereaninstrumentashisharp,anAUTOMATONpoet,mourner,andsupplicant;——allisgone,——allsympathy,atleast,andallexample。Ilisteninaweandfear,butlikewiseinperplexityandconfusionofspirit。
  Yetoneotherinstance,andletthisbethecrucialtestofthedoctrine。SaythattheBookofJobthroughoutwasdictatedbyaninfallibleintelligence。Thenre-perusethebook,andstill,asyouproceed,trytoapplythetenet;tryifyoucanevenattachanysenseorsemblanceofmeaningtothespeecheswhichyouarereading。What!
  werethehollowtruisms,theunsufficinghalf-truths,thefalseassumptionsandmalignantinsinuationsofthesuperciliousbigots,whocorruptlydefendedthetruth:-weretheimpressivefacts,thepiercingoutcries,thepatheticappeals,andthecloseandpowerfulreasoningwithwhichthepoorsufferer——smartingatoncefromhiswounds,andfromtheoilofvitriolwhichtheorthodoxLIARSFORGOD
  weredroppingintothem——impatiently,butuprightlyandholily,controvertedthistruth,whileinwillandinspiritheclungtoit;——
  werebothdictatedbyaninfallibleintelligence?——Alas!ifImayjudgefromthemannerinwhichbothindiscriminatelyarerecited,quoted,appealedto,preacheduponbytheroutiniersofdeskandpulpit,Icannotdoubtthattheythinkso——orrather,withoutthinking,takeforgrantedthatsotheyaretothink;——themorereadily,perhaps,becausethesothinkingsupersedesthenecessityofallafterthought。Farewell。
  LETTERIV。
  Mydearfriend,YoureplytotheconclusionofmyLetter:"Whathavewetodowithroutiniers?Quidmihicumhomunculisputataputidereputantibus?
  Letnothingscountfornothing,andthedeadburythedead!Whobutsucheverunderstoodthetenetinthissense?"
  Inwhatsensethen,Irejoin,doothersunderstandit?If,withexceptionofthepassagesalreadyexcepted,namely,therecordedwordsofGod——concerningwhichnoChristiancanhavedoubtorscruple,——thetenetinthissensebeinapplicabletotheScripture,destructiveofitsnoblestpurposes,andcontradictorytoitsownexpressdeclarations,——againandagainIask:-WhatamItosubstitute?Whatothersenseisconceivablethatdoesnotdestroythedoctrinewhichitprofessestointerpret——thatdoesnotconvertitintoitsownnegative?Asifageometricianshouldnameasugar-
  loafanellipse,adding——"BywhichtermIheremeanacone;"——andthenjustifythemisnomeronthepretextthattheellipseisamongtheconicsections!Andyet——notwithstandingtherepugnancyofthedoctrine,initsunqualifiedsense,toScripture,Reason,andCommonSensetheoretically,whiletoallpracticalusesitisintractable,unmalleable,andaltogetherunprofitable——notwithstandingitsirrationality,andinthefaceofyourexpostulation,groundedonthepalpablenessofitsirrationality,——Imuststillavowmybeliefthat,howeverfittinglyandunsteadily,asthroughamist,itISthedoctrinewhichthegeneralityofourpopulardivinesreceiveasorthodox,andthisthesensewhichtheyattachtothewords。
  ForonwhatothergroundcanIaccountforthewhimsicalsubintelligitursofournumerousharmonists——forthecuriouslyinferredfacts,theinventivecircumstantialdetail,thecomplementalandsupplementalhistorywhich,intheuttersilenceofallhistoriansandabsenceofallhistoricaldocuments,theybringtolightbymereforceoflogic?AndalltodoawaysomehalfscoreapparentdiscrepanciesinthechroniclesandmemoirsoftheOldandNewTestaments——discrepanciessoanalogoustowhatisfoundinallothernarrativesofthesamestorybyseveralnarrators——soanalogoustowhatisfoundinallotherknownandtrustedhistoriesbycontemporaryhistorians,whentheyarecollatedwitheachother(nay,notseldomwheneitherhistorianiscomparedwithhimself),astoformintheeyesofallcompetentjudgesacharacteristicmarkofthegenuineness,independency,and(ifImayapplythewordtoabook),theveraciousnessofeachseveraldocument;amark,theabsenceofwhichwouldwarrantasuspicionofcollusion,invention,oratbestofserviletranscription;discrepanciessotriflingincircumstanceandimport,that,althoughinsomeinstancesitishighlyprobable,andinallinstances,perhaps,possiblethattheyareonlyapparentandreconcilable,nowisemanwouldcareastawwhethertheywererealorapparent,reconciledorleftinharmlessandfriendlyvariance。