Thereforeallsentimentwasobjectionable，forsentimentmeansneglectofrulesandcalculations。HeshrankfromshowingfeelingwithmorethantheusualEnglishreserve；andshowedhisdevotiontohischildrenbydrillingthemintoknowledgewithuncompromisingstrictness，Hehadnofeelingforthepoeticalorliterarysideofthings；andregardedlife，itwouldseem，asaseriesofarguments，inwhichpeopleweretobeconstrainedbylogic，notpersuadedbysympathy。HeseemstohavedespisedpoorMrs。Mill，andtohavebeenunsuccessfulinconcealinghiscontempt，thoughinhislettershereferstoherrespectfully。Millthereforewasamanlittlelikelytowintheheartsofhisfollowers，thoughhisremarkablevigourofminddominatedtheirunderstandings。
　　Theamiableandkindly，whosesympathiesarequicklymoved，gainanunfairshareofourregardbothinlifeandafterwards。Wearemorepleasedbyanineffectualattempttobekindly，thanbyrealkindnessbestowedungraciously。Mill’sgreatqualitiesshouldnotbeoverlookedbecausetheywerehiddenbyamannerwhichseemsalmostdeliberatelyrepellent。Hedevotedhimselfthroughlifetopromotethetruthashesawit；toincreasethescantyamountsofpleasuresenjoyedbymankind；andtodischargeallthedutieswhichheowedtohisneighbours。
　　Hesucceededbeyondalldisputeinforciblypresentingonesetofviewswhichprofoundlyinfluencedhiscountrymen；andtheverynarrownessofhisintellectenabledhimtoplanthisblowsmoreeffectively。
　　NOTES：
　　1。ThechiefauthorityforJamesMillisJamesMill：aBiography，byAlexanderBain，EmeritusProfessorofLogicintheUniversityofAberdeen，London，1882。Thebookcontainsveryfullmaterials，and，ifratherdry，dealswithadrysubject。
　　2。Wallas’sFrancisPlace，p。70n。
　　3。Bain’sJamesMill，p。166。
　　4。Gifford’srealnamewasJohnRichardsGreen。TheidentityofhisassumednamewiththatofthemorefamousWilliamGiffordhasledtocommonconfusionbetweenthetwoperiodicals。’PeterPindar’assaultedWilliamGiffordundertheerroneousimpressionththewaseditorofthesecond。
　　5。LetterinBain’sJamesMill，pp。136-40。
　　6。Autobiography，p。39。
　　7。Bain’sJamesMill，pp。97-106。Millappearstohavesaidsomething’extravagant’aboutBenthaminanarticleuponMirandaintheEdinburghReviewforJanuary，1809。HealsogotsomepraisesofBenthamintotheAnnualReviewof1809Bain，92-96。
　　8。SeetheveryinterestingLifeofFrancisPlace，byMrGrahamWallas，1898。
　　9。Bain’sJamesMill，p。78，andWallas’sFrancisPlace，p。66。
　　10。Wallas’sFrancisPlace，p。68。
　　11。He’puttogether’theNotPaulbutJesusatFordAbbeyin1817，andhelpedtoprefacetheReformCatechism。Wallas’sFrancisPlace，p。84。
　　12。Thearticleof1811wasalsopublishedseparately。
　　13。Hewroteonlythefirstvolume。TwootherswereaddedbyCuthbertSouthey。
　　14。LecturesAshe，1885，pp。32，61。
　　15。JamesMill，accordingtoPlace，wrotea’memorableandadmirableessay，”Schoolsforall，notschoolsforChurchmenonly。”’——Wallas’sFrancisPlace，99n。
　　16。ThisabsurdsuspicionwasarousedbyaquarrelaboutBurdett’sarrest。SeeWallas’Place，p。56。
　　17。MrWallasgivesanaccountoftheseschemesinchap。iv，ofhisLifeofPlace。IhavealsoconsultedPlace’scollectionsinAdditionalMSS。，27，823。
　　18。Bain’sJamesMill，p。162。
　　19。H。H。Wilsoninhisprefacetotheeditionof1840。
　　20。Wallas’sFrancisPlace，p。78。
　　21。Bain’sJamesMill，p。435。
　　22。Ibid。，p。433。
　　23。Bentham’sWorks，p。498。
　　24。SeeCannaninEconomicReview，1894。
　　25。SeeunderBlackinDictionaryofNationalBiography。
　　26。Autobiography，p。101。
　　27。SeePlace’saccountinAdditionalMSS。27，823。
　　28。G。C。Robertson，PhilosophicalRemains，p。166；andunderGeorgeGroteinDictionaryofNationalBiography。
