WearesurprisedatthepunishmentoftheAreopagiteforkillingasparrowwhich,toescapethepursuitofahawk,hadtakenshelterinhisbosom。SurprisedwearealsothatanAreopagiteshouldputhissontodeathforputtingouttheeyesofalittlebird。Butletusreflectthatthequestionheredoesnotrelatetoacriminalsentence,buttoajudgmentconcerningmannersinarepublicfoundedonmanners。
  Inmonarchiesthereshouldbenocensors;theformerarefoundedonhonour,andthenatureofhonouristohavethewholeworldforitscensor。Everymanwhofailsinthisarticleissubjecttothereproachesevenofthosewhoarevoidofhonour。
  Herethecensorswouldbespoiledbytheverypeoplewhomtheyoughttocorrect:theycouldnotprevailagainstthecorruptionofamonarchy;
  thecorruptionratherwouldbetoostrongagainstthem。
  Henceitisobviousthatthereoughttobenocensorsindespoticgovernments。TheexampleofChinaseemstoderogatefromthisrule;butweshallsee,inthecourseofthiswork,theparticularreasonsofthatinstitution。
  ______
  1。Plutarch,Solon。
  2。Ibid。
  3。PhilolausofCorinthmadealawatAthensthatthenumberoftheportionsoflandandthatofinheritancesshouldbealwaysthesame。——
  Aristotle,Politics,ii。7,12。
  4。Laws,xi。
  5。CorneliusNepos,preface。Thiscustombeganintheearliesttimes。
  ThusAbrahamsaysofSarah,"Sheismysister,myfather’sdaughter,butnotmymother’s。"Thesamereasonsoccasionedtheestablishingthesamelawamongdifferentnations。
  6。Despecialibuslegibusqu?pertinentadpr?ceptarDecalogi。
  7。Bookx。
  8。Athenisdimidiumlicet,Alexandri?totum。——Seneca,DeMorteClaudii。
  9。Platohasalawofthiskind。Laws,v。
  10。Aristotle。ii。7。
  11。Solonmadefourclasses:thefirst,ofthosewhohadanincomeof500minaseitherincornorliquidfruits;thesecond,ofthosewhohad300,andwereabletokeepahorse;thethird,ofsuchashadonly200;
  thefourth,ofallthosewholivedbytheirmanuallabour。——Plutarch,Solon。
  12。Solonexcludesfrompublicemploymentsallthoseofthefourthclass。
  13。Theyinsisteduponalargerdivisionoftheconqueredlands。——
  Plutarch,LivesoftheancientKingsandCommanders。
  14。Inthese,theportionsorfortunesofwomenoughttobeverymuchlimited。
  15。Themagistratestherewereannual,andthesenatorsforlife。
  16。Lycurgus,saysXenophon,DeRepub。Laced?m。,10。§1,2,ordainedthatthesenatorsshouldbechosenfromamongsttheoldmen,totheendthattheymightnotbeneglectedinthedeclineoflife;thusbymakingthemjudgesofthecourageofyoungpeople,herenderedtheoldageoftheformermorehonourablethanthestrengthandvigourofthelatter。
  17。EventheAreopagusitselfwassubjecttotheircensure。
  18。DeRepub。Laced?m。,8。
  19。WemayseeintheRomanHistoryhowusefulthispowerwastotherepublic。Ishallgiveaninstanceeveninthetimeofitsgreatestcorruption。AulusFulviuswassetoutonhisjourneyinordertojoinCatiline;hisfathercalledhimback,andputhimtodeath。——Sallust,DeBelloCatil。,xxxiv。
  20。InourdaystheVenetians,whoinmanyrespectsmaybesaidtohaveaverywisegovernment,decidedadisputebetweenanobleVenetianandagentlemanofTerraFirmainrespecttoprecedencyinachurch,bydeclaringthatoutofVeniceanobleVenetianhadnopre—eminenceoveranyothercitizen。