What,Iask,couldhaveinducedlearnedandintelligentdivinestoadoptorsanctionsubterfuges,whichneutralisingtheordinarycriteriaoffullordefectiveevidenceinhistoricaldocuments,would,takenasageneralrule,renderallcollationandcross-examinationofwrittenrecordsineffective,andobliteratethemaincharacterbywhichauthentichistoriesaredistinguishedfromthosetraditionaltales,whicheachsuccessivereporterenlargesandfashionstohisownfancyandpurpose,andeverydifferenteditionofwhichmoreorlesscontradictstheother?Allowmetocreatechasmsadlibitum,andadlibitumtofillthemupwithimaginedfactsandincidents,andIwouldalmostundertaketoharmoniseFalstaff’saccountoftheroguesinbuckramintoacoherentandconsistentnarrative。What,Isay,couldhavetemptedgraveandpiousmenthustodisturbthefoundationoftheTemple,inordertorepairapettybreachorrat-holeinthewall,orfastenaloosestoneortwointheoutercourt,ifnotanassumednecessityarisingoutofthepeculiarcharacterofBiblehistory?
  Thesubstanceofthesyllogism,bywhichtheirprocedurewasjustifiedtotheirownminds,canbenootherthanthis。That,withoutwhichtwoassertions——bothofwhichMUSTbealiketrueandcorrect——wouldcontradicteachother,andconsequentlybe,oneorboth,falseorincorrect,mustitselfbetrue。ButeverywordandsyllableexistingintheoriginaltextoftheCanonicalBooks,fromtheCherethiandPhelethiofDavidtothenameinthecopyofafamilyregister,thesiteofatown,orthecourseofariver,weredictatedtothesacredamanuensisbyaninfallibleintelligence。
  Heretherecanbeneithermorenorless。Importantorunimportantgivesnogroundofdifference;andthenumberofthewritersaslittle。Thesecretariesmayhavebeenmany——thehistorianwasoneandthesame,andheinfallible。ThisistheMINORofthesyllogism,andifitcouldbeproved,theconclusionwouldbeatleastplausible;andtherewouldbebutoneobjectiontotheprocedure,namely,itsuselessness。Forifithadbeenprovedalready,whatneedofprovingitoveragain,andbymeans——theremoval,namely,ofapparentcontradictions——whichtheinfallibleAuthordidnotthinkgoodtoemploy?Butifithavenotbeenproved,whatbecomesoftheargumentwhichderivesitswholeforceandlegitimacyfromtheassumption?
  Infact,itisclearthattheharmonistsandtheiradmirersheldandunderstoodthedoctrineliterally。Andmustnotthatdivinelikewisehavesounderstoodit,who,inanswertoaquestionconcerningthetranscendantblessednessofJael,andtherighteousnessoftheact,inwhichsheinhospitably,treacherously,perfidiouslymurderedsleep,theconfidingsleep,closedthecontroversybyobservingthathewantednobettermoralitythanthatoftheBible,andnootherproofofanaction’sbeingpraiseworthythanthattheBiblehaddeclareditworthytobepraised?——anobservation,asappliedinthisinstance,soslanderoustothemoralityandmoralspiritoftheBibleastobeinexplicable,exceptasaconsequenceofthedoctrineindispute。Butletamanbeoncefullypersuadedthatthereisnodifferencebetweenthetwopositions:"TheBiblecontainsthereligionrevealedbyGod,"and"WhateveriscontainedintheBibleisreligion,andwasrevealedbyGod,"andthatwhatevercanbesaidoftheBible,collectivelytaken,mayandmustbesaidofeachandeverysentenceoftheBible,takenforandbyitself,andInolongerwonderattheseparadoxes。Ionlyobjecttotheinconsistencyofthosewhoprofessthesamebelief,andyetaffecttolookdownwithacontemptuousorcompassionatesmileonJohnWesleyforrejectingtheCopernicansystemasincompatibletherewith;orwhoexclaim"Wonderful!"whentheyhearthatSirMatthewHalesentacrazyoldwomantothegallowsinhonouroftheWitchofEndor。