change,thegovernmentshavejoinedheartily。Awishtoextendtheauthorityandprotectionofthegeneralgovernmentover
  themassofcultivators,andtoincreasetheirefficiency,andthroughthatthewealthandfinancialresourcesofthestate,has
  ledthedifferentsovereignsalwaystoco-operate,andoftentotakethelead,inputtinganendtothepersonaldependenceof
  theserf;andmodifyingthetermsofhistenure。Tothesereasonsofthesovereignsandlandlords,dictatedbyobvious
  self-interest,wemustaddothermotiveswhichdohonortotheircharactersandtotheage,theexistenceofwhichitwould
  beamereaffectationofhard-heartedwisdomtodoubt;namely,apaternaldesireonthepartofsovereignstoelevatethe
  condition,andincreasethecomforts,ofthemostnumerousclassofthehumanbeingscommitted
  totheircharge;anda
  philanthropicdislikeonthepartoftheproprietorstobesurroundedbyaraceofwretcheddependents,whosedegradation
  andmiseryreflectdiscreditonthemselves。Thesefeelingshaveproducedthefermentationonthesubjectoflaborrents,
  whichisatthismomentworkingthroughoutthelargedivisionofEuropeinwhichtheyprevail。Fromthecrownlandsin
  Russia,throughPoland,41Hungary,andGermany,therehavebeenwithinthelastcentury,orarenow,plansandschemes
  onfoot,eitheratonceorgraduallytogetridofthetenure,orgreatlytomodifyitseffects,andimproveitscharacter;andif
  thewishes,ortheauthority,ofthestate,oroftheproprietors,couldabolishthesystemandsubstituteabetterinitsplace,it
  wouldvanishfromthefaceofEurope。Theactualpovertyoftheserfs,however,andthedegradationoftheirhabitsof
  industry,presentaninsurmountableobstacletoanygeneralchangewhichistobecompleteandsudden。Intheirimperfect
  civilizationandhalfsavagecarelessness,thenecessityoriginatedwhichforcedproprietorsthemselvestoraise,theproduce
  onwhichtheirfamiliesweretosubsist。Thatnecessityhasnotceased;thetenantryarenotyetripeinsomeinstances,not
  riperthantheywere1000yearsagotobeentrustedwiththeresponsibilityofraisingandpayingproducerents。Butasthe
  pastprogressandactualcircumstancesofdifferentdistrictsarefoundunlike,sotheircapacityforpresentchangediffersin
  kindanddegree。Hencethegreatvarietyobservableinplansforalteringtherelationsbetween
  theserftenantryandtheir
  landlords。SuchavarietyisexhibitedintheUrbariumofMariaTheresa,intheedictbywhichtheviewsoftheLivonian
  nobilityweremadelaw;intheconstitutionofPoland,andinthedecreesofthesovereignsofsmallerdistricts。The
  ameliorationsproducedbythesestepsarevaluable,if,afterhavingworkedsuccessfullyforsometime,theypreparetheway
  fortwogreatmeasureswhicharetheaimofallpartiesinamoreadvancedstateofsociety,thatis,first,thegeneral
  commutationoftherevenuederivedfromtheallotmentsoftheserfsintoproducerents,andthen,theestablishmentonthe
  domainsheldbytheproprietorsthemselvesofaraceoftenantryabletorelievethemfromthetask
  ofcultivation,andtopay
  eitherproduceormoneyrents。Buttheseresultsaredifficultanddistant。Themannerinwhichsuchachangewaseffectedin
  England,isthatinwhichitismosteasyandsafe。Itwasthegrowthofcenturies;ittookplaceinsensibly:thevilleinswe
  knowgraduallyassumedthecharacterofcopyholderspayingfixeddues,whichagainwereslowlycommutedformoney:in
  themeantime,thegrowthofthefreepopulationmultipliedthenumbersofhiredlaborers,bywhoseassistancethe
  proprietorsmightcultivatetheirdomains,withoutserflabor;andtheincreaseandprogressiveprosperityofanintermediate
  classofagriculturalcapitalistssupplied,afteralonginterval,araceofmenfittedtorelievetheproprietorsfromthecharge
  ofagriculturealtogether,andenabledtopaytheirrentsinmoneyfromtheincreaseofinternalcommerce,andofthemarket
  providedbynon-agriculturalclassesfortheirproduce。Aprocesssimilartothishasbeengoingoninthewesternpartof
  Germany,thoughitisyetfarindeedfrombeingcompletethere。TheenslavedserfhasbecomeafreeLeibeigenerwithfixed
  services:theLeibeigenerischanginggraduallyintoameyer,whoseservicesarecommutedforproduceormoney;some
  few42freelaborersexist,andarehiredbytheproprietorswhofarmtheirdomains;andofthesedomainsanewraceof
  tenantryareinsomeinstancesbeginningtotakepossession,advancingthenecessarycapital,payingmoneyrents,anddischargingtheland-ownersfromallshareinthetaskofcultivation。Inthemeantime,itisnotsurprisingthatthesovereignsandproprietorsofcountriesfurthereast,whoseethisprocess
  hardlybegunamongstthemselves,andknowthatitmaytakecenturiestocompleteitself,shouldfeelimpatientofsuchdelayinthecareeroftheirimprovement,anddetermineforciblytoanticipatetheslowadvanceofunpurposedchange。ThePrussiangovernmenthastakenthemostdecisiveandextensivemeasuresinthisspirit。Throughoutagreatpartof
  Prussia,theserfshadacquiredprescriptiverights,eithertothehereditarypossessionoftheirallotments,ortothe
  occupationofthemforlife;rights,whichthoughimperfect,madeanymarkedchangedifficult。Todeclaretheserfsmere
  tenantsatwill,wouldhavehadtheappearanceofgreatharshness,andcouldnotprobablyhavebeen
  attemptedonalarge
  scale,withoutviolenceandconvulsion。Todeclarethemproprietorsofthesoiltheyoccupied,wasnotdoingjusticetothe
