PREFACE。
  IThasbeenremarkedtome,thatiftherewerenootherreasonwhyaveryreluctantattentionshouldbegrantedtothisPamphlet,therewouldbe"notime"tonoticeadiscussionoftheLaw,arisingoutofaffairspurelypersonal,ataperiodwhensubjectsofmomentouspublicimportanceoccupythemindsofallmen。
  InanswertothatremarkIcanonlysay,thatIhaveneveryetseenthepublicmindinastateofsuchundividedattention。IhavenodoubtthatinthepresentSession,asinallothers,therewillbe"time"forallusualemployments;timeforassemblies,operas,andballs;timeforraces,club—dinners,andfê;tes;timeforreadingworksofscience,andworksoffiction;forthemostabstractstudy,andforthemostfrivolousgossip;timetodiscusswhetherthearmsofScotlandareproperlyquarteredwiththearmsofEngland,aswellastodebatewhethertheEmperorofRussiaistomakewarupontheworld。ItwouldbepayingEnglishmenapoorcomplimenttosupposethattheonesubjecttheyaredeterminednottofindtimefor,isthereformofsomeoftheirownlaws;areformconfidentlyalludedtobytheLordChancellor,inhisspeechofthe14thFebruarylastyear;andformallyintroducedasoneofthetopicsoftheQueen’sSpeechattheopeningofParliament。
  LordCampbell,——inhisbrilliantandinterestingwork,"TheLivesoftheChancellors,"——tellsusthatinthesessionof1758PageivreferencewasmadetotheJudgesonthemotionofex—ChancellorHardwicke,respectingabillforamendingthelawofHabeasCorpus;anditwasproposedtointroduceanewbillintheensuingsession。"ButI
  amsorrytosay,"——observesLordCampbell,——"thatwhenthenextsessionarrived,nothingwasthoughtofexceptthetakingofQUEBEC;andthesubjectwasnotagainresumed,tilltheverycloseofthereignofGeorgeIII。"
  Nowitiscertainlypossible,thatinlikemannertheLaw—reformssoconfidentlypromisedforthissession,maybesetaside;andsomefuturewriterofChancellors’Lives,mayexpresshisregret,that"intheSessionof1854littlewasthoughtofexceptthetakingofSEBASTOPOL。"
  But,ifanotherhalfcenturyshouldglideawaywithoutreforminourEcclesiasticalandotherCourts(asmorethanhalfacenturyelapsed,betweenthemotionofex—ChancellorHardwickeandtheamendmentoftheHabeasCorpusAct)shallwesetitalldowntotheoverwhelminginteresttakeninQuebecandSebastopol?
  Shallwenotratherlookforthesolutionofthesedelays,inacertainsupinenessonthepartofthosewhoworkthemachineryofjustice?andinfact(alsostatedbyLordCampbell)that"itisverydifficulttodrawthenoticeoftherepresentativesofthepeopletomeasuresfortheAmendmentsoftheLaw"?Difficulttodrawattentiontosuchmeasures;notdifficulttofind"time,"eitherfortheirdiscussion,ortheconsiderationofanyexampleswhichmayprovethenecessityofchange。
  Page1
  (body)
  ENGLISHLAWSFORWOMEN。BYC。NORTON。["ItwontdotohaveTRUTHANDJUSTICEonourside;WemusthaveLAWANDLAWYERS。"]CHARLESDICKENS。*Itakethosewordsasmytext。
  Inconsequenceoftheimperfectstateofthelaw,Ihavesufferedbitterly,andforanumberofyears:Ihavelatelybeeninsulted,defrauded,andlibelled:andasthelawisconstitutedIfindredressimpossible。
  Topublishcommentsonmyowncaseforthesakeofobtainingsympathy;toprovemerelythatmyhusbandhasbeenunjust,andmyfateahardone,wouldbeaverypoorandbarrenambition。Iaspiretoadifferentobject。Idesiretoprove,notmysufferingorhisinjustice,butthatthepresentlawofEnglandcannotpreventanysuchsuffering,orcontrolanysuchinjustice。Iwriteinthehopethatthelawmaybeamended;andthatthosewhoareatpresentsoill—providedastohaveonly"TruthandJustice"ontheirside,mayhereafterhavethebenefitof"LawandLawyers。"
  Iknowallthatcanbesaidonmyinterferencewithsuchasubject;alltheprejudiceandcontemptwithwhichmenwillreceiveargumentsfromawoman,andawomanpersonallyinterested。Butitisofmoreimportancethatthelawshouldbealtered,thanthatIshouldbeapproved。ManyawomanmayBleakHouse,page529。Page2
  livetothankHeaventhatIhadcourageandenergyleft,toattemptthetask:and,sincenoonecanforetelthefuture,evenmenmaypauseeretheyflingdownmypamphletwithmasculinescorn;foradaymaycome,——howeverimprobable,——tosomeoneofmyreaders,whenhewouldgivehisrighthand,forthesakeofsister,daughter,orfriend,thatthelawwereinsuchaconditionastoaffordachanceofjustice;withoutthepainofaprotractedstruggle,orthedisgraceofapublicbrawl。WhatIwrite,iswritteninnospiritofrebellion;itputsforwardnoabsurdclaimofequality;itissimplyanappealforprotection。Suchprotection,indegree,asisaccordedtoservants,toapprentices,tothesailoronthehighseas,toallwhomthelawadmitstobeinasubordinateandhelplessposition。
  Suchprotection,indegree,ashaslatelybeenextendedtowomeninthelowerclasses,bythemorestringentlawsenactedintheirbehalf。
  Inarguingmycasefrommyownexample,Iamnotignorantthattherearepersonswhothinksuchargumentblameableonothergrounds;whodeemahusband’srightsoindefeasible,andhistitlesosacred,thatevenawrongedwifeshouldkeepsilence。
  Howfarwilltheycarrythatprinciple?Afewyearsago,aFrenchnobleman,theDucdePraslin,assassinatedhiswifeinthemidstofherslumberinghousehold。Whenmorningbroke,shewasdead;butmanyaproofremainedofthedesperateresistanceandagonizedeffortstoescape,madebythatwretchedwomanbeforeherdoomwascompleted。Dotheadvocatesofthedoctrineofnon—resistanceconsiderthatherdutywouldhavebeentosubmittranquillytothefatepre—determinedforher?Ifnot,letthemwaivejudgmentinmycase;forifchoicewereallowedme,Iwouldratherbemurderedandrememberedbyfriendsandchildrenwithloveandregret,thanhavetheslandersbelieved,whichmyhusbandhasinventedofme。Itishe,whohasmadesilenceimpossible。WithHIMreststhebreakingofthosesealswhichkeepthehistoryofeachman’shomesacredfromindifferenteyes。Page3
  Hehasdeclaredhimselfmydeadliestfoe,whosedaggerhastoonearanaimtomissmyheart,——and,ofthetwo,IholdhisstabtobeworsethanthatoftheDucdePraslin,forhewouldassassinateevenmymemory。
  Iresist。