Inthelatterinstanceitmight,Iadmit,havebeenanerroneous(thoughevenatthisdaytheallbutuniversallyreceived)interpretationoftheword,whichwehaverenderedbyWITCH;butIchallengethesedivinesandtheiradherentstoestablishthecompatibilityofabeliefinthemodernastronomyandnaturalphilosophywiththeirandWesley’sdoctrinerespectingtheinspiredScriptures,withoutreducingthedoctrineitselftoaplaythingofwax;orrathertoahalf-inflatedbladder,which,whenthecontentsarerarefiedintheheatofrhetoricalgeneralities,swellsoutround,andwithoutacreaseorwrinkle;butbringitintothecooltemperatureofparticulars,andyoumaypress,andasitwereexcept,whatpartyoulike——soitbebutonepartatatime——betweenyourthumbandfinger。
  Now,Iprayyou,whichisthemorehonest,nay,whichthemorereverentialproceeding——toplayatfastandlooseinthisway,ortosayatonce,"Seehere,intheseseveralwritingsoneandthesameHolySpirit,nowsanctifyingachosenvessel,andfittingitforthereceptionofheavenlytruthsproceedingimmediatelyfromthemouthofGod,andelsewhereworkinginfrailandfalliblemenlikeourselves,andlikeourselvesinstructedbyGod’swordandlaws?"ThefirstChristianmartyrhadtheformandfeaturesofanordinaryman,norarewetaughttobelievethatthesefeaturesweremiraculouslytransfiguredintosuperhumansymmetry;butHEBEINGFILLEDWITHTHE
  HOLYGHOST,THEYTHATLOOKEDSTEADFASTLYonHIM,SAWHISFACEASIT
  HADBEENTHEFACEOFANANGEL。Evensohasiteverbeen,andsoiteverwillbewithallwhowithhumbleheartsandarightlydisposedspiritscanthesacredvolume。AndtheywhoreaditwithANEVIL
  HEARTOFUNBELIEFandanalienspirit,whatbootsforthemtheassertionthateverysentencewasmiraculouslycommunicatedtothenominalauthorbyGodhimself?Willitnotratherpresentadditionaltemptationstotheunhappyscoffers,andfurnishthemwithapretextofself-justification?
  When,inmythirdletter,Ifirstechoedthequestion"WhyshouldI
  not?"theanswerscamecrowdingonmymind。Iamwellcontent,however,tohavemerelysuggestedthemainpoints,inproofofthepositiveharmwhich,bothhistoricallyandspiritually,ourreligionsustainsfromthisdoctrine。Ofminorimportance,yetnottobeoverlooked,aretheforcedandfantasticinterpretations,thearbitraryallegoriesandmysticexpansionsofpropernames,towhichthisindiscriminateBibliolatryfurnishedfuel,spark,andwind。A
  stillgreaterevil,andlessattributabletothevisionaryhumourandweakjudgmentoftheindividualexpositors,istheliteralrenderingofScriptureinpassages,whichthenumberandvarietyofimagesemployedindifferentplacestoexpressoneandthesameverity,plainlymarkoutforfigurative。Andlastly,addtoallthesethestrange——inallotherwritingsunexampled——practiceofbringingtogetherintologicaldependencydetachedsentencesfrombookscomposedatthedistanceofcenturies,nay,sometimesamillenniumfromeachother,underdifferentdispensations,andfordifferentobjects。AccommodationsofelderScripturalphrases——thatfavouriteornamentandgarnishofJewisheloquence;incidentalallusionstopopularnotions,traditions,apologues(forexample,thedisputebetweentheDevilandthearchangelMichaelaboutthebodyofMoses,Jude9);fanciesandanachronismsimportedfromthesynagogueofAlexandriaintoPalestine,byortogetherwiththeSeptuagintversion,andappliedasmereargumentaadhomines(forexample,thedeliveryoftheLawbythedispositionofangels,Actsvii。53,Gal。
  iii。19,Heb。ii。2),——these,detachedfromtheircontext,and,contrarytotheintentionofthesacredwriter,firstraisedintoindependenttheses,andthenbroughttogethertoproduceorsanctionsomenewcredendumforwhichneitherseparatelycouldhavefurnishedapretence!Bythisstrangemosaic,Scripturetextshavebeenworkedupintopassablelikenessesofpurgatory,Popery,theInquisition,andothermonstrousabuses。ButwouldyouhaveaProtestantinstanceofthesuperstitioususeofScripturearisingoutofthisdogma?