  21。Itwasinsertedbythedecemvirsinthetwolasttables。SeeDionysiusHelicarnassus,x。
  22。Asinsomearistocraciesinourtime;nothingismoreprejudicialtothegovernment。
  23。SeeinStrabo,xiv。,inwhatmannertheRhodiansbehavedinthisrespect。
  24。AmelotdelaHoussaye,OftheGovernmentofVenice,partIII。TheClaudianlawforbadethesenatorstohaveanyshipatseathatheldabovefortybushels。——Livy,xxi。63。
  25。Theinformersthrowtheirscrollsintoit。
  26。SeeLivy,xlix。Acensorcouldnotbetroubledevenbyacensor;
  eachmadehisremarkwithouttakingtheopinionofhiscolleague;andwhenitotherwisehappened,thecensorshipwasinamannerabolished。
  27。AtAthenstheLogist?,whomadeallthemagistratesaccountablefortheirconduct,gavenoaccountthemselves。
  28。ItissopractisedatVenice。——AmelotdelaHoussaye,pp。30,31。
  29。Themaindesignofsomearistocraciesseemstobelessthesupportofthestatethanoftheirnobility。
  30。Itistoleratedonlyinthecommonpeople。SeeLeg。3,Cod。decomm。
  etmercatoribus,whichisfullofgoodsense。
  31。Testamentpolit。
  32。Barbariscunctatioservilis,statimexequiregiumvidetur。——
  Tacitus,Annals。,v。32。
  33。MemoirsofCardinaldeRetz,andotherhistories。
  34。Testamentpolit。
  35。EdifyingLetters,coll。ii,p。315。
  36。ContinuationofPufendorf,IntroductiontotheHistoryofEurope,inthearticleonSweden,10。
  37。AccordingtoSirJohnChardin,thereisnocouncilofstateinPersia。
  38。SeeRicaut,StateoftheOttomanEmpire,p。196。
  39。SeeconcerningtheinheritancesoftheTurks,AncientandModernSparta。SeealsoRicautontheOttomanempire。
  40。CollectionofVoyagesthatContributedtotheEstablishmentoftheEastIndiaCompany,i。ThelawofPeguislesscruel;iftherehappentobechildren,thekingsucceedsonlytotwo—thirds。Ibid。,iii,p。1。
  41。Seethedifferentconstitutions,especiallythatof1722。
  42。SeeJustin。
  43。Seethebookoflawsasrelativetothenatureoftheclimate。Bookxiv,below。
  44。Laquilletiere,AncientandModernSparta,p。463。
  45。Thesamemaybesaidofcompositionsinregardtofairbankrupts。
  46。TherewasnosuchestablishmentmadetilltheJulianlaw,DeCessionebonorum;whichpreservedthemfromprisonandfromanignominiousdivisionoftheirgoods。——Cod。,ii。tit。12。
  47TheyseemtohavebeentoofondofconfiscationsintherepublicofAthens。
  48。Authenticabonadamnatorum。——Cod。debon。proscript。seudamn。
  49。DelaRepublique,v。3。
  50。UtessePhoebidulciuslumensoletJamjamcadentis——Seneca,Troas,V。i。1。
  51。CollectionofVoyagesthatContributedtotheEstablishmentoftheEastIndiaCompany,i,p。80。
  52。Laws,xii。
  53。Leg。6,§2;Dig。adleg。Jul。repet。
  54。Munuscula。
  55。Plato,inhisRepublic,viii,rankstheserefusalsamongthemarksofthecorruptionofarepublic。InhisLaws,vi,heordersthemtobepunishedbyafine;atVenicetheyarepunishedwithbanishment。
  56。VictorAmadeus。