  Fortheshallowerrebuke,thatmineisanexceptionalcase;thatthelawneedscarcelybedisturbedtomeetasolitaryinstanceoftyranny;thereisareadyandreasonableanswer。ALLcasesrequiringlegalinterference,areexceptionalcases;anditwillscarcelybearguedthatabalancemustfirstbestruckinnumbers,andinstancesofwrongbereckonedbythedozenorthegross,beforejusticewillcondescendtoweighthescales。Butitdoesnotfollowthatmineisasolitaryexampleofinjustice,becauseitmaypossiblyhappen,fromacombinationofpeculiarcircumstances,tobetheinstancewhichshallcallattentiontothestateofthelaw。Hundredsofwomenaresufferingatthismoment,whosecasesarenotlesshard,butmoreobscure:anditconsistswithallexperience,thatalthoughwrongandoppressionmayberepeatedtilltheybecomealmostofdailyoccurrence,theystrikeatlastonsomeheartthatrevoltsinsteadofenduring;orarewitnessedbymenwhoseindignantsympathyworksoutreformandredress。Ineithercase,oppressionisbroughttoahaltnotbyamultitudeofinstances,butbysomesingleexample;whichexamplemaybeneithermorenorlessimportantthanothers,thoughitbemadetheargumentandopportunityofchange。
  WearenottoldthatanyextraordinaryperfectionmarkedfordefencethepeasantchildofWilliamTell;norWatTyler’sdaughter;noreventhatvirgingirlofRome,forwhomhersirechosedeathratherthandegradation:
  thedoomhadfallen,perhaps,onothervictimsquiteasworthy。Butitwasresistedforthembyheartsthatbeathighindefenceofhonestright;andtherefore(andnotforthevalueofthevictims)wereadintherecordsofhistory,ofapaganfatherwhotookhischild’slife;ofChristianfatherswhoperilledtheirown;andofthoseconvulsions,changes,andPage4
  tumults,whichhadtheirproximateandapparentcauseinthedesiretoavengeatyrannousactdonetoapeasant’sson,——topunishinsultofferedtoacraftsman’sdaughter,——tokeepfromdefilementoneweakgirl,claimedbyadespoticruler,inthemarket—placeofsuperbRome;——butwhoserootwasinthisestablishedcertainty;thatinallhumansocieties,greatgeneralinjusticeshallbechecked,soonerorlater,byindividualresistance。
  If,asIhavesaid,itdoesnotnecessarilyfollowthattheexampleofresistanceisalsotheexampleofcrowningwrong;soneitherdoesitfollowthatthereistyrannygreaterthanusualenacted,whenthebenefactorarises,whosechivalrousnatureseescauseforexertion,whereothermensawnone。Noteventhen,inthemeritofthesufferers,orthedegreeoftheirsuffering,liestheprospectofchange;butinthespiritofhimwhowillnottamelycontemplateanymiseryhethinkshemightrelieve。Hefollowsinthetrackofthosewhohaveall"passedbyontheotherside;"buthediffersfromtheminthis,thathepausestoknowwhatwoundedandmoaningthingisflungacrosshispath,andforthwithacceptsashisbusiness,thattaskofrescuewhichmoreselfishandcarelessmenhavedeclined。ThegoodSamaritaninScripture,addressedhimselftonopeculiarcase;heliftednobleedingherofromadisastrousbattle—field;norking,writhingundertheassassin’sstroke。
  Amanlaygroaning,whohadfallenamongthieves。Thatisallweshalleverknowoftheexampleofhelp,givenasalessonofcharityeighteenhundredyearsago,tothefleetinggenerationsoftheworld!
  Intheselaterdaysofmorecomplicatedsocialwrong;whenHOWARDroseamongstus,apostleofcompassiontosufferersbarredoutofsight;ourprisonswerenoworsethantheyhadbeen,norourprisonersbettermen;theirdungeonswerenotdarker,northeirfoodmorescant,northeirsighinglouder,northeircasemorepitifulthantheirswhohadgonebefore。Circumstancewasthesame,butthehazardofhelphadarrived。Page5
  Thesighingwasheard,thedarknesswasperceived,thehungerforhumanpitywassatisfied,notforthesakeofthoseespecialprisoners,butbecauseHOWARDwascome。SoinERSKINE’Stime;thelawswerenotmoreoppressive,northeiroperationmoreunequal,thaninagenerationforegone;
  norwerethemenwhohadtoabidebythelegaldecisionsoftheday,unusuallynotableandimportant。Theywerethecommonclientsofcommoncauses,sufferingundercommonandestablishedgrievances,arisingfromthosedefectsinourpatched—upsystem,whichnooneyethadcaredtoexamine,orhadfoundsufficientenergytocorrect。ButERSKINEcame;andwhenmentoldhimthatsuchdefectswerepartofthelaw"beforehewasborn,"heanswered,thatitwas"becausehewasnotborn,thatitwaslaw,"forthathewouldseeitalteredbeforehedied。
  SowithROMILLY:itwasnonewthingthatrousedhisearnestnaturetostruggleforreformsinthescienceofthatprofessionwhichheatonceadoredanddetested。Manyaprisonerwithoutcounsel,hadstoodwistfullyatthebarbeforeROMILLY’S
  time;listeningtolearnedaccusationsdimlyunderstood,destituteofdefence。
  Manyalong—stainingblurandblotlayunremovedonthegreatscrollofournationalcode;whenhiswarmeloquence,enlargedviews,profoundthought,andkeencomparisonwiththeuniversallawofnations,workedtogetherforitsamendment。Hedidnotplead(forhecouldnotsohavepleaded)
  thatthemenofhisdaywhofoundnohelpfromthatcode,werepeculiarmartyrs;ofhigherdesert,withmoreatrociousinjuriestoredress,andwithlesschanceofredressingthem,thanheretofore。Heknewthatthiswasnotthecase。Allwascommon,usual,inevitable;andbecausebeingcommon,usual,andinevitable,itwasalsoUNJUST,andnotformeritinthesufferers,orexcessinanyonecaseofsuffering,hestroveforchange,andeffectedit。
  WeneedtheheartofaROMILLY
  amongstusnow。Thatstrenuousheart,whoseenergeticpitymadenocompromisewithcustom;noreverflaggedorfaintedinthelife—longeffortPage6
  toservehisfellow—men,till,inanhourofdeliriousregret,itsstrongpulsewasstilledforever。*
  IfHEwerehere——ifhewerehere,whosovaluedtheweddedcompanionofhisownhome,thatwhenshediedhesank,scathedbyherlossasbylightning,——hewouldnotanswerwithcontentedapathy,"ITISTHELAW,"whenwomencomplainofinjustice!Hewouldstandfortherightnow,ashestoodinthoseotherdays,whenhenoblystrove,andpatientlyplanned,tomakeLawwhatitshouldbe,ameansofprotection,notanengineofoppression,totheweak。
  Istherenoonewithheartgreatenoughtofillhisplace?