  PassingbytheCabbalaoftheHutchinsonianSchoolasthedotageofafewweak-mindedindividuals,IreferyoutoBishopHacket’ssermonsontheIncarnation。Andifyouhavereadthesameauthor’slifeofArchbishopWilliams,andhaveseenandfelt(aseveryreaderofthislatterworkmustseeandfeel)histalent,learning,acuteness,androbustgoodsense,youwillhavenodifficultyindeterminingthequalityandcharacterofadogmawhichcouldengraftsuchfruitsonsuchatree。
  Itwillperhapsappearaparadoxif,afterallthesereasons,I
  shouldavowthattheyweighlessinmymindagainstthedoctrine,thanthemotivesusuallyassignedformaintainingandenjoiningit。
  Such,forinstance,aretheargumentsdrawnfromtheanticipatedlossanddamagethatwouldresultfromitsabandonment;asthatitwoulddeprivetheChristianworldofitsonlyinfalliblearbiterinquestionsoffaithandduty,suppresstheonlycommonandinappellabletribunal;thattheBibleistheonlyreligiousbondofunionandgroundofunityamongProtestantsandthelike。Fortheconfutationofthiswholereasoning,itmightbesufficienttoask:
  Hasitproducedtheseeffects?Wouldnotthecontrarystatementbenearertothefact?WhatdidtheChurchesofthefirstfourcenturiesholdonthispoint?Towhatdidtheyattributetheriseandmultiplicationofheresies?CananylearnedandcandidProtestantaffirmthatthereexistedandexistsnogroundforthechargesofBossuetandothereminentRomishdivines?Itisnoeasymattertoknowhowtohandleapartymaxim,soframed,thatwiththeexceptionofasingleword,itexpressesanimportanttruth,butwhichbymeansofthatwordismadetoconveyamostdangerouserror。
  TheBibleistheappointedconservatory,anindispensablecriterion,andacontinualsourceandsupportoftruebelief。ButthattheBibleisthesolesource;thatitnotonlycontains,butconstitutes,theChristianReligion;thatitis,inshort,aCreed,consistingwhollyofarticlesofFaith;thatconsequentlyweneednorule,help,orguide,spiritualorhistorical,toteachuswhatpartsareandwhatarenotarticlesofFaith——allbeingsuch——andthedifferencebetweentheBibleandtheCreedbeingthis,thattheclausesofthelatterareallunconditionallynecessarytosalvation,butthoseoftheformerconditionallyso,thatis,assoonasthewordsareknowntoexistinanyoneofthecanonicalbooks;andthat,underthislimitation,thebeliefisofthesamenecessityinboth,andnotatallaffectedbythegreaterorlesserimportanceofthemattertobebelieved;——thisschemedifferswidelyfromthepreceding,thoughitsadherentsoftenmakeuseofthesamewordsinexpressingtheirbelief。Andthislatterscheme,Iassert,wasbroughtintocurrencybyandinfavourofthosebywhomtheoperationofgrace,theaidsoftheSpirit,thenecessityofregeneration,thecorruptionofournature,inshort,allthepeculiarandspiritualmysteriesoftheGospelwereexplainedanddilutedaway。
  AndhowhavethesementreatedthisveryBible?I,whoindeedprizeandreverencethissacredlibrary,asofalloutwardmeansandconservativesofChristianfaithandpracticethesurestandthemostreflectiveoftheinwardWord;I,whoholdthattheBiblecontainsthereligionofChristians,butwhodarenotsaythatwhateveriscontainedintheBibleistheChristianreligion,andwhoshrinkfromallquestionrespectingthecomparativeworthandefficacyofthewrittenWordasweighedagainstthepreachingoftheGospel,thedisciplineoftheChurches,thecontinuedsuccessionoftheMinistry,andthecommunionofSaints,lestbycomparingthemIshouldseemtodetachthem;ItrembleattheprocesseswhichtheGrotiandivineswithoutscruplecarryonintheirtreatmentofthesacredwriters,assoonasanytextsdeclaringthepeculiartenetsofourFaitharecitedagainstthem——eventenetsandmysterieswhichthebelieverathisbaptismreceivesasthetitle-writandbosom-rollofhisadoption;andwhich,accordingtomyscheme,everyChristianborninChurch-membershipoughttobringwithhimtothestudyofthesacredScripturesasthemaster-keyofinterpretation。Whateverthedoctrineofinfallibledictationmaybeinitself,inTHEIRhandsitistothelastdegreenugatory,andtobeparalleledonlybytheRomishtenetofInfallibility——intheexistenceofwhichallagree,butwhere,andinwhom,itexistsstatadhucsublite。EverysentencefoundinacanonicalBook,rightlyinterpreted,containsthedictumofaninfallibleMind;butwhattherightinterpretationis——
  orwhethertheverywordsnowextantarecorruptorgenuine——mustbedeterminedbytheindustryandunderstandingoffallible,andalas!