  fairclaimsofthelandowners。Thegovernmentsteeredamiddlecourse。In1811laborrentstotheeastoftheElbewere
  suppressed,anditwasdecided,thatthepeasantswhohadacquiredanhereditaryrighttotheirallotmentsshouldpaythe
  proprietorsathirdoftheproduce:thatthosewhohadonlyaclaimtoalifeholdpossessionshouldpayhalftheproduce:thepeasantsweretofindallcapitalandtopayallexpencesandtaxes。43Theserentsareheavy:halftheproduce,thetenantsprovidingcapitalandpayingallexpences,istheheaviestrentknownin
  Europe,。withtheexceptionofthosepaidbytheNeapolitanmetayers,whosesoilwillbearnocomparisonwiththePrussian
  sands,andisinfactunrivalledforproductivenessandeasytillage。Itisnotsurprisingthatsomeoftheserfsshouldhave
  declinedtoaccedetothearrangement,althoughitdeliveredthemfromastateofvirtual44bondage,andguaranteedtheirrighttopossession。Twogreatobjectsweresoughtbythisarrangement;theimprovementoftheconditionofthepeasantry,andthepromotion。
  ofgoodagricultureamongtheproprietors。Itsimmediateeffectshavebeentodividethesurfaceofthecountrybetweena
  raceofsmallproprietorssubjecttoaheavyrentcharge,andabodyoflargelandholdersfarmingtheirowndomains。That
  theconditionofthepeasantswillbeatfirstimproved,supposingthemnottobeweigheddownbytherents,issufficiently
  clear;theirfutureprogress,however,justifiessomeapprehensions:theyareexactlyintheconditioninwhichtheanimal
  disposition45toincreasetheirnumbersischeckedbythefewestofthosebalancingmotivesanddesireswhichregulatethe
  increaseofsuperiorranksorofmorecivilizedpeople,andifthetoogreatsubdivision
  oftheirallotmentsisnotguarded
  againstintime,theywillprobably,inthecourseofaveryfewgenerations,bemoremiserablethantheirancestorswereas
  serfs,andwillcertainlybemorehopelessandhelplessintheirmisery,sincetheywillhavenolandlordtoresortto。Inthe
  meantimearaceoffreelaborerswilldoubtlessspringup,withwhoseassistancetheproprietorsmayinstituteabetter
  courseofhusbandryontheirdomains,buttheywillstillhavetoprovidecapital,attention,andscience,andinthetwofirstof
  theseitistobefearedthat,asabody,theywillalwaysbedeficient。Moreadvancesmustbemadebytheminmoneythan
  whentheycultivatedwiththeassistanceoftheirserfs,andthiscircumstancewillincreasetheirdifficultiesandmultiplythe
  chancesoftheirfailure。Afterall,thetaskofcultivationisungenialtothem。Theirobjectswithneverbefullyattainedtilla
  raceoftenantryappears,abletoadvancethenecessarycapitalandundertakeforamoneyrent。Thesearelikelytoappear
  slowlyinPrussia,eventhoughtheyshouldappeartheremuchlessslowlythaninsomeofthesurroundingnations。Thebody
  ofthepeasants,itistolerablyevidentalready,willnotgrowrichenoughtosupplythem,andtheymustspringoutofthe
  bosomofotherclasses。Thecomparativenumbers,andthereforejointwealthofthese,aresmall,andtheprocess,bywhichtheycanbecomethefarmersofallthedomainsofanextensivecountry,mustbeslowindeed。Inthemeantime,therewillbegreatdifferencesinthisrespectbetweendifferentpartsofGermany。Amtmen,whooccupy
  theland,notasagents,buttenants,arealreadycommoninsomestates:inothersalmostunknown。Thosedistrictsofcourse
  willprofitthemostrapidlyandlargelybythelatechanges,whichwereapproachingthemselvestotheconditioninwhich
  theyarenowplaced,andwereprovidedwithsomeoftheelementsofanewandbetterstateofthings。Thoseinwhichthe
  actualchangeswerepreparedbynospontaneousadvances,willforsometimedisappoint,itistobefeared,inagreat
  degree,thebenevolentimpatienceofthosestatesmen,whowishedtospeedthemforciblyinpathsofimprovement,whichtheyarenotfullgrownandstrongenoughtotreadsteadily。Leavinghoweverindividualinstances,andsurveyingthewholebroadmassoflaborrentsthroughoutthatlargerdivisionof
  Europeinwhichtheystillpreponderate,eitherentire,orindifferentstagesofdecomposition,itwillbesufficientlyobvious,
  thatsomeagesmustelapse,beforethosenewelementsofsocietyareperfected,andthatbetterstateofthingsmatured,in
  whichthismodeoftenureisdestinedfinallytomerge。Foralongandindefiniteperiodnowbeforeus,therefore,theancient
  systemofserfrents,modifiedinitsforms,butenduringinitseffects,willimprintmuchoftheircharacteronthoseimperfect
  institutionswhichareslowlyspringingupfromitsdecay。ThefutureprogressofeasternEurope,thesourcesofitswealth,
  andstrength,andalltheelementsofitssocialandpoliticalinstitutions,willcontinuetobemainlyinfluencedbytheresultsof
  thegradualalterationsnowtakingplaceinthoserelationsbetweentheproprietorsandcultivatorsofthesoil,whichhave
  hithertoformedtherudebondbywhichsocietyhasbeenheldtogether。Theprogress,however,ofthis,thelargerpartofthe
  mostimportantdivisionoftheglobe,mustforsomegenerationsbeaspectacleofdeepinteresttous,totheirimmediate
  westernneighbours,andtoallthenations,infact,whohavehithertokepttheleadinthecareerofEuropeancivilization。We
  seethemassesofpeople`whooccupytheeasternandnortherndivisionofourquarteroftheearth,stirringandinstinctwith
  anewspiritoflifeandpower,beginningtoacquirefreshintellectandalessshackledindustry,andtounfoldmoreefficiently