　　29。LetterscommunicatedbyMrGrahamWallas。SeeMrWallas’sFrancisPlace，p。91。
　　30。SoPlaceobservedthatMill’couldhelpthemass，butcouldnothelptheindividual，notevenhimselforhisown。’——Wallas’sFrancisPlace，p。79。
　　31。Autobiography，p。48。Chapter2：ReformMovementsI。PoliticalChangeThelastyearsofMill’slifecorrespondtotheperiodinwhichUtilitarianismreached，incertainrespects，itshighestpitchofinfluence。Thelittlebandwhoacknowledgedhimastheirchiefleader，andastheauthorisedlieutenantofBentham，consideredthemselvestobeinthevanofprogress。Thoughdifferingonmanypointsfromeachother，andregardedwithaversionordistrustbytherecognisedpartyleaders，theywereintheirmostmilitantandconfidentstateofmind。Theyweresystematicallyreticentastotheirreligiousviews：theylefttopopularoratorsthepublicadvocacyoftheirfavouritepoliticalmeasures；andthecreditoffinallypassingsuchofthosemeasuresaswereadoptedfellchieflytothehandsofthegreatpoliticalleaders。
　　TheUtilitariansareignoredintheorthodoxWhiglegend。Intheprefacetohiscollectedworks，SydneySmithrunsovertheusuallistofchangeswhichhadfollowed，and，asheseemstothink，hadingreatpartresultedfrom，theestablishmentoftheEdinburghReview。Smithhimself，andJeffreyandHornerand，aboveall，’thegiganticBrougham，’hadblowntheblastwhichbroughtdownthetowersofJericho。SirG。O。Trevelyan，inhisLifeofMacaulay，describestheadventoftheWhigstoofficeinasimilarsense。’Agitatorsandincendiaries，’hesays，’retiredintothebackground，aswillalwaysbethecasewhenthecountryisinearnest：
　　andstatesmenwhohadmuchtolose，andwerenotafraidtoriskit，steppedquietlyandfirmlytothefront。Themenandthesonsofthemenwhohadsolongenduredexclusionfromoffice，embitteredbyunpopularity，atlengthreapedtheirreward。’1TheRadicalversionofthehistoryisdifferent。Thegreatmen，itsaid，whohadleftthecausetobesupportedbyagitatorssolongasthedefencewasdangerousandprofitless，steppedforwardnowthatitwasclearlywinning，andreceivedboththerewardandthecredit。MillandPlacecouldnotfindwordstoexpresstheircontemptforthetrimming，shufflingWhigs。Theywereprobablyunjustenoughindetail；buttheyhadastrongcaseinsomerespects。TheUtilitariansrepresentedthatpartofthereformingpartywhichhadadefiniteandareasonedcreed。
　　Theytriedtogivelogicwherethepopularagitatorswerecontentwithdeclamation，andrepresentedabsoluteconvictionswhentheWhigreformerswerecontentwithtentativeandhesitatingcompromises。Theyhadsomegroundsforconsideringthemselvestobethe’steelofthelance’；Themenwhoformulatedanddeliberatelydefendedtheprincipleswhichwerebeginningtoconquertheworld。
　　TheUtilitarians，Ihavesaid，becameapoliticalforceintheconcludingyearsofthegreatwarstruggle。Thecatastropheoftherevolutionhadunchainedawholewhirlwindofantagonisms。Theoriginalissueshadpassedoutofsight；andgreatsocial，industrial，andpoliticalchangeswereinprogresswhichmadethenationthatemergedfromthewaraverydifferentbodyfromthenationthathadentereditnearlyagenerationbefore，itisnotsurprisingthatatfirstveryerroneousestimatesweremadeofthenewpositionwhenpeaceatlastreturned。