  57。Somecenturionshavingappealedtothepeoplefortheemploymentswhichtheyhadbeforeenjoyed,"Itisjust,mycomrades,"saidacenturion,"thatyoushouldlookuponeverypostashonourableinwhichyouhaveanopportunityofdefendingtherepublic。"——Livy,dec。5,xlii,34。
  58。Neimperiumadoptimosnobiliumtransferretur,SenatummilitiavetuitGallienus,etiamadireexercitum。——AureliusVictor,DeC?saribus。
  59。Augustusdeprivedthesenators,proconsuls,andgovernorsoftheprivilegeofwearingarms。——Dio,xxxiii。
  60。Constantine。SeeZozimus,ii。
  61。AmmianusMarcellinus,xxvi,EtCivilia,moreveterum,etbellarecturo。
  62。Republic,viii。
  63。WeseethelazinessofSpain,whereallpublicemploymentsaregivenaway。
  BookVI。ConsequencesofthePrinciplesofDifferentGovernmentswithRespecttotheSimplicityofCivilandCriminalLaws,theFormofJudgments,andtheInflictingofPunishments1。OftheSimplicityofCivilLawsindifferentGovernments。Monarchiesdonotpermitofsogreatasimplicityoflawsasdespoticgovernments。
  Forinmonarchiestheremustbecourtsofjudicature;thesemustgivetheirdecisions;thedecisionsmustbepreservedandlearned,thatwemayjudgeinthesamemannerto—dayasyesterday,andthatthelivesandpropertyofthecitizensmaybeascertainandfixedastheveryconstitutionofthestate。
  Inmonarchies,theadministrationofjustice,whichdecidesnotonlyinwhateverbelongstolifeandproperty,butlikewisetohonour,demandsveryscrupulousinquiries。Thedelicacyofthejudgeincreasesinproportiontotheincreaseofhistrust,andoftheimportanceoftheinterestsonwhichhedetermines。
  Wemustnot,therefore,besurprisedtofindsomanyrules,restrictions,andextensionsinthelawsofthosecountries——rulesthatmultiplytheparticularcases,andseemtomakeofreasonitselfanart。
  Thedifferenceofrank,birth,andconditionestablishedinmonarchicalgovernmentsisfrequentlyattendedwithdistinctionsinthenatureofproperty;andthelawsrelatingtotheconstitutionofthisgovernmentmayaugmentthenumberofthesedistinctions。Hence,amongusgoodsaredividedintorealestates,purchases,dowries,paraphernalia,paternalandmaternalinheritances;movablesofdifferentkinds;estatesheldinfee—simple,orintail;acquiredbydescentorconveyance;allodial,orheldbysoccage;groundrents;orannuities。Eachsortofgoodsissubjecttoparticularrules,whichmustbecompliedwithinthedisposalofthem。Thesethingsmustneedsdiminishthesimplicityofthelaws。
  Inourgovernmentsthefiefshavebecomehereditary。Itwasnecessarythatthenobilityshouldhaveafixedproperty,thatis,thefiefshouldhaveacertainconsistency,totheendthattheproprietormightbealwaysinacapacityofservingtheprince。Thismusthavebeenproductiveofgreatvarieties;forinstance,therearecountrieswherefiefscouldnotbedividedamongthebrothers;inothers,theyoungerbrothersmaybeallowedamoregeneroussubsistence。
  Themonarchwhoknowseachofhisprovincesmayestablishdifferentlaws,ortoleratedifferentcustoms。Butasthedespoticprinceknowsnothing,andcanattendtonothing,hemusttakegeneralmeasures,andgovernbyarigidandinflexiblewill,whichthroughouthiswholedominionsproducesthesameeffect;inshort,everythingbendsunderhisfeet。