  themoralandphysicalcapabilitiesoftheirhugeterritories。TheyalreadyassumeastationinEuropesomewhatproportioned
  totheextentoftheirnaturalresources;andthefateofthosenationswhichhavehithertobeenthedepositariesofthecivilizationofthemodernworld,isforthefutureinseparablyconnectedwithevents,whichthecareerofthesepowerfulneighboursmustengender。Wecannotbutseehowintimatelythecourseofthatcareerisdependentonpresentandfuture
  changesinthesystemoflaborrents,andforthiscausesurely,iffornoother,thatsystemdeservesthecarefulattentionofall
  whomayapplythemselvestothetaskofexplainingthenatureoftherentofland,andexaminingitsinfluenceonthecharacterandfortunesofdifferentnations。Thoseindeed,whovaluewhatiscalledpoliticaleconomy,chieflybecauseitleadstoaninsightintothemannerinwhichthe
  physicalcircumstances,whichsurroundmanonearth,developeorswayhismoralcharacter,willfeelinterestedonyet
  highergroundsintracingtheeffectsofasystem,springingoutofthatcommonnecessity,which,foralongperiodinthe
  growthofnations,bindsthemajorityoftheirpopulationtotheearththeytill;asystem,whichhascontinuedforaseriesof
  agestostampitspeculiarimpressonthepolitical,theintellectual,andmoralfeaturesofsolargeadivisionofthehuman
  race。46
  1。AppendixIII。2。SwedenandNorwaymustbeexcepted。Noinformation,writtenorverbal,whichIhavebeenabletocollect,hasmademe
  feelsatisfiedthatIunderstandtherealhistoryofthechangesinthetenure,orinthemodeofoccupyingthesoil,whichhave
  takenplaceinthosecountries。IcanonlysuspectthattheprogressofSwedenintheserespectshasresembled,insome
  measure,thatoftheGermannations:whilethatofNorwayhasbeendistinctandverypeculiar。Laborrents,however,undervariousmodificationshavebeen,andarenow,knowninbothcountries。3。SeeBrightsdescriptionofwhattakesplaceinHungaryevennow,althoughtheAustriangovernmenthasinterposedtoprotect,toacertainextent,therightofthepeasantry。Bright'sHungary。p。114。AppendixIV4。GeneralBoltinwasencouragedbyCatharineIItopublishinRussiasomeresearchesontheoriginofslaveryinRussia,
  andassuchwashisconclusion,itrestscertainlyonnomeanauthority。BeforethetimeofBorisGodounoff,GeneralBoltin
  asserts,thattheonlyrealslavesinRussiawereprisonerstakenfromanenemy,andthatthepeasantswerereducedto
  slaveryasservisafterthatepoch。Storch,Vol。VI。p。310。
  5。SeeGamba,Voy。danslaRuss。Tom。II。p。84。6。HeberlateBishopofCalcuttaquotedbyClarke,Travels,Vol。I。p。165。Thepeasantsbelongingtothenobles,have
  theirabrockregulatedbytheirmeansofgettingmoney;atanaveragethroughouttheempireofeightortenroubles。Itthen
  becomesnotarentforland,butadownrighttaxontheirindustry。Eachmalepeasantisobligedbylawtolaborthreedaysin
  eachweekforhisproprietor。Thislawtakeseffectonhisarrivingattheageoffifteen。Iftheproprietorchoosestoemploy
  himontheotherdayshemay;as,forexample,inamanufactory;buthethenfindshiminfoodandclothing。Mutual
  advantagehowevergenerallyrelaxesthislaw;andexceptingsuchasareselectedfordomesticservants,or,asabove,are
  employedinmanufactories,theslavepaysacertainabrockorrent,tobeallowedtoworkalltheweekonhisownaccount。Themasterisboundtofurnishhimwithahouseandacertainportionofland。7。Thisprivilegewasgivenin1801,andin1810thepeasantsofthecrownhadpurchasedlandstothevalueoftwomillions
  ofroublesinBankassignations。Duringthesameperiod,alltheotherclassesnotbeingnoblehadonlypurchasedtothe
  amountof3……611……000roublesinthesamepapermoney。
  8。Foramoredetailedaccountofthesealterations,seeStorch,Vol。VI。Notexix。p。266。
  9。Storch,Vol。IV。p。299。
  10。Storch,Vol。IV。P。296。
  11。Bright'sHungary,p。110。ThepopulationofHungaryamountsbythelastreturnstonearlytenmillions。12。Intheyear1777,thewholenumberofhandicraftsmen,theirservants,andapprentices,inHungary,amountedto30,921;
  andthisnumberdoesnotseem,bymorerecentpartialcalculations,tohavebeenmuchincreased。Bright,p。205。
  13。Ibid。p。118。14。ThesizeofthesesessionsseemstohavedifferedindifferentpartsofHungary,probablyinproportiontothefertilityofthesoil。15。Besidesthishemustgive4fowls,12eggs,andapfundandahalfofbutter;andeverythirtypeasantsmustgiveonecalf
  yearly。Hemustalsopayaformforhishouse;mustcutandbringhomeaklafterofwood;mustspininhisfamilysixpfund
  ofwoolorhemp,providedbythelandlord:andamongfourpeasants,theproprietorclaimswhatiscalledalongjourney,
  thatis,theymusttransport20centners,each100Frenchpoundsweight,thedistanceoftwoday'sjourneyoutandhome:
  andbesidesallthis,theymustpayone-tenthofalltheirproductstothechurch,andone-ninthtothelord。
  16。Bright,p。115。
  17。Storch,Vol。VI。p。308。Bright。
  18。SeeBright。
  19。Storch。Vol。VI。p。308。20。Schmalz,Econ。Polit。Frenchtranslation,Vol。II。p。109。Sansdoute,cesontlesproprietaireseux-mê;mes,quiont
  donné;lieuà;ladefensequileuraé;té;faitedereprendreleursfermesdesmainsdeleurpaysans,parcequ'ilsontcherché;,et
  qu'ilssontparvenus,Asefairedé;greverdesimpô;tsquelespaysanspaientà;l'é;tat,etqu'enconsé;quence,l'é;tatainterê;tà;
  s'opposerà;cequelesfermesenmé;tairiesnesoientpasreuniesaubiennobleduseigneurfoncier,etaffranchiesparlà;delaperceptiondel'impot。21。TillthereignofCasimirtheGreat,aboutthemiddleofthe14thcentury,thePolishnoblesexercisedovertheirpeasants