  ITISTHELAW。Cananythingbemorecuriousthanthecrabbedobstinacyordespairingsighwithwhichthisreplyismade?asthoughwehadforourguidancetheedictsoftheMedesandPersians,ofwhichitwasfabledthattheyinvolvednoprincipleofchange。Yetchangesareperpetuallymadeinthemoststringentedictswehave。Thatwhichwaslawtothegenerationofyesterday,isnotlawtous;andthatwhichislawtous,maybereversedforthegenerationoftomorrow:whyshouldunjustlawsforwomenbemorepermanentthanotherunjustlaws?WeknowthatLAWwasmappedandplannedamongcivilisednationsasthegreatHighwaytoJUSTICE。Wheretheroadleadsastray,itshouldbemendedoraltered;anditisoneoftheboastsofourever—boastfulEngland,thatshedoesthis。Notindeedofasudden,withthestrokeofsomemagicwand;butafterfitfulstruggleanddelay,asallthingsaredoneonthistravailingearth;adelayproportionedtothestrengthofancientprejudices,thejealousyofcontendinginterests,theenergyorslacknessofthehandsthatdothework。
  Neithermyspace,——normyboundedknowledge,——willpermitSirSamuelRomillylosthiswife,afteralongandhappyunion,onthe29thOctober,1818。Afterfourdaysandnightsofexcessiveanguishandgrieving,hismindbecamedisturbed,andhecommittedself—destruction。Page7
  thatIshouldfollow,indetail,eventhemostrecentofthosechanges;buttakesuchinstancesasthehazardofmemory,ortheveryshallowestchance—referencecansupply;takethementirelyfromamongfactswithinthecognizanceoflivingmen;andyoushallcrowdintoafewpages,suchreversalofmercantile,political,social,andreligiousrights,ashavealteredthedestiniesoftheentirepopulationofEngland。Ourchildrenareborntothetranquilinheritanceofprivilegesthatwerestruggledforinourtime,withfury,ferment,andheart—break。Theystandonconqueredground;groundthatwasinchbyinchabattle—fieldtotheirfathers。Theyexchangeamongthemselvesascurrentandcommoncoin,thosetreasuresofLibertythatfreightedourargosiesinstormierdays;whentheywhowatchedthedoubtfulchance,knewnotiftheyshouldwitnessthesinkingofthewreck,orcheerourentrancetothehaven。Someofthecaptainsofthosedaysareatrest;butsomeareyetamongus;witnessesofthefollyofthosewhowouldsetachangelesslimit,tothatwhichofallthingsismostsusceptibleofchangeintheonwardprogressofanation——thecodebywhichitssocialinterestsaregoverned。
  WhereisthegreatquestionofRomanCatholicEmancipation?Wherearetherestrictionsontrade?Thefirst,alreadyseemstoourchildrenalmostamatterofHistory;yettherearelivingmenwhoheardCANNINGgiveBROUGHAMtheliedirectintheEnglishSenate,whenthatquestiontrembledinthebalance;andthebrilliantAdvocateofmanycauses,inthekeenanxietyofthehour,tauntedthenewMinisterwithexchangingforthetriumphsofofficethesupporthehadpreviouslyaffordedit。Theotherisachangeofyesterday。Fresh,inthemourningmemoryoffriends,isthedeathofthatleaderwhomooredthevesseloftheStateinanuntriedanchorage,withthescornfulwordsthatherefusedtodirectitscourse"byobservationstakenin1842,"andthathewouldfeellesshumiliatedbythechargeofinconsistencythanbyanysupposedfearofacknowledgingthathehadalteredhisopinions。
  Page8
  Whetheritbecontendedthatourrulerswereenlightenedorstruckblindwhentheyprojectedsuchchanges,——thechangesweremade:everyportionofthosetwosystemsremainsforourchildren,alawreversedorabarrierbrokendown。
  WherearethegrossercorruptionsofourParliamentaryrepresentation?Sweptawayonemorninginastormofcheers。YetitisnotsolongsinceLordJohnRussellattemptedtosowthefirstfragileseedoftheReformBill,byproposingthatrottenboroughsshouldbepurchasedbythenation;theirownerstoreceivecompensationfromanindebtedcountry,fortheextinguishedrightofsellingsharesinwhatissupposedtobetheaggregateVoiceofthePeople。ItisnotsolongsincethesameMinisterofLibertyurgedtheclaimofthosegreatcapitalsofmercantileinterest,Manchester,Birmingham,andLeeds,toberepresentedinthelowerhouse,andurgedthatclaiminvain:sincehecomplainedofnationalapathyonthesubjectwhichafterwardsshookEnglandtoitscentre:andbeheldthatgreatmeasureofReformwhich,liketheburdenofSisyphus,hehadheavedupsooftenonlytoseeitrollbacktoitsformerposition,——allowedatlengthtorestintheEnglishSenate,——byfavourofamajorityofONE。
  Thesearechanges,affectingpoliticalrights;struggledforbypoliticalmen;opposedorupheldbythewholemassofthepeople:butthereareothers,affectingsectionsofthecommunity,inwhichanequalorevengreateramountofalterationhasbeeneffected,andinwhichthevalueandpowerofindividualeffortismoredistinctlyvisible。OurSchools,ourPrisons,andourMad—houses,areallunderGovernmentsupervision。Theiroccupantsformclassessetapart——byhelplessnessofage,byerrorofconduct,andbythevisitationofGod——fromthosethathavefreecontroloftheirdestiny:andwepointwithpridetothemodelregularityofsystemandofarchitecturewhichwehaverecentlyintroducedforthebettermanagementoftheirinterests。
  Howwasitbeforethechangecouldbeeffected?Howwasit,first,withthemostmiserableofthoseclasses,thePage9
  insane?Obscurestruggles,halfmeasures,renewedefforts,marktheprogressfrom1763till,intheyear1788,MasonthePoetwroteapamphlet,findingbitterfaultwiththemanagementoftheYorkAsylum。Thetoneofhispamphletwascondemned。Thereisnothingsocietyresentssomuchashavingtheduckweedonthestillpondofitssurfacedisturbedbytheunder—currentofstrugglinglives。Societydidnotwanttohearaboutsuchhorrors;societywasoftheopiniontheycouldnotbehelped。MrMasonwasloudlyblamedforhisinterference,andheandhispamphletwerethrustaside。Aboutthreeyearsafterwards,therelativesofaninsaneQuakerbeingdiscontentedwiththeregulationsofthesameAsylum,renewedthecomplaintsMasonhadmade;andfollowedthemupwithconsiderableperseverance。Littlewasdonehowever,exceptthatthe’Retreat’atYorkwasestablishedbytheQuakersthemselves。Everysortofobstaclewasthrowninthewayofpublicinquiry。
  Atlength(withpraiseworthyingenuity),thirteengentlemenqualifiedasGovernorsoftheYorkAsylumbypayingtwentyguineaseach,fortheexpresspurposeofgettingacommitteeoftheHouseofCommonsappointedtoexamineintothismatter。TheydidgettheCommitteeappointed;theexpensesofmostofthewitnessesbeingpaidbyasubscriptionraisedamongtheladiesofYork:andthusbeganthatinterferencewithamonstrousevil,whichisnowamatterofregulargovernmentcontrol。IntheparticularinstanceoftheYorkAsylum,themosthorribleabuseswerediscovered。Therewerebuttwoservantstoonehundredandtwentymalepatients;thefundshadbeenmisapplied;thebooksandregistriesburned;thegrossestimmoralitypractised;andinthereportofdeaths,144outof365hadbeensuppressed。