  Inproportionasthedecisionsofthecourtsofjudicaturearemultipliedinmonarchies,thelawisloadedwithdecreesthatsometimescontradictoneanother;eitherbecausesucceedingjudgesareofadifferentwayofthinking,orbecausethesamecausesaresometimeswell,andatothertimesill,defended;or,infine,byreasonofaninfinitenumberofabuses,towhichallhumanregulationsareliable。
  Thisisanecessaryevil,whichthelegislatorredressesfromtimetotime,ascontraryeventothespiritofmoderategovernments。Forwhenpeopleareobligedtohaverecoursetocourtsofjudicature,thisshouldcomefromthenatureoftheconstitution,andnotfromthecontradictionoruncertaintyofthelaw。
  Ingovernmentswheretherearenecessarydistinctionsofpersons,theremustlikewisebeprivileges。Thisalsodiminishesthesimplicity,andcreatesathousandexceptions。
  Oneoftheprivilegesleastburdensometosociety,andespeciallytohimwhoconfersit,isthatofpleadinginonecourtinpreferencetoanother。Herenewdifficultiesarise,whenitbecomesaquestionbeforewhichcourtweshallplead。
  Fardifferentisthecaseofthepeopleunderdespoticgovernments。InthosecountriesIcanseenothingthatthelegislatorisabletodecree,orthemagistratetojudge。Asthelandsbelongtotheprince,itfollowsthattherearescarcelyanycivillawsinregardtolandedproperty。Fromtherightthesovereignhastosuccessions,itfollows,likewise,thattherearenonerelatingtoinheritances。Themonopoliesestablishedbytheprinceforhimselfinsomecountriesrenderallsortsofcommerciallawsquiteuseless。Themarriageswhichtheyusuallycontractwithfemaleslavesarethecausethattherearescarcelyanycivillawsrelatingtodowries,ortotheparticularadvantageofmarriedwomen。Fromtheprodigiousmultitudeofslaves,itfollows,likewise,thatthereareveryfewwhohaveanysuchthingasawilloftheirown,andofcourseareanswerablefortheirconductbeforeajudge。Mostmoralactionsthatareonlyinconsequenceofafather’s,ahusband’s,oramaster’swill,areregulatedbythem,andnotbythemagistrates。
  Iforgottoobservethataswhatwecallhonourisathinghardlyknowninthosecountries,theseveraldifficultiesrelatingtothisarticle,thoughofsuchimportancewithus,arewiththemquiteoutofthequestion。Despoticpowerisself—sufficient;rounditthereisanabsolutevacuum。Henceitisthatwhentravellersfavouruswiththedescriptionofcountrieswherearbitraryswayprevails,theyseldommakementionofcivillaws。[1]
  Alloccasions,therefore,ofwranglingandlaw—suitsarehereremoved。
  Andtothisinpartisitowingthatlitigiouspeopleinthosecountriesaresoroughlyhandled。Astheinjusticeoftheirdemandisneitherscreened,palliated,norprotectedbyaninfinitenumberoflaws,ofcourseitisimmediatelydiscovered。
  2。OftheSimplicityofCriminalLawsindifferentGovernments。Wehearitgenerallysaid,thatjusticeoughttobeadministeredwithusasinTurkey。Isitpossible,then,thatthemostignorantofallnationsshouldbethemostclear—sightedonapointwhichitmostbehovesmankindtoknow?