  moreorlessprejudicedtheologians。
  AndyetIamtoldthatthisdoctrinemustnotberesistedorcalledinquestion,becauseofitsfitnesstopreserveunityoffaith,andforthepreventionofschismandsectarianbyways!LetthemanwhoholdsthislanguagetracethehistoryofProtestantism,andthegrowthofsectariandivisions,endingwithDr。Hawker’sultra-
  CalvinisticTracts,andMr。Belsham’sNewVersionoftheTestament。
  Andthenlethimtellmethatforthepreventionofanevilwhichalreadyexists,andwhichtheboastedpreventiveitselfmightratherseemtohaveoccasioned,Imustsubmittobesilencedbythefirstlearnedinfidel,whothrowsinmyfacetheblessingofDeborah,orthecursingsofDavid,ortheGrecismsandheavierdifficultiesinthebiographicalchaptersoftheBookofDaniel,orthehydrographyandnaturalphilosophyofthePatriarchalages。Imustforegothemeansofsilencing,andtheprospectofconvincing,analienatedbrother,becauseImustnotthusanswer"MyBrother!WhathasallthistodowiththetruthandtheworthofChristianity?IfyourejectaprioriallcommunionwiththeHolySpirit,thereisindeedachasmbetweenus,overwhichwecannotevenmakeourvoicesintelligibletoeachother。Butif——thoughbutwiththefaithofaSenecaoranAntonine——youadmittheco-operationofaDivineSpiritinsoulsdesirousofgood,evenasthebreathofheavenworksvariouslyineachseveralplantaccordingtoitskind,character,periodofgrowth,andcircumstanceofsoil,clime,andaspect;onwhatgroundcanyouassumethatitspresenceisincompatiblewithallimperfectioninthesubject——evenwithsuchimperfectionasisthenaturalaccompanimentoftheunripeseason?Ifyoucallyourgardenerorhusbandmantoaccountfortheplantsorcropsheisraising,wouldyounotregardthespecialpurposeineach,andjudgeofeachbythatwhichitwastendingto?Thornsarenotflowers,noristhehuskserviceable。Butitwasnotforitsthorns,butforitssweetandmedicinalflowersthattherosewascultivated;andhewhocannotseparatethehuskfromthegrain,wantsthepowerbecauseslothormalicehaspreventedthewill。IdemandfortheBibleonlythejusticewhichyougranttootherbooksofgraveauthority,andtootherprovedandacknowledgedbenefactorsofmankind。WillyoudenyaspiritofwisdominLordBacon,becauseinparticularfactshedidnotpossessperfectscience,oranentireimmunityfromthepositiveerrorswhichresultfromimperfectinsight?ADavywillnotsojudgehisgreatpredecessor;forherecognisesthespiritthatisnowworkinginhimself,andwhichundersimilardefectsoflightandobstaclesoferrorhadbeenhisguideandguardianinthemorningtwilightofhisowngenius。Mustnotthekindlywarmthawakenandvivifytheseed,inorderthatthestemmayspringupandrejoiceinthelight?Asthegenialwarmthtotheinforminglight,evensoisthepredisposingSpirittotherevealingWord。"
  IfIshouldreasonthus——butwhydoIsayIF?Ihavereasonedthuswithmorethanoneseriousandwell-disposedsceptic;andwhatwastheanswer?——"YOUspeakrationally,butseemtoforgetthesubject。