  Astheinquiryspreadtootherasylums,moreandmorehorrorsweremadeknown。WhenMrWakefieldvisitedBethlem,amongcountlessotherinstancesofcrueltyonemanwasfoundwithanironringroundhisneck,anironbarroundhiswaist,andironpinionsonhisarms,fastenedtothewall;
  andthishadPage10
  enduredtwelveyearsatthepleasureofoneofthekeepers。IntheHouseofCorrectionatKendalamanhadbeeninsolitaryconfinementtenyears,thoughhehadintervalsofsanityofnineandtenmonths’duration。
  Astotheconditionoftheinsanewomen,itwasonetoshudderat,nottospeakof。Inprivatemad—houses(inspiteofanactpassedin1774*)
  matterswereasbad,orworse;andoneofthevisitingphysiciansdeclaredhewasillwiththeatmosphereoftheirfilth,"althoughaccustomedtothedissectingroom。"Atlength,in1816abillpassedtheCommons(andwaslostintheLords)"forthebetterRegulationofMad—houses;"andgraduallythatcametobeapublicandredressedwrong,whichhadbeenanobscuregrievance。
  Ofourprisondiscipline,muchthesamehistorymaybetold。LongafterHoward’stime(whodeclaredin1773,thatsomiserablyoffwerethosekennelledsufferers,that"torotinjail,"wasanexactandnotafigurativeexpression,andthatmorepersonsperishedthusthanbypublicexecution),ourprisonsremained,forthemostpart,densofcorruption,disease,andtorture。In1804,MrNeild,amagistrateofAylesbury,(SecretarytoaSocietyforthereliefanddischargeofpoorDebtors),published,inthe’Gentlemen’sMagazine,’
  observationsonChelmsfordandColchesterBridewells。Heafterwardspublishedanaccountofallthejailsinthisisland;whichhehadvisitedunauthorisedandunaided,Governmentdoingnothingtohelphiminhisself—imposedtask,andobstacleshavingbeenthrowninhiswaywhichwouldhaveweariedoutanylessbenevolentpatience。From1804to1812,heappearstohavebeenceaselessinhisendeavourstoprocuresomeamendment;andthough,whenFowellBuxtonfollowedin1818,andwhenMrsFrydevotedherselftothefemaleprisonersofNewgate,verylittlegeneralimprovementwasperceptible;
  yetmuchBroughtunderthenoticeofParliamenttenyearspreviously。Page11
  wasdoneinNeild’stimetomakeprogressalmostcertain,andaretrogrademovementimpossible。ThejailofAylesbury(withwhichhewasmoreimmediatelyconnected),andotherprisons,controlledintheirmanagementbymenlikehimself,becamewhatitisthecanttermofthedaytocall’ModelPrisons。’Theabusesofthosehecouldnotcontrol,wereexposedbyhim。ItbecameknownthatintheBoroughCompterprisonthedebtorslayuponboards;infilth,damp,anddiscomfort;felonsanddebtorsallhuddledtogether;noclassification,nocomfort,nodecency。
  ThatinAyrjail,theprisonerslayonstraw,tillMrNeildsuppliedblanketsfromhisownprivatecharity。ThatinEdinburghjail,thesamemiseriesandevengreaterwereendured;noemploymentwaspermitted;andfelons(withanenlightenedregardforthestateoftheirsouls)wereabsolutelyexcludedbyrule,fromattendanceondivineservice。IntheprivilegedprisonofDoverCastle,whenitswarderwasthegreatMinisterLordLiverpool(whohadbeenprecededbyMrPitt),theprison—feesweresoenormousthatprisonersmightremaintwentymonthsintheCastleatthesuitoftheCrown,forsumstotallyirrespectiveoftherealdebtforwhichtheywereincarcerated。Theprisonwasinastateofshamefuldilapidation;
  andaQuakergentlemengave800l。inthethreepercents,topavethecourtyardofthisroyaljail,andmakepermanentprovisiontoaidthepoorerdebtorsinobtainingtheirrelease。TheseweremerelysamplesoftheconditionofmostoftheprisonsinGreatBritain。InFowellBuxton’stimetheBoroughCompterwaslittlealtered;dirt,confusion,andmisery;
  cold,sickness,andgambling;andtwentyprisonerssleepingoneightstrawbeds。This,again,ameresampleoftheconditionofotherjails。InMrsFry’stime,Newgate,whichwasbuilttohold480,heldfrom800to1200;
  noclassification,noemployment,noinstruction;filththatsickenedandturnedtheheartfaint;instancesofdebtorsactuallystarvinginjail;
  theaccusedandconvicted,sickandwell,abandonedwomen,andchildrenPage12
  youngenoughtobeinthenursery,allhuddledtogether;prisonersemployedingambling,andcomplainingthattheyhadnothingelsetodo。
  Idleness,contamination,riot,sickness,andblasphemy;norestbynight,andnopeacebyday;onlycorruption,mentalandphysical,hourlyleaveningamongneglectedswarmsoffellow—creatures,withbodiestocareforandsoulstobesaved。
  Totheefforts,firstofoneearnestindividual,andthenofanother,mustbeattributedtheattentionslowlygrantedbysuccessiveGovernmentstothesegreatabuses;untilatlengththegreaterpartofourprisonshavebecomeatriumphandashow;
  fromtheregulationsofwhichitneedsonlythatsomefutureNeildshouldexpungethebarbarousmistakeofprolongedsolitaryconfinement,tomakethemasperfectasplacesofthekindcanbe。
  Totheeffortsofearnestindividuals,mustalsobeattributedthatcontrolnowexercisedovertheeducationofthepoor。WherewasEnglandinthisrespectfiftyorsixtyyearssince?In1798aMrLancasteropenedaschoolintheBoroughroad,whichinsevenyearsbecameafreeschoolforonethousandchildren。TheexpensesofMrLancaster’splanoutranhismeans,andaMrJosephFoxgavebillsfor3,600l。totaketheschooloutofdebt;riskingthissumwithoutanyveryclearprospectofrepayment,forthesakeofthecause。
  Othergenerousandpublicspiritedmenthencameforward,andMrLancastertravelledthroughthecountrygivinglecturesandexplaininghisscheme。
  Inconsequenceofthoselectures,forty—fiveschools,educating11,300
  childrenwereestablished;intheyear1809,fiftyschools,educating14,200
  childrenwereorganised;andatlength,atameetingheldattheFreemason’sTavernonthe11thofMay,1811,——twoRoyalPrinces(theDukeofYorkandtheDukeofSussex),movedandsecondedaresolution,thatMrLancasterdeservedthethanksandsupportofallEngland,forthatinfouryearshehadbeenthemeansofcausingsome25,000childrentobeeducated;andMrFrancisHorneratthesamePage13
  meetingdeclared,thatofthe7,000childreneducatedinLancaster’sownschoolintheBoroughroad,notonehadeverbeenchargedinacourtofjusticewithanycriminaloffence。
  Withthegreateducationalmovementwhichafterwardstookplace,andtheendeavourtomakethestateinsomedegreeresponsibleforthetrainingofthepeople,LordBROUGHAM’S
  namemustforeverbenoblyassociated。Withhim(oneofthemostscientificallyeducatedmenofhisday),restedthetaskofarguingawaytheabsurdprejudicethatifthelowerclasseswereinstructed,theywoulddisdaintowork;