  theuncontrouledpoweroflifeanddeath。Threedays'labourwastheirusualrentBURNETT'sView,ofpresentStateofPoland,p。102。22。SeeMr。Jacob'sFirstReport,p。27。TheAppendixtothisReportcontainssomedetailedreturnsfromthemanagersof
  Polishestates,andtakenwithMr。Bright'sbook,presentsaperfectpictureofthepracticalworkingofthesystemoflabor
  rentsinPolandandinHungary。Foragraphicsketchofthestateofmannersandmoralsithasproduced,thereadermay
  consultBurnett。InPoland,inAustria,andotherpartsofGermany,theproprietor'sdomain,withhisimplements,animals,
  andcapitalofallsorts,aresometimesletatalowmoneyrenttoatenant,togetherwiththe
  rightofexactingandusingthe
  laborduefromtheserfs。Thesuperiortenantis,inPoland,veryoftenayoungerbranchofthefamily,occasionallya
  stranger。Thissubstitutionofanotherpersonascultivatorofthedomain,leaves,however,thelaborrentsoftheserfsour
  presentobjectpreciselywheretheywere。Itisconsideredaverydisastrousmodeofdisposingofthedomain:thestockand
  capitalareusually,asmightbeexpected,ruinedattheexpirationofthelease;itisnotnowpractisedextensively;thoughit
  appearsfromMr。Jacob'sSecondReport,tobenowspreadingintheNorth-westofGermany。Itmay,however,possibly
  provehereafter,onestepping-stonetoadifferentsystem;andifthedilapidationofthestockcouldbeeffectuallyguardedagainst,itmostprobablywoulddoso。23。Foraninstanceofthebadresultsofabenevolentbutill-judgedattemptatahastyandcompleteemancipation,seeBurnett,page106。24。NarrativeofDonJuanVonHalen,&;c。Vol。II。p。88。DonJuanwasmistakenastothedateofthedecree,whichhad
  beenissuedsince1804bytheEmperorAlexander,forpartlyemancipatingsomeoftheLivonianserfs。
  25。Eden,Vol。I。p。7。AppendixV。
  26。See12thCharlesII。c。24。
  27。Hodgskin,Vol。11。p。5。"TheAmtmanfrequentlyunites,"&;c。
  28。Hodgskin,Vol。II,p。90。
  29。Schmalz,Vol。I。p。104。
  30。OntheverypoorsoilsintheGermanprovinceswestoftheRhine,laborrentsstill,Iamtold,prevail。31。ThosewhowishthoroughlytounderstandthespiritandeffectsoftheoldHighlandmodesofdividingandcultivatingthe
  soil,andtheconsequencesoftheviolentchangeeffectedsince1745,mayconsulttheworkofLordSelkirk,publishedin
  1805,entitled"ObservationsonthepresentstateoftheHighlandsofScotland,withaviewofthecausesandprobable
  consequencesofEmigration;"itwillberoundable,interesting,andinstructive。
  32。Schmalz,EconomiePolit。Frenchtranslation。Vol。I。p。66。
  33。Schmalz,Vol。II。p。103。
  34。Vol。II。p。107。
  35。Schmalz,Vol。II。p。107。
  36。Jacob'sGermany,p。235。37。TheRussiangovernment,hopingtoremedythislastdefect,establishedabankfortheexpresspurposeofadvancing
  loanstothenoblestobeemployedinimprovingthecultivationoftheirestates。Theexperimentdidnotsucceed。Thenobles
  wereobservedtogrowsuddenlymoreexpensive,buttheirestatesremainedastheywere。Storch,Vol。IV。p。288。
  38。Jacob'sFirstReport。39。SeeJacob'sGermany,p。342,foraninstanceofthemannerinwhichtherightsoftheproprietorsarefrustratedwhen
  theyarebychancedriventothetribunals。TheSaxoncourtsofjusticeseemtobeactuated,whentheyhaveanopportunity
  tointerferebetweenproprietorandtenant,bythesamebiastowardsfreedomwhichdidhonortothoseofEngland,andseemtootoapproachtheirobjectwithmuchoftheastutenesswhichsuggestedsomeofourownlegalproceedings。40。Hodgskin,Vol。II。p。6。InHanover,someoftheseminutepatrimonialcourtshavebeenabolished;buttherearestill,or
  were,solateas1819,nolessthan160localtribunalsontheroyaldomain,besidesallthosebelongingtoindividualproprietorsandtotowns。41。IntheworkseveraltimesbeforequotedofMr。Burnett,ofBaliolCollege,Oxford,entitled"AView,ofthepresent
  StateofPoland,"thereaderwillfindsomecuriousdetailsofthestateofloathsomemoraldegradationtowhichthePolish
  peasantsarereduced。TheauthorwasforsometimeprivatetutorinaPolishfamily。
  42。Theyareveryfew。43。Differentstatementshavebeenpublishedastothetermsofthisgeneralcommutation。Schmalz,however,whowas
  "conseillerintime"oftheKingofPrussia,andProfessor"dudroitpublic"atBerlin,mustbeconsideredunquestionable
  authority。Schmalz,Vol。II。p。105。
  44。Personalbondagehadlegallyceasedtoexistfromthe10thNovember,1810。Schmalz,Vol。II。p。103。45。Theactualdispositionofthepopulationtoincreasewithextremerapidityshewsthattheseapprehensionsarefarfromfanciful。SeeJacob'sSecondReport。46。Whenthesepageswerefirstwritten,IhadnotseentheSecondReportofMr。Jacob,whichhassincebeenpublishedina
  formsuitedtogeneralcirculation。Thatgentlemanhaslatelybeenonthespot,andhascasthisextremelyacuteandpractised
  eyeupontheactualconditionandprobableprogressoftheagriculturalportionofeasternEurope。Hehascometoresults
  remarkablysimilartothosewhichIhadventuredtosuggestfromamoredistantandgeneralknowledgeoftheir
  circumstances。Thestillpredominantinfluenceoflaborrentsthegeneralwantofcapital
  amongtheproprietors:therapid
  increaseinthenumbersofthepeasantcultivatorswhichhasbeentakingplacesincetheirdependenceonthelandlordshas
  beenlessservile:thefeeblebeneficialeffectsonagricultureandonthegeneralcompositionofsocietywhichintwentyyears