  Ifweexaminethesetformsofjusticewithrespecttothetroublethesubjectundergoesinrecoveringhisproperty,orinobtainingsatisfactionforaninjuryoraffront,weshallfindthemdoubtlesstoonumerous:butifweconsiderthemintherelationtheybeartothelibertyandsecurityofeveryindividual,weshalloftenfindthemtoofew;andbeconvincedthatthetrouble,expense,delays,andeventheverydangersofourjudiciaryproceedings,arethepricethateachsubjectpaysforhisliberty。
  InTurkey,wherelittleregardisshowntothehonour,life,orestateofthesubject,allcausesarespeedilydecided。Themethodofdeterminingthemisamatterofindifference,providedtheybedetermined。Thepasha,afteraquickhearing,orderswhichpartyhepleasestobebastinadoed,andthensendsthemabouttheirbusiness。
  Hereitwouldbedangeroustobeofalitigiousdisposition;thissupposesastrongdesireofobtainingjustice,asettledaversion,anactivemind,andasteadinessinpursuingone’spoint。Allthisshouldbeavoidedinagovernmentwherefearoughttobetheonlyprevailingsentiment,andinwhichpopulardisturbancesarefrequentlyattendedwithsuddenandunforeseenrevolutions。Hereeverymanoughttoknowthatthemagistratemustnothearhisnamementioned,andthathissecuritydependsentirelyonhisbeingreducedtoakindofannihilation。
  Butinmoderategovernments,wherethelifeofthemeanestsubjectisdeemedprecious,nomanisstrippedofhishonourorpropertyuntilafteralonginquiry;andnomanisbereftoflifetillhisverycountryhasattackedhim——anattackthatisnevermadewithoutleavinghimallpossiblemeansofmakinghisdefence。
  Henceitisthatwhenapersonrendershimselfabsolute,[2]heimmediatelythinksofreducingthenumberoflaws。Inagovernmentthusconstitutedtheyaremoreaffectedwithparticularinconveniencesthanwiththelibertyofthesubject,whichisverylittleminded。
  Inrepublics,itisplainthatasmanyformalitiesatleastarenecessaryasinmonarchies。Inbothgovernmentstheyincreaseinproportiontothevaluewhichissetonthehonour,fortune,liberty,andlifeofthesubject。
  Inrepublicangovernments,menareallequal;equaltheyarealsoindespoticgovernments:intheformer,becausetheyareeverything;inthelatter,becausetheyarenothing。
  3。InwhatGovernmentsandinwhatCasestheJudgesoughttodetermineaccordingtotheexpressLetteroftheLaw。Theneareragovernmentapproachestowardsarepublic,themorethemannerofjudgingbecomessettledandfixed;henceitwasafaultintherepublicofSpartafortheEphoritopasssucharbitraryjudgmentswithouthavinganylawstodirectthem。ThefirstconsulsatRomepronouncedsentenceinthesamemannerastheEphori;buttheinconvenienceofthisproceedingwassoonfelt,andtheywereobligedtohaverecoursetoexpressanddeterminatelaws。
  Indespoticgovernmentstherearenolaws;thejudgehimselfishisownrule。Therearelawsinmonarchies;andwheretheseareexplicit,thejudgeconformstothem;wheretheyareotherwise,heendeavourstoinvestigatetheirspirit。Inrepublics,theverynatureoftheconstitutionrequiresthejudgestofollowtheletterofthelaw;
  otherwisethelawmightbeexplainedtotheprejudiceofeverycitizen,incaseswheretheirhonour,property,orlifeisconcerned。
  AtRomethejudgeshadnomoretodothantodeclarethatthepersonsaccusedwereguiltyofaparticularcrime,andthenthepunishmentwasfoundinthelaws,asmaybeseenindiverslawsstillextant。InEnglandthejurygivetheirverdictwhetherthefactbroughtundertheircognisancebeprovedornot;ifitbeproved,thejudgepronouncesthepunishmentinflictedbythelaw,andforthisheneedsonlytoopenhiseyes。