　　TheRadicals，whohadwatchedononesidethegrowthofdebtandpauperism，and，ontheotherhand，theprofitsmadebystockjobbers，landlords，andmanufacturers，ascribedalltheterriblesufferingstotheselfishdesignsoftheupperclasses。Whenthewarendedtheyhopedthattheevilswoulddiminish，whilethepretextformisgovernmentwouldberemoved。Abitterdisappointmentfollowed。Thewarwasfollowedbywidespreadmisery。Plentymeantruintoagriculturists，andcommercial’gluts’resultinginmanufacturers’warehousescrammedwithunsaleablegoods。Thediscontentcausedbymiseryhadbeenencounteredduringthewarbypatrioticfervour。Itwasnotatimeforredressingevils，whentheexistenceofthenationwasatstake。Nowthatthemiserycontinued，andtheexcusefordelayingredresshadbeenremoved，ademandaroseforparliamentaryreform。Unfortunatelydiscontentledalsotosporadicriotings，tobreakingofmachineryandburningofricks。TheTorygovernmentsawinthesedisturbancesarenewaloftheoldJacobinspirit，andhadvisions——apparentlyquitegroundless——ofwidespreadconspiraciesandsecretsocietiesreadytoproducearuinofallsocialorder。Ithadrecoursetotheoldrepressivemeasures，thesuspensionoftheHabeasCorpusAct，thepassageofthe’SixActs，’andtheprosecutionofpopularagitators。
　　Manyobserversfanciedthatthechoicelaybetweenaservileinsurrectionandtheestablishmentofarbitrarypower。
　　Bydegrees，however，peacebroughtbackprosperity。Thingssettleddown；commercerevived；andtheacutedistresspassedaway。ThewholenationwentmadoverthewrongsofQueenCaroline；andthedemandforpoliticalreformbecameforthetimelessintense。Butitsoonappearedthat，althoughthiscrisishadbeensurmounted，thetemperofthenationhadprofoundlychanged。Thesupremepowerstillbelongedconstitutionallytothelandedinterest。Butithadaprofoundlymodifiedsocialorderbehindit。Thewarhadatleastmadeitnecessarytotakeintoaccounttheopinionsoflargerclasses。Anappealtopatriotismmeansthatsomeregardmustbepaidtotheprejudicesandpassionsofpeopleatlarge。Whenenormoussumsweretoberaised，themoneyedclasseswouldhavetheirsayastomodesoftaxation。Commerceandmanufactureswentthroughcrisesofterribledifficultyduetothevariouschangesofthewar；but，onthewhole，theindustrialclassesweresteadilyandrapidlydevelopinginwealth，andbecomingrelativelymoreimportant。Thewaritselfwas，inoneaspectatleast，awarforthemaintenanceoftheBritishsupremacyintrade。Thestrugglemarkedbythepolicyofthe’OrdersinCouncil’ononeside，andNapoleon’sdecreesontheother，involvedaconstantreferencetoManchesterandLiverpoolandtherapidlygrowingmanufacturingandcommercialinterests。Thegrowth，again，ofthepress，atatimewheneveryonewhocouldreadwaskeenlyinterestedinnewsofmostexcitingandimportantevents，impliedtherapiddevelopmentofagreatorganofpublicopinion。
　　Theeffectsofthesechangessoonbecamepalpable。Thepoliticalatmospherewasaltogetherdifferent；
　　andanentirelynewsetofinfluenceswasgoverningthepolicyofstatesmen。
　　ThechangeaffectedtheToryasmuchastheWhig。Howeverstronglyhemightbelievethathewascarryingontheoldmethods，hewasaffectedbythenewideaswhichhadbeenalmostunconsciouslyincorporatedinhiscreed。
　　Howgreatwasthechange，andhowmuchittooktheshapeofacceptingUtilitariantheories，maybebrieflyshownbyconsideringafewcharacteristicfacts。
　　TheablestmenwhoheldofficeatthetimewereCanning，Huskisson，andPeel。Theyrepresentedtheconservatismwhichsoughttodistinguishitselffrommereobstructiveness。Theirinfluencewasfeltinmanydirections。TheHolyAlliancehadthesympathyofmenwhocouldbelievethatthewarhadbroughtbackthepre-revolutionaryorder，andthatitsmainresulthadbeentoputtheJacobinspiritinchains。
　　Canning’saccessiontoofficein1822meantthattheforeignpolicyofEnglandwastobedefinitelyopposedtothepolicyofthe’HolyAlliance。’