  withhimrestedthelongstruggleagainsttheabusesofcharitabletrusts,andbequestsforeducationalpurposes;thesacrednessofwhichwassolittleunderstood,thatLordKenyonremarkedofthegrammarschools,that"everythingwasneglectedexceptthereceiptofsalariesandemoluments;"andLordEldon,that"allovertheKingdom,charityestatesweredealtwithinamanneramountingtothemostdirectbreachofTrust。"Therewasnosuchtranquiladmissiononallsidesasexiststo—day,thattheStateisboundtowatchoverandsecuretoitspoorermillionstheinestimableblessingofeducation。LordBroughamwasfloutedandopposed;andinnothingdidheencountermoreoppositionorgreaterodium,thaninhisattempttopreventthisembezzlementofthepropertyofthepoor。Withmostpertinaciousenergyhemadehimselftheirpioneertoknowledge;andmostassuredly,whenthebalanceofusefulnessisstruckinhisdazzlingandeccentriccareer,thetriumphcanneverbedeniedhimofhavingbeenamainmeansofsecuringtofuturegenerationsofEnglishmen,thefirstoflife’sblessingsbothindateanddegree;thatearlyandorderlytrainingwhichliftsatoilingmanabovethelevelofatoilingbrute;whichteacheshimtousethepowersofhissoulinadditiontothepowersofthebody;whichmakesslumberandfoodnolongerthesolerefreshmentoftheintelligentartisan,andthrowsalightintothelabourer’scottagebeyondthecommonlightofday。
  ItisnotbecauseIundervaluethehelpthusgivenatalaterPage14
  stageofthecause,thatIendeavouredtomarkthemomentwhennationalprogresswassetonfootbyindividualenergy。*
  IknowthatwhenLancaster’stheorywasmadepublic,theDukeofBedfordandLordSomervillebecameeagersupportersofhisscheme;thattheKingandalltheRoyalFamilywarmlyassistedhim(astheyafterwardsdidhissometimerival,DrBell);andthatinprocessoftime,theliberalityofthepublicbecamesogeneral,thattheLancastrianschoolsseemedsupportedratherbythelevyingofanationaltribute,thanbythepaymentofcollectedsubscriptions。ButthatwhichIinsistupon,isthesmallbeginningfromwhichthesegreatresultswereevolved。Notbynationalacclamationofanall—pervadingplan,butbytheresoluteandpatientstruggleofaprivateindividual——thatgreatschemeofNationalInstructionwasbegun。Whenitappearedlikelytofailforwantoffunds,aprivateindividual(MrJOSEPH
  In1787,——thatwhichMrLancasterachievedmanyyearsafterwardsforENGLAND,wasattemptedforIRELANDbyMrThomasSheridan,sonofDrSheridan(thefriendofSwift),andthefatherofR。B。Sheridan。Thoughnotascholarbyprofession,——asDrSheridanwas,——hehadgreatclassicalattainments,andthedegreeofMasterofArtswasconferredonhimbothatOxfordandCambridge。Hewrotemuchonpracticaleducation;thenecessityoflearning"commonthings;"andthefollyofconfininginstructionsomuchtothestudyofthedeadlanguages。HehadlongplannedaNationalEstablishmentforIreland;fundsforwhichhebelievedmightinthefirstinstanceberaised,byputtingdownfreeschoolswhere,fromgradualabuse,nodutywasdone。Whenhistwosons,CharlesandRichardBrinsley,wereinconspicuouspublicsituations,——CharlesasSecretary—of—WarinIreland,andtheyounger,andmoredistinguished,inthezenithofhisfameinEngland,——MrT。SheridanreckonedonobtainingthenoticeandsupportofGovernmentforhiseducationalschemes,moreespeciallyasMrOrde(SecretarytotheDukeofRutland),tookaneagerinterestinthem。Thedeathhowever,oftheDuke,andtheremovalofMrOrde,checkedhisprojects;norwasitlikelyhewouldatthattimeobtainmuchencouragement。ThethenMinistrywasfartoobusywiththeintriguesofadividedCourt,——theimpeachmentoftheGovernor—GeneralofIndia,——thepaymentoftheCrownPrince’sdebts,——andthedisputeswhetherFoxhadorhadnotmockedtheEnglishSenatewithadeliberatefalsehood,sealedwiththePrince’sword,relativetothemarriagewithMrsFitzherbert,——tohavetimetospareforasanguineIrishman’splansforeducatinghiscountrymen;
  andintheensuingyearMrSheridandied。Page15
  FOX)riskedhis3,600l。tosaveitfromevilchance。Tohimjoinedfiveotherprivategentlemen(MrJACKSON,MrALLEN,MrCORSTON,MrSTURGE,andMrFOSTER),whosubscribed,andobtainedsubscriptionsfromothers,andformedthemselvesintoacommitteetomanageMrLancaster’saffairs。Whenthatbrilliantmeetingofthe11thofMay1811,washeld,itwasrathertoapplaudwhathadbeenachieved,thantorousetoaction:
  tocongratulateonforegonevictories;andtoobtainfreshsubsidiesforthesuccessfulgeneralwhohadcarriedonthebattleagainstignorancewithanarmyofvolunteers。BeforethoseRoyalPrincestheDukeofKENT
  andDukeofSUSSEX,——ortheChancellorofthePrinceRegent,——ortheDukeofBEDFORD,MarquisofLANSDOWNE,LordKEITH,FRANCISHORNER,andHENRY
  BROUGHAM,——proposedresolutionsattheFreemason’sTavernas"FriendsoftheRoyalLancastrianSystemfortheEducationofthePoor,"——MrLANCASTER
  hadlabouredinhisvocationforthirteenyears。WhenhisschoolwasfirstopenedintheBoroughroad,probablyhisverynamewasunknowntomostofthesegreatpersonages,andmanyanamelessnotableandlessrememberedhadgivensubstantialaidtothecause,beforetheybecameitspatrons。
  Andnowletmeask,——isthereanyreasonwhyattentionshouldnotbecalledtothedefectivestateofLawsforWomeninEngland,asattentionhasbeencalledtoothersubjects:——namely,byindividualeffort?Isthereanyreasonwhy(attentionbeingsocalledtothesubject)Womenalone,ofthemorehelplessclasses,——theclassessetapartasnothavingfreecontroloftheirowndestinies,——shouldbedeniedtheprotectionwhichinothercasessuppliesandbalancessuchabsenceoffreecontrol?ArewetobelievethatthegentlemenofGreatBritainaresojealousoftheirprivilegeofirresponsiblepowerinthisonerespect,thattheywouldratherknowredressimpossibleincaseswhichtheythemselvesadmittobeinstancesofthegrossestcrueltyandbaseness,thanframelawsofcontrolforthemselvessuchastheyarewillingtoframeforothers?Page16
  Willtheyeagerlyrestrictthelabourerormechanicfromviolenceandbrutalityinhiswretchedhome,andyetinsistontheirownrightofill—usageasaluxuryfairlybelonging(likethepossibilityofdivorce)
  tothesuperiorandwealthyclasses?Isthere,——inthedispositionofthosewhoaretolegislate,——aninsurmountablebarriertofairlegislationonthissubject?andifnot,isthereanyreasonwhy(topleadthecauseoftheinferiorsexashumblyaspossible)thelawsandenactmentsfortheirprotectionshouldnotundergoasmuchrevision,withasfairachanceofbeneficialalteration,astheregulationsaffectingthemanagementofpauperchildren,——insanepatients,——andthetriedanduntriedprisonerswhooccupyourgaols?