  4。OftheMannerofpassingJudgment。Hencearisethedifferentmodesofpassingjudgment。Inmonarchiesthejudgeschoosethemethodofarbitration;theydeliberatetogether,theycommunicatetheirsentimentsforthesakeofunanimity;theymoderatetheiropinions,inordertorenderthemconformabletothoseofothers:andthelessernumberareobligedtogivewaytothemajority。Butthisisnotagreeabletothenatureofarepublic。AtRome,andinthecitiesofGreece,thejudgesneverenteredintoaconsultation;eachgavehisopinioninoneofthesethreeways:"Iabsolve,""Icondemn,""Itdoesnotappearcleartome";[3]thiswasbecausethepeoplejudged,orweresupposedtojudge。
  Butthepeoplearefarfrombeingcivilians;alltheserestrictionsandmethodsofarbitrationareabovetheirreach;theymusthaveonlyoneobjectandonesinglefactsetbeforethem;andthentheyhaveonlytoseewhethertheyoughttocondemn,toacquit,ortosuspendtheirjudgment。
  TheRomansintroducedsetformsofactions,[4]aftertheexampleoftheGreeks,andestablishedarulethateachcauseshouldbedirectedbyitsproperaction。Thiswasnecessaryintheirmannerofjudging;itwasnecessarytofixthestateofthequestion,thatthepeoplemighthaveitalwaysbeforetheireyes。Otherwise,inalongprocess,thisstateofthequestionwouldcontinuallychange,andbenolongerdistinguished。
  HenceitfollowedthattheRomanjudgesgrantedonlythesimpledemand,withoutmakinganyaddition,deduction,orlimitation。Butthepr?torsdevisedotherformsofactions,whichwerecalledexbonafide,inwhichthemethodofpronouncingsentencewaslefttothedispositionofthejudge。Thiswasmoreagreeabletothespiritofmonarchy。HenceitisasayingamongtheFrenchlawyers,thatinFrance[5]allactionsareexbonafide。
  5。InwhatGovernmentstheSovereignmaybeJudge。Machiavel[6]
  attributesthelossofthelibertyofFlorencetothepeople’snotjudginginabodyincasesofhightreasonagainstthemselves,aswascustomaryatRome。Forthispurposetheyhadeightjudges:"butthefew,"saysMachiavel,"arecorruptedbyafew。"Ishouldwillinglyadoptthemaximofthisgreatman。Butasinthosecasesthepoliticalinterestprevailsinsomemeasureoverthecivil(foritisalwaysaninconveniencethatthepeopleshouldbejudgesintheirowncause),inordertoremedythisevil,thelawsmustprovideasmuchaspossibleforthesecurityofindividuals。
  WiththisviewtheRomanlegislatorsdidtwothings:theygavethepersonsaccusedpermissiontobanishthemselves[7]beforesentencewaspronounced;[8]andtheyordainedthatthegoodsofthosewhowerecondemnedshouldbesacred,topreventtheirbeingconfiscatedtothepeople。WeshallseeinBookXItheotherlimitationsthatweresettothejudicatorypowerresidinginthepeople。
  Solonknewhowtopreventtheabusewhichthepeoplemightmakeoftheirpowerincriminaljudgments。HeordainedthattheCourtofAreopagusshouldre—examinetheaffair;thatiftheybelievedthepartyaccusedwasunjustlyacquitted[9]theyshouldimpeachhimagainbeforethepeople;thatiftheybelievedhimunjustlycondemned[10]theyshouldpreventtheexecutionofthesentence,andmakethemrejudgetheproceeding——anadmirablelaw,thatsubjectedthepeopletothecensureofthemagistracywhichtheymostrevered,andeventotheirown!