  havesprungfromthestrongmeasuresofthePrussiangovernment:thedifficultieswhicheverywhereopposethemselvesto
  allsuddenchangesintheoldsystemofcultivation:thestrongapparentprobabilitythatthefutureprogressintheeasterndivisionofEuropewillnot,withalltheeffortsthataremaking,bemuchmorerapidthanthatofthiscountrywhenemergingfromasimilarstateofthings;allthesearepointsonwhichIcannowreferwithverygreatsatisfactiontothelocal
  knowledgeandauthorityofMr。Jacob,insupportofthesuggestionsIhaveherethrownout。SeeSecondReportpassim,but
  moreespecially140andthefollowingpages。
  CHAP。III。
  SECT。I。
  MetayerRents。TheMetayerisapeasanttenantextractinghisownwagesandsubsistencefromthesoil。Hepaysaproducerenttothe
  owneroftheland,fromwhichheobtainshisfood。Thelandlord,besidessupplyinghimwiththelandonwhichhelives,
  supplieshimalsowiththestockbywhichhislaborisassisted。Thepaymenttothelandlordmaybeconsidered,therefore,toconsistoftwodistinctportions:oneconstitutestheprofitsofhisstock,theotherhisrent。Thestockadvancedisordinarilysmall。Itconsistsofseed;ofsomerudeimplements;ofthematerialsofotherswhichthe
  peasantmanufactures;andofsuchmaterialsforhisotherpurposesasthelanditselfaffords;buildingtimber,stone,&;c。and
  occasionallyofsomedraftanimals。Ifnotassistedbytheproductivepowersofthesoil,bythemachineryoftheearth,this
  stockwouldeitherbewhollyinsufficientforthepermanentmaintenanceofanylaborers,or,turnedintosomeothershape,it
  wouldprovideforthetemporarysupportofaverysmallnumber。Whenapplied,however,toassistthepeculiarpowersof
  theearth,thissmallstockisfoundsufficienttoenableanumerousbodyoflaborerspermanentlytomaintainthemselves;and
  intheproduceoftheirindustrythelandlordshares。Theproducewhichthepossessionoflandhasthusenabledhimto
  acquire,andwhichwithoutthelandhecouldnothaveacquired,isthatportionoftheannualproduceofthelaborofthe
  countrywhichfallstohisshareasaland-holder。Itisrent。Therestisprofits。Inthemoreadvancedstagesofcivilization,it
  iseasytodecideineachparticularcase,whatproportionofthelandlord'srevenuefromametayerfarmisrent,andwhatproportionprofits。Intheruderstages,itismoredifficult;butweshallhaveoccasiontoadverttothishereafter。Theexistenceofsucharaceoftenantryindicatessomeimprovementinthebodyofthepeople,comparedwiththestateof
  thingsinwhichserfrentsoriginate。Theyareentrustedwiththetaskofprovidingthefoodandannualrevenueoftheproprietor,withouthissuperintending,orinterferingwith,theirexertions。Themetayer,then,mustbesomewhatsuperiorinskillandcharactertotheserfs,whoseindustrycanbesafelydependedon
  bytheproprietor,onlywhileexercisedunderhisdirectcontrol,andwhoserentsarethereforepaid,notinproduce,butin
  labor。Butstilltheadvanceofstockbytheproprietor,andtheabandonmentofthemanagementofcultivationtotheactual
  laborers,indicatethecontinuedabsenceofanintermediateclassofcapitalists;ofmenabletoadvancefromtheirown
  accumulationsthefoodofthelaborerandthestockbywhichheisassisted;andthustotakeuponthemselvesthedirection
  ofagriculture。Themetayersystemindicates,therefore,astateofsociety,advanced,whencomparedwiththatinwhichserfrentsprevail;backward,whencomparedwiththatinwhichrentspaidbycapitalistsmaketheirappearance。Itisfoundspringingupinvariouspartsoftheworld,engraftedoccasionallyontheserfrentswehavebeenreviewing,and
  moreoftenonthesystemofryotrentswehaveyettoexamine。ButitisinthewesterndivisionofcontinentalEurope,in
  Italy,Savoy,Piedmont,theValteline,France,andSpain,thatthepuremetayertenantryarethemostcommon,anditisthere
  thattheyinfluencemostdecidedlythesystemsofcultivationandthoseimportantrelationsbetweenthedifferentordersof
  society,whichoriginateintheappropriationofthesoil。Intothosecountries,onceprovincesoftheRomanEmpire,they
  wereintroducedbytheRomans,and,todiscovertheirorigininEurope,wemustturnbackoureyesforaninstantonthe
  classicalnationsofantiquity。
  SECTIONII。
  OfMetayerRentsinGreece。Greece,whenitfirstpresentsmaterialsforauthentichistory,was,forthemostpart,dividedintosmallpropertiescultivated
  bythelaboroftheproprietors,assistedbythatofslaves。Butbeforeweobservehowthisstateofthingsledthewaytothe
  establishmentofmetayerrents,itshouldberemarked,thatrelicsofasystemwhicheveninthosedaysborethemarksofantiquity,andwasbecomingobsolete,werestilltobeseeninmanydistrictsofGreece。Irruptionsfromothercountries,astothedetailsofwhichthelearneddisputeinvain,had,previoustotheaeraofhistorical
  certainty,filledseveralprovincesofGreecewithforeignmasters。Thesepeople,insomeinstancesatleast,foundtheoriginal
  inhabitantsacquaintedwithagriculture,thetoilsofwhichtheyhadnoinclination,perhapsnotsufficientskill,toshare。They
  convertedthereforethehusbandmenintoapeculiarspeciesoftenantry,differingfromtheserftenantryofmodemEuropein
  this,thatthoughattachedtothesoil,andasortofpredialbondsmen,theypaid,not
  labor,butproducerents,andbelonged,
  insomeremarkableinstances,nottoindividuals,buttothestate。ThesetenantswerecalledinCretePeriaeci,Mnotae,