  Iforget;Imightpleadyetmorehumbly;Imightdropyetonegreatstepinthesocialscale,tofindamoreexactparallelwiththelegalpositionofwomeninthiscountry。
  EnglandhaslatelymadeasortofovationtoanAmericanlady,whosegraphicandimpassionedappealontheanti—slaveryquestion,reachedEuropeintheguiseofaromance;
  aromancewhichhassincebeentranslatedintomostmodernlanguages,——sothat"UncleTom’sCabin"hasbecomeeverywherea"householdword。"HadIbeeninEnglandatthetimeMrsBeecherStowevisitedus,Itoo,wouldhaveconsidereditaprivilegeandjoytoseeonewhosegeniusglorifiedthatsolemnandgloomyargument,andsentitamongstusclothedinlight。
  Iwishhersuccess。Idesireheartilyforherthathernamemayhereafterberememberedwithablessing,amongthenamesofthosewhowereearlylabourersinadaynowdawning,thatshallbringhelptothehelpless。
  Iholdhertasktobeaholyone,andslaveryanaccursedthing。
  But,meanwhile,itmaynotbeuninterestingtothoseAmericanswhoareofacontraryopinion,andwhohavefeltwoundedatthemannerinwhichwehavecalledacrosstheAtlantictobidAmericarenouncetheerrorofherway,——tolookbacktothetime,——whensonewandunwelcomewasourconversiontothecreedofmercy,inourowncolonies,thatLordSeaforthPage17
  wrotehometoMinistersin1802,tosayhehadoffendedthewholeislandofBarbadoesbyendeavouringtopersuadethemthatthewilfulmurderofaslaveshouldbemadefelony,insteadofbeingcompoundedforbyafineof11l。4s。ThetimewhenWILBERFORCEwasastrugglingenthusiastinanuncertaincause;whenourKing,PrinceofWales,andthewholeoftheRoyalFamily(withthesingleexceptionoftheDukeofGloucester),wereopposedtotheAbolitionBill;whenPittdespairedofcarryingthatmeasure,anditwasahotangrywaramongEnglishmenwhetheritshouldpassornot。Awarwhichcontinuedthroughyearsofdebatingandpamphleteering,beforethevictorywaswonbyourAbolitionists。
  ItmaynotbeuninterestingtoAmericanstoknow,also,thatiftheywillexaminethereportsofourHouseofCommons,——afterthatstrugglewasfairlyended,andthenewlawhadbeenpassed,——theywillfindtheprototypeof"LEGREE"inthepersonof"ARTHURHODGE,Esq。,oneoftheMembersofhisMajesty’sCouncilfortheVirginIslands,"——who,intheyear1811,wasbroughttotrialandcondemnedforthemurderofaslavenamedProsperonhisestateintheislandofTortola,——whenhiscountlesscrueltieswereexposed,insworndepositionspreservedinthoserecords。There,AmericansmayfindtheoriginalofUNCLE
  TOM,in"TOMBOILER,astout,hale,heartyman,"whointheyear1807waslaiddownandfloggedwithoutintermissionformorethananhourbyorderofHODGE,andbeingunabletoriseaftertheflogging,wascarriedtothesick—house;lingeredafewdays;andthendied。There,theywillfinditcomputedthatsixtyofHodge’sslaveshadperishedinthreeyearsfromseverityofpunishment,andnotmorethanthree,inthatperiod,haddiedanaturaldeath。AboutadozenofthesewretchedvictimsarenamedintheaffidavitsreportedtoourHouseofCommons;amongthemarewomenandchildren:
  onechildoftenyearsold,namedTAMSEN,havingbeendipped(byorder)
  intoacopperofboilingliquor,andtwoofthewomenhavinghadboilingwaterPage18
  poureddowntheirthroats。YetwhenthissubjectofKingGeorgeofEnglandwastried,itwaspleadedforhiminopencourtthatanegrobeingproperty,itwasnogreateroffenseinlawforhisownertokillhimthantokilladog:thejury,thoughtheyreturnedaverdictof"guilty,"
  byamajorityoftheirnumberrecommendedHodgetomercy:andGovernorElliotwrotehomeinhisdespatches,thathewasobligedtobepresent,asCommander—in—chief,——tocalloutthemilitia,——andtoproclaimmartiallaw,——inordertosecuretheexecutionofthesentence。Itisaremarkableadditionalfact,andshowsthestateoffeelingatthattime,thatalthoughtheseandathousandotherhorrorswereperfectlywellknown,ARTHURHODGE,Esq。,waswellreceivedinthesocietyoftheisland,andretainedhisrankas"oneoftheMembersofhisMajesty’sCouncil"uptothedayofhisarrest。
  Butthesearethingsofthepast:horribleshadows,rememberedlikebaddreams:eventsthatnevercanoccuragainwhereEngland’slawhassway。ForEnglandisjustandmerciful;
  andifsheisalsoalittleproudandpreaching,itisnomorethanallconvertstogoodcausesareapttobe,inthefreshearnestnessoftheirdesirethattruthslatelybroughthometothemselves,shouldbebroughthometoothers;andifshefindsfaultwiththelawsthatpermitoppressioninthecodeofothercountries,itisthatshehasnolawwhichpermitsoppressioninherown。
  IbegtheattentionofbothmyAmericanandEnglishreaderstoacaseIfindcopied,fromareportina"CincinnatiGazette,"intothecolumnsofourown"Times"newspaper,inthemonthofNovember,1853。ItwasacasetriedintheCovingtonCircuitCourt,andbythereportitappears,thataslavenamedSamNorris,belongingtoaMrJ。N。Patton,ofVirginia,hadbeenpermittedtoworkinCovington,onconditionofpayingeachyearacertainsumtohismaster;whichsumwasaccordinglypaid:thattwoyearsago,MrPattonproposedthattheslaveshouldpurchasehisfreedombythepaymentofPage19
  acertainadditionalsum,whichsumwasnearlypaidupwhenMrPattonchangedhismind,rescindedthecontract,andclaimedSamNorrisashisslave。Thecasewasarguedwithmuchability;butatthecloseoftheargumentthejudgedecidedforMrPattonagainstSamNorris,onthisprinciple,thatbythelawofKentucky"aslavecannotmakeacontract,norcanhehavemoniesofhisown。"Thecontract,therefore,wasnullandvoid;andthemoney,thoughreceivedandexpendedbythemaster,couldnotbeheldlegallytohavebeenpaid。Thereportconcludeswiththisconsolatoryadmission,thattheHon。JudgePryor,beforewhomthecasewastried,"characteriseditasoneofgreathardshipandcruelty;
  andeveryoneinthecourt—roomseemedtosympathisedeeplywiththepoornegro。"InthatsympathyImosttrulyshare;butthecasehasbesidesapeculiarinterestforme,——inasmuchasIfind,intheslavelawofKentucky,anexactparallelofthelawofEnglandforitsmarriedwomen;andinthispassageinthelifeofthepoorslaveSamNorris,anexactcounterpartofwhathaslatelyoccurredinmyown。