  Inaffairsofthiskinditisalwayspropertothrowinsomedelays,especiallywhenthepartyaccusedisunderconfinement;totheendthatthepeoplemaygrowcalmandgivetheirjudgmentcoolly。
  Indespoticgovernments,theprincehimselfmaybejudge。Butinmonarchiesthiscannotbe;theconstitutionbysuchmeanswouldbesubverted,andthedependentintermediatepowersannihilated;allsetformsofjudgmentwouldcease;fearwouldtakepossessionofthepeople’sminds,andpalenessspreaditselfovereverycountenance:themoreconfidence,honour,affection,andsecurityinthesubject,themoreextendedisthepowerofthemonarch。
  Weshallgivehereafewmorereflectionsonthispoint。Inmonarchies,theprinceisthepartythatprosecutesthepersonaccused,andcauseshimtobepunishedoracquitted。Now,werehehimselftosituponthetrial,hewouldbebothjudgeandparty。
  Inthisgovernmenttheprincehasfrequentlythebenefitofconfiscation,sothathereagain,bydeterminingcriminalcauses,hewouldbebothjudgeandparty。
  Further,bythismethodhewoulddeprivehimselfofthemostgloriousattributeofsovereignty,namely,thatofgrantingpardon,[11]foritwouldbequiteridiculousofhimtomakeandunmakehisdecisions;
  surelyhewouldnotchoosetocontradicthimself。
  Besides,thiswouldbeconfoundingallideas;itwouldbeimpossibletotellwhetheramanwasacquitted,orreceivedhispardon。
  LouisXIIIbeingdesiroustositinjudgmentuponthetrialoftheDukedelaValette,[12]sentforsomemembersoftheparliamentandoftheprivycouncil,todebatethematter;upontheirbeingorderedbythekingtogivetheiropinionconcerningthewarrantforhisarrest,thepresident,DeBelievre,said"thathefounditverystrangethataprinceshouldpasssentenceuponasubject;thatkingshadreservedtothemselvesthepowerofpardoning,andleftthatofcondemningtotheirofficers;thathismajestywantedtoseebeforehimatthebarapersonwho,byhisdecision,wastobehurriedawayintotheotherworld!Thattheprince’scountenanceshouldinspirewithhopes,andnotconfoundwithfears;thathispresencealoneremovedecclesiasticcensures;andthatsubjectsoughtnottogoawaydissatisfiedfromthesovereign。"
  Whensentencewaspassed,thesamemagistratedeclared,"Thisisanunprecedentedjudgmenttosee,contrarytotheexampleofpastages——akingofFrance,inthequalityofajudge,condemningagentlemantodeath。"[13]
  Again,sentencespassedbytheprincewouldbeaninexhaustiblesourceofinjusticeandabuse;thecourtiersbytheirimportunitywouldalwaysbeabletoextorthisdecisions。SomeRomanemperorsweresomadastositasjudgesthemselves;theconsequencewasthatnoreignseversosurprisedtheworldwithoppressionandinjustice。
  "Claudius,"saysTacitus,[14]"havingappropriatedtohimselfthedeterminationoflawsuits,andthefunctionofmagistrates,gaveoccasiontoallmannerofrapine。"ButNero,uponcomingtotheempireafterClaudius,endeavouredtoconciliatethemindsofthepeoplebydeclaring"thathewouldtakecarenottobejudgehimselfinprivatecauses,thatthepartiesmightnotbeexposedwithinthewallsofapalacetotheiniquitousinfluenceofafewfreedmen。"[15]
  "UnderthereignofArcadius,"saysZozimus,[16]"aswarmofcalumniatorsspreadthemselvesoneveryside,andinfestedthecourt。
  Uponaperson’sdecease,itwasimmediatelysupposedhehadleftnochildren;[17]and,inconsequenceofthis,hispropertywasgivenawaybyarescript。Forastheprincewassurprisinglystupid,andtheempressexcessivelyenterprising,shewasaslavetotheinsatiableavariceofherdomesticsandconfidants;insomuchthattoanhonestmannothingcouldbemoredesirablethandeath。"
  "Formerly,"saysProcopius[18]"thereusedtobeveryfewpeopleatcourt;butinJustinian’sreign,asthejudgeshadnolongerthelibertyofadministeringjustice,theirtribunalsweredeserted,whiletheprince’spalaceresoundedwiththelitigiousclamoursoftheseveralparties。"Everybodyknowswhataprostitutiontherewasofpublicjudgments,andevenoftheverylawsthemselves,atthatemperor’scourt。