  Aphamiotae;inLaconiaPeriaeciandHelots;inAtticaThetesandPelatae;inThessalyPenestae,andinotherdistrictsbyothernames。1Theproducerents,whichthistenantrywereboundinCretetopaytothegovernment,enabledthelegislatorsofthatisland
  toestablishpublictablesinthedifferentdistricts,atwhichthefreemenandtheirfamilieswerefed。2Thisinstitution
  LycurgusestablishedorrenewedatLacedaemon,wherethetablesweresuppliedbytheproduceoftheindustryofthe
  Helots;andwhereverSyssitiaeorcommontablescanbetraced,itisatleastprobable,thattheyweresuppliedbyasimilarraceoftenants。InAttica,theexistenceoftheThetesorPelataeasthistenantryweretherecalledexercisednosuchinfluenceonthe
  generalhabitsofthecitizensasitdidinCrete,inSparta,andinotherDorianstates;andwhentheywererestoredbySolontopersonalfreedom,thoughnottothepoliticalrightsofcitizens,thealterationledtonostrikingresults。3ItrequiresindeedsomelittleattentiontodiscerntheirpastexistenceamongtheAthenians;andthedetailsoftheircondition
  arenowperhapsoutofthereachofresearch。wasthenameappliedindifferently,itshouldseem,bothtotheshare
  paidasrentandthatretainedbytheThetes。Therentusuallyconsistedofasixthoftheproduce,hencetheirnameof?sometimesitwasafourth,andthenthePelataeweresaid。ThePenestaeofThessalywerea
  bodyofsimilartenantry。Withtheexceptionofthedistrictsoccupiedbythispeculiarspeciesoftenantry,4andofthelands
  belongingtotownswhichseemoftentohaveletfortermsofyearsatmoneyrents,thelandsofGreecewereverygenerallyinthepossessionoffreemen,cultivatingsmallpropertieswiththeassistanceofslaves。Slaveswereverynumerous。MendistributedliketheGreeksintosmalltribesofrudefreemen,surroundedbysimilartribes,
  probablyexhibitthepugnaciousqualitiesofhumannatureinthehighestdegreeknown。Ithasoftenbeenobservedwith
  truth,thatinsuchastateofsocietytheappearanceofdomesticslaveryindicatesaconsiderablesofteningofthemanners。
  Whenwarriornationshavefoundoutthemeansofmakingthelaborofcaptivescontribute
  totheirownease,theypreserve
  them。Beforetheyhavemadesuchadiscoverytheyputthemtodeath。AmongtheNorthAmericanIndians,thelaborofno
  manwilldomorethanmaintainhimself;noprofitistobemadeofaslave;hence,unlessthecaptiveisselectedtotakeupon
  himselfinthecharacterofasonorhusbandthetaskofprotectingandprovidingfoodforafamilydeprivedofitschief,heis
  invariablyslaughtered。SometribesofTartarsonthebordersofPersiamassacreallthetruebelieverswhofallintotheir
  hands,butpreserveallhereticsandinfidels;becausetheirreligionforbidsthemtomakeslavesoftruebelievers,andallowsthemtouseorsellallothersattheirpleasure。TheGreeksusedtheslaves,withwhichtheirfrequentwarssuppliedthem,inallkindsofmeniaandlaboriousoccupations,
  andanotionthatsuchoccupationscouldnotbefilledwithoutslaves,becamesofamiliar,thateventheiracutest
  philosophersseemnevertohavedoubteditsaccuracyorjustice。Acommonwealth,saysAristotle,consistsoffamilies,anda
  familytobecompletemustconsistoffreemenandslaves,5andinfixingontheformofgovernment,whichaccordingtohim
  wouldbemostperfect,andconducethemosttothehappinessofmankind,herequiresthathisterritoryshouldbecultivated
  byslavesofdifferentracesanddestituteofspirit,thatsotheymaybeusefulforlabor,andthattheabsenceofany
  dispositiontorevoltmaybesecurelyreliedon。6TheconditionofAfricaisnowinthisparticular,muchlikethatofGreece
  then。OneofthelatetravellerswasexplainingtoanAfricanchiefthattherearenoslavesinEngland。"Noslaves,"exclaimedtheirauditor,"thenwhatdoyoudoforservants?"InGreecethelaborofcultivationwasatfirstsharedbetweenthemasterandslave。Thismustalwaysbewhilepropertiesare
  small;andaccordinglyitwassoinLatium。Cincinnatuswouldhavestarvedonhisfouracres,hadhetrustedtotheproduce
  slavescouldextractfromit,andneglectedtolayhisownhandsontheplough。ButascivilizationwentforwardinGreece,
  propertiesbecameenlarged。Theproprietorsclungtocities;wherepopulargovernmentsofferedtotheactivedutiesto
  perform,andobjectsofambitiontoaspireto,andtotheindolentandvoluptuouseveryspeciesofpleasure,mademore
  seducingbyalltheembellishmentsthatcouldbecreatedbyatasteandfancy,whichseemtohavebelongedtothosetimes
  andtothatpeoplealone。BysuchoccupationsandamusementsmanyoftheleadingGreciansweresoengrossed,thatthey
  refusedtogiveupeventhetimeandattentionnecessarytocommandtheirhouseholdslaves。7Thosewhostillattendedto
  themanagementoftheirfarmsmusthavefoundthetaskdifficultandhazardous。Xenophonhas
  leftanaccuratepictureof
  themodeinwhichtheGrecian,gentlemenofhisdayconductedthecultivationof,theirestates。Inoneofthedialoguesof
  theMemorabilia,Socratesrelatesaconversationhehadhad,withIschomachus,whowasbytheconfessionofall,menand
  women,foreignersandcitizens,,anaccomplishedandgoodman。Ischomachusdetailsthoseparticulars
  ofhisdomesticeconomywhichhadprincipallyearnedforhimthisgeneralpraise,andexplainsatlargehismanagementof
  hishousehold,hiswife,andfinallyhisestate。Itappearsintheprogressofthedialogue,thattheestateofIschomachuswas
  withinashortdistanceofAthens,thatherodetoitveryfrequently,paiditmuchpersonalattention,andsuperintendedallits