  I,too,hadacontract。
  Myhusbandbeingdesiroustoraisemoneysettledonmeandmysons,toemployonhisseparateestate,andrequiringmyconsentinwritingbeforethatcouldbedone,gavemeinexchangeforsuchconsentawrittencontractdrawnupbyalawyer,andsignedbythatlawyerandhimself。Whenhehadobtainedandemployedthemoneyhewasdesiroustoraise,likeMrPattonofVirginiaheresolvedto"rescindthecontract。"WhenI,liketheslaveNorris,endeavouredtostruggleagainstthisgrossbreachoffaith,——I
  wasinformedthatbythelawofEngland,"amarriedwomancouldnotmakeacontract,orhavemoniesofherown。"WhenIcomplainedofit,——Iwaspunishedbyafloodoflibellousaccusations,publishedinalltheEnglishnewspapers;libelsforwhich,thoughprovedfalsehoods,Icouldobtainnoredress,becausetheywerepublishedbymyhusband。ThecircumstancethatMrNorton,likeMrPatton,hadobtainedPage20
  alltheadvantagehesoughtwhenhewentthroughtheformalityandpretenceofmakingacontractwithme,madenodifference;andastomoney,eventhatwhichIearnedbyliteraturewassubjecttotheclaimofmyhusband,asthemanuallabouroftheslavewassubjecttotheclaimofhismaster,——becauseamarriedwomanis,bythecodeofEngland,(asSamNorrisbythecodeofKentucky)non—existantinlaw。ItisfitthatIshouldadd,inbehalfofEnglishheartsandEnglishloveofjustice,thatwhenIstood,withthatvaincontractinmyhand,intheWestminsterCountyCourt;(I,anintelligenteducatedwoman,grand—daughterofamansufficientlydistinguishedtohaveobtainedsepultureinWestminsterAbbey,hardby,)andwhenthelawwasshowntobe,forme,whatitisfortheslaveofKentucky,therewas,inthecourt—roomoftheWestminsterCountyCourt,astherewasinthecourt—roomoftheCovingtonCircuitCourt,evidenceofstrongsympathy。Mycase,——whichopenedupahistoryofwrong,treachery,libel,andinjusticeenduredforyearswithoutredress——wasevidentlyconsideredlikethatofNorris,tobe"oneofgreathardshipandcruelty,"andtheconcludingwordswithwhichMrNortonvehementlyattemptedtoaddressthecourt,weredrownedinthegroansandhootingofanexcitedcrowd。ButsympathycoulddonomoreformethanforMrPatton’sslave。ItcouldnotforceopenformetheirongatesoftheLAWwhichbarredoutjustice。
  Itcouldnotpreventlibel,andtorment,andfraud;therippingupofoldwounds,ortheinflictionofnew。TheLAWalonecoulddothat,iffitlawsofprotectionexistedforwomen。Thattheydonotexist,ismycomplaint。
  Thattheydonotexist,mightpointascornfulanswerfromnationsweimperiouslylectureontheinternaleconomyoftheirowngovernments。WehaverebukedAmerica,tauntedNaples,complainedofSweden,remonstratedwithTuscany,condemnedPortugal,andpositivelyshudderedatAustria(inthepersonofHAYNAU),becauseslaveryintheone,thetreatmentofpoliticalprisonersinanother,religiousintoleranceinPage21
  third,andaboveall,thetreatmentofWOMENinthelast,offendsourverysouls。IsEnglandthenincapableofanybutaBORRIOBOOLAmission?Issheforevertoprefermakingasortof"Sterne’sSentimentalJourney"intoothercountries,tofulfillingherdutiesathome?Theforeignerswearesofondofreproving,seewithdisgustandabhorrenceourownmethodofdealingwithcertainlaws。Tothem,ourmercantileanduncertainspeculationof"damages,"——thewonderfulindecencyofourdivorcetrials,——theincrediblefactthatthewomanaccusedisallowednodirectdefence,andcannotappearbycounselonsuchoccasions——thelothandreluctantadmission(andthatofveryrecentdate)oftherightofamothertoherinfantchildren,——arealikeodiousandincomprehensible。IwillventuretosaythatinnocountryinEurope,isthere,infact,solittleprotectionofwomenasinEngland。Englandthefault—finder;Englandtheuniversallecturer;England——wheretoaddtotheabsurdanomalyofthisstateofthings,theSaliquelawisconsideredabarbarism,andoffenceagainstafemaleSovereignistreason。
  Thecontrastbetweenthatwhichwepermit,andthatwhichwedisallow,bordersalmostontheburlesque。IfMrNorton,amagistrateandmemberofthearistocracy,hadcheatedatagameofcardsplayedbyafewidlersinoneoftheclubsofLondon,allEnglandwouldhavebeeninaferment。
  Accuserswouldhaverisen;friendswouldhavehungtheirheads;andforthesakeofsomedandy’spurse,theinvocationtojusticewouldhavebeenmadeinsuchasternuniversalshout,aswouldhavesentanechothroughallEurope。OrifI,whilevisitingforeignlands,hadinvestedmyselfwiththedignityofaself—appointedmessengerofGod;ifIhadbrokendownthefencethatguardsothermen’sconsciences,andtrespassedtheretosowwhatIconsidered"thegoodseed;"ifIhadforcedonreluctantRomanCatholics,tractsofinstructioninmyownformoffaith,andhadbeenarrestedforthattrespass,——thenindeed,ImighthopetoattracttheattentionoftheGovernmentofmyowncountry,andmycasemightbewarmlyadvocatedatPage22
  somesuchmeetingasstoodadvertisedintheEnglishnewspapersforNov。29,1853,headed,"PersecutingLawsinPortugal,Tuscany,andMalta;theEarlofShaftesburyinthechair。"ButintheEnglishlawswhichwreckawoman’swholedestiny;inthelawwhichpermitsthemostindecentandatrociouslibelagainsther,withoutachanceoflegaldefence,——inthelawwhichcountenancesandupholdsfarworsethancheatingatcards,andrendersnullandvoidacontractsignedbyamagistrate,becausethatcontractwasmadewithhiswife,——inthelawwhichgivesawoman’searningsevenbyliterarycopyright,toherhusband,——inthewholeframework,inshort,ofthoselawsbywhichherexistenceismergedintheexistenceofanother,(letwhatwillbethecircumstancesofhercase;)andbywhichJusticeinfactdivestsherselfofallcontrolandresponsibilityinthematter——Englandseesnothingworthyofremark。
  Withwhatascornfulretortmightthenationsweundertaketolecture,answerourbusy—bodymeddling!