  IhavefrequentlyattendedmeetingsoftheBritishandForeignBibleSociety,whereIhaveheardspeakersofeverydenomination,CalvinistandArminian,QuakerandMethodist,DissentingMinistersandClergymen,nay,dignitariesoftheEstablishedChurch,andstillhaveIheardthesamedoctrine——thattheBiblewasnottoberegardedorreasonedaboutinthewaythatothergoodbooksareormaybe——thattheBiblewasdifferentinkind,andstoodbyitself。Bysomeindeedthisdoctrinewasratherimpliedthanexpressed,butyetevidentlyimplied。Butbyfarthegreaternumberofthespeakersitwasassertedinthestrongestandmostunqualifiedwordsthatlanguagecouldsupply。Whatismore,theirprincipalargumentsweregroundedontheposition,thattheBiblethroughoutwasdictatedbyOmniscience,andthereforeinallitspartsinfalliblytrueandobligatory,andthatthemenwhosenamesareprefixedtotheseveralbooksorchapterswereinfactbutasdifferentpensinthehandofoneandthesameWriter,andthewordsthewordsofGodHimself:andthatonthisaccountallnotesandcommentsweresuperfluous,nay,presumptuous——aprofanemixingofhumanwithdivine,thenotionsoffalliblecreatureswiththeoraclesofInfallibility——asifGod’smeaningcouldbesoclearlyorfitlyexpressedinman’sasinGod’sownwords!Buthowoftenyouyourselfmusthaveheardthesamelanguagefromthepulpit!"
  WhatcouldIreplytothis?Icouldneitherdenythefact,norevadetheconclusion——namely,thatsuchisatpresentthepopularbelief。
  Yes——Iatlengthrejoined——Ihaveheardthislanguagefromthepulpit,andmorethanoncefrommenwhoinanyotherplacewouldexplainitawayintosomethingsoverydifferentfromtheliteralsenseoftheirwordsascloselytoresemblethecontrary。Andthis,indeed,isthepeculiarcharacterofthedoctrine,thatyoucannotdiminishorqualifybutyoureverseit。Ihaveheardthislanguagefrommenwhoknewaswellasmyselfthatthebestandmostorthodoxdivineshaveineffectdisclaimedthedoctrine,inasmuchastheyconfessitcannotbeextendedtothewordsofthesacredwriters,ortheparticularimport——thatthereforethedoctrinedoesnotmeanallthattheusualwordingofitexpresses,thoughwhatitdoesmean,andwhytheycontinuetosanctionthishyperbolicalwording,Ihavesoughttolearnfromtheminvain。Butletathousandoratorsblazonitatpublicmeetings,andletasmanypulpitsechoit,surelyitbehovesyoutoinquirewhetheryoucannotbeaChristianonyourownfaith;anditcannotbutbebeneathawisemantobeanInfidelonthescoreofwhatothermenthinkfittoincludeintheirChristianity!
  Nowsuppose——and,believeme,thesuppositionwillvarylittlefromthefact——thatinconsequenceoftheseviewsthesceptic’smindhadgraduallyopenedtothereceptionofallthetruthsenumeratedinmyfirstLetter。SupposethattheScripturesthemselvesfromthistimehadcontinuedtoriseinhisesteemandaffection——thebetterunderstood,themoredear;asinthecountenanceofone,whomthroughacloudofprejudiceswehaveatleastlearnedtoloveandvalueaboveallothers,newbeautiesdawnonusfromdaytoday,tillatlengthwewonderhowwecouldatanytimehavethoughtitotherthanmostbeautiful。Studyingthesacredvolumeinthelightandinthefreedomofafaithalreadysecured,ateveryfreshmeetingmyscepticfriendhastotellmeofsomenewpassage,formerlyviewedbyhimasadrystickonarottenbranch,whichhasBUDDEDand,liketherodofAaron,BROUGHTFORTHBUDSANDBLOOMEDBLOSSOMS,ANDYIELDEDALMONDS。