  arrangementswithgreatcare。Whilecultivationwascarriedonunderthesuperintendanceofsuchmen;whileproprietors
  freedfromallnecessityofpersonallabor,liberal,learned,andwealthy,sedulouslyappliedthepowersoftheirmindsto
  agriculture,theartmaderapidprogress,andasuccessionofwritersonthesubjectappearedinvariouspartsofGreece,
  whoseworksevidencedboththequantityofintellectappliedtotheunfoldingtheresourcesofthesoil,andtheactualprogressofcultivation。Butcauseswhichdestroyedthissystemofmanagingthelandweresilentlyatwork。EvenIsehomachuswasobligedtorely
  muchonhisoroverseers;slaveswhowereverycarefullytrainedasbailiffs,liketheRomanvillici。Allestates,
  however,couldnotbelikehiswithinarideofthecapital;themoredistantwerenecessarilyconfidedalmostwhollytothese
  managingslaves;andtheirmanagement,unlesstheydifferedutterlyfromallotherslavessimilarlytrusted,musthavebeen
  verygenerallycarelessandbad。AsGreecetoobecameconsolidated,firstbytheMacedonian,thentheRomaninfluence,the
  possessionsofindividualproprietorsnaturallyextendedthemselvesoveralargerspace,andprofitablemanagementbyslave
  agentsmusthavebecomemoreandmoreimpracticable。Atlastatenantwasintroducedwho,receivingfromthelandowner
  hislandandstock,becameresponsibletohimforacertainproportion,usuallyhalf,oftheproduce:andtheproprietorsgave
  upfinallyallinterferencewiththetaskofcultivation。Thesenewtenantswerecalledmortitae,andtheyarecalledsostillinGreece。Theprecisedateatwhichtheybegantosupersedethecultivationbyproprietorsisnotknown。Itissupposedbysomethat
  thishappenedaftertheirconnectionwithRome,andthat?whichisnotawordofancientorclassicalGreek,wasa
  translationoftheLatinphrasecolonuspartiarius。Butwecanseesodistinctlythesameinternalcauseswhichledtothe
  creationoftheRomantenantryactinginGreece,thatitisprobablethemnortitaeappearedthereassoon,ifnotsooner,than
  thecolonipartiariiamongtheRomans,andthattheword?wassuggestedby?whichwehaveseenwasthe
  nameoftheproducerentpaidbytheancientThetesofAttica。Howeverthismightbe,bysuchatenantrythesurfaceof
  Greecewasgraduallyoccupied;theysurvivedtheMahometanconquest,andthelandsoftheTurkishAgaswerevery
  generallycultivated,beforethepresentdisturbances,byGrecianmortitaeormetayers。8
  SECTIONIII。
  OnMetayersamongtheRomans。ThecauseswhichintroducedmetayersintoItalywerepreciselysimilartothosewhichultimatelyestablishedtheminGreece。
  TheRomansbeganbysharingwiththeirslavesthetoilsofcultivation。As:thesizeofestatesenlarged,theirownersbecame
  thesuperintendantsofthelabortheybeforeassisted。InthisstagetheartofagriculturewasdeeplystudiedinRome,asithad
  beeninasimilarstageinGreece,byaclassofmenwellqualifiedtocarryitfartowardsperfection。TheworksoffiftyGreek
  writersonagriculturewereknowntotheRomans,9andthoseofseveralCarthaginians。Oftheselast,one,Mago,was
  markedbythehonorabledistinctionofhavinghisworkstranslatedintoLatininobediencetoaformaldecreeofthe
  Senate。10RomanworksonagriculturewerelessnumerousthantheGreek,buttheyweretheproductionsofeminentmen,
  beginningwithCatothecensorquieamlatinè;loquiprimusinstituit,Col。andincludingVarroandVirgil。Thegreatpoet
  wasfarfrombeingthelastamongthecultivatorsofhisday,andhaseven,inafewremarkablelines,recommendedthat
  alternatehusbandry,andsubstitutionofpulseandgreencropsforfallows,whichisthemainbasisofthemostimportant
  improvementsofourowntimes。
  Alternisidemtonsascessarenovales,Etsegnempatieresitudurescerecampum;
  Autibiflavaseres,mutatosidere,farra,Undepriusbetumsiliquâ;quassantelegumenAuttenuisfetusviciae,tristisquelupiniSustulerisfragilescalamossilvamquesonantem。
  Geor。Lib。I。1。71。Astheempirebecamelarger,thesizeofestatesincreased;andwhentheywerescatteredoverprovinceswhichreached
  fromBritainandSpain,toAsiaMinorandSyria,thesuperintendanceofthehnsbandrycarriedonuponthembecame
  burthensomeandinefficient,11andeventhetaskoftrainingproperlythevilliciormanagerswasabandoned,andthelands
  givenupinsomemeasuretothediscretionofaninferiorclassofslaves。Theimmediateconsequencewassuchadeficiency
  intheproduce,thatsomestrangeandunknowncausewassupposedtobeenfeeblingthefecundityoftheearthitself。
  AmongeventhemoreeminentRomans,whilesometalkedofalongcontinuedunwholesomenessintheseasons,others
  wereinclinedtoasuperstitiousbelief,。thattheworldwaswaxingold,anditspowers
  decayingthattheexuberantcrops
  reapedbytheirforefathersbadbeentheproduceofitsyouthfulstrength;andthatthesterilitywhichthenafflicteditwasa
  symptomofitsdecrepitude。12Columellasawmoredistinctlytherealcauseofthefallingoff;hedescribesinapassage
  whichhasbeenoftenquoted,themalpracticesoftheslavesonthosedistantfarms,whichitwasnoteasyfortheproprietor
  oftentovisit;andthoughhimselfanindignantadvocateforthemoregeneralpracticeofagriculture,asthemostliberaland
  usefulofarts,heconcludesbyrecommendingthatallsuchestatesshouldbelet。"Itafitutetactoretfamiliapeccent,etagersaepiusinfametur:quaretalisgenerispraedium,si,utdixi,dominipraesentiâ;cariturumest,censeolocandum。"13AraceoftenantsthengraduallyacquiredpossessionofthesurfaceofItalyandtheprovinces。Theywereofvariousclasses,