  "Protectyourownwomen。Lookathome,forinstancesoftyranny,persecution,andunavailingappealsforjustice。Donottroubleyourselvesyet,aboutthedenialofsocialrightstoslaves,orthoselawsofKentuckywhichseeminsuchharmonywithyourown;donotevenpretendtoshudderatthedisgracefulchastisementinflictedonAustrianwomen,forwhatintheirlandistreason。Cometouswhenyourmagistratesdonotmakeaprofitofthelawtheyadminister;whenyouraristocracyarenotguiltyofviolenceandbrutalitytotheirwives,whichtheyexcusebylibelsinyourgazettes;
  whenthedaughtersofyourstatesmendonotstandinyourcourtsoflaw,ignoblybaitedforassertingjustclaims。Thatsuchthingsshouldoccur,inyourvain—gloriousland,maybeonlyaprivateandindividualwrong;
  butthatsuchthingsshouldoccur,withimpunity,——uncontrolledandunpunishedbylaw,——isnolongeraprivatewrong,butanationaldisgrace。"
  Ishallnowgiveanarrativeofmyowncase,asanexampleofwhatcanbedoneundertheEnglishlawof1853。IfthePage23
  publicationfailtodrawanypermanentattentiontothelawitself,atleastitwillremainacuriousrecordofinjustice,inacountryespeciallyboastfulofitsliberalandmagnanimousenactments。Iftherecordappearunimportantasthemerehistoryofawoman’swrongs,itmayhaveinterestasinvolvingapassageinthelifeofoneofEngland’sPrimeMinisters。
  Ihaveendeavouredtomakethenarrativeasclearaspossible,bydividingintothreeoutlines,——1st,thestrangemutualpositionofMrNortonandmyselfwithrespecttomoney—matters,bothbeforeandafterourseparation,——2dly,thetreatmentIreceivedasawife;takenfromthepaperssubmittedatthetimetolawyersemployedforme——and,——3dly,LordMelbourne’sopinionoftheaffairsinwhichhisnamewasinvolved;copiedwordforwordfromhisownletters。Ihavehadthat,andallothercorrespondence,printedinItalics;thattheinterruptionsmaybemoredistinct,andthatsuchpersonsasarealreadyfamiliarwithsomeoftheletters,mayomitthematpleasureandcontinuethenarrative。
  Ihavetakencounselofnoone;andnooneisresponsibleforthementionofnames,oroftheparttakenbyfriendsinthesemiserableaffairs。IfanyseecausetoregretwhatIhavedone,letthemblametheLAW。
  Thispamphletaddressesitself,nottoprivatesympathy,buttoEnglishjustice:itisanattempttoarguethereformwhichoughttobe,fromtheabusethathasbeen:——acomplaintoftheexerciseofirresponsiblepower,tothesourceofpower:——anappealfromTHELAW,asitstands,totheLegislaturewhichframesandalterslaws。
  Ibeginbyanexplanationofourmutualpositionastomoney—matters;becauseMrNortonhasbroughtourdisputestoacrisisonapecuniaryclaim;becausehehasfalsifiedthewholehistoryofthosematters;andbecause,fromthefirst,ourpositioninthisrespectwasextraordinaryandanomalous;inasmuchasinsteadofMrNortonbeing,eitherbytheexerciseofhisprofessionorpatrimonialproperty,whatGermanscallthePage24
  "Breadfinder,"itwasonmyliterarytalentsandtheinterestofmyfamily,thatoursupportalmostentirelydepended,whileIstillhadahome。
  MrNortonhaslatelyspoken(inthefabuloushistorieshehasgiventothepublicthroughthemediumofthenewspapers)oftheprofoundandpatientattachmentheentertainedformeprevioustoourunion。Idomostsolemnlydeclarethatatthetimehefirstdemandedmeofmymotherinmarriage,Ihadnotexchangedsixsentenceswithhimonanysubjectwhatever。MrNortonwasbrothertoLordGrantley;andthegovernesstowhosecareIwasconfided,happeningtobesistertoLordGrantley’sagent,thefemalemembersoftheNortonfamily,fromcourtesytothislady,invitedherandsuchofherpupilsasshechosetoaccompanyher,toLordGrantley’shouse。AsisterofMrNorton’s,aneccentricpersonwhoaffectedmasculinehabitsandplayedalittleontheviolin,amusedherselfwithmyearlyversesandmyloveofmusic,andtookmorenoticeofmethanofmycompanions。TheoccasionsonwhichIsawthisladywerenotfrequent;andstillmorerareweretheoccasionsonwhichIhadalsoseenherbrother;itwasthereforewithafeelingofmereastonishment,thatIreceivedfrommygovernesstheintelligencethatshethoughtitrighttorefusemetheindulgenceofaccompanyingheragaintoLordGrantley’stillshehadheardfrommymother;asMrNortonhadprofessedhisintentionofaskingmeinmarriage。Thisladyisstillliving,andcananswerfortheexacttruthofmystatement。
  AlmostthefirststepMrNortontook,afterhehadmademymother’sacquaintance,wastobegherinterestwithamemberoftheroyalfamily,whosegoodwordwiththeChancellorEldonwastoprocurehimasmalllegalappointment;andfromthedayweweremarriedheneverceasedimpressinguponme,thatasIbroughthimnopresentfortune(myportionbeingonlypayableonmymother’sdeath),IwasboundtouseeveryeffortwiththepoliticalfriendsofmyPage25
  grandfather,togethimlucrativepromotioninhisprofession。
  IfoundthismoredifficultthanIexpected。ThememoryofMrSheridanamongtheWhigparty,wasnotheldinthataffectionwhichinmyinexperienceIhadfancied;andifithadbeen,IdonotknowthatitwouldhavebeenasufficientpleaforservingMrNorton,whocouldputforwardnopersonalclaimsforemployment。Idid,however,whatmyhusbandrequested。Ibesieged,withvariouslywordedlettersofimportunity,thefriendswhomIknewasthegreatnameslinkedwiththecareerofmygrandfather;andwhilewaitingtheresultofthepetitionsIhadsownonsowideafield,Iturnedmyliteraryabilitytoaccount,bysellingthecopyrightofmyfirstpoemtoMessrsEbersofBondstreet。ItisnotwithoutacertaindegreeofromanticpridethatIlookbackandknowthatthefirstexpensesofmyson’slifeweredefrayedfromthepriceofthatfirstcreationofmybrain;andbeforethatchildwastwoyearsold,Ihadprocuredformyhusband,——(forthehusbandwhohaslatelyoverwhelmedme,mysons,andhisdeadpatronwithslander,ratherthanyieldamiserableannuity)——aplaceworthathousandayear;thearduousdutyofwhichconsistedinattendingthreedaysintheweek,forfivehours,tohearcausestriedinthesimplestformsoflaw。Fromthatdaytothepresent,myhusbandhasalwaysconsideredthatIoughttoassisthim——insteadofhissupportingme。Thedependanceuponmyliteraryeffortsforallextraresources,runs,asamatterofcourse,throughallthelettersIreceivedfromhimduringourunion。ThenamesofmypublishersoccurasiftheywereMrNorton’sbankers。
  IfMurrayofAlbemarlestreetwillnotacceptapoem,——ifBullofHollesstreetdoesnotcontinueamagazine,——ifHeathdoesnotoffertheeditorshipofanAnnual,——ifSaundersandOtleydonotbuytheMS。ofanovel,——ifColburn’sagreementisnotsatisfactoryandsufficient,——ifPowerdelayspaymentforasetofballads,——if,inshort,theWIFEhasnoearningstoproduce,theHUSBANDprofesseshimselftobe"quiteatalosstoknow"Page26
  howthenextdifficultyofpaymentistobegotover。Ononeoccasion,whenIhadbeenemployedtowritewordstoSpanishmusic,byanofficerofsomedistinction,andwasextremelylothtoexpresstothisgentlemantheopinionMrNortonwishedconveyedtohim,——namely,thatpaymentwastoolongdelayed,——MrNortonhimselfundertookthetaskofdunninghim,forthestipulatedsumbywhichhewastoprofit。Iworkedhard,andwasproudofmysuccess。Ibroughttomymanytasksalltheenergywhichyouth,highspirits,ambition,goodhealth,andthetriumphofusefulnesscouldinspire;joinedtoawishforliteraryfame,soeager,thatIsometimeslookbackandwonderifIwaspunishedforitbyunenviableandadditionalnotoriety。