  Thelawsaretheeyeoftheprince;bythemheseeswhatwouldotherwiseescapehisobservation。Shouldheattemptthefunctionofajudge,hewouldnotthenlabourforhimself,butforimpostors,whoseaimistodeceivehim。
  6。ThatinMonarchiesMinistersoughtnottositasJudges。Itislikewiseaverygreatinconvenienceinmonarchiesfortheministersoftheprincetositasjudges。Wehavestillinstancesofstateswherethereareagreatnumberofjudgestodecideexchequercauses,andwheretheministersnevertheless(athingmostincredible!)wouldfaindeterminethem。Manyarethereflectionsthatherearise;butthissingleonewillsufficeformypurpose。
  Thereisintheverynatureofthingsakindofcontrastbetweenaprince’scouncilandhiscourtsofjudicature。Theking’scounciloughttobecomposedofafewpersons,andthecourtsofjudicatureofagreatmany。Thereasonis,intheformer,thingsshouldbeundertakenandconductedwithakindofwarmthandpassion,whichcanhardlybeexpectedbutfromfourorfivemenwhomakeittheirsolebusiness。Onthecontrary,incourtsofjudicatureacertaincoolnessinrequisite,andanindifference,insomemeasure,toallmannerofaffairs。
  7。OfasingleMagistrate。Amagistracyofthiskindcannottakeplacebutinadespoticgovernment。WehaveaninstanceintheRomanhistoryhowfarasinglemagistratemayabusehispower。MightitnotbeverywellexpectedthatAppiusonhistribunalshouldcontemnalllaws,afterhavingviolatedthatofhisownenacting?[19]LivyhasgivenustheiniquitousdistinctionoftheDecemvir。HehadsubornedamantoreclaimVirginiainhispresenceashisslave;Virginia’srelativesinsistedthatbyvirtueofhisownlawsheshouldbeconsignedtothem,tillthedefinitivejudgmentwaspassed。Uponwhichhedeclaredthathislawhadbeenenactedonlyinfavourofthefather,andthatasVirginiuswasabsent,noapplicationcouldbemadeofittothepresentcase。[20]
  8。OfAccusationindifferentGovernments。AtRome[21]itwaslawfulforonecitizentoaccuseanother。Thiswasagreeabletothespiritofarepublic,whereeachcitizenoughttohaveanunlimitedzealforthepublicgood,andissupposedtoholdalltherightsofhiscountryinhisownhands。Undertheemperors,therepublicanmaximswerestillpursued;andinstantlyappearedapernicioustribe,aswarmofinformers。Crafty,wickedmen,whocouldstooptoanyindignitytoservethepurposesoftheirambition,weresuretobusythemselvesinthesearchofcriminalswhosecondemnationmightbeagreeabletotheprince;
  thiswastheroadtohonourandpreferment,[22]butluckilywearestrangerstoitinourcountry。
  Wehaveatpresentanadmirablelaw,namely,thatbywhichtheprince,whoisestablishedfortheexecutionofthelaws,appointsanofficerineachcourtofjudicaturetoprosecuteallsortsofcrimesinhisname;
  hencetheprofessionofinformersisathingunknowntous,forifthispublicavengerweresuspectedtoabusehisoffice,hewouldsoonbeobligedtomentionhisauthor。
  ByPlato’sLaws[23]thosewhoneglecttoinformorto。assistthemagistratesareliabletopunishment。Thiswouldnotbesoproperinourdays。Thepublicprosecutorwatchesforthesafetyofthecitizens;heproceedsinhisofficewhiletheyenjoytheirquietandease。
  9。OftheSeverityofPunishmentsindifferentGovernments。Theseverityofpunishmentsisfitterfordespoticgovernments,whoseprincipleisterror,thanforamonarchyorarepublic,whosespringishonourandvirtue。
  Inmoderategovernments,theloveofone’scountry,shame,andthefearofblamearerestrainingmotives,capableofpreventingamultitudeofcrimes。Herethegreatestpunishmentofabadactionisconviction。Thecivillawshavethereforeasofterwayofcorrecting,anddonotrequiresomuchforceandseverity。