  butthecolonipartiariiormedietarii,metayers,seemalwaystohavebeenfavorites,andthetermsonwhichtheycultivated
  tohaveappearedthemostjustandexpedient。Pliny,havingtried,itseems,someotherformofcontractwithhistenantry,
  andfindingitanswerill,announcesinoneofhislettershisdeterminationtoadoptthemetayersystemasthebestremedy。
  "Theonlyremedy,"hesays,"Icanthinkofis,nottoreservemyrentinmoneybut
  inkindpartibus,andtoplacesomeof
  myservantstooverlookthetillage,andtotakecareofmyshareoftheproduce,asindeedthereisnosortofrevenuemorejustthanthat,whichisregulatedbythesoil,theclimate,andtheseasons。"14Thesystemthuspraised,ultimatelyprevailedthroughouttheprovincesoftheempire;andinthewesternpartofEurope,
  wasneverwhollyextirpatedbytheconvulsionswhichaccompanieditsdownfall。Inmanyinstancesindeedthefirstviolence
  ofthebarbariansputtoflightallregularindustry,andintothewildernesswhichtheycreatedtheywereobligedtointroduce
  laborrentsandaraceofserfs。Thefeudalsystemtoo,andthenumerousbodyofarriè;revassalsitgavebirthto,changedthe
  occupationofmuchofthecountry。Butstill,thickasthedarknesswas,whichcoveredforatimetheremainsofRoman
  civilization,itseffectswereneverwhollylost。Thelanguage,thecustoms,thelawsoftheprovincialsstillsurvived,and
  sting。lingatlastintoinfluencetheycommunicatedmuchoftheircharactertothatmixedracewhichhasariseninwestern
  Europe:indifferentdegreesindifferentcountries,butenoughinalltheprincipalkingdomstodistinguishtheirinhabitantsbroadlyfromthemoreprimitiveracetotheeastwardoftheRhine。Theclassofmetayerswasprobablyneveranywherewhollydestroyed,andastimesoftenedthecharacteroftheconquerors,
  andintroducedsomedegreeofconfidenceandsecurityintotheirrelationswiththesubjectcultivators,industrybeganto
  returntoitsoldemployments。Itwasalwaysanobjectgainedbythelandlord,ifhecouldsubstituteaproducerent,anda
  tenantwhomhecouldtrustwiththewholetaskofcultivation,forarudeserfliketheGermanorSlavonicboor,whoselabor
  hecouldrelyon,onlywhilehehimselfenforcedandsuperintendedit。Metayersthereforespreadthemselves:thedomain
  landsoftheproprietorsfellgenerallyintotheirhands,andtheyre-acquiredthatgeneral,thoughnotcomplete,possessionof
  theagricultureofwesternEurope,whichweseetheminagreatmeasurestillretaining。
  SECTIONIV。
  OnMetayerRentsinFrance。TheprovinceofGaulwasviolentlyaffectedinallitssocialrelations,bythevariousirruptionsandfinalpredominanceofthe
  barbarians。Thegradualestablishmentoffeudaltenures,andtheintroductionofserfsandlaborrents,weretwoofthemost
  importanteffectsofthechangeofmasters。Thenumberandspeciesoffeudaltenures,weremultipliedtoastrangeextentin
  Francebythepracticeofsubinfeudation;whichhadbeencheckedinEngland,butprevailedwidelyonthecontinent。The
  seignoralrights,andtherentsandservicestowhichtheygaverise,wererangedbytheFrenchlawyersunder300heads,thesubdivisionsofwhichtheystatetobeinfinite。15Someofthesemultipliedrightsnodoubtwereengraftedonthemoresimplerelationoftheserfstotheirlandlords;forasthe
  feudalsystembecamefamiliartothepeople,thenotionsandphraseologytowhichitgavebirth,extendedthemselvestoa
  multitudeofrelationsandobjects,quiteforeigntotheoriginalaimofthesystemitself。Thusonthecontinentannuitiesin
  moneyorcornweregrantedasfeuds,andoccasionallyeventheuseofsumsofmoney,16andinEnglandthecopyholder,
  whomwecandistinctlytracetothevilleinorslave,wasadmittedtoswearfealtyanddohomagetohislordmuchinthe
  mannerofthemilitarytenants;apracticewhichstillcontinues。Thusalso,thoseadmittedtodegreesatourUniversitiesdo
  feudalhomagetotheVice-Chancellor。Byasimilarabuseoffeudalforms,someoftheserfsinFrancenodoubtrankedatlastamongstthemanorialtenantryoftheSeigneur,andtheirrelationwasconsideredtobeafeudalone。Butbesidestheserfsthusgraduallyassimilatedtovassals,therewereotherserfswhosestateofslaverywasasdistinctand
  undisguisedasthatoftheRussiancultivatorsisnow:theyexistedforsometimeinconsiderablenumbers,andcontinuedto
  existinseveralprovincesuptotheeraoftherevolution。Wewillsaysomethingofthesebeforeweproceedtothemetayers。
  Theywerefoundontheestatesofthecrown,oflayindividuals,andofecclesiastics,underthenameofmainmortables,
  whichwasusedindifferentlywiththatofserf,andappearstohavebeenconsideredsynonymouswithit。Theywereattached
  tothesoil,andiftheyescapedfromit,wererestoredbytheinterferenceofthetribunalstotheirowners,towhomtheir
  personsandthoseoftheirposteritybelonged。Theywereincapableoftransmittingproperty:iftheyacquiredany,their
  ownersmightseizeitattheirdeath:theexerciseofthisrightwasinfullvigor,andsomestartlinginstancesledLouisXVI。
  tomakeafeebleattemptatapartialemancipation。Proprietors,exercisingtheirdroitdesuiteasitwascalled,hadforcedthe
  reluctanttribunalsofthekingtodeliverintotheirhandsthepropertyofdeceasedcitizenswhohadbeenlongsettledas
  respectableinhabitantsindifferenttownsofFrance,someeveninParisitself;butwhowereprovedtohavebeenoriginally